Effect of lateral versus supine positioning on hypoxaemia in sedated adults: multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Summary
In a multicenter RCT of 2143 analyzed adults undergoing sedation, lateral positioning significantly reduced hypoxemia compared with supine positioning and lowered the need for airway rescue interventions, without safety trade-offs. The benefits were observed across centers, supporting lateral positioning as a simple, scalable respiratory strategy during procedural sedation.
Key Findings
- Lateral positioning significantly reduced the incidence and severity of hypoxemia versus supine.
- Lateral position decreased the need for airway rescue interventions during sedation.
- No safety compromise was observed, supporting lateral positioning as a routine strategy.
Clinical Implications
Adopt lateral positioning as a default during procedural sedation to lower hypoxemia risk and reduce airway rescue interventions, especially in resource-constrained settings.
Why It Matters
A large, pragmatic RCT demonstrates that a no-cost positional intervention reduces hypoxemia during sedation, with immediate applicability across diverse settings.
Limitations
- Generalizability to very high-risk subgroups (e.g., extreme obesity, very elderly) requires replication
- Blinding to positioning is not feasible, potentially introducing performance bias
Future Directions
Replicate in high-BMI and frail populations, and integrate with oxygen supplementation and airway adjunct protocols to define optimal bundles.
Study Information
- Study Type
- RCT
- Research Domain
- Prevention
- Evidence Level
- I - High-quality multicenter randomized controlled trial
- Study Design
- OTHER