Skip to main content

Daily Respiratory Research Analysis

3 papers

Three impactful respiratory studies advance public health and mechanistic understanding. A US-wide multi-cohort analysis links PM2.5, NO2, and ozone to higher childhood asthma incidence with clear sociodemographic disparities. A massive genomic cohort clarifies that most CFTR heterozygotes do not have substantially elevated CF-related disease risks, while a Thorax meta-analysis quantifies inhalational exposures that increase interstitial lung disease risk.

Summary

Three impactful respiratory studies advance public health and mechanistic understanding. A US-wide multi-cohort analysis links PM2.5, NO2, and ozone to higher childhood asthma incidence with clear sociodemographic disparities. A massive genomic cohort clarifies that most CFTR heterozygotes do not have substantially elevated CF-related disease risks, while a Thorax meta-analysis quantifies inhalational exposures that increase interstitial lung disease risk.

Research Themes

  • Air pollution and childhood asthma disparities
  • Genetic risk profiling of CFTR heterozygotes
  • Occupational/environmental inhalational exposures and ILD risk

Selected Articles

1. Disparities in the association of ambient air pollution with childhood asthma incidence in the ECHO consortium: A US-wide multi-cohort study.

75.5Level IIICohortEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025PMID: 40520482

In 23,234 US children followed to age 10 across 34 ECHO sites, higher prior-year PM2.5, NO2, and ozone exposures were associated with increased asthma incidence. Effects varied by sociodemographic context, underscoring structural vulnerability and environmental injustice.

Impact: This large, diverse multi-cohort provides robust, time-varying evidence that common pollutants raise childhood asthma risk and identifies disparity modifiers, pointing to actionable policy levers.

Clinical Implications: Pediatric and public health strategies should integrate pollution reduction with targeted interventions in high-vulnerability communities (e.g., housing, traffic mitigation, green space). Clinicians can use exposure-aware risk counseling and advocate for environmental health policies.

Key Findings

  • Each IQR increase in prior-year PM2.5, NO2, and ozone was associated with higher asthma incidence by age 10 (HR ~1.11–1.19).
  • Time-varying Cox models accounting for site and socio-demographics demonstrated effect modification by social disadvantage.
  • Residential history-based exposure assignment enabled longitudinal linkage across 182,008 person-years.

Methodological Strengths

  • Large, geographically diverse multi-cohort with 23,234 children and 182,008 person-years.
  • Time-varying exposure modeling with residential histories and adjustment for area- and individual-level covariates.

Limitations

  • Modeled exposures and potential exposure misclassification.
  • Heterogeneity in exposure time windows (e.g., differing years for NO2 and ozone) and residual confounding.

Future Directions: Quantify co-exposure mixtures, integrate personal/indoor exposures, and evaluate structural interventions (e.g., diesel restrictions) in vulnerable communities with quasi-experimental designs.

2. Diseases Common in Persons With Cystic Fibrosis Among CFTR Heterozygotes.

74Level IIICohortJAMA internal medicine · 2025PMID: 40522671

In 317,964 adults with WGS-linked EHRs, 7,957 CFTR heterozygotes showed no phenome-wide excess disease risk. Modest increases in select respiratory outcomes (e.g., ABPA, bronchiectasis, COPD) were observed, with effect sizes far lower than in CF homozygotes.

Impact: Clarifies real-world risk for a very large, diverse population of CFTR carriers, informing genetic counseling and respiratory surveillance without overmedicalization.

Clinical Implications: Routine screening for CF-related disease in CFTR heterozygotes is not broadly indicated; however, targeted evaluation is reasonable for carriers with recurrent respiratory infections, bronchiectasis, or ABPA features.

Key Findings

  • Across 2,909 phenotypes, no significant phenome-wide associations were found in CFTR heterozygotes.
  • Select respiratory risks showed modest ORs: ABPA 2.50, bronchiectasis 1.21, pneumococcal pneumonia 1.54, COPD 1.14, asthma 1.08, Pseudomonas infection 1.34.
  • Diverse ancestry with mean 12.4-year follow-up supports generalizability of findings.

Methodological Strengths

  • Phenome-wide association with whole-genome sequencing and long EHR follow-up.
  • Diverse ancestry inference using 1000 Genomes and HGDP references.

Limitations

  • EHR-based diagnoses may introduce misclassification.
  • Limited power for rare outcomes within ancestry strata; residual confounding possible.

Future Directions: Dissect modifiers of elevated respiratory risk among subgroups (e.g., environmental exposures, polygenic background), and evaluate targeted surveillance strategies.

3. Inhalational exposures associated with risk of interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

72.5Level IISystematic Review/Meta-analysisThorax · 2025PMID: 40518258

Pooling 54 studies (over 40 million subjects), smoking, organic agents, metals, dust, and asbestos were each associated with higher ILD risk. Silica and fumes showed positive trends. The analysis excluded HP, pneumoconiosis, and sarcoidosis to focus on non-classical ILD risk.

Impact: Provides quantitative evidence to inform exposure histories, workplace protections, and preventive policies beyond classical occupational ILDs.

Clinical Implications: Clinicians should routinely elicit and document inhalational exposure histories (metals, organic agents, dusts, asbestos) and integrate exposure mitigation and surveillance for at-risk workers.

Key Findings

  • Smoking (OR 1.69), organic exposures (OR 1.56), metals (OR 1.52), dust (OR 1.45), and asbestos (OR 1.53) increased ILD risk.
  • Silica and fumes had positive associations trending toward significance.
  • Excluded HP, pneumoconiosis, and sarcoidosis to isolate non-classical ILD risks.

Methodological Strengths

  • Comprehensive search with dual independent review and data extraction.
  • Multilevel random-effects meta-analysis across very large aggregated populations.

Limitations

  • Exposure assessment heterogeneity and potential residual confounding.
  • Observational evidence limits causal inference; publication bias possible.

Future Directions: Identify and quantify emerging occupational exposures, evaluate gene–environment interactions, and test targeted workplace interventions.