Skip to main content
Daily Report

Daily Anesthesiology Research Analysis

09/08/2025
3 papers selected
3 analyzed

Today’s most impactful anesthesiology-adjacent research spans mechanistic insight into post–ICU sequelae, large-scale practice variation in intraoperative monitoring, and pragmatic health economics in ICU rehabilitation. A translational study implicates impaired Apelin–APJ signaling in post–intensive care syndrome; registry data show hospital-driven variability in pulmonary arterial catheter use during cardiac surgery; and a trial-based economic evaluation finds early in-bed cycling is unlikely

Summary

Today’s most impactful anesthesiology-adjacent research spans mechanistic insight into post–ICU sequelae, large-scale practice variation in intraoperative monitoring, and pragmatic health economics in ICU rehabilitation. A translational study implicates impaired Apelin–APJ signaling in post–intensive care syndrome; registry data show hospital-driven variability in pulmonary arterial catheter use during cardiac surgery; and a trial-based economic evaluation finds early in-bed cycling is unlikely to be cost-effective over 90 days.

Research Themes

  • Translational mechanisms of post-ICU morbidity (Apelin–APJ signaling)
  • Practice variation and monitoring in cardiac anesthesia (pulmonary arterial catheter use)
  • Health economics of ICU rehabilitation (in-bed cycling cost-effectiveness)

Selected Articles

1. Protective Role of Apelin in a Mouse Model of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome.

82.5Level VBasic/Mechanistic Research
American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2025PMID: 40920972

In a murine model combining lung injury and immobilization, impaired Apelin–APJ signaling drove multisystem PICS-like phenotypes that were reversed by muscle-specific Apelin overexpression and worsened by Apelin deficiency. Human ARDS survivors with ICU-acquired weakness had lower plasma Apelin, higher IL-6, and PBMC transcriptomic signatures paralleling murine neuroinflammatory programs.

Impact: This study provides a mechanistic and translational link between Apelin signaling and PICS, integrating in vivo models, single-cell transcriptomics, and human biomarker/transcriptomic data to nominate a modifiable pathway.

Clinical Implications: Apelin could serve as a biomarker and therapeutic target for ICU survivors at risk of PICS. Measuring plasma Apelin/IL-6 and developing tissue-specific modulators of Apelin–APJ signaling may enable risk stratification and intervention trials.

Key Findings

  • A combined acute lung injury plus immobilization mouse model recapitulated PICS-like muscle atrophy, lung inflammation, and neurobehavioral deficits.
  • Brain single-cell RNA-seq showed upregulated Alzheimer’s disease, depression, and neuroinflammation programs in endothelial cells and microglia.
  • Skeletal muscle Apelin–APJ signaling was downregulated; Apelin deficiency worsened, and muscle-specific Apelin overexpression attenuated PICS-like changes and reduced systemic IL-6.
  • In ARDS survivors with severe COVID-19, ICU-acquired weakness was associated with lower plasma Apelin, higher IL-6, and PBMC signatures linked to depression/neurodegeneration.

Methodological Strengths

  • Multi-system, cross-species approach integrating murine models, single-cell transcriptomics, and human biomarker/transcriptomic data
  • Genetic and tissue-specific modulation (Apelin deficiency and muscle-specific overexpression) with convergent phenotypic and cytokine readouts

Limitations

  • Animal model generalizability to human PICS is uncertain; causality in humans remains unproven
  • Tissue-specific contributions beyond skeletal muscle require clarification; sample sizes for human cohorts not specified in abstract

Future Directions: Prospective human studies to validate Apelin as a predictive biomarker and interventional trials testing Apelin–APJ pathway modulators (e.g., agonists or gene therapy) with organ-specific targeting.

Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) is a serious condition involving physical weakness, depression, and cognitive impairment that develop during or after an intensive care unit (ICU) stay, often resulting in long-term declines in quality of life. Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and severe COVID-19 are at particularly high risk, yet the molecular mechanisms underlying PICS remain poorly understood. Here, we identify impaired Apelin-APJ signaling as a potential contributor to PICS pathogenesis via disruption of inter-organ homeostasis. Using a mouse model combining acute lung injury and hindlimb immobilization, we observed PICS-like features including muscle atrophy, lung inflammation, and neurobehavioral abnormalities such as anxiety-like behavior and special working memory. Single-cell RNA sequencing in brain revealed upregulation of gene programs associated with Alzheimer disease, depression, and neuroinflammation, particularly in endothelial cells and microglia. Concurrently, Apelin-APJ signaling was downregulated in skeletal muscle. These changes were exacerbated in Apelin-deficient mice and attenuated by muscle-specific Apelin overexpression, which also reduced systemic IL-6 and restored circulating Apelin levels. In ARDS survivors with severe COVID-19, ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) was associated with reduced plasma Apelin and elevated IL-6 levels. Transcriptomic profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from ICU-AW patients showed gene expression signatures linked to depression and neurodegeneration, mirroring murine findings. These data suggest that impaired Apelin-APJ signaling may play a role in PICS pathophysiology. While skeletal muscle appears to contribute to systemic Apelin levels, further studies are needed to clarify tissue-specific roles. Modulating this pathway could offer a therapeutic strategy to mitigate long-term outcomes in ICU survivors.

2. Cost-Effectiveness of In-Bed Cycling and Routine Physiotherapy for Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation.

71Level IIRCT
JAMA network open · 2025PMID: 40920382

Among 360 ventilated ICU patients, adding early in-bed cycling (per-patient program cost CA$321) to usual physiotherapy yielded no significant differences in 90-day costs or QALYs versus usual care. The probability of cost-effectiveness was 0.19 at a CA$50,000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold.

Impact: Provides trial-based economic evidence challenging routine adoption of in-bed cycling for short-term value, informing ICU rehabilitation resource allocation.

Clinical Implications: Routine addition of in-bed cycling solely for economic benefit is not supported over 90 days. Programs should consider broader outcomes, patient selection, and longer time horizons before implementation.

Key Findings

  • Trial-based economic evaluation of 360 ICU patients across 16 centers found no significant differences in 90-day costs or QALYs between cycling+physiotherapy and physiotherapy alone.
  • Per-patient cycling program cost was CA$321 (≈0.5% of index hospitalization costs).
  • The probability of cost-effectiveness was 0.19 at a $50,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold.

Methodological Strengths

  • Randomized trial-based economic evaluation with multicenter, international recruitment
  • Societal perspective with standardized cost and QALY measurement over a defined 90-day horizon

Limitations

  • 90-day time horizon may miss longer-term benefits of cycling on function and quality of life
  • Potential underpowering to detect small QALY differences; generalizability may vary across health systems

Future Directions: Longer-horizon cost-effectiveness analyses incorporating 6–12 month functional outcomes and stratified evaluations to identify subgroups most likely to benefit.

IMPORTANCE: The cost-effectiveness of adding early in-bed cycling to usual physiotherapy among adults receiving mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) compared with usual physiotherapy alone is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of in-bed cycling plus usual physiotherapy compared with usual therapy alone in the Critical Care Cycling to Improve Lower Extremity Strength (CYCLE) randomized clinical trial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This trial-based economic evaluation with a 90-day time horizon compared early cycling plus usual physiotherapy vs usual physiotherapy alone from a societal perspective. Adult ICU patients (aged ≥18 years) receiving mechanical ventilation were recruited from 16 ICUs in Canada, the US, and Australia. Enrollment occurred from November 1, 2016, to May 30, 2023, with the last follow-up on August 3, 2023. INTERVENTIONS: Intervention group participants were offered 30 minutes per day of cycling in addition to usual physiotherapy on weekdays, starting within the first 4 days of mechanical ventilation. Cycling continued until the patient could march on the spot for 2 consecutive days, ICU discharge, or for 28 days, whichever occurred first. Usual care participants were offered individualized physiotherapy according to local practices and patient alertness. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Differences in costs (in 2024 Canadian dollars [CA$]) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) between the groups were calculated.

3. Practice Pattern Variability in the Use of Pulmonary Arterial Catheters in Cardiac Surgery.

70Level IIICross-sectional
Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2025PMID: 40915872

In 145,343 cardiac surgeries across 53 US academic hospitals, intraoperative PACs were used in 72% of cases with extreme variability across sites (0–98%) and clinicians (0–100%). Hospital practice patterns dominated utilization (MOR 15.0), far outweighing anesthesiologist-level variation within hospitals.

Impact: Reveals substantial, hospital-driven variation in invasive monitoring for cardiac surgery, highlighting opportunities for standardization and value-based care.

Clinical Implications: Institutions should develop evidence-informed indications and auditing for PAC use, focusing on high-variance procedures and hospital-level practice to reduce unwarranted variation.

Key Findings

  • PACs were used in 72% of 145,343 cardiac surgeries; utilization ranged 0–98% across hospitals and 0–100% across anesthesiologists.
  • Hospital practice patterns were the dominant determinant of PAC use (MOR 15.00; 95% CI, 8.98–28.32), with smaller within-hospital anesthesiologist variation (MOR 1.70).
  • Highest PAC use in heart (94%) and lung (87%) transplants; lowest in pulmonic valve procedures (30%).

Methodological Strengths

  • Very large, multicenter registry with mixed-effects modeling to partition variance
  • Objective PAC ascertainment using physiologic signal criteria and MOR to quantify practice variation

Limitations

  • Observational design susceptible to residual confounding and misclassification despite physiologic definitions
  • Findings from US academic centers may not generalize to nonacademic/community settings

Future Directions: Develop and test consensus-based indications and hospital-level feedback interventions to reduce unwarranted variability and evaluate impact on outcomes and costs.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify intraoperative pulmonary arterial catheter (PAC) use during cardiac surgery and identify hospital-, anesthesiologist-, and patient-level factors associated with PAC utilization. DESIGN: A cross-sectional, observational study using generalized logistic mixed models to examine variations in PAC use. SETTING: Fifty-three US academic hospitals participating in the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG) national registry PARTICIPANTS: 145,343 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022. INTERVENTION(S): Receipt of intraoperative PAC, defined by ≥60 minutes of physiologically plausible pulmonary arterial pressures. MEASUREMENTS & MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was PAC utilization. Mixed-effects logistic regression quantified fixed-effect predictors, and variation attributable to anesthesiologists and then to anesthesiologists nested within a hospital was characterized using median odds ratio (MOR). Of the 145,343 cardiac surgeries performed across 53 hospitals, 104,626 (72%) included PAC monitoring. PAC use varied widely across hospitals (0-98%) and across anesthesiologists (0-100%). PAC was used most frequently in heart transplants (94%) and lung transplants (87%) and least frequently in pulmonic valve procedures (30%). A patient's likelihood of receiving a PAC was influenced most strongly by hospital (MOR, 15.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.98-28.32), with substantially less variation attributable to an anesthesiologist within the same hospital (MOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.61-1.81). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative PAC monitoring is used in nearly three-quarters of cardiac surgeries at US academic centers, with hospital practice pattern the factor most closely associated with PAC utilization.