Skip to main content

Effect of lateral versus supine positioning on hypoxaemia in sedated adults: multicentre randomised controlled trial.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)2025-08-20PubMed
Total: 84.0Innovation: 7Impact: 0Rigor: 0Citation: 0

Summary

In a multicenter RCT of 2143 analyzed adults undergoing sedation, lateral positioning significantly reduced hypoxemia compared with supine positioning and lowered the need for airway rescue interventions, without safety trade-offs. The benefits were observed across centers, supporting lateral positioning as a simple, scalable respiratory strategy during procedural sedation.

Key Findings

  • Lateral positioning significantly reduced the incidence and severity of hypoxemia versus supine.
  • Lateral position decreased the need for airway rescue interventions during sedation.
  • No safety compromise was observed, supporting lateral positioning as a routine strategy.

Clinical Implications

Adopt lateral positioning as a default during procedural sedation to lower hypoxemia risk and reduce airway rescue interventions, especially in resource-constrained settings.

Why It Matters

A large, pragmatic RCT demonstrates that a no-cost positional intervention reduces hypoxemia during sedation, with immediate applicability across diverse settings.

Limitations

  • Generalizability to very high-risk subgroups (e.g., extreme obesity, very elderly) requires replication
  • Blinding to positioning is not feasible, potentially introducing performance bias

Future Directions

Replicate in high-BMI and frail populations, and integrate with oxygen supplementation and airway adjunct protocols to define optimal bundles.

Study Information

Study Type
RCT
Research Domain
Prevention
Evidence Level
I - High-quality multicenter randomized controlled trial
Study Design
OTHER