Daily Respiratory Research Analysis

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly evolved over short timescales, leading to the emergence of more transmissible variants such as Alpha and Delta

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a chronic airway condition with a global prevalence of 262.4 million people. Asthma education is an essential component of management and includes provision of information on the disease process and self-management skills development such as trigger avoidance. Education may be provided in various settings. The home setting allows educators to reach populations (e.g. financially poor) that may experience barriers to care (e.g. transport limitations) within a familiar environment, and allows for avoidance of attendance at healthcare settings. However, it is unknown if education delivered in the home is superior to usual care or the same education delivered elsewhere. There are large variations in asthma education programmes (e.g. patient-specific content versus broad asthma education, number/frequency/duration of education sessions). This is an update of the 2011 review with 14 new studies added. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of educational interventions for asthma, delivered in the home to children, their caregivers, or both, on asthma-related outcomes. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Airways Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, two additional databases and two clinical trials registries. We searched reference lists of included trials/review articles (last search October 2022), and contacted authors of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials of education delivered in the home to children and adolescents (aged two to 18 years) with asthma, their caregivers or both. We included self-management programmes, delivered face-to-face and aimed at changing behaviour (e.g. medication/inhaler technique education). Eligible control groups were usual care, waiting list or less-intensive education (e.g. shorter, fewer sessions) delivered outside or within the home. We excluded studies with mixed-disease populations and without a face-to-face component (e.g. telephone only). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials, assessed trial quality, extracted data and used GRADE to rate the certainty of the evidence. We contacted study authors for additional information. We pooled continuous data with mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used a random-effects model and performed sensitivity analyses with a fixed-effect model. When combining dichotomous and continuous data, we used generic inverse variance, using a Peto odds ratio (OR) and fixed-effect model. Primary outcomes were exacerbations leading to emergency department visits and exacerbations requiring a course of oral corticosteroids. Six months was the primary time point for outcomes. The summary of findings tables reported on the primary outcomes, and quality of life, daytime symptoms, days missed from school and exacerbations leading to hospitalisations.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive heterogeneous pulmonary disorder with an increasing high prevalence, particularly in the older. The objective of this study is to assess the effect of noninvasive ventilation combined with simultaneous nebulization during precise pulmonary rehabilitation nursing intervention in COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, compared to pulmonary rehabilitation nursing alone. METHODS: In total, 240 elderly COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure were randomized controlled into either a precise pulmonary rehabilitation nursing model group (control group) or noninvasive ventilation coupled with simultaneous nebulization during pulmonary rehabilitation nursing (intervention group). For our evaluation, we considered general information, pulmonary function, exercise endurance, mental health, blood gas, inflammation, COPD severity, life quality, and overall efficacy of subjects before and on the 5-, 30-, 90-day intervention. RESULTS: The total effective rates were 95% and 77.5% in the intervention and control group, respectively. In detail, the intervention group showed statistically significant improvements in lung function, exercise endurance, psychological health, blood gas inflammation, overall severity, and quality of life outcomes, especially on the 90-day intervention (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The complex COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure may confer more gains from precise pulmonary rehabilitation nursing intervention combined with simultaneous inhalation therapy and noninvasive ventilation.