Skip to main content

Daily Cardiology Research Analysis

3 papers

Three notable cardiology studies stood out today: an AI-enhanced ECG model identified a continuous sex-related risk signal that pinpoints women at elevated cardiovascular risk; a nationwide Medicare analysis found surgical AVR confers superior 5-year outcomes versus TAVR in low- and intermediate-risk older adults despite higher in-hospital risk; and a large OHCA registry showed survival benefits from bystander CPR persist even when started 8–9 minutes after collapse.

Summary

Three notable cardiology studies stood out today: an AI-enhanced ECG model identified a continuous sex-related risk signal that pinpoints women at elevated cardiovascular risk; a nationwide Medicare analysis found surgical AVR confers superior 5-year outcomes versus TAVR in low- and intermediate-risk older adults despite higher in-hospital risk; and a large OHCA registry showed survival benefits from bystander CPR persist even when started 8–9 minutes after collapse.

Research Themes

  • AI-enabled risk stratification and sex differences
  • Long-term comparative effectiveness of SAVR vs TAVR
  • Public health impact of bystander CPR timing

Selected Articles

1. Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography for the identification of a sex-related cardiovascular risk continuum: a retrospective cohort study.

85.5Level IICohortThe Lancet. Digital health · 2025PMID: 40015763

Using over 1.2 million ECGs for derivation and external validation in UK Biobank, an AI-ECG model produced a continuous sex discordance score that identified women at higher risk of cardiovascular death and incident HF/MI, while no association was seen in men. The score also tracked “male-like” cardiac and body composition phenotypes in at-risk women.

Impact: Introduces a scalable, externally validated AI biomarker that reveals sex-specific cardiovascular risk heterogeneity and could enable earlier prevention in women.

Clinical Implications: Clinicians could use AI-ECG sex discordance to flag women with normal ECGs but elevated latent risk for intensified risk factor control, surveillance, or referral for advanced imaging.

Key Findings

  • AI-ECG sex classification achieved AUC 0.943 (BIDMC) and 0.971 (UK Biobank).
  • Higher sex discordance score predicted cardiovascular death in women (HR 1.78 BIDMC; 1.33 UKB) but not in men.
  • Women with higher discordance had greater future HF/MI risk and exhibited male-like cardiac (higher LV mass/volumes) and non-cardiac phenotypes (more muscle, less fat).

Methodological Strengths

  • Very large derivation dataset with rigorous external validation in an independent population
  • Clear, clinically relevant endpoints (cardiovascular death, HF/MI) and phenotype concordance across cohorts

Limitations

  • Retrospective design with potential residual confounding and selection biases
  • Generalizability beyond studied health systems and ancestries requires prospective validation

Future Directions: Prospective implementation trials to test risk-guided prevention in women, mechanistic studies linking ECG features to sex-specific cardiac remodeling, and fairness audits across ancestries.

2. Surgical vs Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients 65 Years of Age and Older.

77.5Level IICohortThe Annals of thoracic surgery · 2025PMID: 40015547

In a 159,112-patient Medicare cohort, SAVR had higher in-hospital risk but delivered better 5-year freedom from death, stroke, or valve reintervention than TAVR in low- and intermediate-risk patients, alongside lower stroke readmissions. Pacemaker implantation was more frequent after TAVR across strata.

Impact: Provides contemporary, risk-stratified real-world evidence to inform Heart Team decisions for older adults, challenging assumptions about universal TAVR predominance.

Clinical Implications: For low/intermediate-risk older adults, SAVR should be discussed as it may yield superior 5-year outcomes despite higher perioperative risk; device selection must weigh pacemaker risk with TAVR.

Key Findings

  • Across risk strata, SAVR had higher adjusted in-hospital mortality, AKI, and bleeding, but lower pacemaker implantation than TAVR.
  • At 5 years, SAVR improved freedom from composite death/stroke/reintervention in low- and intermediate-risk groups (HR 0.85 and 0.86 vs TAVR).
  • Stroke readmissions were lower with SAVR in low- and intermediate-risk patients (HR 0.72 and 0.78).

Methodological Strengths

  • Very large national dataset with rigorous inverse probability weighting and competing-risk time-to-event modeling
  • Risk stratification incorporating comorbidities and frailty for clinically relevant comparisons

Limitations

  • Observational design with residual confounding and device/procedural heterogeneity not fully captured
  • Generalizability limited to Medicare-age US population and 2018–2022 device generations

Future Directions: Prospective comparative effectiveness in specific anatomic/physiologic subgroups, strategies to mitigate SAVR perioperative risk, and device iteration studies to reduce TAVR pacemaker rates.

3. Time to bystander CPR and survival for witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

75Level IICohortResuscitation · 2025PMID: 40015622

In 194,807 witnessed OHCAs, bystander CPR improved survival to discharge and neurological outcomes even when initiated 8–9 minutes after collapse, with no benefit at ≥10 minutes. The survival association decreased progressively with longer delays, reinforcing the imperative of immediate CPR.

Impact: Provides actionable, time-binned survival estimates that can inform dispatcher-assisted CPR protocols, public training, and AED placement strategies.

Clinical Implications: Dispatchers should persist in coaching CPR up to 9 minutes after collapse; public health messaging can emphasize that starting CPR late is still beneficial within this window.

Key Findings

  • Bystander CPR was associated with higher survival when initiated within 0–1, 2–3, 4–5, 6–7, and 8–9 minutes versus no CPR.
  • No survival benefit was observed when bystander CPR started at ≥10 minutes.
  • A graded, inverse relationship exists between delay to CPR initiation and both survival to discharge and favorable neurological survival.

Methodological Strengths

  • Very large, contemporary national registry spanning a decade with hierarchical modeling
  • Time-binned exposure analysis enabling practical protocol guidance

Limitations

  • Potential misclassification of time intervals and unmeasured confounding inherent to registry data
  • Findings apply to witnessed arrests and may not generalize to unwitnessed events

Future Directions: Evaluate dispatcher-assisted CPR quality within time windows, integrate smartphone crowd responder activation, and model AED deployment strategies aligned with the 9-minute benefit window.