Skip to main content
Daily Report

Daily Anesthesiology Research Analysis

06/09/2025
3 papers selected
3 analyzed

Three anesthesiology-focused papers stand out today: a network meta-analysis clarifies that periarticular local infiltration analgesia provides the most consistent pain relief after total hip arthroplasty, while ketamine mechanistically prevents anesthetic-induced excess GABAA receptor function via BDNF–TrkB signaling, mitigating postoperative memory deficits in mice. A large prospective cohort shows explicit recall under sedation/regional anesthesia is common but not linked to depression or PTS

Summary

Three anesthesiology-focused papers stand out today: a network meta-analysis clarifies that periarticular local infiltration analgesia provides the most consistent pain relief after total hip arthroplasty, while ketamine mechanistically prevents anesthetic-induced excess GABAA receptor function via BDNF–TrkB signaling, mitigating postoperative memory deficits in mice. A large prospective cohort shows explicit recall under sedation/regional anesthesia is common but not linked to depression or PTSD, whereas surgery itself imposes a substantial new mental health burden.

Research Themes

  • Perioperative analgesia optimization for total hip arthroplasty
  • Ketamine’s mechanistic neuroprotection against postanesthetic cognitive deficits
  • Perioperative mental health burden and explicit recall under sedation

Selected Articles

1. Ketamine-induced Sustained Modulation of γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor Function in Mouse Hippocampal Neurons after Anesthesia.

85.5Level VBasic/Mechanistic research
Anesthesiology · 2025PMID: 40489634

Ketamine prevented anesthetic-triggered, sustained increases in tonic GABAA currents through facilitation of BDNF–TrkB signaling (via GSK-3β), independent of NMDA receptor antagonism. It reduced α5-GABAA surface expression and mitigated recognition and spatial memory deficits after sevoflurane in mice.

Impact: This study reveals a novel, non-NMDA mechanism by which ketamine protects against postanesthetic cognitive dysfunction, providing a mechanistic basis for cognitive-sparing strategies in anesthesia.

Clinical Implications: These findings support mechanistically informed trials testing ketamine as an adjunct to reduce postanesthetic cognitive deficits, and suggest targeting BDNF–TrkB signaling or α5-GABAA receptors as therapeutic avenues.

Key Findings

  • Ketamine prevented sustained increases in tonic GABAA currents induced by etomidate and sevoflurane.
  • Protection was mediated by BDNF–TrkB signaling via a GSK-3β-dependent pathway, independent of NMDA antagonism.
  • Ketamine increased cell-surface TrkB without changing BDNF levels and reduced α5-GABAA receptor surface expression.
  • In vivo, ketamine prevented recognition and spatial memory deficits after sevoflurane anesthesia.

Methodological Strengths

  • Integrated in vitro electrophysiology, molecular assays, and in vivo behavioral testing
  • Mechanistic dissection identifying BDNF–TrkB/GSK-3β pathway and α5-GABAA involvement

Limitations

  • Preclinical mouse and cell models limit direct clinical extrapolation
  • Short-term outcomes; dosing and timing relative to clinical anesthesia require validation

Future Directions: Conduct randomized clinical trials to test ketamine’s cognitive-sparing effect and evaluate pharmacologic targeting of TrkB or α5-GABAA receptors in humans.

BACKGROUND: Excess function of γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA A ) receptors that generate a tonic inhibitory conductance contributes to postanesthetic cognitive impairment. Ketamine may have postoperative cognition-sparing properties; however, whether it reduces excess GABA A receptor function is unknown. This study investigated whether ketamine prevents a sustained anesthetic-triggered increase in GABA A receptor function in vitro and mitigates postanesthetic memory deficits in vivo . METHODS: Murine hippocampal neurons and cortical astrocytes were cocultured and treated for 1 h with an injectable (etomidate) or an inhaled (sevoflurane) anesthetic, with or without ketamine. After 24 h, GABA A receptor-mediated tonic currents were recorded from neurons using whole cell patch clamp. Expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its receptor tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB) was assessed by biotinylation, Western blotting, ELISA, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Immunostaining was used to visualize α5 subunit-containing GABA A receptors in neurons. In vivo , adult mice were anesthetized with sevoflurane for 2 h, with or without ketamine, and recognition and spatial memory were assessed 24 and 48 h later, respectively. RESULTS: Ketamine prevented the sustained increase in GABA A receptor-mediated tonic currents triggered by etomidate and sevoflurane. This effect was independent of N -methyl- d -aspartate receptor antagonism and instead was mediated by BDNF-TrkB signaling through a GSK-3β-dependent pathway. Interestingly, ketamine did not alter BDNF levels but increased cell-surface expression of TrkB receptors and thereby facilitated BDNF-TrkB signaling. Ketamine also reduced the anesthetic-induced increase in cell-surface expression of α5 subunit-containing GABA A receptors. In vivo , ketamine prevented deficits in both recognition and spatial memory that occurred after sevoflurane anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine prevents the general anesthetic-induced sustained increase in GABA A receptor function by facilitating BDNF-TrkB signaling. This mechanism is associated with a mitigation of postanesthetic memory deficits in mice.

2. Analgesic Benefits of Motor-sparing Fascial Plane Blocks in Comparison to Periarticular Local Infiltration Analgesia for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Network Meta-analysis.

77Level ISystematic Review/Network Meta-analysis
Anesthesiology · 2025PMID: 40489642

Across 44 RCTs (n=3,579), periarticular local infiltration analgesia ranked best for 0–24 h rest pain, while quadratus lumborum block ranked best for reducing postoperative opioid consumption. Combining motor-sparing blocks (e.g., QL or PENG) with local infiltration may further enhance analgesia and recovery after THA.

Impact: This network meta-analysis synthesizes high-level evidence to guide perioperative analgesia strategies for THA, clarifying when to favor local infiltration versus adding motor-sparing blocks.

Clinical Implications: Adopt periarticular local infiltration analgesia as a core component for THA analgesia, and consider adding quadratus lumborum or PENG blocks to reduce opioid requirements while preserving motor function.

Key Findings

  • 44 RCTs with 3,579 patients were included in a frequentist network meta-analysis.
  • Periarticular local infiltration analgesia ranked best for 0–24 h rest pain (P score 89%).
  • Quadratus lumborum block ranked best for reducing postoperative analgesic consumption (P score 88%).
  • Combining local infiltration with QL or PENG blocks may further improve outcomes.

Methodological Strengths

  • Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with multiple interventions
  • Use of P scores and multiple clinically relevant outcomes (pain AUC, function, opioid use)

Limitations

  • Heterogeneity in block techniques and local infiltration regimens across trials
  • Potential indirectness and variable risk of bias inherent to network meta-analyses

Future Directions: Head-to-head RCTs combining periarticular local infiltration with specific motor-sparing blocks and standardized regimens, including safety and functional outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Periarticular local infiltration analgesia has become an important mainstay of multimodal analgesia after elective total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the role of novel motor-sparing fascial plane blocks-with or without periarticular local infiltration analgesia-has not been fully elucidated for patients undergoing THA. The authors conducted a network meta-analysis evaluating the relative analgesic effectiveness of motor-sparing fascial plane blocks (quadratus lumborum, erector spinae, and pericapsular nerve group blocks) and periarticular local infiltration analgesia for adult patients undergoing THA. METHODS: Randomized trials examining single-injection quadratus lumborum, erector spinae, or pericapsular nerve group blocks, or periarticular local infiltration analgesia, for THA were sought. The primary outcome was area under the curve (AUC) rest pain scores during the period from 0 to 24 h. Secondary outcomes included rest pain scores at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h; postoperative function at 6, 12, and 24 h; analgesic consumption at 0 to 24 h; incidence of opioid-related side effects; and incidence of block-related complications. Network meta-analysis was performed using a frequentist approach. RESULTS: A total of 44 trials (3,579 patients) evaluating the quadratus lumborum block, erector spinae block, pericapsular nerve group block, or periarticular local infiltration analgesia for THA were considered. Network meta-analysis was used to derive the probability of each intervention being the most effective as compared to the others (P score). For AUC 0 to 24 h rest pain, periarticular local infiltration analgesia was the most effective intervention, as demonstrated by a P score of 89%. For postoperative analgesic consumption, the quadratus lumborum block was the most effective intervention, with a P score of 88%. This was followed by the pericapsular nerve group block (74%), the erector spinae block (38%), and periarticular local infiltration analgesia (42%). CONCLUSIONS: Periarticular local infiltration analgesia alone provides the most consistent improvements in postoperative rest pain, analgesic consumption, and functional recovery after THA. The addition of a quadratus lumborum block or pericapsular nerve group block to periarticular local infiltration may further improve analgesic outcomes.

3. Psychological Effects of Explicit Recall under Sedation and after Surgery (PEERS): A Prospective Cohort Study on 2,500 Patients.

71.5Level IIProspective cohort
Anesthesiology · 2025PMID: 40489649

In 2,138 arthroplasty patients under sedation/regional anesthesia, explicit recall occurred in 22.2% but was not associated with probable depression or suspected PTSD at 6 weeks. However, surgery itself led to new depression (5%), suspected PTSD (5%), and suicidal ideation (4.4%), with approximately 1 in 18 patients requiring new psychiatric consultation.

Impact: This large prospective study reframes perioperative mental health priorities: explicit recall under sedation is not the driver of psychiatric morbidity; surgery is. It highlights the need for routine screening and early mental health support postoperatively.

Clinical Implications: Implement systematic postoperative mental health screening (e.g., PHQ, PTSD checklists), educate patients about recall under sedation, and build pathways for timely psychiatric referral following arthroplasty.

Key Findings

  • Explicit recall under sedation/regional anesthesia occurred in 22.2% (475/2,138).
  • Explicit recall was not associated with probable depression or suspected PTSD at 6 weeks.
  • New probable depression occurred in 5%, suspected PTSD in 5%, and suicidal ideation in 4.4% postoperatively.
  • Approximately 1 in 18 patients required a new psychiatric consultation after surgery.

Methodological Strengths

  • Prospective cohort with large sample and validated instruments (modified Brice, PHQ, PCL-C)
  • Multivariable regression to assess associations between recall experiences and outcomes

Limitations

  • Single-center arthroplasty population may limit generalizability
  • Six-week follow-up may miss longer-term psychiatric sequelae; reliance on self-report scales

Future Directions: Extend follow-up to assess long-term trajectories, test perioperative mental health interventions, and evaluate subgroup risks across procedures and sedation depths.

BACKGROUND: Explicit recall occurring during sedation/regional anesthesia is common but has long been assumed to have no sequelae. A prospective cohort study was conducted to determine the incidence of explicit recall experience under sedation/regional anesthesia, as well as to assess the recall experiences that are associated with psychological consequences. METHODS: The study prospectively recruited 2,500 adults who underwent elective total hip or knee arthroplasty under sedation/regional anesthesia from September 2021 to March 2024 at University Hospital in London, Ontario, Canada. The primary exposure was recall experience, assessed using the modified Brice questionnaire. The co-primary outcomes included probable depression (defined as a Patient Health Questionnaire score of 8 or higher) and suspected posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (defined as a Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for Civilians score of 13 or higher) at 6 weeks postoperatively. The association between specific recall experiences and the co-primary outcomes was evaluated by multivariable regression analysis. Additionally, the incidence and mental health burden related to the psychological effects of surgery in the entire cohort were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 2,138 patients were included in the final analysis. Explicit recall was reported by 475 participants (22.2%) but was not associated with the co-primary outcomes. Regarding surgery's overall impact, 61 participants (5%) developed new probable depression, 105 participants (5%) reported suspected PTSD, and 95 patients (4.4%) developed new suicidal ideation postoperatively. The authors estimated that 1 in 18 patients required new psychiatric consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Explicit recall per se during sedation/regional anesthesia did not increase the odds of developing psychiatric illness. Surgery itself carries significant risks of triggering depression and PTSD that are severe enough to reach levels associated with suicidal ideation, requiring immediate mental care. This study reveals a significant, yet underappreciated, mental healthcare burden.