Daily Respiratory Research Analysis
A double-blind RCT showed that interferon-α nasal spray halved COVID-19 incidence in adult cancer patients without added safety concerns. Two mechanistic and translational studies advanced respiratory science: human nasal organoid assays accurately predicted real-world monoclonal antibody efficacy against SARS-CoV-2, and a JCI study uncovered an ARG1–ornithine–collagen immune–mesenchymal circuit driving lung fibrosis, nominating ARG1 as a therapeutic target.
Summary
A double-blind RCT showed that interferon-α nasal spray halved COVID-19 incidence in adult cancer patients without added safety concerns. Two mechanistic and translational studies advanced respiratory science: human nasal organoid assays accurately predicted real-world monoclonal antibody efficacy against SARS-CoV-2, and a JCI study uncovered an ARG1–ornithine–collagen immune–mesenchymal circuit driving lung fibrosis, nominating ARG1 as a therapeutic target.
Research Themes
- Prophylaxis for respiratory viral infections in immunocompromised hosts
- Human-relevant organoid models to predict antiviral antibody efficacy
- Immunometabolic circuits driving lung fibrosis as drug targets
Selected Articles
1. Interferon-α Nasal Spray Prophylaxis Reduces COVID-19 in Cancer Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
In 433 adult cancer patients, daily interferon-α nasal spray reduced COVID-19 incidence from 14.4% to 8.3% (RR 0.60), with consistent benefit in per-protocol analysis and subgroups (<65 years, female, vaccinated). There was no reduction in severity or hospitalization, and safety was favorable.
Impact: This is a rigorously designed, double-blind RCT in a high-risk population demonstrating a simple, low-cost prophylactic strategy against COVID-19. It can inform infection prevention policies for immunocompromised patients.
Clinical Implications: Clinicians may consider IFN-α nasal spray as an adjunct prophylaxis to reduce COVID-19 incidence in adult cancer patients, especially those <65 years, female, or vaccinated, while noting it did not reduce severity or hospitalization.
Key Findings
- COVID-19 incidence was 8.3% with IFN-α vs 14.4% with placebo (RR 0.60; 95% CrI 0.33–0.97).
- Per-protocol analysis: 7.7% vs 16.0% (RR 0.50; 95% CrI 0.26–0.84).
- No differences in severity, hospitalization, or mortality; safety was acceptable.
- Benefits were consistent in subgroups: age <65 years, female sex, and vaccinated.
Methodological Strengths
- Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design with prespecified endpoints
- Subgroup and per-protocol analyses with Bayesian credible intervals; self-collection standardized
Limitations
- No reduction in severity/hospitalization; study likely underpowered for hard outcomes
- Outcome ascertainment relied on participant self-swabbing and testing
Future Directions: Larger trials powered for hospitalization and mortality, evaluation in other immunocompromised groups, dosing optimization, and combination with vaccines/antivirals.
BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether a daily nasal spray of interferon-alpha (IFN-α) would reduce the incidence of COVID-19 or community-acquired respiratory viral infections in adult cancer patients. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, participants were randomized 1:1 to receive daily 40 000 IU IFN-α nasal spray or normal saline placebo. Participants who developed influenza-like symptoms self-collected nasal swabs for PCR testing of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza, adenovirus, seasonal coronavirus, picornavirus, human metapneumovirus, and/or SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing. Co-primary endpoints were incidence of COVID-19 and/or other respiratory viruses ≤90 days of randomization. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-three participants were randomized to IFN-α (n = 217) or placebo (n = 216). The incidence of COVID-19 was lower in the IFN-α group versus placebo (8.3% vs 14.4%), indicating a 40% reduced risk of infection (relative risk [RR]: .60; 95% credible interval [CrI]: .33-.97). Other respiratory viral infection incidence was 5.1% and 5.1% in both groups (RR: 1.12; .43-2.34). In the per-protocol cohort (n = 389), the incidence of COVID-19 in IFN-α and placebo groups was 7.7% and 16.0% (RR: .50; .26-.84) with other respiratory virus incidence of 4.6% and 5.7%, respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated lower COVID-19 in the IFN-α group for ages <65 years (RR: .48; .20-.92), female sex (RR: .44; .19-.85), and COVID-19 vaccinated (RR: .50; .26-.82), but no difference by underlying malignancy. No differences were observed in secondary endpoints of severity, hospitalization, and mortality. IFN-α was well tolerated and safe. CONCLUSIONS: IFN-α nasal spray prophylaxis reduced the incidence of COVID-19 among adult cancer patients. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04534725 (ANZCTR: ACTRN12620000843954).
2. Myeloid-mesenchymal crosstalk drives ARG1-dependent profibrotic metabolism via ornithine in lung fibrosis.
This study identifies an ARG1–ornithine–proline/collagen axis in lung fibrosis driven by myeloid cells and regulated by a P2RX4–IL-6 immune–mesenchymal circuit. Pharmacologic ARG1 inhibition and myeloid Arg1 deletion reduced collagen in precision-cut IPF human lung slices and murine models, nominating ARG1 as a therapeutic target.
Impact: It elucidates a druggable immunometabolic mechanism of fibrosis with validation in human IPF tissue and multiple in vivo systems, providing a clear translational path to ARG1-targeted therapies.
Clinical Implications: ARG1 inhibition could modulate collagen synthesis by depriving fibroblasts of ornithine/proline substrate; biomarkers in the P2RX4–IL-6–ARG1 axis may stratify patients for antifibrotic strategies.
Key Findings
- Myeloid ARG1 produces ornithine that fuels fibroblast proline and collagen synthesis.
- In mouse lungs, macrophages predominated as ARG1+ cells; in IPF lung, neutrophils were the main ARG1+ myeloid cells.
- Small-molecule ARG1 inhibition reduced ornithine and collagen in precision-cut IPF lung slices and murine fibrosis.
- Macrophage-specific Arg1 deletion confirmed antifibrotic effects; P2RX4-dependent fibroblast IL-6 was required to induce myeloid ARG1, defining a crosstalk circuit.
Methodological Strengths
- Convergent evidence across human precision-cut lung slices, high-dimensional imaging, pharmacology, and genetic KO models
- Mechanistic dissection of purinergic signaling (P2RX4) and cytokine (IL-6) regulation of ARG1
Limitations
- Translational gap remains: clinical efficacy of ARG1 inhibition in IPF is untested
- Potential off-target effects of small-molecule inhibitors not fully characterized
Future Directions: Early-phase clinical trials of ARG1 inhibitors in IPF; development of biomarkers for P2RX4–IL-6–ARG1 activity; cell-type–specific targeting strategies.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a disease of progressive lung remodeling and collagen deposition that leads to respiratory failure. Myeloid cells are abundant in IPF lung and in murine lung fibrosis, but their functional effects are incompletely understood. Using mouse and human lung models, we show that ornithine produced by myeloid cells expressing arginase 1 (ARG1) serves as a substrate for proline and collagen synthesis by lung fibroblasts. The predominant ARG1-expressing myeloid cells in mouse lung were macrophages, but in IPF lung, high-dimensional imaging revealed ARG1 was expressed mainly in neutrophils. Small-molecule ARG1 inhibition suppressed both ornithine levels and collagen expression in cultured, precision-cut IPF lung slices and in murine lung fibrosis. These results were confirmed in macrophage-specific Arg1-KO mice. Furthermore, we found that this pathway is regulated by cell-to-cell crosstalk, starting with purinergic signaling: extracellular ATP receptor P2RX4 was necessary for fibroblast IL-6 expression, which, in turn, was necessary for ARG1 expression by myeloid cells. Taken together, our findings define an immune-mesenchymal circuit that governs profibrotic metabolism in lung fibrosis.
3. Organoid-based neutralization assays reveal a distinctive profile of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and recapitulate the real-world efficacy.
Human nasal organoid neutralization assays showed that several class 3 anti–SARS-CoV-2 mAbs (for example, VIR-7831) are underestimated by standard cell-line assays, yet their efficacy aligns with clinical outcomes when tested in organoids. The organoid system captures low ACE2 and high TMPRSS2 expression, recapitulating in vivo protection, including for S2-directed mAbs.
Impact: It resolves a key discrepancy between in vitro neutralization and clinical efficacy, providing a more predictive platform for evaluating monoclonal antibodies against evolving variants and informing regulatory and clinical decisions.
Clinical Implications: For antibody selection and authorization, organoid-based assays may better predict real-world performance than cell-line assays, guiding which mAbs to advance or retain against emerging variants.
Key Findings
- Class 3 mAbs that do not block RBD–ACE2 (including VIR-7831) are substantially underestimated by cell-line assays.
- Nasal organoids with low ACE2 and high TMPRSS2 recapitulate real-world protection and in vivo effects, including S2 mAbs.
- Organoid-based neutralization correlates with clinical efficacy, outperforming conventional cell-line readouts.
Methodological Strengths
- Use of human nasal organoids with physiologic ACE2/TMPRSS2 expression profiles
- Direct comparison to conventional assays and alignment with real-world clinical outcomes across mAb classes
Limitations
- Preclinical platform without randomized clinical validation for each antibody
- Variant coverage and breadth of tested antibodies, while broad, may not capture all future evolution
Future Directions: Prospective correlation studies linking organoid assay results to clinical outcomes for newly authorized mAbs and variants; standardization and regulatory acceptance frameworks.
The efficacy of VIR-7831, a class 3 anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody (mAb), was demonstrated repeatedly in clinical trials; yet, reduced neutralization against Omicron variants in cell-line-based neutralization assays led to its withdrawal from clinical use. We developed organoid-based neutralization assays to measure mAb potency. We found that most class 3 mAbs, especially those not blocking receptor-binding domain-ACE2 binding, including VIR-7831, were substantially underestimated in cell-line-based assays. Nasal organoids adequately recapitulated the real-world effectiveness of VIR-7831 because of biologically relevant low ACE2 expression, and exclusively reproduced the in vivo protection of S2 mAbs due to the high TMPRSS2 expression, reminiscent of native human respiratory epithelial cells. Collectively, the robust organoid culture system and biologically relevant expression profiles of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 make nasal organoids present a correlate of in vivo protection of neutralizing mAbs exclusively. The organoid-based neutralization assays, superior to conventional cell-line-based assays, can recapitulate and predict the real-world efficacy of mAbs.