Skip to main content
Daily Report

Daily Respiratory Research Analysis

04/05/2026
3 papers selected
87 analyzed

Analyzed 87 papers and selected 3 impactful papers.

Summary

Analyzed 87 papers and selected 3 impactful articles.

Selected Articles

1. DOT1L Drives Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition and Fibrotic Vascular Remodeling via H3K79 Methylation.

85.5Level VBasic/mechanistic study
Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026PMID: 41933932

This mechanistic study identifies DOT1L-mediated H3K79 methylation as a central epigenetic driver of EndoMT and pulmonary fibrosis. TGFβ-SMAD2 upregulates DOT1L, increasing H3K79me2 at fibrosis genes; endothelial Dot1L deletion attenuates bleomycin-induced fibrosis in mice.

Impact: It reveals a druggable epigenetic axis linking TGFβ signaling to transcriptional activation of fibrotic programs via H3K79me2, providing a concrete target (DOT1L) for antifibrotic therapy.

Clinical Implications: While preclinical, DOT1L inhibition could emerge as a novel antifibrotic strategy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and related conditions, informing biomarker-guided trials targeting EndoMT.

Key Findings

  • TGFβ stimulation increases DOT1L and H3K79me2 during EndoMT in endothelial cells.
  • SMAD2 directly binds the DOT1L promoter, promoting H3K79me2 deposition at fibrosis gene loci.
  • Endothelial-specific Dot1L deletion reduces fibrotic remodeling and collagen deposition in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis.

Methodological Strengths

  • Multi-level validation: in vitro EndoMT models, ChIP mechanistic assays, and in vivo endothelial lineage tracing
  • Endothelial-specific genetic deletion to establish causality in a relevant fibrosis model

Limitations

  • Sample sizes and detailed quantitative effect sizes are not reported in the abstract
  • Translatability to human disease and on-target safety of DOT1L inhibition remain to be established

Future Directions: Develop selective DOT1L inhibitors; define EndoMT biomarkers of target engagement; test combination strategies with TGFβ/SMAD modulators in preclinical fibrosis models and early-phase trials.

The lung is a highly vascularized organ in which endothelial cells (ECs) play a pivotal role in maintaining tissue homeostasis and regulating gas-blood exchange. Increasing evidence suggests that endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT) contributes to fibrosis; however, the underlying epigenetic mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Here, we identify disruptor of telomeric silencing 1-like (DOT1L), a histone H3 lysine 79 (H3K79) methyltransferase, as a key epigenetic regulator of EndoMT and fibrotic progression. In human umbilical vein ECs, TGFβ stimulation upregulated DOT1L expression and increased H3K79me2 levels during EndoMT. DOT1L knockdown abrogated H3K79 methylation and suppressed the expression of fibrosis-associated genes. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis revealed that direct binding of SMAD2 to the DOT1L promoter increased its transcription and promoted H3K79me2 deposition at fibrosis-related gene loci following TGFβ2 stimulation. In vivo, endothelial lineage-tracing in mice demonstrated H3K79me2 accumulation in ECs undergoing EndoMT during bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Importantly, endothelial-specific deletion of Dot1L significantly attenuated fibrotic remodeling, collagen deposition, and mesenchymal marker expression. Collectively, these findings establish DOT1L as a critical epigenetic driver of EndoMT and pulmonary fibrosis through H3K79me2-mediated transcriptional activation, highlighting it as a potential therapeutic target in fibrotic lung disease.

2. Legumain Restrains Granuloma Formation by Inhibiting mTORC1/STAT1-Mediated M1 Macrophage Polarization in Sarcoidosis.

85.5Level VBasic/mechanistic study
Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026PMID: 41933939

Legumain is upregulated in sarcoid-like granulomas and restrains M1 polarization via integrin αvβ3-dependent inhibition of mTORC1/STAT1 signaling. Intratracheal lipid nanoparticles delivering Lgmn plasmid reduced granuloma burden in two mouse models, nominating LGMN supplementation as a therapeutic strategy.

Impact: This study pinpoints a macrophage-intrinsic checkpoint of granuloma biology and demonstrates a tractable gene-delivery approach, bridging mechanistic insight with a translational therapeutic modality for sarcoidosis.

Clinical Implications: LGMN-based therapies, including airway-delivered gene augmentation, could offer an alternative for refractory sarcoidosis; biomarkers of M1 polarization and mTORC1/STAT1 activity may guide patient selection.

Key Findings

  • LGMN expression is increased in macrophages within sarcoid-like granulomas.
  • Lgmn knockout exacerbates granulomatous inflammation with enhanced M1 polarization in P. acnes-induced mice.
  • LGMN binds integrin αvβ3 to inhibit mTORC1/STAT1 signaling, and intratracheal LNP-Lgmn therapy reduces granuloma formation.

Methodological Strengths

  • Use of two granuloma models (P. acnes and trehalose 6,6'-dimycolate) to replicate findings
  • Mechanistic dissection linking surface integrin engagement to intracellular mTORC1/STAT1 signaling

Limitations

  • Human sample validation and safety/pharmacokinetics of airway gene delivery were not addressed
  • Quantitative dosing-response and durability of LNP-mediated gene expression require further study

Future Directions: Advance LGMN augmentation to large-animal safety studies; explore small-molecule or peptide agonists; develop companion diagnostics of macrophage polarization to stratify sarcoidosis patients.

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease that has limited treatment options. Emerging evidence suggests that macrophages are essential for sarcoid granuloma initiation. Legumain (LGMN), a cysteine protease, regulates macrophage polarization in various cancers. However, its involvement in sarcoid granuloma formation remains elusive. Herein, LGMN is upregulated in macrophages within sarcoid-like granulomas. Genetic deletion of Lgmn exacerbates granulomatous inflammation in a Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes)-induced mouse model, accompanied by increased M1 macrophage polarization. Mechanistically, LGMN binds to integrin αvβ3 on the macrophage surface and restrains M1 polarization by inhibiting the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) pathway. Furthermore, intratracheal administration of lipid nanoparticles carrying Lgmn plasmid DNA effectively alleviates granuloma formation induced by P. acnes or trehalose 6,6'-dimycolate, concomitant with decreased mTORC1/STAT1 activation and M1 polarization. These findings reveal the pivotal role of LGMN in restraining sarcoid granulomatous inflammation through suppression of mTORC1/STAT1-driven M1 macrophage polarization. Therefore, LGMN supplementation may be a promising therapeutic strategy for sarcoidosis.

3. Fixed-pressure versus auto-adjusting continuous positive airway pressure for blood pressure control in obstructive sleep apnoea: a double-blind, randomised, crossover trial (FIX PAP Trial ).

81Level IRCT
Chest · 2026PMID: 41933609

In a double-blind randomized crossover trial of hypertensive OSA, fixed-pressure CPAP showed a high probability of greater reductions in 24-hour and nighttime systolic BP versus auto-adjusting CPAP, and increased nocturnal diastolic dipping. Adherence and satisfaction were similar.

Impact: Challenges the assumption of cardiovascular equivalence between APAP and fixed-pressure therapy, with immediate implications for PAP titration strategies in hypertensive OSA.

Clinical Implications: For hypertensive OSA patients prioritizing BP control, fixed-pressure CPAP guided by manual titration may be favored over APAP; ABPM should be considered to monitor cardiometabolic response.

Key Findings

  • Posterior median treatment effect favored FPAP for 24-hour SBP by −4.41 mmHg (pd 91.2%), more pronounced at night (−6.80 mmHg; pd 94.0%).
  • FPAP increased the probability of nocturnal diastolic BP dipping versus APAP (posterior probability of benefit 94.3%; OR 4.09).
  • Device use averaged 6.2 h/night with similar adherence and satisfaction across arms; FPAP mean pressure exceeded APAP P95.

Methodological Strengths

  • Double-blind randomized crossover design with ambulatory BP monitoring
  • Bayesian hierarchical modeling providing probability estimates of treatment superiority

Limitations

  • Small sample with only 30 completing both arms; credible intervals included zero
  • Short treatment periods (4 weeks per arm) limit assessment of long-term cardiovascular outcomes

Future Directions: Larger, longer RCTs powered for hard cardiovascular endpoints and phenotyping to identify subgroups benefiting most from fixed-pressure PAP.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist concerning the impact of fixed-pressure PAP (FPAP) and auto-adjusting CPAP (APAP) on blood pressure (BP) in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). RESEARCH QUESTION: In hypertensive patients with OSA, do FPAP and APAP lead to different effects on blood pressure? METHODS: In this double-blind, randomised crossover clinical trial, patients with OSA and hypertension were treated with both FPAP and APAP. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and autonomic function testing were performed before and after each treatment. The effect of PAP mode on the change from baseline (4-week value minus baseline value) was analysed using a Bayesian hierarchical linear model. RESULTS: Forty-six patients (mean age 48.8±11.2 years) with OSA (median AHI 59 [IQR: 34, 99] events/hour) were enrolled, with 30 patients completing both treatment arms. Median device use was 6.2 hours/night. In the primary Bayesian hierarchical analysis, FPAP showed a high probability of superior Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) control compared to APAP. For 24-hour SBP, the posterior median treatment effect was -4.41 mmHg [95% CrI: -11.11, 2.00] with a Probability of Direction (pd) of 91.2%. This effect was more pronounced for nighttime SBP, with a posterior median change of -6.80 mmHg [95% CrI: -15.37, 1.76] and a pd of 94.0%. FPAP increased the likelihood of nocturnal diastolic BP dipping compared with APAP (posterior probability of benefit 94.3%; OR 4.09).Baseline characteristics, compliance, and satisfaction were similar between treatment sequences (pd typically < 75%). Mean FPAP pressure was higher than APAP (P95) pressures (12.51±4.55 vs. 10.33±2.66 cmH INTERPRETATION: Our analysis suggests a high probability that FPAP provides superior BP control compared to APAP in OSA patients with Hypertension. These findings challenge the assumption that APAP provides equivalent cardiovascular protection and suggest that fixed-pressure therapy, guided by manual titration, may be preferable for optimal blood pressure management in this population.