Skip to main content

Daily Cardiology Research Analysis

3 papers

Three impactful cardiology studies stood out today: two implementation- and AI-focused diagnostics and one pragmatic systems-level randomized trial. A wrist-worn AI device matched Holter accuracy for atrial fibrillation over 28 days, an AI echocardiography model improved HFpEF classification and prognostic stratification, and semiautomated pharmacist referrals substantially increased evidence-based statin prescribing in high-risk patients.

Summary

Three impactful cardiology studies stood out today: two implementation- and AI-focused diagnostics and one pragmatic systems-level randomized trial. A wrist-worn AI device matched Holter accuracy for atrial fibrillation over 28 days, an AI echocardiography model improved HFpEF classification and prognostic stratification, and semiautomated pharmacist referrals substantially increased evidence-based statin prescribing in high-risk patients.

Research Themes

  • AI-enabled cardiovascular diagnostics
  • Implementation science to close prevention gaps
  • Digital health and remote rhythm monitoring

Selected Articles

1. Encouraging Pharmacist Referrals for Evidence-Based Statin Initiation: Two Cluster Randomized Clinical Trials.

82Level IRCTJAMA cardiology · 2025PMID: 40136263

Across two pragmatic cluster RCTs (n=1412 and n=1950), a visit-based interruptive EHR alert did not significantly increase statin prescribing versus usual care, whereas an asynchronous semiautomated pharmacist referral strategy increased prescribing by 16.4 percentage points (31.6% vs 15.2%). This scalable workflow leverages pharmacists to close preventive care gaps in high-risk patients.

Impact: Pragmatic, system-level randomization demonstrates an immediately implementable strategy to increase evidence-based statin use, a cornerstone of cardiovascular prevention.

Clinical Implications: Health systems should consider implementing asynchronous semiautomated pharmacist referrals for lipid management to increase appropriate statin prescribing in high-risk patients, rather than relying on interruptive alerts.

Key Findings

  • Visit-based interruptive EHR alerts did not significantly increase statin prescribing compared with usual care (15.6% vs 11.6%).
  • Semiautomated pharmacist referral increased statin prescribing by 16.4 percentage points versus usual care (31.6% vs 15.2%).
  • Trials enrolled 1412 and 1950 patients across 12 practices with mean 10-year ASCVD risk 17.9%.

Methodological Strengths

  • Two pragmatic cluster RCTs across multiple primary care practices
  • Clear primary outcome with prespecified analysis and large samples

Limitations

  • Single health system; generalizability may be limited
  • Outcome focused on prescribing, not downstream clinical events

Future Directions: Evaluate long-term adherence and clinical outcomes, and test scalability across diverse health systems and payers.

2. External validation of artificial intelligence for detection of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

81Level IICohortNature communications · 2025PMID: 40133291

In a matched cohort (n=496), an AI echocardiography model (EchoGo Heart Failure v2) showed similar discrimination to H2FPEF/HFA-PEFF but reduced intermediate classifications and improved net classification and clinical decision impact. Positive AI classification identified patients with a two-fold higher risk of death or HF hospitalization, adding prognostic value.

Impact: Addresses a major diagnostic gap in HFpEF using validated AI on routine echocardiograms, with demonstrated decision-support and prognostic utility.

Clinical Implications: Integrating AI-based echocardiography analysis into HFpEF pathways can reduce indeterminate cases, prioritize further testing, and identify patients at higher risk for closer management.

Key Findings

  • AI HFpEF model achieved similar discrimination and calibration to H2FPEF/HFA-PEFF but with fewer intermediate classifications.
  • Integration of AI with existing scores improved correct management decisions.
  • AI-positive patients had approximately two-fold higher risk of mortality or HF hospitalization.

Methodological Strengths

  • External validation with matched controls and multiple performance metrics
  • Assessment of clinical utility and prognostic associations

Limitations

  • Single-model evaluation; generalizability to diverse scanners and populations requires further study
  • Observational design; no randomized clinical impact assessment

Future Directions: Prospective multi-center impact studies, integration with workflows, and calibration across devices/vendors to ensure equitable performance.

3. Ambulatory atrial fibrillation detection and quantification by wristworn AI device compared to standard holter monitoring.

76Level IICohortNPJ digital medicine · 2025PMID: 40133622

In a 150-participant study, a wrist-worn PPG+ECG AI device achieved ≥95% sensitivity and ≥98% specificity for AF detection and 99% correlation for AF burden versus 24-h Holter. Extending monitoring to 28 days nearly doubled AF detection (14.7% to 26.7%), highlighting the value of comfortable, longer-term wearable monitoring.

Impact: Demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and substantial yield gain with prolonged monitoring using an accessible wearable, with direct implications for AF screening and secondary prevention.

Clinical Implications: Wrist-worn AI-enabled devices can augment or extend Holter monitoring to improve AF detection and burden quantification, informing anticoagulation and rhythm management decisions.

Key Findings

  • Sensitivity ≥95% and specificity ≥98% for AF detection compared to 24-hour Holter.
  • AF burden showed 99% correlation between the wearable and Holter.
  • AF prevalence increased from 14.7% to 26.7% with 28-day wearable monitoring.

Methodological Strengths

  • Head-to-head performance versus gold-standard Holter
  • Extended 28-day monitoring to assess real-world detection yield

Limitations

  • Single-device study with modest sample size
  • Clinical outcomes not assessed; potential selection bias

Future Directions: Assess clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of wearable-guided AF detection and management; validate across diverse populations and device ecosystems.