Daily Ards Research Analysis
A large multinational cohort shows extremely high 90-day mortality in cancer patients with ARDS, with no observable survival benefit from venovenous ECMO in severe cases. A mechanistic COVID-19 study links dexamethasone to suppression of endothelial-driven coagulopathy, while a qualitative study in Uganda finds immediate delivery-room CPAP acceptable but contingent on staff, training, and equipment.
Summary
A large multinational cohort shows extremely high 90-day mortality in cancer patients with ARDS, with no observable survival benefit from venovenous ECMO in severe cases. A mechanistic COVID-19 study links dexamethasone to suppression of endothelial-driven coagulopathy, while a qualitative study in Uganda finds immediate delivery-room CPAP acceptable but contingent on staff, training, and equipment.
Research Themes
- ARDS outcomes and treatment decisions in oncology
- Endothelial-coagulation mechanisms and corticosteroid effects in COVID-19 ARDS
- Implementation acceptability of immediate CPAP for preterm infants in low-resource settings
Selected Articles
1. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with cancer: the YELENNA prospective multinational observational cohort study.
In a 13-country prospective cohort of 715 cancer patients with ARDS, 90-day mortality was 73.2% overall and 82.2% in severe ARDS. Venovenous ECMO did not confer a survival benefit in severe ARDS, even after double-adjusted overlap and propensity weighting.
Impact: This large, methodologically rigorous cohort challenges the applicability of ECMO guidelines to cancer patients with severe ARDS and provides granular prognostic data for ICU decision-making.
Clinical Implications: For cancer patients with severe ARDS, ECMO may not improve survival; discussions should focus on realistic goals of care, patient values, and selection criteria rather than default escalation. Risk stratification should consider age, peripheral vascular disease, severity, and acute kidney injury.
Key Findings
- Overall 90-day mortality was 73.2%; in severe ARDS, 82.2%.
- Independent predictors of higher 90-day mortality: older age, peripheral vascular disease, severe ARDS at inclusion, acute kidney injury, and ICU admission as a time-limited trial.
- Lymphoma was associated with lower 90-day mortality.
- Venovenous ECMO showed no survival benefit in severe ARDS (82.6% vs 80.7%; P=0.89); adjusted HR 1.12 (95% CI 0.65–1.94; P=0.69).
Methodological Strengths
- Prospective, multinational cohort across 13 countries with large sample size (N=715).
- Predefined primary endpoint (90-day mortality) and multivariable analysis.
- Advanced causal adjustment using overlap- and propensity-weighted Cox mixed-effects models.
Limitations
- Observational design limits causal inference and residual confounding cannot be excluded.
- Potential selection bias for ECMO candidacy and heterogeneity in cancer types and treatments.
Future Directions: Define selection criteria for ECMO in cancer-associated ARDS; prospective registries or pragmatic trials focusing on specific cancer subgroups; incorporate patient-centered outcomes and goals-of-care frameworks.
PURPOSE: Acute respiratory failure is the leading reason for intensive care unit (ICU) admission among critically ill patients with cancer. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of patients with cancer and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and to evaluate associations of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with outcomes in the subgroup with severe ARDS. METHODS: We conducted a multinational, prospective, observational cohort study of patients with cancer and ARDS in 13 countries in Europe and North America. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Among 715 included patients, 73.4% had hematologic malignancies and 26.6% solid tumors; 31.2% had undergone hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (168 allogeneic). ICU, hospital, and 90-day mortality rates were 55.3%, 70.9%, and 73.2%, respectively. By multivariate analysis, independent predictors of higher 90-day mortality were older age, peripheral vascular disease, severe ARDS at inclusion, acute kidney injury, and ICU admission as a time-limited trial (vs. full code). Conversely, lymphoma was associated with lower 90-day mortality. Among the 322 patients (45.7%) with severe ARDS at inclusion, 90-day mortality was 82.2%; with no difference between patients who received ECMO (n = 58, 18%) and those who did not (82.6% vs. 80.7%, P = 0.89). This finding remained unchanged in a double-adjusted overlap- and propensity-weighted Cox mixed-effects model (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval 0.65-1.94; P = 0.69). CONCLUSION: Patients with cancer and ARDS, particularly severe forms, experience high 90-day mortality, irrespective of ECMO use. These findings suggest a need for nuanced ICU goals-of-care discussions and raise concerns about the generalizability of ECMO guidelines to this population.
2. Dexamethasone Suppresses Endotheliopathy and Endothelial-Induced Coagulopathy in COVID-19.
Prospective biomarker tracking in ARDS due to COVID-19 showed that dexamethasone (with UFH) reduced endothelial activation and coagulopathy markers over 7 days. In vitro assays demonstrated that dexamethasone, but not UFH, suppressed endothelial-induced thrombin generation under inflammatory conditions.
Impact: Links a standard-of-care therapy to a mechanistic reduction of endothelial-driven coagulopathy, strengthening biological plausibility for observed thrombotic benefits in COVID-19.
Clinical Implications: Supports early dexamethasone use in severe COVID-19 with ARDS to mitigate endothelial injury–driven coagulopathy; may inform antithrombotic strategies and biomarker-guided monitoring.
Key Findings
- In 23 dexamethasone+UFH-treated patients, von Willebrand factor, Ang-2, soluble E-selectin, and D-dimer decreased significantly over 7 days.
- Endothelial thrombin generation assay showed dexamethasone (not UFH) reduced endogenous thrombin potential under proinflammatory cytokine stimulation.
- Plasma from ARDS patients induced higher endothelial thrombin generation than plasma from non-ARDS COVID-19 patients.
- Findings align with reduced venous thrombosis prevalence among dexamethasone-treated hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Methodological Strengths
- Prospective longitudinal biomarker assessment over 7 days.
- Novel endothelial thrombin generation assay using human endothelial colony-forming cells.
- Use of an independent cohort (N=331) to contextualize endothelial procoagulant activity.
Limitations
- Primary clinical cohort was small (N=44) and nonrandomized; potential confounding from concomitant UFH.
- In vitro findings may not fully capture in vivo complexity; clinical outcomes beyond biomarkers were not assessed.
Future Directions: Randomized trials or mechanistic substudies to isolate steroid effects on endothelial coagulopathy; validate endothelial thrombin generation assays as monitoring tools; integrate with antithrombotic strategies.
BACKGROUND: Endotheliopathy and coagulopathy are known complications of COVID-19, with a significant association with mortality. Although dexamethasone is the standard of care for patients with severe COVID-19, its precise mode of action remains elusive. We aim to investigate the functional consequences of dexamethasone treatment on COVID-19-associated procoagulant endotheliopathy. METHODS: First, during the 7 days after hospitalization, we measured several endothelial and coagulopathy biomarkers in a prospective cohort of patients with COVID-19 with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who were either treated or not with both dexamethasone and therapeutic UFH (unfractionated heparin). Second, we developed an in vitro thrombin generation assay on cultured human endothelial cells to measure the ability of stimulated endothelial colony-forming cells to activate coagulation in normal plasma, which is expressed as an endogenous thrombin potential (ETP). RESULTS: Among the cohort of 44 ARDS COVID-19 patients, 23 patients treated with dexamethasone and therapeutic UFH had significantly decreased von Willebrand Factor, Ang-2 (angiopoietin-2), soluble E-selectin, and d-dimer levels over 7 days. To differentiate the effect of UFH and dexamethasone on endotheliopathy, we used the thrombin generation assay and showed that endothelial colony-forming cell stimulation with dexamethasone but not UFH-in addition to a cocktail of proinflammatory cytokines (to mimic the cytokine storm of severe COVID-19)-significantly decreased ETP in comparison to proinflammatory cytokines only. Moreover, in another cohort of 331 patients with COVID-19 of varying severity, the endothelial colony-forming cell stimulation with the plasma of 87 ARDS patients showed significantly higher ETP (1260 nmol/L per minute [interquartile range, 1140-1260]) compared with 75 non-ARDS patients (1024 nmol/L per minute [interquartile range, 915-1200]; CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that dexamethasone protects against COVID-19 endothelium-induced coagulopathy. These findings are in line with the decreased prevalence of venous thrombosis among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 treated with dexamethasone.
3. Acceptability of immediate CPAP for preterm infants in the delivery room to mothers, caregivers and healthcare workers in a low-resource setting: a qualitative study.
Immediate delivery-room CPAP for very-low-birthweight infants in a Ugandan hospital was acceptable to healthcare workers and families. Implementation success hinges on staffing, training, multidisciplinary collaboration, maternal engagement, and reliable CPAP availability.
Impact: Addresses a critical implementation gap for neonatal respiratory support in low-resource settings, informing scale-up strategies aligned with parent and provider perspectives.
Clinical Implications: Programs adopting immediate CPAP should prioritize staff training, caregiver education, and device availability; policies must accommodate cultural and religious considerations and mitigate opportunity costs in understaffed settings.
Key Findings
- Stakeholders (mothers, caregivers, healthcare workers) expressed positive attitudes toward immediate CPAP.
- Perceived effectiveness included preventing complications and shortening hospital stays; families believed it improved survival.
- Implementation barriers included staffing constraints, equipment availability, and need for training; cultural and religious factors influenced decision-making.
- Self-efficacy was linked to adequate staffing, training, and equipment.
Methodological Strengths
- Nested within a pilot randomized controlled trial; multi-stakeholder perspectives (parents, caregivers, healthcare workers).
- Structured deductive framework analysis using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability with systematic coding (Nvivo 12).
Limitations
- Single-site qualitative study limits generalizability; no direct clinical outcome assessment.
- Potential social desirability and selection biases; resource context may not translate to other settings.
Future Directions: Integrate feasibility and effectiveness endpoints in larger pragmatic trials; develop implementation packages (training, maintenance, education) and evaluate cost-effectiveness.
BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is the leading cause of childhood mortality, with respiratory distress syndrome as the predominant aetiology. Initiating continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) immediately after birth may reduce CPAP failure, the need for ventilation, and surfactant use. In low-resource settings, without ventilation or surfactant, immediate CPAP could significantly reduce preterm mortality. We explored the experiences, perceptions, and acceptability of immediate CPAP among parents, caregivers, and healthcare workers in a Ugandan hospital. METHODS: This qualitative study (April 2023-April 2024) was nested in a pilot randomised controlled trial of immediate delivery room CPAP for very low birthweight infants (VLBW, < 1500 g) at a government hospital in Uganda. Data were collected through 12 key informant interviews and focus group discussions with 36 healthcare workers, and 37 parents and caregivers of enrolled infants. We applied deductive framework analysis using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) and coded transcripts using Nvivo 12. RESULTS: Regarding affective attitude, healthcare workers, mothers and caregivers expressed positive feelings towards immediate CPAP. For perceived effectiveness, healthcare workers described immediate CPAP as a prophylactic intervention that reduces the severity of complications and shortens hospital stays, while mothers and caregivers believed it expands the infant's lungs and increases chances of survival. Concerning burden, healthcare workers highlighted that successful implementation depends on a committed neonatal team, multidisciplinary team collaboration, adequate staffing, active maternal involvement, and the availability of sufficient CPAP machines. Opportunity costs were evident where limited staffing forced healthcare workers to choose between prioritising the mother or the infant. Under ethicality, cultural beliefs, religious views, and fear were identified as influential factors in decision making around immediate CPAP. Regarding intervention coherence, healthcare workers, mothers, and caregivers demonstrated a good understanding of the purpose and process of immediate CPAP. Finally, self-efficacy was linked to the availability of adequate staff, training, and necessary equipment to confidently engage in the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate CPAP was found to be acceptable among healthcare workers and mothers/caregivers. Successful implementation requires adequate staff training, comprehensive health education, adequate human resources, and sufficient availability of CPAP machines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study is registered on Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR) PACTR202208462613789. Registered 08/08/2022. https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=23888 .