Daily Respiratory Research Analysis
Analyzed 250 papers and selected 3 impactful papers.
Summary
Three impactful respiratory papers span treatment, prevention, and climate-health. A phase 3 randomized trial shows that adding carboplatin–pemetrexed to aumolertinib improves progression-free survival in EGFR-mutated NSCLC with concomitant tumor suppressor mutations. Nationwide U.S. data link power outages to increases in cardiovascular and respiratory hospitalizations among older adults, and interim U.S. estimates show measurable, though lower-than-recent-seasons, influenza vaccine effectiveness.
Research Themes
- Genotype-directed intensification for EGFR-mutated lung cancer
- Climate resilience and respiratory/cardiovascular morbidity
- Real-world influenza vaccine effectiveness for 2025–26 season
Selected Articles
1. Aumolertinib with carboplatin-pemetrexed versus aumolertinib for nonsmall cell lung cancer with EGFR and concomitant tumor suppressor genes (ACROSS2): An open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 study.
In EGFR-mutated NSCLC with concomitant tumor suppressor gene mutations, adding carboplatin–pemetrexed to aumolertinib significantly prolonged PFS versus aumolertinib alone (19.78 vs 16.53 months; HR 0.58). Benefit was pronounced in TP53-mutated tumors, and toxicity was manageable with no treatment-related deaths.
Impact: This is the first prospective, randomized evidence supporting genotype-directed upfront intensification for EGFR-mutated NSCLC with TSG co-mutations, a population with suboptimal outcomes on TKI monotherapy.
Clinical Implications: For EGFR-mutated NSCLC harboring TSG co-mutations (notably TP53), initial aumolertinib plus carboplatin–pemetrexed may be preferred over TKI monotherapy to extend PFS, with careful AE monitoring. OS data and broader generalizability should be confirmed.
Key Findings
- Median PFS: 19.78 vs 16.53 months (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.34–0.97) favoring combination.
- Landmark PFS at 12/18/24 months: 78.7%/67.2%/41.0% vs 65.3%/40.8%/29.9%.
- Subgroup: clear PFS benefit in TP53-mutated tumors.
- Grade ≥3 adverse events: 25.9% (combination) vs 17.2% (monotherapy); no drug-related deaths.
- Overall survival not mature (4% maturity).
Methodological Strengths
- Prospective, multicenter randomized phase 3 design with pre-specified PFS endpoint
- Molecularly defined population with relevant subgroup (TP53) analyses
Limitations
- Open-label design and modest sample size (n=126) may introduce bias and limit precision
- Overall survival data immature; external validity beyond study population requires confirmation
Future Directions: Confirm OS and quality-of-life outcomes, refine biomarker selection (e.g., specific TSG constellations), and evaluate sequencing versus combination strategies across EGFR-TKIs.
Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are standard first-line therapy for advanced, EGFR-mutated nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, their benefit is limited in patients who have co-existing tumor suppressor gene (TSG) mutations, highlighting a need for intensified strategies to improve outcomes. ACROSS2 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04500717) is the first prospective, multicenter, randomized phase 3 study to compare the third-generation EGFR-TKI aumolertinib in combination with carboplatin-pemetrexed versus aumolertinib monotherapy in patients who had NSCLC with EGFR mutations and concomitant TSG mutations. In total, 126 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either combination therapy (n = 62) or monotherapy (n = 64). The primary end point was median progression-free survival (PFS). At a median follow-up of 25.3 months, combination therapy significantly prolonged median PFS compared with monotherapy (19.78 vs 16.53 months; hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.97). Landmark PFS rates at 12, 18, and 24 months were 78.7% versus 65.3%, 67.2% versus 40.8%, and 41.0% versus 29.9%, respectively. Subgroup analyses demonstrated a clear PFS benefit in patients who had co-existing tumor protein p53 (TP53) mutations. Grade 3 or greater adverse events occurred in 25.9% of patients who received combination therapy versus 17.2% of those who received monotherapy; no drug-related deaths were observed. Overall survival data were immature (data maturity, 4%). The ACROSS2 trial provides the first prospective evidence supporting a genotype-directed, chemotherapy-targeted intensification approach favoring aumolertinib plus carboplatin-pemetrexed for this molecularly defined population.
2. The association between power outages and cardiovascular and respiratory hospitalizations among US Medicare beneficiaries in 2018: A case-crossover study.
Using a national case-crossover analysis of 23 million Medicare beneficiaries, county-level power outages were linked to small but significant increases in respiratory hospitalizations on the outage day (RR 1.03) and cardiovascular hospitalizations the following day (RR 1.02). Associations persisted after adjusting for meteorology.
Impact: This is the first nationwide analysis linking power outages to cardio-respiratory morbidity in older adults, informing climate resilience and healthcare preparedness.
Clinical Implications: Healthcare systems and public health should incorporate outage-responsive plans (e.g., outreach to oxygen/ventilator-dependent patients, cooling/heating access, backup power for clinics/hospitals) and target at-risk older adults during outage events.
Key Findings
- National case-crossover across 23M older adults linked outages to respiratory hospitalizations same day (RR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01–1.04).
- Cardiovascular hospitalizations peaked the day after outages (RR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01–1.03).
- Models adjusted for temperature, precipitation, and wind; exposure defined as county-days with ≥1% customers experiencing ≥8-hour outages.
Methodological Strengths
- Case-crossover design controls for time-invariant confounding within counties
- Large, nationwide Medicare dataset with meteorological adjustment
Limitations
- Exposure assessed at county level; potential exposure misclassification
- Single year (2018); residual confounding and generalizability across years/regions require evaluation
Future Directions: Incorporate higher-resolution outage data, evaluate compounding hazards (heat/cold), and assess targeted interventions to mitigate cardio-respiratory risk during outages.
BACKGROUND: In the United States, already-prevalent power outages are increasing in frequency and duration with climate change. Studies from New York State show that power outages may increase hospitalizations for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and respiratory disease in vulnerable populations such as older adults, but exposure data limitations have constrained nationwide studies of power outages and health. Here, we tested if power outages were associated with emergency CVD and respiratory disease-related hospitalizations among older adults in the United States. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We developed a national dataset of power outage exposure and identified county-days with ≥1% of customers exposed to 8+ hour power outages in 2018. We leveraged data on 23 million Medicare Fee-For-Service beneficiaries aged 65+ to estimate daily county-level rates of emergency CVD- and respiratory-related hospitalizations. We applied a case-crossover design with a conditional Poisson model to estimate the lagged association (up to 1 week) between daily county-level power outage exposure and cause-specific hospitalization rates. Models controlled for daily temperature, precipitation, and wind speed. RESULTS: Power outages were associated with increased emergency CVD and respiratory hospitalizations. The association between power outage and CVD hospitalizations was strongest the day after power outage exposure (rate ratio [RR]=1.02, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.03), while the association between outage and respiratory disease was strongest the day of power outage exposure (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.04). We estimated this association using county-level power outage data; future studies could use higher spatial resolution data. CONCLUSIONS: Power outages may increase the risk of CVD and respiratory hospitalizations among US older adults. Improving electricity reliability could support community health and protect older adults from CVD and respiratory disease exacerbations.
3. Interim Estimates of 2025-26 Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness - United States, September 2025-February 2026.
Interim test-negative estimates show 2025–26 influenza VE of 38–41% for pediatric outpatient visits and 41% for pediatric hospitalizations; in adults, VE was 22–34% for outpatient visits and 30% for hospitalizations. VE against influenza B was higher (up to 63% in adults), supporting continued vaccination.
Impact: Real-time, multi-network VE estimates inform clinicians and public health during the active season, guiding messaging and prioritization (e.g., for children and high-risk adults).
Clinical Implications: Continue to recommend and deliver vaccination across ages, emphasizing protection in children and against influenza B, and integrate with antivirals and risk-based strategies, given lower but meaningful VE.
Key Findings
- Pediatric VE: 38–41% (outpatient), 41% (hospitalization).
- Adult VE: 22–34% (outpatient), 30% (hospitalization).
- Influenza B VE: 45–71% (children outpatients) and 63% (adults outpatients).
- VE against A(H3N2): 35% (pediatric outpatient) and 38% (pediatric hospitalization).
Methodological Strengths
- Multi-network, test-negative design across outpatient and inpatient settings
- Age- and subtype-specific VE estimates during ongoing season
Limitations
- Interim estimates; some subtype/setting estimates not statistically significant or not reportable
- Potential residual confounding and vaccine-strain mismatch effects
Future Directions: Finalize season-end VE with expanded sample, evaluate waning, and integrate antigenic/phylogenetic characterization to inform next-season strain selection.
In the United States, annual influenza vaccination has been recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months, including during the 2025-26 season. Interim influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates were calculated for patients with acute respiratory illness-associated outpatient visits and hospitalizations from three U.S. respiratory virus VE networks during the 2025-26 influenza season, using a test-negative case-control design. Among children and adolescents aged <18 years, VE was 38%-41% against influenza outpatient visits and 41% against influenza-associated hospitalization. Among adults aged ≥18 years, VE was 22%-34% against influenza outpatient visits and 30% against influenza-associated hospitalization. Among children and adolescents, VE against influenza A ranged from 37% (against outpatient visits) to 42% (against hospitalization) across settings; among adults, VE against influenza A ranged from 30% (against hospitalization) to 34% (against outpatient visits) across settings. Among children and adolescents, VE against influenza A(H3N2)-associated outpatient visits was 35% and against influenza A(H3N2)-associated hospitalization was 38%. VE against influenza B outpatient visits ranged from 45%-71% among children and adolescents and was 63% among adults. Other estimates of VE were not statistically significant or were not reportable. Although interim influenza VE is lower during the 2025-26 influenza season than it was during recent influenza seasons, these findings demonstrate that influenza vaccination still provides protection against influenza. CDC recommends influenza vaccination; U.S. influenza vaccines remain available for persons aged ≥6 months.