Skip to main content
Daily Report

Daily Anesthesiology Research Analysis

07/05/2025
3 papers selected
3 analyzed

Three perioperative studies stand out today: a rigorous BJA systematic review/meta-analysis standardizes how to measure and report adherence to prehabilitation, a comprehensive BJA systematic review links perioperative autonomic imbalance to major postoperative complications and potential modulatory strategies, and a mixed retrospective–prospective study shows afternoon cesarean sections are associated with higher postoperative pain and analgesic requirements with biomarker correlates.

Summary

Three perioperative studies stand out today: a rigorous BJA systematic review/meta-analysis standardizes how to measure and report adherence to prehabilitation, a comprehensive BJA systematic review links perioperative autonomic imbalance to major postoperative complications and potential modulatory strategies, and a mixed retrospective–prospective study shows afternoon cesarean sections are associated with higher postoperative pain and analgesic requirements with biomarker correlates.

Research Themes

  • Standardizing adherence metrics in perioperative prehabilitation
  • Autonomic nervous system modulation to reduce postoperative complications
  • Chronobiology influences on postoperative pain after cesarean section

Selected Articles

1. Adherence to prehabilitation in adult surgical patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis, meta-regression, and qualitative synthesis.

78Level ISystematic Review/Meta-analysis
British journal of anaesthesia · 2025PMID: 40615328

Across 105 randomized trials (n=4941), pooled adherence to prehabilitation was 79%, but adherence metrics varied widely. Meta-regression found little credible evidence for predictors of adherence, while qualitative synthesis identified practical barriers and facilitators. The authors call for standardization of adherence definitions and reporting to strengthen evidence synthesis and implementation.

Impact: This work provides the most comprehensive synthesis to date of prehabilitation adherence, quantifying performance and exposing critical measurement heterogeneity that limits translation.

Clinical Implications: Use standardized, transparent adherence metrics in prehabilitation programs; address identified barriers (e.g., access, motivation, complexity) and leverage facilitators to improve uptake. Reporting adherence consistently will enable benchmarking and more reliable effectiveness estimates.

Key Findings

  • Pooled prehabilitation adherence across 105 trials (n=4941) was 79% (95% CI 70–88).
  • Adherence measurement and reporting were highly variable across studies, limiting comparability.
  • Meta-regression found little credible evidence for predictors of adherence; qualitative synthesis mapped barriers and facilitators using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Methodological Strengths

  • Comprehensive multi-database search with predefined protocol (PROSPERO CRD42024518851).
  • Random-effects meta-analysis, meta-regression, and qualitative synthesis using a theoretical framework.

Limitations

  • Heterogeneity in adherence definitions and metrics across trials.
  • Potential reporting biases and limited ability to identify robust predictors of adherence.

Future Directions: Develop consensus adherence definitions and core outcome sets; incorporate implementation science endpoints; evaluate digital/telehealth strategies to enhance adherence.

BACKGROUND: Prehabilitation is hypothesised to play an important role in optimising postoperative outcomes. However, achieving high adherence can be challenging. Our objectives were to synthesise current approaches to adherence measurement and reporting, estimate prehabilitation adherence across trials, identify procedural-, programme-, or patient-level factors associated with adherence, and report barriers and facilitators to adherence. METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, the CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception until April 10, 2024. We included randomised trials of adults undergoing major elective surgery allocated to a prehabilitation programme, with at least one binary or continuous measure of adherence to prehabilitation, to an individual component, or both. Random-effects meta-analysis pooled overall adherence rates; meta-regression evaluated predictors of adherence. Qualitative synthesis of reported barriers and facilitators was informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. RESULTS: We screened 11 652 titles and abstracts, followed by 1232 full texts, and included 105 trials (n=4941). Pooled adherence was 79% (95% confidence interval [CI] 70-88; I CONCLUSIONS: Prehabilitation adherence metrics are variable across trials and standardisation is required to improve reporting and interpretation of prehabilitation evidence. Little credible evidence identifies factors associated with adherence; however, qualitative barriers and facilitators could inform programme design and implementation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO (CRD42024518851).

2. Effect of perioperative autonomic nervous system imbalance on surgical outcomes: a systematic review.

77Level IISystematic Review
British journal of anaesthesia · 2025PMID: 40615330

This systematic review synthesizes mechanistic and clinical evidence that perioperative sympathetic–parasympathetic imbalance contributes to inflammation, cardiovascular instability, immunosuppression, neurocognitive decline, and possibly cancer recurrence. It outlines pharmacologic (e.g., dexmedetomidine, beta-blockers) and non-pharmacologic (e.g., temperature control, electroacupuncture) strategies that may restore autonomic balance.

Impact: It reframes perioperative risk through the lens of autonomic dysregulation and maps actionable targets for modulation, with potential to reduce common and serious postoperative complications.

Clinical Implications: Consider integrating ANS-aware strategies (dexmedetomidine, judicious β-blockade, normothermia, analgesia minimizing sympathetic surges, and selected non-pharmacologic approaches) into ERAS pathways; monitor for dysautonomia in high-risk patients.

Key Findings

  • Perioperative ANS imbalance drives stress responses, cardiovascular instability, impaired repair, and immunosuppression, increasing infection, neurocognitive decline, and organ dysfunction.
  • Low parasympathetic tone weakens the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway; sympathetic hyperactivity elevates catecholamines and pro-inflammatory cytokines.
  • Multiple pharmacologic (dexmedetomidine, β-blockers) and non-pharmacologic (electroacupuncture, temperature management) strategies may help restore autonomic balance.

Methodological Strengths

  • Comprehensive synthesis across basic and clinical studies.
  • Actionable mapping of therapeutic strategies linked to mechanistic pathways.

Limitations

  • Heterogeneous evidence base without unified quantitative effect estimates.
  • Potential publication bias and limited RCT data for some proposed interventions.

Future Directions: Prospective trials testing ANS-modulating bundles within ERAS; standardized perioperative dysautonomia metrics; integration of autonomic monitoring into risk stratification.

The autonomic nervous system (ANS) is essential for maintaining physiological homeostasis. Autonomic nervous system imbalance, characterised by sympathetic hyperactivation and low parasympathetic tone, can occur during the perioperative period. These changes drive systemic stress responses, cardiovascular instability, impaired tissue repair, and immunosuppression, which in turn increase infection risk, neurocognitive decline, and multiorgan dysfunction. Surgical trauma, anaesthesia, pain, hypothermia, and psychological stressors all contribute to this dysregulation, and consequently low parasympathetic tone results in the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway being less effective. High sympathetic nervous system activity promotes catecholamine surges and pro-inflammatory cytokine release. Pharmacological interventions, including dexmedetomidine and β-blockers, together with nonpharmacological strategies, such as electroacupuncture and temperature management, are measures that have potential to restore ANS balance. This systematic review covers ANS-mediated organ regulation, pathophysiological consequences of perioperative dysautonomia, and evidence-based therapeutic strategies. By integrating findings from multiple basic and clinical studies, the pivotal roles of ANS modulation in mitigating postoperative complications, including neurocognitive disorders, immunosuppression, and cancer recurrence, are discussed. Maintaining balance of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems is an important prospect in perioperative medicine that could benefit surgical patients' short- or long-term recovery.

3. Effects of daytime variation on pain intensity and analgesic requirement after cesarean section: a retrospective and prospective study.

63Level IIICohort
Annals of medicine · 2025PMID: 40616594

Afternoon cesarean sections were associated with higher 24-hour postoperative pain (NRS AUC) and analgesic consumption than morning procedures. Prospective biomarker and psychophysical testing suggested lower postoperative pressure pain tolerance and increased endorphin and IL-6 responses after afternoon CS.

Impact: Identifying a circadian effect on post-cesarean pain with biologic correlates provides a rationale for time-tailored analgesia and staffing in obstetric anesthesia.

Clinical Implications: Consider proactive multimodal analgesia (e.g., neuraxial adjuncts, scheduled non-opioids, regional blocks) and monitoring for patients undergoing afternoon CS; incorporate chronobiology into obstetric anesthesia planning.

Key Findings

  • Afternoon CS was associated with higher 24-hour analgesic requirements compared to morning CS.
  • Pain NRS AUC and total analgesic consumption over 24 hours were higher after afternoon CS.
  • Postoperative pressure pain tolerance decreased and serum endorphin and IL-6 increased after afternoon CS, but not after morning CS.

Methodological Strengths

  • Combined retrospective cohort with prospective psychophysical and biomarker assessments.
  • Registered protocol (ChiCTR2000039720) and objective endpoints (IL-6, endorphin, pain tolerance).

Limitations

  • Single-center study with potential confounding by case-mix and workflow.
  • Details on sample size and analgesic protocols are limited in the abstract; not randomized.

Future Directions: Conduct multicenter randomized or time-blocked trials testing time-tailored analgesic strategies and exploring mechanistic circadian pathways.

BACKGROUND: This study compared postoperative pain and analgesic requirements in women who underwent cesarean section (CS) in the morning and afternoon. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: It is unclear whether there was difference in postoperative pain intensity and analgesic requirements between morning and afternoon CS. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare postoperative analgesic requirements between women who underwent CS during 06:00-12:00 (morning group, RESULTS: The frequency of analgesic requirements 24 h after CS in the afternoon group was significantly higher than morning group in the retrospective cohort. The AUC of pain NRS and analgesic consumption during 24 h after afternoon CS were significantly higher than those after morning procedures. Significantly lower pressure pain tolerance, higher postoperative serum endorphin levels and higher levels of interleukin-6 were found in the afternoon group compared to those preoperatively, but not in the morning group. CONCLUSION: CS performed in the afternoon predicted severer postoperative pain compared to those performed in the morning, which might be associated with lower postoperative pain tolerance and more drastic responses to surgery. This finding needs to be considered in pain treatment after CS in the future. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER AND REGISTRY URL: ChiCTR2000039720, www.chictr.org.cn.