Daily Respiratory Research Analysis
A phase 2 randomized trial showed that the DPP-1 inhibitor HSK31858 significantly reduced exacerbations in bronchiectasis without new safety signals. A large-scale lung cancer screening program (SUMMIT) demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for low-dose CT in a diverse urban population with mostly early-stage detection and low surgical mortality. Precision phenotyping in central sleep apnea identified patients with high event-related heart rate surges who derive greater left ventricular
Summary
A phase 2 randomized trial showed that the DPP-1 inhibitor HSK31858 significantly reduced exacerbations in bronchiectasis without new safety signals. A large-scale lung cancer screening program (SUMMIT) demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for low-dose CT in a diverse urban population with mostly early-stage detection and low surgical mortality. Precision phenotyping in central sleep apnea identified patients with high event-related heart rate surges who derive greater left ventricular ejection fraction benefit from transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation.
Research Themes
- Targeting neutrophil protease activation in bronchiectasis
- Implementation effectiveness of low-dose CT lung cancer screening
- Precision phenotyping to optimize therapy in central sleep apnea
Selected Articles
1. Effects of the DPP-1 inhibitor HSK31858 in adults with bronchiectasis in China (SAVE-BE): a phase 2, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
In a multicenter phase 2 RCT (n=224), HSK31858 (20 mg or 40 mg daily for 24 weeks) significantly reduced annualized exacerbation frequency versus placebo (IRR 0.52 and 0.41, respectively) in adults with bronchiectasis. Safety profiles were similar across groups without increases in adverse events of special interest.
Impact: This trial provides the first robust randomized evidence that DPP-1 inhibition can reduce exacerbations in bronchiectasis, a condition with few disease-modifying therapies. It validates neutrophil protease activation as a tractable therapeutic axis.
Clinical Implications: If confirmed in phase 3, HSK31858 or similar DPP-1 inhibitors could be added to standard care to reduce exacerbations in bronchiectasis, especially in frequent exacerbators, without apparent new safety concerns.
Key Findings
- Annualized exacerbation frequency reduced versus placebo (IRR 0.52 at 20 mg; IRR 0.41 at 40 mg; both statistically significant).
- Consistent safety with no increase in adverse events of special interest (e.g., hyperkeratosis, gingivitis, life-threatening infections).
- Effect observed over 24 weeks across a multicenter Chinese cohort with stratification by prior exacerbation frequency.
Methodological Strengths
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design with stratified randomization.
- Clear, clinically meaningful primary endpoint (annualized exacerbation frequency) with prespecified analysis in a full analysis set.
Limitations
- Phase 2 duration (24 weeks) limits long-term efficacy and safety assessment.
- Single-country (China) study may limit generalizability to other populations and etiologies of bronchiectasis.
Future Directions: Conduct phase 3 multinational trials with longer follow-up, explore biomarkers of neutrophil activity to enrich responders, and assess effects on quality of life, lung function, and microbiology.
BACKGROUND: Airway neutrophil inflammation with excessive neutrophil serine proteases is implicated in frequent exacerbations of bronchiectasis. HSK31858 is a novel reversible inhibitor of DPP-1. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of HSK31858 in decreasing the frequency of bronchiectasis exacerbations among adults with bronchiectasis. METHODS: SAVE-BE was a phase 2, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial in 25 tertiary centres in China. Participants were aged 18 years or older with a physician diagnosis of bronchiectasis, according to chest high-resolution CT showing bronchial dilatation and compatible respiratory symptoms, and at least two exacerbations within 12 months before screening. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) via a central interactive web-response system to receive 20 mg HSK31858, 40 mg HSK31858, or placebo, orally, once daily for 24 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by exacerbation frequency in the previous year (less than three vs three or more annually) and study investigators and participants were masked to group assignment for analysis of study outcomes. The primary endpoint was the annualised exacerbation frequency over 24 weeks, assessed in the full analysis set. Safety was monitored throughout the study. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05601778. FINDINGS: Between Dec 6, 2022, and March 31, 2024, 292 patients were screened, 226 of whom were enrolled and randomly assigned (75 to the 20 mg HSK31858 group, 76 to the 40 mg HSK31858 group, and 75 to the placebo group. 74 patients received 20 mg HSK31858, 75 received 40 mg HSK31858, and 75 received placebo and were included in the full analysis set. In the full analysis set, 136 (61%) participants were female and 88 (39%) were male. The mean annualised frequency of exacerbations was 1·00 per person-year (SD 1·44) in the 20 mg HSK31858 group, 0·75 per person-year (1·37) in the 40 mg HSK31858 group, and 1·88 per person-year (1·97) in the placebo group. The least-squares mean frequency of exacerbations was 1·05 per person-year (95% CI 0·73-1·51) in the 20 mg HSK31858 group, 0·83 per person-year (0·55-1·25) in the 40 mg HSK31858 group, and 2·01 per person-year (1·53-2·63) in the placebo group. The incidence rate ratio compared with placebo was 0·52 (95% CI 0·34-0·80; p=0·0031) for the 20 mg HSK31858 group and 0·41 (0·26-0·66; p=0·0002) for the 40 mg HSK31858 group. The incidence of adverse events was similar across the three groups. Neither HSK31858 dose was associated with an increased incidence of adverse events of special interest (eg, hyperkeratosis, gingivitis, or life-threatening infections). INTERPRETATION: Both HSK31858 doses improved clinical outcomes in adults with bronchiectasis, significantly reducing the exacerbation frequency compared with placebo. The development of new drugs targeted at amelioration of neutrophilic inflammation (eg, via suppression of DPP-1 activity) might lead to new options for hindering the progression of bronchiectasis. FUNDING: Haisco.
2. Low-dose CT for lung cancer screening in a high-risk population (SUMMIT): a prospective, longitudinal cohort study.
Among 12,773 high-risk participants, low-dose CT screening achieved 97.0% episode sensitivity and 95.2% specificity with a 4.8% false-positive rate at 12 months. Most screen-detected lung cancers were stage I–II (79.3%), with surgery as the primary treatment (77.0%) and low 90-day surgical mortality (0.4%).
Impact: Demonstrates real-world performance and safety of large-scale lung cancer screening in an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse urban setting, informing program design and policy.
Clinical Implications: Health systems can deploy low-dose CT screening with high sensitivity and manageable false positives, anticipating predominantly early-stage detection and low perioperative mortality when surgical management is pursued.
Key Findings
- Episode sensitivity 97.0% and specificity 95.2% at 12 months; false-positive rate 4.8%.
- 79.3% of screen-detected lung cancers were stage I–II; surgery was primary treatment in 77.0%.
- Low 90-day postoperative mortality (0.4%) and benign resection rate of 11.6% among resections.
Methodological Strengths
- Large prospective cohort with standardized low-dose CT protocol and defined performance metrics.
- Inclusive recruitment across 329 primary care practices in a diverse metropolitan area.
Limitations
- Baseline round analysis; long-term mortality impact not assessed here.
- Benign resection rate (11.6%) indicates potential for further optimization of nodule management algorithms.
Future Directions: Evaluate longitudinal outcomes (mortality, overdiagnosis), refine risk models and nodule management to reduce benign resections, and assess equity and adherence in program scale-up.
BACKGROUND: Low-dose CT screening reduces lung cancer mortality. In advance of planned national lung cancer screening programmes, research is needed to inform policies regarding implementation. We aimed to assess the implementation of low-dose CT for lung cancer screening in a high-risk population and to validate a multicancer early detection blood test. METHODS: In this prospective, longitudinal cohort study, individuals aged 55-77 years recorded as current smokers in their primary care records at any point within the past 20 years were identified from 329 primary care practices in London (UK) and invited for a lung health check via postal letter. Individuals meeting the 2013 United States Preventive Services Taskforce criteria (current or former smokers within the past 15 years with at least 30 pack-year smoking histories) or having a Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian 2012 model 6-year risk of 1·3% or greater, and not currently receiving treatment for an active cancer (except adjuvant hormonal therapy), were eligible for the study. These individuals underwent lung cancer screening via non-contrast, thin collimation low-dose CT. In this analysis, we report the results of the baseline round of low-dose CT screening. Key primary endpoints were those associated with examining the performance of a lung cancer screening service. Outcome measures were analysed on a per-participant level using descriptive frequencies. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03934866. FINDINGS: Between April 8, 2019, and May 14, 2021, 12 773 participants were recruited and analysed. 7353 (57·6%) of 12 773 participants were male and 5420 (42·4%) were female, and 10 665 (83·5%) participants were White. 261 (2·0%) of 12 773 participants were diagnosed with lung cancer (including 163 [1·3%] participants with screen-detected lung cancer and 98 [0·8%] with delayed screen-detected lung cancer [ie, after a 3-month or 6-month nodule follow-up CT]) and 276 (2·2%) participants were diagnosed with any intrathoracic malignancy after a positive baseline screen. 207 (79·3%) of 261 individuals with prevalent screen-detected lung cancer were diagnosed at stage I or II and surgical resection was the primary treatment modality in 201 (77·0%) of 261 individuals. Including cases where multiple resections were done in the same participant (eg, for synchronous primaries), 28 (11·6%) of 241 surgical resections were benign, and there was one (0·4%) death within 90 days of surgery. At 12 months, the episode sensitivity of our low-dose CT screening protocol for detecting lung cancer was 97·0% (95% CI 95·0-99·1; 261 of 269 participants). The specificity was 95·2% (94·8-95·6; 11 905 of 12 504 participants), with a false-positive rate of 4·8% (4·4-5·2). INTERPRETATION: Large-scale lung cancer screening is effective and can be delivered efficiently to an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse population. FUNDING: GRAIL.
3. Determinants of transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation-induced improvements in left ventricular function in central sleep apnea and heart failure.
Secondary analyses of the remedē pivotal trial identified that patients with high respiratory event-related heart rate surges (>14.6 bpm) experienced greater LVEF improvement with TPNS versus control (interaction estimate +7.8%). Benefits in LVEF persisted through 12 months in the high-∆HR subgroup but were absent in the low-∆HR subgroup.
Impact: Introduces a practical, physiology-based biomarker (∆HR) to identify heart failure patients with CSA who may derive cardiac functional benefit from TPNS, enabling precision therapy.
Clinical Implications: Measuring event-related ∆HR on baseline polysomnography may guide selection for TPNS in HF with CSA, prioritizing patients likely to improve LVEF and potentially clinical outcomes.
Key Findings
- High ∆HR subgroup (>14.6 bpm) showed greater LVEF improvement with TPNS vs control (interaction estimate +7.8%, 95% CI 0.37–15.2; pinteraction=0.04).
- Sustained LVEF gains at 6, 9, and 12 months in high-∆HR subgroup; no improvements in low-∆HR subgroup.
- Supports ∆HR as a marker of sympathetic overactivity that may mediate TPNS cardiac benefits.
Methodological Strengths
- Predefined physiologic metric (∆HR) quantified from polysomnography with echocardiographic LVEF endpoints.
- Longitudinal assessment demonstrating durability of effect up to 12 months.
Limitations
- Secondary analysis with subgroup interaction; limited sample size and sex imbalance (74 men, 5 women).
- Not powered for hard clinical outcomes; generalizability to broader CSA-HF populations requires validation.
Future Directions: Prospective trials stratifying by ∆HR to confirm predictive enrichment, explore mechanisms linking sympathetic surges to TPNS response, and assess impacts on clinical outcomes.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Central sleep apnea (CSA) is common in heart failure (HF) patients, but its treatment's impact on cardiac function is unclear. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) is an emerging CSA therapy that may improve long-term left ventricular systolic function (LVEF) in HF. Given that the cardiovascular risk of sleep apnea appears contingent on respiratory event-related heart rate surges ("high ∆HR"), we hypothesized that TPNS treatment may preferentially improve LVEF in CSA patients with high ∆HR. METHODS: In the remedē System pivotal trial, ∆HR was calculated from baseline polysomnography in patients with HF. Primary analysis quantified whether treatment-related change in left ventricular ejection fraction (∆LVEF; echocardiography, biplane method) versus control was greater in "high ∆HR" (>14.6 beats/min, i.e. fourth quartile) versus "low ∆HR (≤4.2 beats/min, i.e. first quartile)" at 6 months (treatment × "high ∆HR" interaction). Longitudinal analysis quantified whether favorable LVEF changes from baseline were maintained longer term (6-12 months). RESULTS: In primary analysis (N = 79, M:F = 74:5, LVEF = 34 ± 12% [mean ± SD]), TPNS versus control was associated with a markedly greater improvement in LVEF in patients with high ∆HR versus low ∆HR (estimate [95% CI]: +7.8% [0.37, 15.2], pinteraction = 0.04). In longitudinal analysis, LVEF increased in patients with high ∆HR at 6, 9, and 12 months (+2.5% [-0.1, 5.1]; +3.9% [1.2, 6.5]; and +3.7% [1.0, 6.4] from baseline, respectively) but not among low ∆HR (-0.1% [-2.8, 2.6]; -0.3% [-3.1, 2.4]; and -0.8% [-3.7, 2.1]). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to low ∆HR, patients with high ∆HR showed greater LVEF improvement with TPNS for CSA. High ∆HR, a potential reflection of CSA-related sympathetic overactivity, may identify those who benefit most from CSA treatment.