Skip to main content

Daily Cardiology Research Analysis

3 papers

Three impactful cardiology papers span late-breaking device therapy, drug strategy meta-evidence, and a mechanistic pathway in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Long-term randomized data favor considering subcutaneous ICDs over transvenous systems in eligible patients, heart rate–lowering therapy shows context-dependent benefits with a practical target of 65–70 bpm, and STING-driven ferroptosis emerges as a druggable axis in reperfusion injury.

Summary

Three impactful cardiology papers span late-breaking device therapy, drug strategy meta-evidence, and a mechanistic pathway in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Long-term randomized data favor considering subcutaneous ICDs over transvenous systems in eligible patients, heart rate–lowering therapy shows context-dependent benefits with a practical target of 65–70 bpm, and STING-driven ferroptosis emerges as a druggable axis in reperfusion injury.

Research Themes

  • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator strategy and long-term complications
  • Heart rate–lowering therapy meta-evidence and clinical targets
  • STING–GPX4 axis and ferroptosis in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury

Selected Articles

1. Device-Related Complications in Transvenous Versus Subcutaneous Defibrillator Therapy During Long-Term Follow-Up: The PRAETORIAN-XL Trial.

78Level IRCTCirculation · 2025PMID: 40279654

In an 8-year extension of a randomized trial (n=849), overall device-related complications were similar between S-ICD and TV-ICD, but TV-ICD incurred higher major and lead-related complications. Findings support prioritizing S-ICD for patients without pacing indications.

Impact: Provides long-term randomized evidence informing device selection, directly affecting ICD implantation strategy and complication risk counseling.

Clinical Implications: For ICD candidates without pacing needs, consider S-ICD to reduce major and lead-related complications over the long term. Incorporate these data into shared decision-making and center policies.

Key Findings

  • Randomized 426 to S-ICD and 423 to TV-ICD; median follow-up 87.5 months.
  • Overall device-related complications were not significantly different in mITT (sHR 0.73, 95% CI 0.48–1.12).
  • TV-ICD had higher risk of major and lead-related complications compared with S-ICD.
  • Supports S-ICD consideration for all patients without pacing indication.

Methodological Strengths

  • Randomized multicenter design with long-term (median 7.3 years) follow-up
  • Competing risk–adjusted analysis (Fine-Gray) and as-treated sensitivity analyses

Limitations

  • Primary composite endpoint neutral; subgroup signals not fully quantified in abstract
  • Patient selection excluded those needing pacing, limiting generalizability

Future Directions: Head-to-head cost-effectiveness analyses, patient-reported outcomes, and evaluation in populations with evolving pacing alternatives (e.g., leadless systems) are warranted.

2. Heart rate-lowering drugs and outcomes in hypertension and/or cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis.

77Level IMeta-analysisEuropean heart journal · 2025PMID: 40279099

Across 74 RCTs (n=157,764), HR lowering (~8 bpm) reduced CHD, HF, CV and all-cause mortality, particularly in post-MI and HF, but increased discontinuations. Effects were context-dependent, supporting a pragmatic target HR of 65–70 bpm when baseline HR exceeds 70 bpm.

Impact: Provides comprehensive, trial-level evidence clarifying where HR-lowering confers benefit and proposes a clinically actionable HR target.

Clinical Implications: Prioritize HR-lowering in post-MI and HF; apply a 65–70 bpm target when resting HR >70 bpm, while balancing increased discontinuation risk and avoiding routine use in uncomplicated hypertension.

Key Findings

  • Meta-analysis of 74 RCTs (n=157,764); mean HR reduction 8.2 bpm over 2.7 years.
  • Reduced CHD (−16%), HF (−9%), CV mortality (−14%), and all-cause mortality (−13%).
  • Benefits concentrated in post-AMI and HF; no clear benefit in hypertension without CV disease.
  • Adverse event–related discontinuations increased by 25%; 65–70 bpm target reasonable for HR >70 bpm.

Methodological Strengths

  • Large-scale meta-analysis of randomized trials with predefined protocol (PROSPERO-registered)
  • Random-effects modeling with subgroup and threshold analyses

Limitations

  • Heterogeneity of drug classes and populations; class-specific effects may differ
  • Limited applicability to normotensive or low-risk populations

Future Directions: Head-to-head trials of HR-lowering strategies across drug classes in defined phenotypes; pragmatic implementation studies of HR targets and adherence optimization.

3. STING aggravates ferroptosis-dependent myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by targeting GPX4 for autophagic degradation.

74.5Level VBasic/Mechanistic researchSignal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025PMID: 40274801

This mechanistic study identifies an autophagy-dependent pathway whereby STING targets GPX4 for degradation, promoting ferroptosis and worsening MI/R injury. Genetic disruption of STING–GPX4 interaction or pharmacological STING inhibition (H-151), and AAV-mediated GPX4 delivery, all mitigated injury and improved cardiac recovery.

Impact: Reveals a druggable STING–GPX4 axis linking innate immune sensing to ferroptosis in MI/R, opening avenues for targeted cardioprotective therapies.

Clinical Implications: While preclinical, the data support investigating STING inhibitors and GPX4-stabilizing strategies as adjuncts to reperfusion to reduce MI/R injury.

Key Findings

  • MI/R triggers cGAS–STING activation and cardiomyocyte ferroptosis; cgas/Sting deletion reduces injury.
  • STING promotes autophagic degradation of GPX4 by enhancing autophagosome–lysosome fusion.
  • Disrupting STING–GPX4 interaction (STING T267 or GPX4 N146 mutants) stabilizes GPX4 and limits ferroptosis.
  • AAV-mediated GPX4 expression and STING inhibitor H-151 attenuate MI/R injury and improve functional recovery.

Methodological Strengths

  • Multimodal mechanistic validation (genetic loss-of-function, pharmacologic inhibition, and rescue via AAV-GPX4)
  • Direct biochemical mapping of protein interaction and autophagy flux effects

Limitations

  • Preclinical models; absence of human clinical validation
  • Abstract lacks detailed sample sizes and species/sex-specific analyses

Future Directions: Translational studies of STING inhibitors (e.g., H-151) and GPX4-targeted approaches as adjuncts to PCI; biomarker development for STING–ferroptosis activation in MI.