Daily Anesthesiology Research Analysis
Three anesthesia-relevant studies stand out today: a double-blind RCT shows that propofol may blunt the renoprotective biomarker response to remote ischemic preconditioning compared with sevoflurane in cardiac surgery; a large two-cohort analysis supports maintaining intraoperative MAP ≥70 mm Hg in older adults to reduce MACE; and a randomized non-inferiority trial finds continuous costoclavicular brachial plexus block provides comparable shoulder analgesia to interscalene block with markedly le
Summary
Three anesthesia-relevant studies stand out today: a double-blind RCT shows that propofol may blunt the renoprotective biomarker response to remote ischemic preconditioning compared with sevoflurane in cardiac surgery; a large two-cohort analysis supports maintaining intraoperative MAP ≥70 mm Hg in older adults to reduce MACE; and a randomized non-inferiority trial finds continuous costoclavicular brachial plexus block provides comparable shoulder analgesia to interscalene block with markedly less hemidiaphragmatic paresis.
Research Themes
- Anesthetic choice and organ protection
- Intraoperative hemodynamic thresholds in older adults
- Phrenic-sparing regional anesthesia for shoulder surgery
Selected Articles
1. Impact of propofol or sevoflurane on the renoprotective effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning in cardiac surgery: the HypnoRenalRIP randomised clinical trial.
In a double-blind factorial RCT of 160 high-risk cardiac surgery patients, RIPC increased the urinary [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7] biomarker only under sevoflurane anesthesia, not propofol. Sevoflurane plus RIPC uniquely avoided a postoperative biomarker rise consistent with renal stress; patient-centered outcomes did not differ across groups.
Impact: This RCT provides mechanistic evidence that anesthetic choice modulates the renal biomarker response to RIPC, suggesting propofol may blunt preconditioning benefits.
Clinical Implications: When employing RIPC strategies for renal protection in cardiac surgery, sevoflurane may be preferable to propofol to preserve the preconditioning-associated biomarker response; however, confirmatory trials with clinical AKI endpoints are needed.
Key Findings
- RIPC-induced rise in urinary [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7] occurred under sevoflurane but not propofol (P=0.022).
- Postoperative renal stress biomarker elevation was absent only in the sevoflurane+RIPC arm (P=0.001 versus other arms).
- No statistically significant differences in patient-centered outcomes across groups.
Methodological Strengths
- Prospective, randomized, double-blind, 2×2 factorial design
- Objective, validated renal stress biomarker ([TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7]) as primary endpoint
Limitations
- Single-centre trial with biomarker primary endpoint rather than clinical AKI
- No differences in patient-centered outcomes; sample size may limit detection of clinical effects
Future Directions: Conduct multicentre RCTs powered for clinical AKI and long-term renal outcomes to test whether anesthetic choice modifies RIPC’s clinical efficacy.
BACKGROUND: Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) might reduce acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Protective effects appear to be restricted to patients with early and transient increases in two cell cycle arrest markers, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2) and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7), in urine. Studies suggest that propofol can attenuate the preconditioning effect on the myocardium. This study investigated whether propofol diminishes the renoprotective effect associated with the early transient increases in TIMP-2 and IGFBP7. METHODS: This was a single-centre, prospective randomised double-blind 2×2 factorial clinical trial of high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Patients were randomised to receive either propofol+sham-RIPC, propofol+RIPC, sevoflurane+sham-RIPC, or sevoflurane+RIPC. The primary outcome measure was the change in the product of urinary concentrations of TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 ([TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7]) from before to after the intervention. RESULTS: We enrolled 160 participants in the trial (propofol+sham-RIPC: n=20, propofol+RIPC: n=60, sevoflurane+sham-RIPC: n=20, sevoflurane+RIPC: n=60). The median change in [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7] as an indicator of response to RIPC was greater in participants receiving sevoflurane (0.070; interquartile range, -0.120 to 0.418) compared with those receiving propofol (-0.015; interquartile range, -0.138 to 0.068; P=0.022). Conversely, elevated [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7] as a sign of renal stress in response to surgery was detected in all groups except for sevoflurane+RIPC (P=0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in patient-centred outcomes between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Transient increases in [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7] induced by RIPC, which were associated with renoprotective effects, were only seen with sevoflurane anaesthesia, but not when propofol was used. The association of biomarker concentrations and choice of anaesthetic agent suggests that propofol can attenuate the renoprotective effects of remote ischaemic preconditioning. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00014989.
2. Comparison of the analgesic efficacy between the ultrasound-guided continuous costoclavicular brachial plexus block and ultrasound-guided continuous interscalene brachial plexus block: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
In a randomized single-blind trial in rotator cuff repair, continuous costoclavicular block was non-inferior to interscalene block for 24-hour pain scores and markedly reduced early complete hemidiaphragmatic paresis (7.3% vs 41.5%). Procedure time and sensory onset were slightly longer with costoclavicular, while opioid use and satisfaction were similar.
Impact: Demonstrates a phrenic-sparing alternative to interscalene analgesia without sacrificing pain control, directly informing regional anesthesia practice for shoulder surgery.
Clinical Implications: For patients at risk of respiratory compromise (e.g., COPD, contralateral diaphragmatic dysfunction), continuous costoclavicular block may be preferred to reduce hemidiaphragmatic paresis while maintaining analgesia.
Key Findings
- CCB was non-inferior to ISB for 24-hour resting NRS pain (mean difference 0.41; 95% CI 0.1–0.73).
- Early complete hemidiaphragmatic paresis was far less frequent with CCB (7.3%) than ISB (41.5%; P<0.001), with no complete HDP at 24 h in either group.
- CCB had slightly longer block performance time and sensory onset; opioid consumption, rescue analgesia, and satisfaction were comparable.
Methodological Strengths
- Randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority design
- Clinically meaningful safety endpoint (hemidiaphragmatic paresis) alongside analgesic efficacy
Limitations
- Sample size and single-centre conduct may limit generalizability
- Slightly longer block time and sensory onset with CCB could impact workflow
Future Directions: Multicentre trials with standardized diaphragm ultrasound and respiratory outcomes, and studies in high-risk pulmonary populations to validate benefits.
BACKGROUND: The continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) is widely used for regional anesthesia in shoulder surgeries. Although the continuous costoclavicular brachial plexus block (CCB) has been proposed, its comparative efficacy and safety remain unclear. This randomized, single-blind trial aimed to determine whether the CCB offers non-inferior postoperative analgesia compared to the ISB while mitigating hemidiaphragmatic paresis (HDP). METHODS: patients underwent rotator cuff repair received continuous ISB or CCB followed by 0.2% ropivacaine infusion postoperatively. The primary outcome was the resting numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included block-related parameters, dynamic and resting pain scores, HDP incidence, opioid consumption, rescue analgesia requirements, and satisfaction scores. RESULTS: Resting NRS scores at 24 h demonstrated the non-inferiority of the CCB compared to the ISB (2.41 ± 0.59 vs. 2.00 ± 0.81; mean difference: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.1-0.73). The CCB significantly reduced the incidence of early complete HDP (30 min post-block: 7.3% vs. 41.5%; P < 0.001), with no incidence of complete HDP at 24 h. The CCB had longer block times (19.2 ± 3.7 vs. 17.2 ± 3.6 min; P = 0.013) and sensory onet (24.0 [21.0-24.0] vs. 18.0 [18.0-21.0] min; P < 0.001). Total ropivacaine consumption, rescue analgesia, or satisfaction scores were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: The continuous CCB is non-inferior to the ISB in terms of postoperative analgesia after rotator cuff repair and substantially decreases the risk of HDP. These findings support the CCB as a clinically advantageous alternative for shoulder surgery analgesia.
3. Intraoperative Hypotension and Major Adverse Cardiac Events Among Older Adult Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Across two large cohorts of older adults, intraoperative MAP <70 mm Hg was associated with higher MACE risk, with a clear exposure–response and a marked risk increase when duration below threshold exceeded 15 minutes. Findings were reproduced in an external 2024 cohort.
Impact: Defines a pragmatic MAP target in older adults with external validation, supporting intraoperative BP management strategies to reduce cardiac complications.
Clinical Implications: For patients ≥65 years undergoing noncardiac surgery, avoid MAP <70 mm Hg, especially durations >15 minutes; incorporate time under threshold into hemodynamic protocols and decision-support.
Key Findings
- MAP <70 mm Hg was the absolute threshold linked to higher MACE in an older-adult cohort.
- Exposure–response observed across duration, area under threshold, and time-weighted average; >15 minutes below 70 mm Hg significantly increased MACE (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.22–1.88).
- Association replicated in an external 2024 cohort (13,418 patients).
Methodological Strengths
- Very large sample size with external validation in an independent cohort
- Robust modelling (restricted cubic splines) and multiple exposure metrics (duration, area, time-weighted MAP)
Limitations
- Retrospective design with potential residual confounding and center-specific practices
- Outcome ascertainment and BP measurement granularity may vary; threshold choice is observational
Future Directions: Prospective trials testing MAP targets (e.g., ≥70 mm Hg) and decision-support systems that minimize time below threshold to establish causality and outcome benefit.
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) is an important risk factor for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. However, the IOH threshold in older adult patients remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore an appropriate IOH threshold in older adult patients to decrease the risk of MACE. METHODS: This study involved older adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery (age ≥65 y) from January 2012 to August 2019 in the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital (PLAGH; 35,262 patients) and Shanghai Changhai Hospital from January 2024 to December 2024 (13,418 patients). Univariate moving-average plots and multivariate restricted cubic splines were used to determine the IOH thresholds associated with an increased risk of MACE. The relationship between the IOH threshold and MACE was assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses by 3 different hypotension exposure forms (duration, area, and time-weighted average mean arterial pressure [MAP]). RESULTS: Out of 35,262 patients, 874 developed MACE in PLAGH, and 296 of 13,418 patients developed MACE in Changhai Hospital. In PLAGH, MAP below an absolute threshold of 70 mm Hg was associated with MACE. When the IOH absolute threshold was 70 mm Hg, the risk of MACE demonstrated a "dose-increasing" effect with changes in IOH exposure, and the risk of MACE was significantly increased when the duration lasted >15 minutes (odds ratio 1.51, 95% CI 1.22-1.88; P<.001). The stratified analysis showed that in patients younger than 80 years, when intraoperative MAP dropped below 70 mm Hg for more than 15 minutes, the odds ratio was 1.38 (95% CI 0.86-2.28), P<.01. In Changhai hospital, intraoperative MAP <70 mm Hg was also significantly associated with MACE. Furthermore, IOH lasting longer than 15 minutes substantially increased the risk of MACE. CONCLUSIONS: For older adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, intraoperative MAP should be kept above 70 mm Hg to reduce the risk of postoperative MACE.