Skip to main content
Daily Report

Daily Respiratory Research Analysis

02/19/2025
3 papers selected
3 analyzed

Three high-impact studies stood out today: a large U.S. cohort showed that completely switching from cigarettes to e‑cigarettes was associated with short‑term improvements in functionally important respiratory symptoms comparable to quitting; a single-center cohort reported high uptake of maternal RSV vaccination and infant nirsevimab with no signal for increased preterm birth; and an international VV‑ECMO registry analysis found a non‑linear association between BMI and mortality, partly mediate

Summary

Three high-impact studies stood out today: a large U.S. cohort showed that completely switching from cigarettes to e‑cigarettes was associated with short‑term improvements in functionally important respiratory symptoms comparable to quitting; a single-center cohort reported high uptake of maternal RSV vaccination and infant nirsevimab with no signal for increased preterm birth; and an international VV‑ECMO registry analysis found a non‑linear association between BMI and mortality, partly mediated by pulmonary complications.

Research Themes

  • Harm reduction and respiratory symptom outcomes with e-cigarette switching
  • Early implementation and equity of maternal RSV prevention strategies
  • Obesity paradox and mechanisms in VV-ECMO outcomes

Selected Articles

1. Functionally important respiratory symptoms and continued cigarette use versus e-cigarette switching: population assessment of tobacco and health study waves 2-6.

75.5Level IIICohort
EClinicalMedicine · 2025PMID: 39968205

In a longitudinal, nationally representative cohort of U.S. adults who smoked, completely switching to e‑cigarettes was associated with lower risk of respiratory symptom worsening (RR 0.69) and higher likelihood of improvement (RR 1.31) versus continued smoking, with magnitudes similar to quitting. Sensitivity analyses supported these findings.

Impact: This study provides policy-relevant, longitudinal evidence that complete switching to e-cigarettes can yield short-term respiratory symptom benefits comparable to quitting, informing harm-reduction strategies for adults unable to stop nicotine use.

Clinical Implications: For adult smokers unwilling or unable to quit, complete switching to e‑cigarettes may reduce functionally important respiratory symptoms relative to continued smoking; clinicians should couple this with cessation support and guard against youth uptake.

Key Findings

  • Among baseline low-symptom participants (index <2), symptom worsening occurred in 15.4% (continued smoking), 10.0% (e-cig switch), 10.1% (quit); adjusted RR for worsening: 0.69 (switch) and 0.73 (quit) versus continued smoking.
  • Among baseline higher-symptom participants (index ≥2), symptom improvement occurred in 27.7% (continued), 45.8% (switch), 42.1% (quit); adjusted RR for improvement: 1.31 (switch) and 1.36 (quit).
  • Findings were directionally consistent using a stricter symptom cutoff (≥3) and in sensitivity analyses including partial follow-up data.

Methodological Strengths

  • Nationally representative longitudinal cohort with repeated two-wave observations (2014–2021)
  • Multivariable modeling with explicit symptom indices and sensitivity analyses

Limitations

  • Observational design with self-reported symptoms and tobacco product use
  • Short-term symptom outcomes; no objective lung function or long-term clinical endpoints

Future Directions: Assess long-term respiratory outcomes (lung function, exacerbations) and safety; evaluate subgroups (e.g., asthma/COPD), device types, and dual-use dynamics; incorporate objective biomarkers.

BACKGROUND: Substitution of noncombustible tobacco products for cigarettes could improve respiratory symptoms. We hypothesized that complete cigarette-to-e-cigarette switching would improve respiratory symptoms compared to continued smoking. METHODS: Longitudinal analysis of data from waves 2-6 (W2-W6; 2014-2021) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, an observational cohort study that surveyed 5653 US adults ≥18 years without COPD/chronic bronchitis/emphysema. We compiled 14,947 two-wave (1-2 year) observations with persons who smoked cigarettes at baseline and compared the relation between functionally important respiratory symptoms and switching to exclusive e-cigarette use or quitting tobacco versus continued cigarette use (reference). A 9-point wheezing/nighttime cough index was dichotomized based on index scores of ≥2 or ≥3, previously associated with poorer functional health. Multivariable models assessed how changes in cigarette use predicted worsening/improvement of symptoms. FINDINGS: Among those with an index score <2, 3.5% switched to e-cigarettes, and 11.1% quit all tobacco. Functionally important respiratory symptoms worsened (≥2 at follow-up) in 15.4%, 10.0% and 10.1% of those who continued cigarettes, switched to e-cigarettes, and quit, respectively. Adjusted relative risk (RR) for respiratory symptom worsening was 0.69 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52, 0.91) for e-cigarette switching and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.54, 0.97) for quitting. Of persons with index score ≥2, 2.8% switched to e-cigarettes, and 6.7% quit. Respiratory symptoms improved (<2 at follow-up) in 27.7%, 45.8% and 42.1% of those who continued cigarettes, switched to e-cigarettes, and quit, respectively. The RR for improving was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.05, 1.64) for e-cigarette switching and 1.36 (95% CI, 1.15, 1.62) for quitting. The RRs for exclusive e-cigarette use with a cutoff of ≥3 for respiratory symptom worsening and improvement were not significant (0.74 [0.53, 1.05] and 1.20 [0.95, 1.51] respectively) but were significant in an unweighted analysis that included partial data for individuals lost to follow-up (0.74 [0.57, 0.95] and 1.21 [1.06, 1.39] respectively). INTERPRETATION: Switching completely from past 30-day use of cigarettes to e-cigarettes had short-term beneficial associations with functionally important respiratory symptoms similar to quitting tobacco completely. FUNDING: This manuscript is supported with Federal funds from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Department of Health and Human Services, under contract to Westat (contract nos. HHSN271201100027C and HHSN271201600001C), and through an interagency agreement between NIH NIDA and FDA CTP. Heather L. Kimmel was substantially involved in the scientific management of and providing scientific expertise for contract nos. HHSN271201100027C and HHSN271201600001C.

2. Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine and Nirsevimab Uptake Among Pregnant People and Their Neonates.

71.5Level IIICohort
JAMA network open · 2025PMID: 39969879

At a single academic center, 64% of eligible pregnant people received the RSVpreF vaccine and 70% of eligible infants received nirsevimab before discharge, with overall RSV coverage exceeding 80% after the first month. Maternal vaccination was not associated with preterm birth, and uptake disparities by language and race were observed.

Impact: Provides early real-world implementation data for dual maternal–infant RSV prevention with reassuring perinatal safety and highlights equity gaps, informing health systems and public health rollouts.

Clinical Implications: Health systems can expect high uptake of maternal RSVpreF and infant nirsevimab with coordinated programs; targeted outreach is needed for non‑English speakers and marginalized racial groups to close gaps.

Key Findings

  • Maternal RSVpreF uptake was 64.0% (414/647); infant nirsevimab uptake was 70.1% (183/261) before discharge.
  • RSV coverage exceeded 80% in all months after October 2023; maternal vaccination showed no association with preterm birth (AOR 1.03; 95% CI 0.55–1.93).
  • Uptake was higher with older age, nulliparity, private insurance, and prior vaccinations, and lower with non‑English language preference, Black race, other/unknown race, and multiple gestation.

Methodological Strengths

  • Clear eligibility windows and multivariable modeling with adjusted odds ratios
  • Nested case–control analysis for preterm birth safety signal

Limitations

  • Single-center retrospective design limits generalizability; short time window after approval
  • Potential supply, access, and policy factors not fully captured

Future Directions: Multicenter evaluations across diverse populations; assess infant clinical outcomes (RSV hospitalizations) and cost‑effectiveness; targeted interventions to reduce disparities.

IMPORTANCE: Two interventions to prevent severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants were approved in 2023-a bivalent prenatal RSV prefusion F protein-based (RSVpreF) vaccine and an infant monoclonal antibody (nirsevimab). Understanding their uptake and clinical outcomes is essential for public health planning. OBJECTIVE: To describe uptake of the prenatal RSVpreF vaccine and infant nirsevimab. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single academic center among 647 pregnant individuals eligible for RSVpreF vaccination (32-36 weeks' gestation between October 15, 2023, and January 31, 2024) and infants eligible for nirsevimab (no prenatal RSVpreF vaccination >14 days before delivery). EXPOSURE: Pregnancy or birth during the 2023-2024 RSV season. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: RSVpreF vaccination among eligible pregnant individuals and nirsevimab administration prior to hospital discharge among eligible infants. RESULTS: Of 647 eligible pregnant individuals (mean [SD] age, 34.6 [6.2] years; 355 nulliparous [54.9%]; 558 privately insured [86.2%]), 414 (64.0%) received the RSVpreF vaccine. Factors associated with higher RSVpreF uptake included older birthing parent age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.12), nulliparity (AOR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.31-2.60), private insurance (AOR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.27-3.80), non-Hispanic ethnicity (AOR, 2.36; 95% CI 1.57-3.55; reference: Hispanic), receipt of any COVID-19 vaccine (AOR, 7.12; 95% CI, 3.91-13.70), 2023-2024 formula COVID-19 booster vaccine (AOR, 5.62; 95% CI, 3.80-8.48), influenza vaccine (AOR, 8.14; 95% CI, 5.38-12.50), or tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis vaccine (AOR, 6.86; 95% CI, 3.79-13.10). Factors associated with lower RSVpreF uptake included non-English language preference (AOR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.10-0.52), Black race (AOR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.57; reference: Asian), other or unknown race (AOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30-0.76), and multiple gestation (AOR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.07-0.88). Nirsevimab was administered to 183 of 261 eligible infants (70.1%) prior to hospital discharge. Among those who did not receive RSVpreF or standard prenatal vaccines, 40.4% of their neonates (19 of 47) received nirsevimab; among those who declined infant hepatitis B vaccination, 34.0% of their neonates (17 of 50) received nirsevimab. Respiratory syncytial virus coverage exceeded 80% during all months of the study period except October 2023, the first month during which prenatal RSV vaccination and infant nirsevimab were available. Preterm delivery occurred in 35 of 414 RSVpreF-vaccinated individuals (8.5%) and 43 of 233 unvaccinated individuals (18.5%). In a nested case-control analysis with preterm birth as the outcome, there was no significant association between RSVpreF vaccination and preterm birth (AOR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.55-1.93). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, uptake of the RSVpreF vaccine and infant nirsevimab was high. Nirsevimab uptake was high even among individuals who did not receive routine prenatal or infant vaccines. There was no significant association between RSVpreF vaccination and preterm birth. This study suggests that an RSV prevention strategy that included both prenatal vaccination and infant monoclonal antibody administration had high uptake and reassuring perinatal outcomes.

3. The Association Between Body Mass Index and Mortality Mediated by Medical and Mechanical Complications in Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

67.5Level IIICohort
Critical care medicine · 2025PMID: 39969243

In 24,796 VV‑ECMO adult runs, higher BMI was associated with lower hospital mortality in a nonlinear pattern (e.g., OR 0.82 at BMI 40 vs 25). Mediation analyses suggested pulmonary complications partially explained the association, whereas some complications acted as suppressors, refining understanding of the “obesity paradox.”

Impact: This large, contemporary international analysis clarifies BMI–mortality relationships on VV‑ECMO and identifies mediating pathways, informing patient selection and complication mitigation strategies rather than using BMI cutoffs alone.

Clinical Implications: BMI alone should not exclude candidates from VV‑ECMO; anticipate and manage pulmonary complications in higher‑BMI patients to optimize outcomes; consider device and circuit strategies to minimize mechanical complications.

Key Findings

  • Nonlinear BMI–mortality association: compared with BMI 25 kg/m², BMI 20 increased death risk (OR 1.11), BMI 30 decreased risk (OR 0.92), BMI 40 decreased risk further (OR 0.82).
  • BMI correlated with mechanical, renal, pulmonary, and neurologic complications; pulmonary complications partially mediated the BMI–mortality association.
  • Mechanical, renal replacement therapy, and neurologic complications acted as suppressing mediators, indicating complex pathways underlying the observed survival advantage.

Methodological Strengths

  • Very large international multicenter registry with contemporary practice (2015–2021)
  • Advanced modeling using fractional polynomials and formal mediation analysis

Limitations

  • Retrospective registry with potential residual confounding and variable coding across centers
  • Causality cannot be established; limited granularity on nutritional status or body composition

Future Directions: Prospective studies to validate mediators; integrative models incorporating body composition, inflammation, and ventilatory strategies; trials of targeted complication prevention in higher‑BMI ECMO patients.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the associations between body mass index (BMI) and mortality and between BMI and complications in patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and to estimate if any mortality association was mediated by complications. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of an international, multicenter registry. SETTING: ICUs. PATIENTS: Adults in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization database who received venovenous ECMO between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Logistic regression with BMI transformed using fractional polynomials was used to estimate the association between BMI and hospital mortality and between BMI and complications. Mediation analysis was used to estimate if the association between BMI and mortality was a direct effect or was mediated by complications. Of the 24,796 patient runs, 10,361 patients died (48%). After adjusting for confounders, we found nonlinear associations between BMI and mortality. Compared with BMI = 25 kg/m 2 , a BMI = 20 had an 11% higher risk of dying, odds ratio (OR) =1.11 (95% CI, 1.08-1.15); a BMI = 30 had an 8% lower risk, OR = 0.92 (95% CI, 0.90-0.95); and a BMI = 40 kg/m 2 had an 18% lower risk of death OR = 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78-0.87). BMI was also associated with mechanical, renal, pulmonary, and neurologic complications. The association between BMI and mortality was both a direct effect and mediated via pulmonary complications, while mechanical, renal replacement therapy, and neurologic complications were suppressors having a negative association with improved mortality in patients with higher BMI. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that patients with higher BMI requiring venovenous ECMO were less likely to die. This finding was partially mediated by pulmonary complications and partially via a direct association between BMI and mortality. BMI was also associated with mechanical, renal replacement therapy, and neurologic complications that acted as suppressing mediators and were associated with increased mortality for increasing BMI despite the overall trend of improved survival.