Skip to main content
Daily Report

Daily Anesthesiology Research Analysis

03/24/2026
3 papers selected
73 analyzed

Analyzed 73 papers and selected 3 impactful papers.

Summary

Today’s most impactful anesthesiology/critical care papers span perioperative analgesia, ECMO physiology, and sepsis definition. A randomized trial shows liposomal bupivacaine prolongs thoracic paravertebral block analgesia after VATS. A porcine study introduces trans-ECMO thermodilution to quantify recirculation and accurately estimate mixed venous oxygenation, while an SCCM/ESICM Delphi consensus defines clinical criteria for refractory septic shock.

Research Themes

  • Perioperative analgesia innovation and regional anesthesia optimization
  • ECMO recirculation physiology and noninvasive monitoring
  • Consensus clinical criteria for refractory septic shock

Selected Articles

1. Effect of liposomal bupivacaine thoracic paravertebral block on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

77Level IRCT
Regional anesthesia and pain medicine · 2026PMID: 41871916

In adults undergoing VATS, TPVB with liposomal bupivacaine prolonged analgesia by a mean of 417 minutes versus bupivacaine plus dexamethasone and improved early pain profiles. Signals of earlier ambulation and flatus and greater patient satisfaction were observed without increased adverse events.

Impact: This RCT directly informs regional anesthesia practice by demonstrating clinically meaningful, longer-lasting analgesia with liposomal bupivacaine for TPVB after thoracic surgery.

Clinical Implications: Consider liposomal bupivacaine for TPVB in VATS analgesia pathways to extend block duration and potentially reduce opioid needs, while weighing cost, availability, and institutional protocols.

Key Findings

  • Analgesia duration was significantly longer with liposomal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine+dexamethasone (1160.4±403.8 min vs 743.1±216.8 min; p<0.001), a mean 417 min (56%) extension.
  • Lower NRS pain scores at rest and with coughing on postoperative day 1 and reduced 72-hour AUCs for pain (rest: 67.5 vs 87.9; cough: 213.9 vs 244.0) favored liposomal bupivacaine.
  • Exploratory outcomes suggested lower day-1 oxycodone use, earlier ambulation and flatus, and higher satisfaction, with no differences in intraoperative sufentanil, LOS, or adverse events.

Methodological Strengths

  • Randomized controlled design with prespecified primary outcome (duration of analgesia).
  • Comprehensive secondary endpoints capturing pain trajectory, opioid use, recovery milestones, and safety.

Limitations

  • Single-center study with modest sample size; blinding procedures not detailed.
  • Some secondary outcomes were exploratory and may be underpowered; cost-effectiveness not assessed.

Future Directions: Multicenter, blinded trials to confirm efficacy and safety, define optimal dosing/volume/levels, and evaluate cost-effectiveness and longer-term recovery and chronic pain outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) can provide effective analgesia for patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). However, the duration of analgesia achieved with conventional local anesthetics combined with dexamethasone remains limited. This study aimed to determine if liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is superior to bupivacaine combined with dexamethasone (BD) with respect to duration of postoperative analgesia in VATS patients. METHODS: Adults scheduled for VATS were randomized to treatment with LB or BD. The primary outcome was duration of analgesia. Secondary outcomes involved Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, cumulative oxycodone consumption, total intraoperative sufentanil consumption, first times to ambulation and flatus, length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction level, and incidence of adverse reactions. RESULTS: Of 93 total subjects, 78 were randomized into two groups (n=39 each). The LB group demonstrated a significantly prolonged duration of analgesia compared with the BD group (1160.4±403.8 min vs 743.1±216.8 min, p<0.001), with a mean increase of 417 min (a 56% extension). LB was associated with lower resting and cough NRS pain scores on the first postoperative day. The 72-hour area under the curve values for scores for resting pain (67.5 vs 87.9) and pain during cough (213.9 vs 244.0) were lower for the LB group versus the BD group. In exploratory analyses, cumulative oxycodone consumption on the first postoperative day was numerically lower in the LB group. Subjects receiving treatment LB had lower cumulative oxycodone consumption on the first postoperative day, earlier times to first ambulation and first flatus, and higher satisfaction scores as compared with subjects receiving BD. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of total intraoperative sufentanil consumption, duration of hospital stay, or incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSION: In VATS patients receiving TPVB, LB significantly prolonged the duration of postoperative analgesia compared with BD. Exploratory secondary outcomes suggested modest improvements in early pain profiles and potential opioid-sparing and early recovery benefits. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2500095090.

2. Recirculation quantified by Trans-ECMO thermodilution to predict mixed venous oxygenation during V-V ECMO: an in vivo porcine study.

74.5Level VBasic/Mechanistic Research
Anesthesiology · 2026PMID: 41874371

Trans-ECMO thermodilution quantified recirculation during V-V ECMO in vivo and identified the ECMO flow-to-cardiac output ratio as a key determinant. The method enabled highly accurate noninvasive estimation of mixed venous oxygen content and saturation, suggesting a practical approach to guide ECMO flow titration.

Impact: Introduces a bedside-feasible, mechanistically grounded method to quantify recirculation and estimate SvO2 without a pulmonary artery catheter, addressing a common cause of refractory hypoxemia in V-V ECMO.

Clinical Implications: ECMO teams could use TET-derived recirculation and noninvasive SvO2 to titrate flows and assess cannulation strategies, recognizing that increasing flow may worsen recirculation depending on the flow/CO ratio.

Key Findings

  • Median recirculation was 7.4% (IQR 1.1–22.0) with marked variability; in 45% of measurements, significant recirculation (~27.4% median) was observed.
  • The extracorporeal blood flow-to-cardiac output ratio was the only physiological determinant of recirculation (r=0.67 overall; r=0.81 in significant recirculation conditions).
  • Noninvasive estimation of mixed venous oxygenation using measured recirculation achieved r=0.98 with minimal bias for both oxygen content and saturation.

Methodological Strengths

  • Combined in vivo hemodynamic/thermal measurements with validated computational modeling across repeated measures.
  • Rigorous quantification using AUC-based thermodilution curves and mixed-effects analysis for determinants.

Limitations

  • Animal model with small sample size (n=8) and fixed cannulation configuration limits generalizability.
  • No assessment of clinical outcomes or validation in human ECMO circuits.

Future Directions: Prospective human validation studies integrating TET into ECMO consoles, exploring different cannulation strategies, and testing algorithmic flow optimization against patient-centered outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Recirculation is a major contributor to refractory hypoxemia during veno-venous ECMO (V-V ECMO), yet it remains difficult to measure at the bedside. In an animal study, we applied the trans-ECMO thermodilution (TET) to quantify the phenomenon, identify its determinants and estimate the mixed venous oxygenation non-invasively. METHODS: Eight pigs (65±3 kg) were anesthetized and cannulated for femoral-jugular V-V ECMO. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was induced using oleic (n=4) or hydrochloric acid (n=4) targeting a PaO 2 /FiO 2 of 150 mmHg. The experiment lasted 24 hours, with serial measurements of blood gases, hemodynamics and respiratory mechanics. TET was performed by injecting a bolus of cold saline downstream the membrane lung and by recording the resulting temperature changes in the drainage and return cannulas. Recirculation was calculated as the ratio of the areas under the temperature-time curves (AUCs). The determinants of the recirculation were analyzed with mixed linear models, including a random intercept. The measured recirculation was incorporated in a series of mass-transfer equations to estimate the mixed venous oxygen content and saturation. RESULTS: Median recirculation was 7.4% IQR [1.1-22.0] and presented large inter-subject variability. In 55% of measurements, recirculation was <10% (minimal recirculation, MR). In the remaining measurements, the recirculation measured 27.4 [15.0- 43.5] (significant recirculation, SR). The ratio of extracorporeal blood flow to cardiac output (ECS F ) measured 0.63 [0.55-0.72] and was the only physiological factor correlated with recirculation (overall Pearson correlation coefficient r=0.67, in the SR r =0.81). The distance between the tip of the cannulas was, in our setup, non-significantly associated to the recirculation (p=0.74). An increased recirculation was modestly associated with a decreased mixed venous PO 2 (r=-0.37). The non-invasive estimation of the mixed venous oxygenation was highly accurate (r=0.98, bias +0.48 ml/100 ml for the oxygen content, r=0.98, bias +4% for saturation). CONCLUSIONS: TET is a promising technique to measure the recirculation during V-V ECMO. Increasing the blood flow does not always lead to an improvement in oxygenation given the tight relationship between ECS F and recirculation. The proposed numerical method allows the non-invasive estimation of the mixed venous oxygenation without the need of a pulmonary artery catheter.

3. Clinical criteria for the definition of refractory septic shock: a joint Delphi consensus from the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).

74.5Level IVSystematic Review
Intensive care medicine · 2026PMID: 41874620

An international SCCM/ESICM panel reached consensus on 13 clinical criteria to define refractory septic shock, emphasizing tissue hypoperfusion (lactate, capillary refill), fluid nonresponsiveness, high-dose vasopressors (norepinephrine equivalents >0.5 µg/kg/min), and critical care ultrasound when mixed shock is suspected.

Impact: Provides a unified, practice-ready definition of refractory septic shock to standardize recognition, guide escalation, and harmonize research endpoints across ICUs.

Clinical Implications: Clinicians can apply the consensus criteria to identify refractory cases, justify escalation (adjunct vasopressors, mechanical support), and structure protocols and trials around standardized thresholds.

Key Findings

  • Consensus achieved on 13 criteria across eight domains using a five-round Delphi with 56 experts.
  • Tissue perfusion markers (lactate and capillary refill time) and assessment of fluid responsiveness after initial resuscitation were endorsed.
  • Use of norepinephrine-equivalent dose >0.5 µg/kg/min and critical care ultrasound in suspected mixed shock were selected as key criteria.

Methodological Strengths

  • Multinational, multiprofessional expert panel with predefined consensus thresholds and stability checks over multiple rounds.
  • Systematic scope across domains (perfusion, vasopressors, organ dysfunction) integrating literature, expert statements, and practice.

Limitations

  • Consensus-based criteria lack prospective outcome validation; cut-offs are expert-derived.
  • Implementation and measurement variability (e.g., capillary refill) may affect generalizability and adherence.

Future Directions: Prospective validation of the criteria across ICUs, linking thresholds to outcomes, and use for trial enrollment stratification and adaptive management pathways.

OBJECTIVE: A definition of refractory septic shock is necessary to guide diagnosis, management, prognostication, research, and future guidelines for this most severe form of the disease. We sought to achieve consensus on clinical criteria that would be used to define refractory septic shock. DESIGN: Review of literature, expert panel position statements, and Delphi rounds with an international expert group. SETTING: Consensus was defined as having at least 75% of panellists in agreement or disagreement on the three highest or lowest levels of a 7-point Likert scale or based on responses to single- or multiple-choice questions, respectively. SUBJECTS: A panel of multinational, multiprofessional, and multidisciplinary critical care experts assembled by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (57 invitations and 56 participants). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A five-round Delphi process was conducted for consensus and stability. The steering committee proposed 34 statements, and five of them were rejected by panel experts after round 2. Among 29 statements selected from eight domains, consensus was reached for 13. The panel agreed on the need for a comprehensive consensus set of clinical criteria for refractory septic shock. Markers of organ dysfunction (75%, 2 rounds), tissue perfusion (91.1%, 2 rounds) including lactate (94.6%, 2 rounds) and capillary refill time (76.8%, 2 rounds), assessment of fluid responsiveness after initial resuscitation (92.9%, 5 rounds), and use of vasoactive drugs at norepinephrine equivalents greater than 0.5 µg/kg/min (75.0%, 3 rounds) were selected as clinical criteria of refractory septic shock. The use of critical care ultrasound (CCUS) (92.9%, 3 rounds) was the single diagnostic modality that reached a consensus-based agreement. CONCLUSIONS: A consensus for 13 criteria to frame the definition of refractory septic shock was reached. Refractory septic shock is characterised by persistently elevated lactate concentrations and or prolonged capillary refill time in patients with septic shock who are fluid unresponsive, require a norepinephrine base equivalent dose greater than 0.5 µg per kilogram per minute, and undergo CCUS assessment when mixed shock is suspected.