Daily Anesthesiology Research Analysis
Analyzed 97 papers and selected 3 impactful papers.
Summary
Analyzed 97 papers and selected 3 impactful articles.
Selected Articles
1. Superficial parasternal intercostal plane block with ropivacaine versus placebo for opioid exposure after cardiac surgery (EPOCH CardioLink-10): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised trial.
In adults undergoing sternotomy, bilateral superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks with continuous ropivacaine infusion reduced 72-hour opioid consumption by about 21 MMEs versus placebo without changing pain scores or recovery metrics. No serious block-related complications were observed.
Impact: Provides randomized, double-blind evidence supporting a practical opioid-sparing regional technique for a high-pain cardiac surgery population.
Clinical Implications: SPIP catheters can be considered as part of multimodal analgesia after sternotomy to modestly reduce opioid exposure while maintaining similar pain and recovery outcomes.
Key Findings
- Ropivacaine SPIP reduced 72-hour opioid consumption vs placebo (LS mean difference -20.7 MMEs; 95% CI -39.0 to -2.3; p=0.027).
- Pain scores, quality of recovery, delirium rates, and discharge opioid use were similar between groups.
- No serious block-related complications occurred; maximal cumulative ropivacaine dose was 592 mg over 48 hours.
Methodological Strengths
- Multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design with trial registration.
- Objective primary endpoint (cumulative MMEs) with modified intention-to-treat analysis.
Limitations
- Effect size was modest with no difference in pain scores or other patient-centered secondary outcomes.
- Adverse events were not analyzed per a pre-specified safety framework; generalizability outside participating centers is uncertain.
Future Directions: Larger pragmatic trials comparing SPIP with other regional techniques and evaluating longer-term recovery, opioid-related adverse events, and cost-effectiveness are warranted.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery performed through a midline chest incision (median sternotomy) is associated with substantial postoperative pain and opioid use, the latter of which remains the dominant modality of analgesia. Contemporary international guidelines prioritise opioid-sparing, multimodal strategies; however, robust randomised evidence to support specific opioid-sparing analgesic approaches in cardiac surgery is lacking. METHODS: EPOCH CardioLink-10 was a pan-Canadian, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in adults undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. Participants were assigned to receive bilateral superficial parasternal intercostal plane (SPIP) blocks with either 0.2% ropivacaine or placebo (0.9% sodium chloride), delivered via indwelling catheters. Study interventions were delivered at a basal infusion rate (0.1-1 mL/h) after a 20 mL bolus post-insertion. Bolus dosing of 5 mL every 3-4 h was continued for 48 h. In the ropivacaine arm, this resulted in a maximum total ropivacaine dose of 592 mg over the infusion period. The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption over 72 h following catheter insertion, expressed in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Secondary outcomes included subjective pain scores, cumulative use of opioid to discharge, rates of delirium, and participant-reported Quality of Recovery-15 score (ClinicalTrials.govNCT06028126). FINDINGS: Between Aug 16, 2023, and Dec 22, 2025, 650 patients were screened, and 318 included in the modified intention-to-treat population (164 in the ropivacaine group, 154 in the placebo group). Median age was 67 years (IQR 61-72), 72 (23%) participants were female, 178 (56%) were White, and 69 (22%) were South Asian. Over 72 h, ropivacaine reduced opioid consumption compared with placebo (least-squares mean difference -20.7 MMEs [95% CI -39.0 to -2.3]; p = 0.027). Pain scores and other secondary outcomes were similar between groups. There were no serious block-related complications and there was no pre-specified analysis of adverse events. INTERPRETATION: The findings of this multicentre, randomised trial suggest that bilateral SPIP blockade with ropivacaine may be a pragmatic option to manage sternotomy pain with lower opioid consumption post-cardiac surgery. FUNDING: Grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [...]
2. A Prospective Evaluation of Routine Extubation Criteria in Children with Upper Respiratory Symptoms Undergoing Elective Surgery.
Among 756 children ≤9 years undergoing awake extubation, achieving three or more "Big Five" criteria predicted successful extubation with similar positive predictive value whether or not upper respiratory symptoms were present. The difference (0.8%) met the predefined equivalence margin (<5%).
Impact: Offers pragmatic, prospective evidence to guide safe extubation decisions in children with intercurrent upper respiratory symptoms.
Clinical Implications: If three or more of the "Big Five" signs are present, awake extubation can be undertaken with high likelihood of success even when upper respiratory symptoms are reported.
Key Findings
- Positive predictive value for successful awake extubation with ≥3 "Big Five": 94.7% (no URI symptoms) vs 93.9% (URI symptoms).
- Between-cohort effect size 0.8% (95% CI -2.6% to 4.2%) met the prespecified equivalence margin (<5%).
- Standardized grading rubric showed similar need for interventions across cohorts when ≥3 criteria were present.
Methodological Strengths
- Prospective design with predefined clinical equivalence margin and standardized outcome rubric.
- Large pediatric sample and targeted inclusion focusing on awake extubation readiness criteria.
Limitations
- Generalizability may be limited to awake extubations in children ≤9 years in elective settings.
- Single-system practice patterns and anesthetic techniques may introduce center-specific effects.
Future Directions: Validation in broader pediatric age ranges, non-awake extubations, and across varied anesthetic techniques would strengthen external validity.
BACKGROUND: A previous study has shown that tidal volume >5 mL/kg, conjugate gaze, facial grimace, purposeful movement, and eye opening are predictive of emergence and extubation readiness in children anesthetized primarily with inhalational agents. We hypothesize that having any three of the "Big Five" criteria above will be similarly predictive of extubation success even if upper respiratory symptoms are present. METHODS: Following verbal consent, 756 patients ≤9 years of age were extubated awake. A parental questionnaire was performed preoperatively to assess upper respiratory symptoms and risk factors for respiratory adverse events. Based on this questionnaire, patients were assigned to either the non-upper respiratory infection symptom cohort or the upper respiratory infection symptom cohort. The presence or absence of the "Big Five" and other routine extubation criteria were recorded at extubation. Patients were included in the primary analysis only if they achieved ≥3 of the "Big Five" at the time of extubation. Awake extubations were graded as successful, intervention required, or major intervention required, according to a standard rubric. Intervention required and major intervention required were combined as a single outcome for the primary analysis. The positive predictive value of successful extubation was compared between the two cohorts using an equivalence analysis. The clinical equivalence margin was set at <5%. RESULTS: The positive predictive value of successful extubation with ≥3 of "Big Five" criteria in the non-upper respiratory infection symptom cohort was 94.7%[95%CI 92.5-97.0%] and 93.9%[95%CI 91.5%-96.3%] in the upper respiratory infection symptom cohort. The effect size and 95% confidence interval was 0.8%(95%CI -2.6%-4.2%). This was below the clinical equivalence margin of 5%. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of three or more of the "Big Five" criteria appears to be equivalently predictive of successful awake extubation in patients with upper respiratory symptoms when compared to patients with no upper respiratory symptoms.
3. Rapid Sequence Induction Practices and Outcomes in Abdominal Surgery Patients: A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study.
In 82,772 abdominal surgery cases across 13 U.S. centers, use of succinylcholine for RSI declined markedly from 2015 to 2022 and was replaced by rocuronium. Adjusted analyses showed no differences in 30-day mortality, hypoxia, pulmonary complications, or AKI between rocuronium and succinylcholine.
Impact: Clarifies contemporary RSI practice patterns and provides large-scale, methodologically rigorous comparative effectiveness data on neuromuscular blocker choice.
Clinical Implications: Rocuronium’s growing use for RSI appears safe with outcomes comparable to succinylcholine, supporting flexibility in neuromuscular blocker selection based on contraindications, availability, and reversal strategies.
Key Findings
- Documented RSI in 11.3% of 82,772 abdominal surgery cases; video laryngoscopy used more often in RSI.
- Succinycholine use dropped from 85.4% (2015) to 37.3% (2022), with corresponding rise in rocuronium.
- No adjusted differences for 30-day mortality, post-induction hypoxia, pulmonary complications, or AKI between rocuronium and succinylcholine.
Methodological Strengths
- Large multicenter dataset with mixed-effects modeling and targeted maximum likelihood estimation.
- Temporal trend analysis with clinically relevant endpoints (30-day mortality and complications).
Limitations
- Observational design susceptible to residual confounding and misclassification of RSI status.
- Practice heterogeneity across centers and co-administered sedatives may influence outcomes.
Future Directions: Prospective studies examining RSI bundles (agent choice, laryngoscopy modality, preoxygenation and reversal strategies) could refine best-practice protocols.
BACKGROUND: Rapid Sequence Induction (RSI) is commonly performed in the operating room to quickly secure the airway and minimize aspiration risk, especially in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Current practice patterns of medications and RSI techniques used by anesthesiologists are not well-described. METHODS: This observational cohort study utilized the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group database to evaluate RSI practices on adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery from 2015 to 2022. The primary aim was to describe modern RSI practices. We evaluated peri-induction medication use and intubation techniques. We hypothesized that over time, rocuronium would become the most utilized agent. Additionally, we investigated how the choice of neuromuscular blocking agent (NMB) affected outcomes using mixed-effects models and targeted maximum likelihood estimation. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints included post-induction hypoxia, pulmonary complications, and acute kidney injury (AKI). RESULTS: Across 13 institutions and 82,772 cases, 9,352 (11.3%) had a documented RSI. The most common NMB was succinylcholine (70.5%). However, the use of succinylcholine significantly decreased over the study period (85.4% of RSI cases in 2015; 37.3% in 2022, p < 0.0001), replaced by rocuronium. Patients usually received coadministration of multiple sedatives. Video laryngoscopy was more frequently used (16.2% of RSI vs 8.0% of non-RSI cases, p<0.0001). Rocuronium was not associated with a different risk of mortality (relative risk 0.85; 95% confidence interval 0.67 - 1.09), hypoxia (1.04; 0.61-1.77), pulmonary complications (0.93; 0.81-1.06), or AKI (1.05; 0.84-1.31) as compared to succinylcholine. CONCLUSION: Across institutions in the United States, rocuronium has been increasingly used for RSI, eventually overtaking succinylcholine. Rocuronium use was not associated with a different risk of mortality, hypoxia, pulmonary complications, or AKI.