Skip to main content

Daily Cardiology Research Analysis

3 papers

Three high-impact cardiology studies advance prevention and intervention. A nationwide Danish-BMJ cohort quantifies arterial thrombotic risk across modern hormonal contraceptives, showing no excess risk with levonorgestrel IUDs. A Circulation registry study links anabolic-androgenic steroid use to markedly elevated risks of MI, cardiomyopathy, and heart failure. A large JACC registry shows that transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair improves survival only in intermediate disease stages, inf

Summary

Three high-impact cardiology studies advance prevention and intervention. A nationwide Danish-BMJ cohort quantifies arterial thrombotic risk across modern hormonal contraceptives, showing no excess risk with levonorgestrel IUDs. A Circulation registry study links anabolic-androgenic steroid use to markedly elevated risks of MI, cardiomyopathy, and heart failure. A large JACC registry shows that transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair improves survival only in intermediate disease stages, informing patient selection.

Research Themes

  • Hormonal contraception and arterial thrombotic risk
  • Anabolic-androgenic steroids and cardiovascular disease
  • Stage-specific outcomes after transcatheter tricuspid repair

Selected Articles

1. Stroke and myocardial infarction with contemporary hormonal contraception: real-world, nationwide, prospective cohort study.

83Level IICohortBMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025PMID: 39938934

In a nationwide cohort of 2,025,691 Danish women, combined oral contraceptives doubled the risk of ischemic stroke and MI, while progestin-only pills modestly increased risk. Levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs showed no increased arterial risk. Absolute event rates were low but clinically relevant for risk–benefit counseling.

Impact: This is one of the largest real-world evaluations quantifying arterial thrombotic risks across contemporary contraceptives, isolating a method (levonorgestrel IUD) without excess risk.

Clinical Implications: Use levonorgestrel IUDs when minimizing arterial risk is paramount; discuss small but meaningful arterial risks with combined oral or progestin-only pills, particularly in patients with vascular risk factors.

Key Findings

  • Combined oral contraception doubled adjusted rates of ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction versus non-use (aIRR ≈2.0).
  • Progestin-only pills increased risk modestly (stroke aIRR 1.6; MI aIRR 1.5).
  • Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices showed no increased risk (stroke aIRR 1.1; MI aIRR 1.1).

Methodological Strengths

  • Nationwide, prospective registry design with >22 million person-years of follow-up.
  • Detailed method-specific risk estimates with standardized rates and adjusted rate ratios.

Limitations

  • Observational design with potential residual confounding (e.g., smoking, blood pressure).
  • Generalizability may vary outside Denmark; absolute risks remain low.

Future Directions: Evaluate individualized contraceptive risk calculators integrating vascular risk factors; assess mechanisms and differential progestins’ arterial effects; extend to diverse populations.

2. Cardiovascular Disease in Anabolic Androgenic Steroid Users.

80Level IICohortCirculation · 2025PMID: 39945117

In a matched nationwide cohort, anabolic-androgenic steroid users had markedly elevated risks of MI, revascularization, VTE, arrhythmias, cardiomyopathy (aHR ~9), and heart failure over ~11 years. These robust associations quantify the cardiovascular burden of AAS use.

Impact: Provides definitive population-level evidence linking AAS use to a spectrum of major cardiovascular outcomes, informing public health, sports medicine, and clinical screening strategies.

Clinical Implications: Clinicians should screen for AAS exposure in young/middle-aged men with cardiomyopathy, arrhythmias, or premature ASCVD; counsel cessation and monitor cardiac function.

Key Findings

  • AAS users had a threefold higher risk of acute MI (aHR 3.00) and nearly threefold higher need for PCI/CABG (aHR 2.95).
  • Cardiomyopathy risk was profoundly increased (aHR 8.90), with elevated risks of HF (aHR 3.63) and arrhythmias (aHR 2.26).
  • Venous thromboembolism risk was also higher (aHR 2.42), underscoring systemic thromboinflammatory effects.

Methodological Strengths

  • Nationwide registry linkage with long-term follow-up and large matched control cohort (1:50).
  • Comprehensive endpoint ascertainment across multiple cardiovascular outcomes.

Limitations

  • Selection limited to sanctioned users; exposure misclassification (dose/duration) possible.
  • Residual confounding cannot be excluded; stroke/cardiac arrest underpowered.

Future Directions: Prospective mechanistic studies on AAS cardiotoxicity, dose-response, and reversibility; evaluate screening pathways and cessation interventions to reduce CVD burden.

3. Tricuspid Regurgitation Disease Stages and Treatment Outcomes After Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair.

72.5Level IICohortJACC. Cardiovascular interventions · 2025PMID: 39939038

In EuroTR (n=1,885), T-TEER conferred a 1-year survival benefit only in intermediate-stage TR (HR 0.73), with no benefit in early or advanced stages. Stage stratification by biventricular function, renal function, and natriuretic peptides guided selection and was externally validated.

Impact: Provides actionable, stage-based selection criteria to optimize T-TEER benefits, potentially reconciling trial-neutral survival results by timing of intervention.

Clinical Implications: Prioritize T-TEER referral for intermediate-stage TR based on integrated ventricular-renal-biomarker staging; reconsider intervention in very early or advanced stages where survival benefit is not demonstrated.

Key Findings

  • Among 1,885 TR patients, only the intermediate-stage subgroup had lower 1-year mortality with T-TEER versus conservative therapy (HR 0.73).
  • No mortality difference with T-TEER in early-stage (HR 0.78) or advanced-stage (HR 1.06) disease.
  • Disease staging incorporated LV/RV function, renal function, and natriuretic peptides and was externally validated.

Methodological Strengths

  • Large prospective multicenter registry with comparative conservative cohort.
  • Externally validated staging framework and clinically relevant endpoint (1-year mortality).

Limitations

  • Nonrandomized design with potential selection/residual confounding.
  • Staging thresholds and generalizability beyond registry settings require further validation.

Future Directions: Prospective randomized trials stratified by disease stage; refine thresholds and integrate right ventricular-pulmonary coupling metrics to optimize timing.