Skip to main content

Daily Respiratory Research Analysis

3 papers

A twice-yearly anti–IL-5 biologic (depemokimab) significantly improved polyp burden and nasal obstruction in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in two parallel phase 3 RCTs. Bispecific antibodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 NTD and RBD maintained potent neutralization across Omicron variants with in vivo efficacy. A large prospective cohort showed persistent long COVID burden up to 3 years, with vaccination associated with better physical and mental health outcomes.

Summary

A twice-yearly anti–IL-5 biologic (depemokimab) significantly improved polyp burden and nasal obstruction in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in two parallel phase 3 RCTs. Bispecific antibodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 NTD and RBD maintained potent neutralization across Omicron variants with in vivo efficacy. A large prospective cohort showed persistent long COVID burden up to 3 years, with vaccination associated with better physical and mental health outcomes.

Research Themes

  • Biologics for airway inflammatory disease
  • Variant-resilient SARS-CoV-2 antibody therapeutics
  • Long COVID trajectories and vaccination benefits

Selected Articles

1. Efficacy and safety of twice per year depemokimab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (ANCHOR-1 and ANCHOR-2): phase 3, randomised, double-blind, parallel trials.

84.5Level IRCTLancet (London, England) · 2025PMID: 40037388

Two replicate phase 3 randomized, double-blind trials showed depemokimab significantly reduced total nasal polyp score and nasal obstruction at 52 weeks versus placebo with comparable safety. The ultra–long-acting anti–IL-5 enables twice-yearly dosing, potentially reducing treatment burden for CRSwNP.

Impact: First replicated phase 3 evidence that a twice-yearly anti–IL-5 biologic improves CRSwNP outcomes with acceptable safety, offering a new dosing paradigm.

Clinical Implications: Depemokimab could become a convenient biologic option for severe, type 2–driven CRSwNP uncontrolled on standard therapy, with less frequent dosing than current agents.

Key Findings

  • Met both co-primary endpoints: greater reductions in total endoscopic nasal polyp score and mean nasal obstruction score vs placebo at week 52.
  • Consistent efficacy across two parallel, replicate phase 3 trials with integrated analyses showing similar effect sizes.
  • Safety profile comparable to placebo with similar rates of adverse events across trials.

Methodological Strengths

  • Two concurrent, replicate, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials across 190 centers in 16 countries
  • Pre-specified co-primary endpoints with masked assessment and integrated analyses

Limitations

  • Effect sizes were modest in absolute terms on ordinal symptom scales
  • Follow-up limited to 52 weeks; long-term durability and surgical avoidance not yet established

Future Directions: Head-to-head comparisons with existing biologics, long-term durability, health-economic analyses, and biomarker-driven patient selection.

2. Bispecific antibodies targeting the N-terminal and receptor binding domains potently neutralize SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

80.5Level IIIBasic/MechanisticScience translational medicine · 2025PMID: 40043139

Engineering NTD–RBD bispecific antibodies (CoV2-biRNs) yielded potent and breadth-resilient neutralization across Omicron variants (XBB.1.5, BA.2.86, JN.1), outperforming monotherapy/cocktail parents. Prophylactic bsAb delivery reduced XBB.1.5 lung viral load in K18-hACE2 mice.

Impact: Demonstrates a generalizable antibody architecture that maintains potency against highly evasive Omicron lineages, with structural rationale and in vivo validation.

Clinical Implications: Supports development of bispecific antibody therapeutics resilient to VOC escape; may inform next-generation COVID-19 prophylaxis or treatment strategies.

Key Findings

  • C1596 NTD mAb recognizes a distinct epitope outside the NTD site i supersite, enabling broad binding.
  • NTD–RBD bispecifics (CoV2-biRN5/7) retained potent neutralization against Omicron variants XBB.1.5, BA.2.86, and JN.1, outperforming parental mAbs/cocktails.
  • Prophylactic CoV2-biRN5 reduced lung viral load in K18-hACE2 mice challenged with XBB.1.5.

Methodological Strengths

  • Integrated structural (cryo-EM), in vitro neutralization across multiple VOCs, and in vivo mouse efficacy
  • Rational antibody engineering based on epitope mapping enabling mechanistic insight

Limitations

  • Lack of human clinical efficacy or safety data for bsAbs
  • Manufacturing complexity and potential immunogenicity of bispecific constructs not addressed

Future Directions: Advance bsAbs to phase 1 human trials, assess durability against emerging variants, and compare prophylactic vs. therapeutic use.

3. Differences in Long COVID severity by duration of illness, symptom evolution, and vaccination: a longitudinal cohort study from the INSPIRE group.

70.5Level IICohortLancet regional health. Americas · 2025PMID: 40040820

In 3,663 participants followed up to 3 years, current long COVID was associated with worse PROMIS physical and mental health, higher stress, fatigue, and dyspnea. Only 1.8% reported resolution; vaccination dose count correlated with better outcomes across measures.

Impact: Provides long-horizon, multi-domain evidence of persistent long COVID burden and quantifies vaccination’s association with improved outcomes, informing public health and clinical follow-up.

Clinical Implications: Supports sustained monitoring and multidisciplinary management of long COVID; reinforces vaccination as a strategy linked to better long-term outcomes.

Key Findings

  • Current long COVID associated with significantly worse PROMIS Physical and Mental Health scores vs never-long COVID.
  • Higher odds of stress, loneliness, moderate-to-severe fatigue, insufficient activity, and dyspnea in current long COVID.
  • Only 1.8% reported resolved long COVID; more vaccine doses correlated with better outcomes across domains.

Methodological Strengths

  • Prospective, multisite cohort with up to 3-year follow-up and validated patient-reported outcome tools
  • Stratification by long COVID status and vaccination with multivariable analyses

Limitations

  • Operational definition relied on reported long COVID status; potential misclassification
  • Not all participants had documented prior infection in claims/EHR; residual confounding possible

Future Directions: Mechanistic studies linking symptom domains to biomarkers, and interventional trials testing vaccination timing/boosting and targeted therapies.