Skip to main content
Daily Report

Daily Cardiology Research Analysis

03/03/2025
3 papers selected
3 analyzed

A phase 3 randomized trial (PRESTIGE-AF) shows that, in atrial fibrillation survivors of intracerebral hemorrhage, direct oral anticoagulants markedly reduce ischemic stroke but at the cost of substantially higher recurrent ICH, underscoring nuanced, patient-tailored decisions. Genomic analyses refine cardiovascular risk: a PNAS study quantifies recessive genetic contributions across congenital heart disease, and a JAMA study reveals that true PROS1 loss-of-function is rare but confers very high

Summary

A phase 3 randomized trial (PRESTIGE-AF) shows that, in atrial fibrillation survivors of intracerebral hemorrhage, direct oral anticoagulants markedly reduce ischemic stroke but at the cost of substantially higher recurrent ICH, underscoring nuanced, patient-tailored decisions. Genomic analyses refine cardiovascular risk: a PNAS study quantifies recessive genetic contributions across congenital heart disease, and a JAMA study reveals that true PROS1 loss-of-function is rare but confers very high venous thromboembolism risk while not affecting arterial events.

Research Themes

  • Anticoagulation strategy after intracerebral hemorrhage in atrial fibrillation
  • Genetic architecture of congenital heart disease
  • Population-scale thrombosis risk stratification via protein S deficiency

Selected Articles

1. Direct oral anticoagulants versus no anticoagulation for the prevention of stroke in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage with atrial fibrillation (PRESTIGE-AF): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

86.5Level IRCT
Lancet (London, England) · 2025PMID: 40023176

In AF survivors of intracerebral hemorrhage, DOAC therapy dramatically reduced ischemic stroke (HR 0.05) but increased recurrent ICH (HR 10.89). Net clinical benefit therefore depends on individual bleeding versus ischemic risk, reinforcing the need for tailored decision-making and evaluation of alternative strategies.

Impact: This is the first phase 3 RCT directly addressing anticoagulation after ICH in AF, a critical evidence gap guiding high-stakes decisions. The divergent effects on ischemic and hemorrhagic outcomes will shape guidelines and shared decision-making.

Clinical Implications: Consider DOACs for selected AF survivors of ICH with very high ischemic risk and controlled bleeding risk; systematically integrate neuroimaging markers, ICH location, and patient preference. Investigate mechanical alternatives (e.g., left atrial appendage occlusion) when bleeding risk dominates.

Key Findings

  • DOACs lowered first ischaemic stroke versus no anticoagulation (HR 0.05; p<0.0001).
  • Recurrent ICH was higher with DOACs and did not meet non-inferiority margin (HR 10.89; 90% CI 1.95–60.72).
  • Serious adverse events and mortality were similar in proportions between groups over median 1.4 years.

Methodological Strengths

  • Multicentre randomized phase 3 design with blinded endpoint adjudication.
  • Prespecified hierarchical testing for efficacy and safety endpoints.

Limitations

  • Open-label design may influence management behaviors.
  • Modest sample size with wide confidence intervals for hemorrhage estimates.

Future Directions: Pool data across ongoing trials and meta-analyze to identify subgroups with net benefit; evaluate left atrial appendage occlusion and combined strategies; integrate imaging biomarkers for individualized risk models.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reduce the rate of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation but the benefits and risks in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage are uncertain. We aimed to determine whether DOACs reduce the risk of ischaemic stroke without substantially increasing the risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage. METHODS: PRESTIGE-AF is a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial conducted at 75 hospitals in six European countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage, atrial fibrillation, an indication for anticoagulation, and a score of 4 or less on the modified Rankin Scale. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to a DOAC or no anticoagulation, stratified by intracerebral haemorrhage location and sex. Only the events adjudication committee was masked to treatment allocation. The coprimary endpoints were first ischaemic stroke and first recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage. Hierarchical testing for superiority and non-inferiority, respectively, was performed in the intention-to-treat population. The margin to establish non-inferiority regarding intracerebral haemorrhage was less than 1·735. The safety analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03996772, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between May 31, 2019, and Nov 30, 2023, 319 participants were enrolled and 158 were randomly assigned to the DOAC group and 161 to the no anticoagulant group. Patients' median age was 79 years (IQR 73-83). 113 (35%) of 319 patients were female and 206 (65%) were male. Median follow-up was 1·4 years (IQR 0·7-2·3). First ischaemic stroke occurred less frequently in the DOAC group than in the no anticoagulant group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·05 [95% CI 0·01-0·36]; log-rank p<0·0001). The rate of all ischaemic stroke events was 0·83 (95% CI 0·14-2·57) per 100 patient-years in the DOAC group versus 8·60 (5·43-12·80) per 100 patient-years in the no anticoagulant group. For first recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage, the DOAC group did not meet the prespecified HR for the non-inferiority margin of less than 1·735 (HR 10·89 [90% CI 1·95-60·72]; p=0·96). The event rate of all intracerebral haemorrhage was 5·00 (95% CI 2·68-8·39) per 100 patient-years in the DOAC group versus 0·82 (0·14-2·53) per 100 patient years in the no anticoagulant group. Serious adverse events occurred in 70 (44%) of 158 patients in the DOAC group and 89 (55%) of 161 patients in the no anticoagulant group. 16 (10%) patients in the DOAC group and 21 (13%) patients in the no anticoagulant group died. INTERPRETATION: DOACs effectively prevent ischaemic strokes in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage with atrial fibrillation but a part of this benefit is offset by a substantially increased risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage. To optimise stroke prevention in these vulnerable patients, further evidence from ongoing trials and a meta-analysis of randomised data is needed, as well as the evaluation of safer medical or mechanical alternatives for selected patients. FUNDING: European Commission.

2. Recessive genetic contribution to congenital heart disease in 5,424 probands.

80.5Level IICohort
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025PMID: 40030011

Whole-exome analysis of 5,424 CHD probands estimates that rare recessive genotypes explain at least 2.2% of CHD overall and 5.4% in laterality phenotypes, with clear enrichment in consanguinity. The study catalogs recessive hits across curated CHD genes, refining genetic counseling and research priorities.

Impact: Provides the largest systematic quantification of recessive contribution across CHD phenotypes and identifies target genes/phenotypes for future discovery. This shifts understanding beyond anecdotal consanguineous families to population-level estimates.

Clinical Implications: Enhances risk counseling, especially in consanguineous populations and laterality defects; informs gene panel design and prioritization for molecular diagnosis; sets baselines for recessive disease burden in CHD.

Key Findings

  • Rare damaging recessive genotypes contribute to ≥2.2% of CHD overall and 5.4% in laterality phenotypes.
  • Among 108 curated recessive CHD genes, 66 recessive genotypes were identified; 11 genes harbored >1 recessive genotype.
  • Recessive genotypes were more prevalent in consanguineous offspring (4.7%) than in nonconsanguineous probands (0.7%).

Methodological Strengths

  • Large, multi-center whole-exome cohort with phenotype stratification.
  • Systematic curation of recessive CHD genes enabling gene-level resolution.

Limitations

  • Abstract truncation suggests incomplete reporting of founder variants and full gene list in this extract.
  • Exome-based approach may miss non-coding/regulatory variants and structural variants.

Future Directions: Expand to whole-genome sequencing for regulatory variants; deepen analyses of laterality pathways; integrate functional validation to confirm causality and mechanisms.

Variants with large effect contribute to congenital heart disease (CHD). To date, recessive genotypes (RGs) have commonly been implicated through anecdotal ascertainment of consanguineous families and candidate gene-based analysis; the recessive contribution to the broad range of CHD phenotypes has been limited. We analyzed whole exome sequences of 5,424 CHD probands. Rare damaging RGs were estimated to contribute to at least 2.2% of CHD, with greater enrichment among laterality phenotypes (5.4%) versus other subsets (1.4%). Among 108 curated human recessive CHD genes, there were 66 RGs, with 54 in 11 genes with >1 RG, 12 genes with 1 RG, and 85 genes with zero. RGs were more prevalent among offspring of consanguineous union (4.7%, 32/675) than among nonconsanguineous probands (0.7%, 34/4749). Founder variants in

3. Population-Scale Studies of Protein S Abnormalities and Thrombosis.

77.5Level IICohort
JAMA · 2025PMID: 40029645

Across UK Biobank and All of Us, rare PROS1 loss-of-function variants are very uncommon yet confer ~14-fold higher VTE risk, while missense variants confer modest risk and coding variants do not associate with arterial thrombosis. Protein S deficiency is more often driven by non-PROS1 factors and is linked to VTE and PAD.

Impact: Provides definitive population-scale quantification of inherited PROS1 risk, clarifies the disconnect between genotype and circulating protein S, and refines VTE risk stratification without conflating arterial events.

Clinical Implications: Consider targeted genetic evaluation for PROS1 loss-of-function in unexplained/recurrent VTE, while recognizing most low protein S is acquired; arterial event prevention should not be guided by PROS1 coding variants.

Key Findings

  • Heterozygosity for PROS1 loss-of-function (FIS=1.0) is rare (~0.009–0.018%) but confers markedly increased VTE risk (OR 14.01).
  • Missense variants (FIS ≥0.7) are more common (~0.2%) with modest VTE risk (OR ~1.98) and marginal protein S reductions.
  • No association between PROS1 coding variants and myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, or noncardioembolic stroke.

Methodological Strengths

  • Very large, population-scale cohorts with multi-omic integration (exome, proteomics) and independent validation.
  • Robust statistical modeling (Firth logistic regression; survival analyses) and functional impact stratification.

Limitations

  • Predominantly European ancestry in UK Biobank may limit generalizability.
  • Cross-sectional design for some analyses; protein S deficiency etiology remains multifactorial.

Future Directions: Extend to diverse ancestries; evaluate gene–environment interactions; incorporate clinical decision tools for VTE prophylaxis guided by genotype–phenotype integration.

IMPORTANCE: Clinical decision-making in thrombotic disorders is impeded by long-standing uncertainty regarding the magnitude of venous and arterial thrombosis risk associated with low protein S. Population-scale multiomic datasets offer an unprecedented opportunity to answer questions regarding the epidemiology and clinical impacts of protein S deficiency. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk associated with protein S deficiency across multiple thrombosis phenotypes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study using longitudinal population cohorts derived from the UK Biobank (n = 426 436) and the US National Institutes of Health All of Us (n = 204 006) biorepositories. UK Biobank participants were enrolled in 2006-2010 (last follow-up, May 19, 2020) and underwent whole exome sequencing, with a subset (n = 44 431) having protein S levels measured by high-throughput plasma proteomics. Recruitment for All of Us began in 2017 and is ongoing, with participants receiving germline whole genome sequencing. Both cohorts include individual-level data on demographics, laboratory measurements, and clinical outcomes. EXPOSURE: Presence of rare germline genetic variants in PROS1, segmented by functional impact score (FIS), an in silico prediction of the probability that a genetic variant will disrupt protein activity. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Firth logistic regression and linear regression modeling were used to evaluate the thrombosis risk associated with low plasma protein S levels and PROS1 variants across a range of FIS ratings. RESULTS: The UK Biobank cohort was 54.3% female, with a median age of 58.3 (IQR, 50.5-63.7) years at enrollment. Most participants (95.6%) were of European ancestry, and 18 011 had experienced a venous thromboembolism (VTE). In this population cohort, heterozygosity for the highest-risk PROS1 variants with an FIS of 1.0 (nonsense, frameshift, and essential splice site disruptions) was rare (adjusted prevalence, 0.0091% in the UK and 0.0178% in the US) and associated with markedly increased risk of VTE (odds ratio [OR], 14.01; 95% CI, 6.98-27.14; P = 9.09 × 10-11). Plasma proteomics (n = 44 431) demonstrated that carriers of these variants had total protein S levels that were 48.0% of normal (P = .02 compared with noncarriers). In contrast, less damaging missense variants (FIS ≥0.7) occurred more commonly (adjusted prevalence, 0.22% in the UK and 0.20% in the US) and were associated with marginally reduced plasma protein S concentrations and a smaller point estimate for VTE risk (OR, 1.977; 95% CI, 1.552-2.483; P = 1.95 × 10-7). Associations between PROS1 and VTE at both FIS cutoffs were independently validated in the All of Us cohort with similar effect sizes. No association was detected between the presence of coding PROS1 variants and 3 forms of arterial thrombosis: myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, and noncardioembolic ischemic stroke. The presence of PROS1 variants correlated poorly with low plasma protein S levels, and protein S deficiency was significantly associated with VTE and peripheral artery disease regardless of PROS1 variant carrier status. The elevated risk of VTE associated with germline loss of function in PROS1 was evident in Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and appeared to persist throughout life (log-rank P = .0005). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: True inherited loss of function in PROS1 is rare but represents a stronger risk factor for VTE in the general population than previously understood. Acquired, environmental, or trans-acting genetic factors are more likely to cause circulating protein S deficiency than coding variation in PROS1, and low plasma protein S is associated with VTE.