Daily Anesthesiology Research Analysis
Analyzed 131 papers and selected 3 impactful papers.
Summary
Three studies inform perioperative anesthesiology: a large meta-analysis confirms that multicomponent non-pharmacological bundles prevent delirium in older adults and suggests dexmedetomidine benefit in non-cardiac surgery; a randomized trial finds no functional advantage of early (<6 h) versus delayed (6–12 h) extubation after thrombectomy under general anesthesia; and a multicenter cohort shows that intraoperative fluid balance and vasopressor dose are not associated with early graft dysfunction after liver transplantation.
Research Themes
- Perioperative delirium prevention strategies in older adults
- Extubation timing after endovascular thrombectomy under general anesthesia
- Intraoperative hemodynamic management in liver transplantation
Selected Articles
1. Effectiveness of non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions in preventing delirium in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Across 87 RCTs (19,289 patients), multicomponent non-pharmacological bundles reduced delirium by about 44% versus usual care, with significant effects in medical and non-cardiovascular surgical settings. Dexmedetomidine was associated with lower delirium risk in non-cardiac surgical patients; other drugs had mixed evidence and overall certainty ranged from low to very low.
Impact: It synthesizes high-level evidence guiding perioperative delirium prevention and clarifies where pharmacologic options (notably dexmedetomidine) may add benefit.
Clinical Implications: Prioritize multicomponent non-pharmacological bundles in perioperative pathways for older adults and consider dexmedetomidine for non-cardiac surgical patients at high risk of delirium, balancing bradycardia/hypotension risks. Standardize protocols and monitor implementation quality.
Key Findings
- Multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions reduced delirium (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45–0.72; I2=63%).
- Dexmedetomidine lowered delirium risk in non-cardiac surgical patients (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.43–0.57; low-certainty).
- Single-component interventions were mixed; corticosteroids and intranasal insulin showed benefits in limited high-certainty trials.
- Overall certainty of evidence was low to very low, indicating need for better-quality RCTs.
Methodological Strengths
- Comprehensive search across multiple databases with PROSPERO registration (CRD42024500387).
- Random-effects meta-analysis restricted to RCTs; RoB 2.0 risk-of-bias assessment and subgroup analyses.
Limitations
- High heterogeneity and low to very low certainty for many comparisons.
- Exclusion of ICU-only studies and variation in intervention components may limit generalizability.
Future Directions: Conduct large, CONSORT-compliant multicenter RCTs standardizing bundle components and dosing/monitoring of dexmedetomidine; evaluate implementation fidelity and patient-centered outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Delirium is a serious neuropsychiatric condition common among older adults, associated with prolonged hospital stays, increased morbidity and mortality. Although guidelines emphasise prevention, identifying most effective measures is crucial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions in preventing delirium in older adults (≥65 years). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials across settings, excluding ICU-only studies. MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science and PsycINFO were searched through October 2024. Comparators included standard care, placebo, or other drugs. Random-effects models estimated pooled risk ratios. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0. Subgroup analyses were performed by setting and drug type. PROSPERO: CRD42024500387. RESULTS: Eighty-seven trials (19,289 randomised patients) were included. Non-pharmacological multicomponent interventions (k = 17) significantly reduced delirium occurrence (risk ratio [RR] = 0.56, 95% CI 0.45-0.72; I2 = 63%) versus usual care, although certainty of evidence was very low. Effects were significant in non-cardiovascular surgical and medical patients. Single-component non-pharmacological interventions (k = 9) showed mixed or inconclusive findings. Among pharmacological trials (k = 53), dexmedetomidine reduced delirium risk (RR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.43-0.57; low-certainty) in non-cardiovascular surgical patients. Corticosteroids and intranasal insulin showed significant effects (high-certainty), based on a small number of trials. Mixed strategies, such as haemodynamic or cerebral oxygen-guided approaches, suggested potential benefit but were heterogeneous. CONCLUSIONS: Non-pharmacological multicomponent interventions reduce delirium occurrence and should be prioritised. Dexmedetomidine showed benefit in non-cardiac surgical populations, while evidence for other drugs remains inconclusive. Overall, certainty was low to very low, highlighting the need for further high-quality randomised trials to ensure generalisability.
2. Early vs Delayed Extubation After Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: The EDESTROKE Randomized Clinical Trial.
In 174 randomized patients after successful thrombectomy under general anesthesia, early extubation (<6 h) did not improve 90-day functional independence versus delayed extubation (6–12 h). Pneumonia was numerically lower with early extubation, but differences in respiratory complications, reintubation, and mortality were not significant.
Impact: Provides randomized evidence to inform extubation timing protocols after thrombectomy under general anesthesia, an area with practice variability.
Clinical Implications: Extubation timing between 0–12 hours can be individualized without expecting functional outcome differences; focus should remain on airway protection, aspiration risk, and pneumonia prevention. Early extubation may reduce pneumonia numerically but should be balanced against reintubation risk.
Key Findings
- No difference in 90-day functional independence (mRS 0–2: 47.7% early vs 45.9% delayed; RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.76–1.43).
- Pneumonia numerically lower with early extubation (21.8% vs 29.9%; RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.44–1.22), not statistically significant.
- Reintubation (4.6% vs 2.3%) and 90-day mortality (23.3% vs 22.4%) were similar between groups.
Methodological Strengths
- Randomized 1:1 allocation with prespecified primary endpoint and 90-day follow-up.
- Registered trial (NCT05847309) with comprehensive reporting of respiratory and functional outcomes.
Limitations
- Single-center design and modest sample size may limit power for secondary outcomes.
- Open-label care pathways and potential practice variations could influence pneumonia and reintubation rates.
Future Directions: Multicenter pragmatic trials to evaluate standardized extubation bundles and sedation/weaning strategies; explore predictors of safe early extubation and pneumonia reduction.
IMPORTANCE: The optimal timing of extubation after endovascular thrombectomy performed under general anesthesia for patients with acute ischemic stroke remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether early extubation (<6 hours) compared with delayed extubation (6-12 hours) after successful thrombectomy under general anesthesia improves 90-day functional outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at a single tertiary academic referral center from April 2023 to June 2025 with 90 days of follow-up. Participants were adults (age ≥18 years) with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion who underwent successful endovascular thrombectomy under general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive early (<6 hours) or delayed (6-12 hours) extubation following thrombectomy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was functional independence at 90 days (as indicated by a modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 0-2). Secondary outcomes included the ordinal distribution of mRS scores, length of hospital stay, respiratory and procedure-related complications, and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Of 312 patients assessed, 174 were randomized, 87 to receive early extubation and 87 to delayed extubation. Ninety-eight patients (56.3%) were women and 76 (43.7%) were men; the median (IQR) age was 76 (69-86) years. Functional independence at 90 days occurred in 41 of 86 patients (47.7%) in the early group and 39 of 85 (45.9%) in the delayed group (risk ratio [RR], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.43). The ordinal analysis of mRS scores showed no significant difference between groups (generalized odds ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.31). Median (IQR) length of hospital stay was 6 (3-9.5) days in the early group and 6 (4-10) days in the delayed group (median difference, 0.0 days; 95% CI, -1.81 to 1.81). The incidence of pneumonia was 19 patients (21.8%) in the early group and 26 patients (29.9%) in the delayed group (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.22), and reintubation occurred in 4 patients (4.6%) vs 2 patients (2.3%), respectively (RR, 2.00; 95% CI, 0.37 to 10.9). Mortality at 90 days was 20 of 86 patients (23.3%) in the early group vs 19 of 85 patients (22.4%) in the delayed group (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.81). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing successful thrombectomy under general anesthesia, early extubation (<6 hours) did not improve functional independence compared with delayed extubation (6-12 hours). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05847309.
3. Intraoperative hemodynamic management during liver transplantation and postoperative morbidity: a multicenter cohort study.
In 852 liver transplants across 8 centers, neither greater intraoperative fluid balance nor higher norepinephrine-equivalent vasopressor dosing was associated with early (7-day) allograft dysfunction or primary graft non-function, after adjustment for confounders including intraoperative hypotension.
Impact: This multicenter analysis challenges assumptions that more liberal fluids or higher vasopressor doses worsen early graft outcomes, informing hemodynamic targets during liver transplantation.
Clinical Implications: Within contemporary practice, clinicians may individualize fluid and vasopressor therapy to maintain perfusion without concern that higher balances or doses inherently increase early graft dysfunction risk; emphasis should remain on preventing prolonged hypotension and optimizing organ perfusion.
Key Findings
- Across 852 recipients, early allograft dysfunction/primary non-function occurred in 28%.
- Per-liter increases in intraoperative fluid balance were not associated with higher risk (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.97–1.06).
- Higher intraoperative vasopressor doses (per 25 µg/kg norepinephrine equivalents) were not associated with risk (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.99–1.06).
Methodological Strengths
- Multicenter cohort with consecutive cases and adjusted regression accounting for intraoperative hypotension.
- Clear, quantitative exposure definitions (fluid balance; norepinephrine-equivalents).
Limitations
- Observational design limits causal inference; residual confounding is possible.
- Primary endpoint restricted to 7-day outcomes; longer-term graft function not assessed.
Future Directions: Prospective trials testing goal-directed hemodynamic algorithms in liver transplantation, including thresholds for hypotension, vasopressor choice, and fluid responsiveness.
BACKGROUND: The best intraoperative hemodynamic strategy in liver transplantation remains uncertain. No high-quality clinical trials or observational studies have comprehensively assessed the association between intraoperative hemodynamic management and postoperative outcomes in liver transplantation. In this study, we aimed to measure the association between two key components of intraoperative hemodynamic management, fluid balance and vasopressor doses, and 7-day graft dysfunction or non-function and other postoperative complications following liver transplantation. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter cohort study across 8 liver transplantation centers in Canada and France. We included consecutive liver transplant recipients over at least 1-year between January 2021 and May 2023. Our exposures were intraoperative fluid balance (volume of blood products, transfused cell saver, colloids, and crystalloids (divided by 1.5), minus estimated blood loss, expressed in liters) and intraoperative vasopressor doses (expressed in increments of 25 µg/kg norepinephrine equivalents). Our primary outcome was 7-day early allograft dysfunction or primary graft non-function. We used regression models adjusted for confounders, including intraoperative hypotension. RESULTS: We included 852 liver transplant recipients (836 with complete data). Participants had a mean (standard deviation) age of 54 years (12), and a median [quartiles] MELD 3.0 score of 20 [11, 29]. The incidence of 7-day early allograft dysfunction or primary graft non-function was 28% (occurring in 236 patients). Neither fluid balance (RR = 1.02 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.06] for each liter of fluid balance) nor vasopressor doses (RR = 1.03 [95% CI, 0.99 to 1.06] for each increment of 25 ug/kg of norepinephrine equivalent) were associated with the risk of this outcome. CONCLUSION: A higher fluid balance and higher doses of vasopressors were not associated with a higher risk of 7-day early allograft dysfunction or primary graft non-function after liver transplantation.