Skip to main content

Daily Anesthesiology Research Analysis

3 papers

Today’s top anesthesiology-related studies span critical care sedation, AI-guided vasopressor strategy, and regional anesthesia pharmacokinetics. A large phase 3 RCT (SESAR) found inhaled sevoflurane sedation in ARDS reduced ventilator-free days and 90-day survival versus propofol, while a JAMA reinforcement learning study suggested earlier, more frequent vasopressin initiation during septic shock may lower mortality. A randomized trial in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine showed epinephrine

Summary

Today’s top anesthesiology-related studies span critical care sedation, AI-guided vasopressor strategy, and regional anesthesia pharmacokinetics. A large phase 3 RCT (SESAR) found inhaled sevoflurane sedation in ARDS reduced ventilator-free days and 90-day survival versus propofol, while a JAMA reinforcement learning study suggested earlier, more frequent vasopressin initiation during septic shock may lower mortality. A randomized trial in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine showed epinephrine prolongs time to peak ropivacaine levels in TAP blocks without increasing Cmax, supporting routine inclusion for safety and efficacy.

Research Themes

  • ICU sedation strategy in ARDS (sevoflurane vs propofol)
  • AI/reinforcement learning for vasopressor timing in septic shock
  • Regional anesthesia pharmacokinetics and safety optimization (TAP block)

Selected Articles

1. Inhaled Sedation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: The SESAR Randomized Clinical Trial.

81.5Level IRCTJAMA · 2025PMID: 40098564

In this multicenter phase 3 RCT of 687 adults with moderate to severe ARDS, inhaled sevoflurane sedation resulted in fewer ventilator-free days at day 28 and lower 90-day survival compared with propofol. Early mortality (7-day) and ICU-free days were also worse with sevoflurane.

Impact: This definitive RCT provides high-level evidence that inhaled sevoflurane may harm ARDS patients relative to propofol, directly informing ICU sedation protocols.

Clinical Implications: For moderate to severe ARDS requiring deep sedation, prefer intravenous propofol over inhaled sevoflurane. Reassess protocols that promote volatile sedation in ARDS; consider potential harms despite logistical or environmental advantages.

Key Findings

  • Ventilator-free days at day 28 were lower with sevoflurane vs propofol (median difference -2.1 days; 95% CI -3.6 to -0.7).
  • Ninety-day survival was lower with sevoflurane (47.1%) vs propofol (55.7%); HR 1.31 (95% CI 1.05–1.62).
  • Sevoflurane increased 7-day mortality (19.4% vs 13.5%; RR 1.44) and reduced ICU-free days through day 28 (median difference -2.5 days).

Methodological Strengths

  • Phase 3, multicenter randomized design with assessor blinding
  • Clinically meaningful endpoints (ventilator-free days, 90-day survival) and adequate sample size

Limitations

  • Open-label sedation strategy could introduce performance bias despite assessor blinding
  • Generalizability beyond French ICUs and to milder ARDS or different sedation protocols remains uncertain

Future Directions: Mechanistic studies to explain adverse outcomes with volatile sedation in ARDS and pragmatic trials testing protocolized sedation minimizing volatile agents.

2. Optimal Vasopressin Initiation in Septic Shock: The OVISS Reinforcement Learning Study.

81Level IICohortJAMA · 2025PMID: 40098600

Using reinforcement learning across multi-institutional EHRs, an initiation rule recommended earlier and more frequent vasopressin use at lower norepinephrine doses in septic shock. Adherence to the rule was associated with lower in-hospital mortality, findings that were consistent across external validation cohorts.

Impact: Introduces a validated AI-driven decision rule for vasopressin timing with mortality association, addressing a critical gap where RCTs are lacking.

Clinical Implications: Consider earlier vasopressin initiation when norepinephrine doses are modest, especially if decision support can operationalize the rule. Treat as hypothesis-generating pending prospective trials.

Key Findings

  • Rule recommended vasopressin in 87% vs clinicians’ 31%, earlier after shock onset (median 4 vs 5 hours).
  • Recommended initiation occurred at lower norepinephrine doses (median 0.20 vs 0.37 μg/kg/min).
  • Concordance with the rule associated with lower hospital mortality (adjusted OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.73–0.91); consistent across external datasets.

Methodological Strengths

  • Large multicenter real-world datasets with external validation across 227 hospitals
  • Robust off-policy evaluation (weighted importance sampling, IPW pooled logistic regression)

Limitations

  • Observational nature with residual confounding; causal inference limited
  • Generalizability may vary with differing sepsis care patterns and vasopressin availability

Future Directions: Prospective pragmatic trials to test early vasopressin initiation rules and integration of AI decision support into sepsis pathways.

3. Impact of epinephrine on ropivacaine pharmacokinetics in TAP blocks: a randomized controlled trial.

70.5Level IRCTRegional anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025PMID: 40096993

In weight-adjusted (1 mg/kg) bilateral TAP blocks, epinephrine (1:200,000) did not increase total ropivacaine Cmax but significantly prolonged Tmax and reduced mean plasma concentrations over 240 minutes. No serious adverse events occurred; QT interval prolongation was observed in both groups.

Impact: Provides controlled pharmacokinetic evidence supporting epinephrine coadministration with ropivacaine in TAP blocks, informing safety and dosing strategies.

Clinical Implications: Including epinephrine may flatten systemic uptake (prolonged Tmax, lower Cmean) without increasing peak concentration, supporting routine use in TAP blocks while monitoring for QT changes in at-risk patients.

Key Findings

  • Epinephrine did not increase total ropivacaine Cmax (0.531 vs 0.746 μg/mL; NS).
  • Tmax was prolonged with epinephrine (165 vs 55.9 minutes; p<0.001) and Cmean reduced (p=0.005).
  • No serious adverse events; QT interval prolongation occurred in both groups.

Methodological Strengths

  • Randomized controlled design with weight-adjusted dosing
  • Assessment of both total and free ropivacaine and inclusion of α1-acid glycoprotein

Limitations

  • Small single-center sample size and limited 240-minute sampling window
  • Specific to laparoscopic colectomy; generalizability to other surgeries/blocks needs study

Future Directions: Larger trials linking PK to clinical analgesia duration and toxicity, and exploration in other fascial plane blocks and higher concentrations.