Skip to main content

Precise diagnosis of small invasive pulmonary nodules driven by single-cell immune signatures in peripheral blood.

Nature communications2025-12-09PubMed
Total: 86.0Innovation: 9Impact: 9Rigor: 8Citation: 9

Summary

In a multicenter prospective study, mass cytometry-derived peripheral immune signatures combined with machine learning distinguished invasive from non-invasive pulmonary nodules (AUC 0.952) and predicted adenocarcinoma invasiveness (AUC 0.949). The platform outperformed clinical and radiomics models, indicating immediate translational potential to guide surgery and reduce overtreatment.

Key Findings

  • Peripheral immune signatures classified invasive versus non-invasive pulmonary nodules with AUC 0.952, surpassing clinical and radiomics models.
  • Predicted tumor invasiveness, differentiating minimally invasive from invasive adenocarcinoma with AUC 0.949.
  • Prospective, multicenter design supports translational generalizability for clinical decision support.

Clinical Implications

Could inform surgical versus surveillance decisions for small pulmonary nodules, reduce unnecessary resections, and prioritize high-risk lesions. Implementation would require standardized immune profiling and validated ML pipelines integrated into lung nodule clinics.

Why It Matters

This study proposes a noninvasive, immune-based diagnostic that could reshape management of indeterminate pulmonary nodules by accurately identifying invasiveness. Its high performance and prospective multicenter design enhance generalizability and clinical readiness.

Limitations

  • Sample size and external validation cohorts are not specified in the abstract
  • Operational deployment requires access to mass cytometry and robust, generalizable ML pipelines

Future Directions

Conduct large-scale external validation, assess real-world impact on management and outcomes, standardize panels and analytics, and evaluate cost-effectiveness in lung nodule programs.

Study Information

Study Type
Cohort
Research Domain
Diagnosis
Evidence Level
II - Prospective multicenter diagnostic cohort with comparative modeling
Study Design
OTHER