Skip to main content
Daily Report

Daily Anesthesiology Research Analysis

01/22/2025
3 papers selected
3 analyzed

Three high-impact studies shape perioperative and critical care practice today: a national U.S. cohort links COVID-19 surges to increased maternal mortality and failure-to-rescue with disproportionate risk for uninsured Black patients; a meta-analysis clarifies which intravenous antihypertensives reduce cerebral blood flow, informing neuroprotective strategies; and a randomized trial finds no benefit of intra-CPB cytokine hemoadsorption on microcirculation or outcomes in cardiac surgery.

Summary

Three high-impact studies shape perioperative and critical care practice today: a national U.S. cohort links COVID-19 surges to increased maternal mortality and failure-to-rescue with disproportionate risk for uninsured Black patients; a meta-analysis clarifies which intravenous antihypertensives reduce cerebral blood flow, informing neuroprotective strategies; and a randomized trial finds no benefit of intra-CPB cytokine hemoadsorption on microcirculation or outcomes in cardiac surgery.

Research Themes

  • Peripartum health equity under system stress
  • Cerebral hemodynamics with intravenous antihypertensives
  • Inflammation modulation during cardiopulmonary bypass

Selected Articles

1. The Association of the COVID-19 Pandemic With Disparities in Maternal Outcomes.

73.5Level IIICohort
Anesthesia and analgesia · 2025PMID: 39841612

Using 2.48 million U.S. deliveries, weeks with higher hospital COVID-19 burden (10.1–20%) had increased maternal mortality and failure-to-rescue, whereas severe maternal morbidity and cesarean rates were unchanged. Black and Hispanic patients had worse outcomes overall; uninsured Black patients experienced disproportionate increases in mortality and failure-to-rescue with rising hospital COVID-19 burden.

Impact: This national analysis quantifies how system-level surge conditions translate into maternal harm and identifies uninsured Black patients as a uniquely high-risk group, providing actionable targets for resource and policy interventions.

Clinical Implications: During infectious surges, obstetric units should implement surge-specific escalation pathways (early warning and rescue), bolster staffing and critical care access, and proactively support uninsured Black patients with targeted monitoring and access to higher-acuity care.

Key Findings

  • Among 2,484,895 deliveries, hospital COVID-19 burden of 10.1–20% was associated with increased maternal mortality (AOR 2.72) and failure-to-rescue (AOR 2.89).
  • Black and Hispanic patients had higher severe maternal morbidity, mortality, and cesarean rates than White patients.
  • Uninsured Black patients had disproportionate increases in mortality (AOR 1.96) and failure-to-rescue (AOR 3.67) per 10% increase in hospital COVID-19 burden.
  • Severe maternal morbidity and cesarean delivery rates did not change with hospital COVID-19 burden.

Methodological Strengths

  • Very large national cohort with multivariable adjustment and interaction analyses
  • Hospital-level exposure (weekly COVID-19 burden) linked to multiple maternal outcomes across 2017–2022

Limitations

  • Observational design with potential residual confounding and misclassification
  • Exposure measured at hospital level; individual COVID-19 status and care processes not fully captured

Future Directions: Evaluate targeted surge protocols and equitable resource allocation strategies that reduce failure-to-rescue, with prospective studies focusing on uninsured populations and real-time early warning systems.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, Black and Hispanic patients have substantially worse maternal outcomes than non-Hispanic White patients. The goals of this study were to evaluate the association between the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and maternal outcomes, and whether Black and Hispanic patients were disproportionately affected by the pandemic compared to White patients. METHODS: Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine in the United States the association between maternal outcomes (severe maternal morbidity, mortality, failure-to-rescue, and cesarean delivery) and the weekly hospital proportion of COVID-19 patients, and the interaction between race, ethnicity, payer status, and the hospital COVID-19 burden using US national data from the Vizient Clinical Database between 2017 and 2022. RESULTS: Among 2484,895 admissions for delivery, 457,992 (18.4%) were non-Hispanic Black (hereafter referred to as Black), 537,867 (21.7% were Hispanic), and 1489,036 (59.9%) were non-Hispanic White (hereafter referred to as White); mean (standard deviation [SD]) age, 29.9 (5.8). Mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-5.8; P = .01) and failure-to-rescue (AOR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.36-6.13, P = .01), increased during weeks with a COVID-19 burden of 10.1% to 20.0%, while rates of severe maternal morbidity and cesarean delivery were unchanged. Compared to White patients, Black and Hispanic patients had higher rates of severe maternal morbidity ([Black: OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.85-2.11, P < .001]; [Hispanic: OR, 1.37;95% CI, 1.28-1.48, P < .001]), mortality ([Black: OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.29-2.86, P < .001]; [Hispanic: OR, 1.51;95% CI, 1.01-2.24, P = .04]), and cesarean delivery ([Black: OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.54-1.63, P < .001]; [Hispanic: OR, 1.09;95% CI, 1.05-1.13, P < .001]), but not failure-to-rescue. Except for Black patients without insurance (1.3% of the patients), the pandemic was not associated with increases in maternal disparities. Odds of mortality (AOR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.22-3.16, P = .01) and failure-to-rescue (AOR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.67-8.07, P = .001) increased 2.0 and 3.7-fold, respectively, in Black patients without insurance compared to White patients with private insurance for each 10% increase in the weekly hospital COVID-19 burden. CONCLUSIONS: In this national study of 2.5 million deliveries in the United States, the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increases in maternal mortality and failure-to-rescue but not in severe maternal morbidity or cesarean deliveries. While the pandemic did not exacerbate disparities for Black and Hispanic patients with private or Medicaid insurance, uninsured Black patients experienced greater increases in mortality and failure-to-rescue compared to insured White patients.

2. Impact of intravenous antihypertensive therapy on cerebral blood flow and neurocognition: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

72Level ISystematic Review/Meta-analysis
British journal of anaesthesia · 2025PMID: 39837698

Across 50 studies, nitroprusside and nitroglycerin reduced CBF in awake normotensive individuals (median ~14% CBF decrease), whereas most other IV antihypertensives had no significant CBF effect across populations within typical MAP reductions. MAP reduction did not correlate with CBF change, implying preserved autoregulation; neurocognitive changes appear when CBF approaches ~30 ml/100 g/min.

Impact: Clarifies agent-specific CBF effects for commonly used IV antihypertensives, directly informing neuroprotective choices during anesthesia, neurocritical care, and stroke management.

Clinical Implications: Avoid or use caution with nitroprusside/nitroglycerin when cerebral perfusion is marginal; consider alternative agents and cerebral monitoring. Typical MAP-lowering with other agents may preserve CBF via autoregulation, but patient-specific pathology must guide therapy.

Key Findings

  • Nitroprusside and nitroglycerin significantly reduced CBF in awake normotensive individuals (median ~14% CBF drop with ~17% MAP reduction).
  • Most other IV antihypertensives did not significantly change CBF across populations within typical clinical dosing.
  • No correlation between MAP reduction and CBF change, supporting preserved cerebral autoregulation within studied ranges.
  • Neurocognitive changes were reported historically when CBF approached ~30 ml/100 g/min.

Methodological Strengths

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis across 50 studies with stratification by population, agent, state, and measurement modality
  • Quantitative synthesis of CBF and MAP changes enabling agent-specific inferences

Limitations

  • Low certainty due to study heterogeneity and historical data; potential publication bias
  • Predominantly surrogate physiological outcomes; limited linkage to hard clinical endpoints

Future Directions: Prospective trials comparing antihypertensives with cerebral monitoring and neurocognitive endpoints in neurosurgical and critically ill populations; personalized autoregulation-guided BP management.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous antihypertensivedrugs are commonly used in acute care settings, yet their impact on cerebral blood flow (CBF) remains uncertain. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 50 studies evaluated the effects of commonly used i.v. antihypertensive agents on CBF in normotensive, hypertensive, and intracranial pathology populations. Meta-analyses used standardised mean differences (SMD), stratified by population type, consciousness state, antihypertensive agent, and CBF measurement method. RESULTS: Intravenous antihypertensivedrug therapy significantly reduced CBF in normotensive individuals without intracranial pathology (SMD -0.31, 95% confidence interval -0.51 to -0.11), primarily driven by nitroprusside and nitroglycerin in awake subjects (SMD -0.80, 95% confidence interval -1.15 to -0.46), with a median CBF decrease of 14% (interquartile range 13-16%) and a median mean arterial pressure reduction of 17% (interquartile range 9-22%). Other antihypertensives showed no significant effects on CBF in normotensive individuals, nor were changes observed in hypertensive patients or those with intracranial pathology when the median mean arterial pressure reduction was ∼20%. No correlation was found between mean arterial pressure reduction and CBF change, supporting intact cerebral autoregulation. Historical data revealed neurocognitive changes when CBF fell to ∼30 ml 100 g CONCLUSIONS: Most i.v. antihypertensive agents do not significantly affect CBF in clinical dose ranges; however, nitroprusside and nitroglycerin can reduce CBF under specific clinical conditions. The certainty of evidence remains low. Neurocognitive changes appear to depend on the magnitude of blood pressure and CBF reductions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO (CRD42024511954).

3. Cytokine Hemoadsorption versus Standard Care in Cardiac Surgery Using the Oxiris Membrane: The OXICARD Single-center Randomized Trial.

68Level IIRCT
Anesthesiology · 2025PMID: 39841886

In a single-center randomized trial (n=70) of cardiac surgery with prolonged CPB, intraoperative Oxiris hemoadsorption did not improve sublingual microcirculation (MFI difference −0.17; P=0.2), 30-day composite adverse outcomes (42% vs 35%; P=0.7), or cytokine/endothelial biomarker profiles compared with standard care.

Impact: Provides high-quality negative evidence against routine intra-CPB hemoadsorption to modulate inflammation, preventing premature adoption and guiding resource allocation in cardiac anesthesia.

Clinical Implications: Routine use of Oxiris hemoadsorption during CPB to improve microcirculation or outcomes is not supported; focus should remain on evidence-based perfusion, protection strategies, and targeted hemostasis/inflammation control.

Key Findings

  • No improvement in sublingual microcirculation: MFI difference (Oxiris − standard) −0.17 (95% CI −0.44 to 0.10), P=0.2.
  • No reduction in 30-day composite adverse outcomes (42% Oxiris vs 35% standard; P=0.7).
  • No significant differences in cytokine and angiopoietin trajectories between groups.

Methodological Strengths

  • Randomized, intention-to-treat design with predefined microcirculatory and clinical endpoints
  • Concurrent biomarker profiling (cytokines, angiopoietins) to probe mechanistic effects

Limitations

  • Single-center trial with modest sample size limits power for clinical endpoints
  • Primary endpoint is a surrogate (sublingual MFI); generalizability to other circuits and populations uncertain

Future Directions: Larger multicenter RCTs powered for clinical outcomes, stratifying by inflammatory risk phenotypes and integrating organ-specific perfusion markers.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery can lead to dysregulation with a proinflammatory state, resulting in adverse outcomes. Hemadsorption using the AN-69 membrane (Oxiris membrane, Baxter, USA) has the properties to chelate inflammatory cytokines. The authors hypothesized that in patients at high risk of inflammation, the use of the Oxiris membrane could decrease inflammation, preserve endothelial function, and improve postoperative outcomes. METHODS: The authors conducted a randomized single-center study at Amiens University Hospital (Amiens, France). The study population consisted of adult patients admitted for scheduled cardiac surgery with an expected cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time greater than 90 min. The patients were allocated to either the standard group or the Oxiris group. The intervention consisted of using the Oxiris membrane on a Prismaflex device (Baxter, USA) at a blood flow rate of 450 ml/min during CPB. The primary outcome was the assessment of microcirculation on day 1 after surgery by measuring sublingual microcirculation using the microvascular flow index. Microvascular flow index reflects the microcirculation flow type and is graded from 0 to 3 as follows: 0, no flow; 1, intermittent flow; 2, sluggish flow; 3, continuous flow. The secondary outcome was a composite adverse outcome within 30 days after surgery. Cytokines and endothelial biomarkers were measured in all patients at different time points. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. RESULTS: From October 2019 to November 2022, the study included 70 patients. Two patients were excluded from the Oxiris group: one patient did not undergo surgery, and one procedure was performed under deep hypothermia. The microvascular flow index did not differ between groups on day 1 from baseline: difference (95% CI) Oxiris minus standard at -0.17 (-0.44 to 0.10); P = 0.2. The occurrence of a composite adverse outcome did not significantly differ between groups (14 [42%] for the Oxiris group vs. 12 [35%] for the standard group; P = 0.7). The overall variation in cytokines and angiopoietins did not significantly differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients scheduled for a cardiac surgery with prolonged CPB, the authors could not demonstrate the benefit on microcirculation and major cardiovascular events.