Skip to main content
Daily Report

Daily Cardiology Research Analysis

06/11/2025
3 papers selected
3 analyzed

Three large-scale clinical studies advance cardiology practice: (1) abdominal adiposity (waist circumference/waist-to-height ratio), but not BMI, predicts kidney outcomes in HFpEF across four outcome trials; (2) US Medicare data reveal persistent racial disparities in PAD revascularization and major amputation with wide state-level variation; (3) a national registry shows substantial hospital-level variability in STEMI FMC-to-device times, with delays linked to higher in-hospital mortality.

Summary

Three large-scale clinical studies advance cardiology practice: (1) abdominal adiposity (waist circumference/waist-to-height ratio), but not BMI, predicts kidney outcomes in HFpEF across four outcome trials; (2) US Medicare data reveal persistent racial disparities in PAD revascularization and major amputation with wide state-level variation; (3) a national registry shows substantial hospital-level variability in STEMI FMC-to-device times, with delays linked to higher in-hospital mortality.

Research Themes

  • Risk stratification using anthropometrics in HFpEF for kidney outcomes
  • Racial and geographic disparities in PAD treatment and outcomes
  • Systems-level performance in STEMI care and time-to-treatment metrics

Selected Articles

1. Obesity and Risk of Kidney Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Participant-Level Pooled Analysis of 4 Contemporary Trials.

74Level IIMeta-analysis
JACC. Heart failure · 2025PMID: 40494011

In 16,919 HFpEF participants pooled from 4 trials, waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio—but not BMI—were independently associated with higher risk of kidney outcomes over a median 2.3 years. These findings suggest abdominal adiposity better captures renal risk than overall adiposity in HFpEF.

Impact: Shifts renal risk stratification in HFpEF from BMI to abdominal adiposity, using participant-level data across multiple outcome trials.

Clinical Implications: Consider incorporating waist circumference or waist-to-height ratio into routine HFpEF assessment to identify patients at higher risk for kidney decline and guide preventive strategies.

Key Findings

  • Across 16,919 HFpEF participants, 339 kidney events occurred over a median 2.3 years.
  • BMI was not associated with incident kidney events (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.96–1.02; P=0.45 per 1 kg/m2).
  • Waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio were associated with increased kidney risk, whereas BMI was not.
  • Elevated WHtR (≥0.5) was present in 95% of those with available data (n=6,177).

Methodological Strengths

  • Participant-level pooled analysis across four large HFpEF outcome trials
  • Multivariable Cox models stratified by trial and treatment
  • Use of multiple anthropometric measures (BMI, WC, WHtR)

Limitations

  • Waist circumference data were not available in all trials (collected in PARAGON-HF and TOPCAT only)
  • Secondary analysis; not randomized by adiposity measure, residual confounding possible

Future Directions: Prospective studies should test whether targeting abdominal adiposity reduces kidney risk in HFpEF and validate pragmatic cutoffs for WC/WHtR.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is prevalent among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate whether anthropometrics including body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) are associated with kidney outcomes in patients with HFpEF. METHODS: In this participant-level pooled analysis of DELIVER, PARAGON-HF, TOPCAT Americas, and I-PRESERVE, we evaluated the impact of adiposity-related anthropometrics on risk of kidney outcomes (sustained eGFR reduction of ≥50%, end-stage kidney disease, or kidney-related death). BMI was collected in all trials and WC was collected in PARAGON-HF and TOPCAT. Multivariable Cox models stratified by trial and treatment were used. RESULTS: Overall, 16,919 participants were included in the analysis (71.9 ± 8.7 years of age; 50.7% women). Of these, 18% were normal/underweight, 35% had overweight, and 47% had obesity as assessed by BMI. WC data was available in 6,177 (105 cm; Q1-Q3: 95-116 cm), and 95% had an elevated WHtR (≥0.5). During follow-up (2.3 years; Q1-Q3: 0.6-2.9 years), 339 kidney outcome events accrued. In multivariable models, higher BMI was not associated with incident kidney events (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.96-1.02; P = 0.45, per 1 kg/m CONCLUSIONS: In this participant-level pooled analysis of 4 large-scale HFpEF outcome trials, obesity and excess abdominal adiposity were highly prevalent. WC and WHtR were associated with an increased risk of kidney outcomes, while BMI was not. (Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the LIVEs of Patients With PReserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure [DELIVER]; NCT03619213) (Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Valsartan, on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction [PARAGON-HF]; NCT01920711) (Aldosterone Antagonist Therapy for Adults With Heart Failure and Preserved Systolic Function [TOPCAT]; NCT00094302) (Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function [I-PRESERVE]; NCT00095238).

2. Temporal and Geographic Trends in the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Stratified by Race Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

71.5Level IIICohort
JAMA cardiology · 2025PMID: 40498478

Among 2.38 million Medicare beneficiaries with PAD (2018–2022), Black patients had higher rates of revascularization (OR 1.19) and major amputation (OR 2.91) than White patients, with substantial state-level variation. Amputation disparities narrowed slightly over time for Black patients but persisted overall and correlated with county-level social vulnerability.

Impact: Provides nationwide, contemporary quantification of PAD treatment disparities by race with adjustment for comorbidities and social context, identifying geographic targets for equity-focused interventions.

Clinical Implications: Health systems and payers should target high-disparity states with programs to improve limb salvage (eg, timely diagnosis, revascularization access) and address social vulnerability to reduce preventable amputations.

Key Findings

  • Black patients had higher revascularization rates (8.9% vs 7.6%; OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.18–1.21) and major amputation rates (2.8% vs 1.0%; OR 2.91, 95% CI 2.83–2.99) than White patients.
  • State-level proportional differences were substantial; disparities persisted despite modest temporal improvement for Black patients in amputation (2.9% to 2.5%).
  • Amputation correlated moderately with county-level Social Vulnerability Index (ρ=0.46), suggesting social context contributes to disparities.

Methodological Strengths

  • Very large, national cohort (n=2,376,300) with contemporary data (2018–2022)
  • Adjustment for demographics, comorbidities, tobacco use, CKD, and county-level SVI
  • Granular state-level comparisons and temporal trend analysis

Limitations

  • Claims-based definitions may misclassify PAD severity and indications
  • Residual confounding (eg, anatomy, lesion complexity, facility resources) cannot be excluded

Future Directions: Link clinical detail (anatomy, WIfI stage), facility characteristics, and longitudinal limb outcomes; evaluate equity-focused care pathways to reduce amputation disparities.

IMPORTANCE: Racial disparities in the management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are well established. Analysis of the temporal trends and geographic variation in racial differences in the use of revascularization and major amputation may identify areas for targeted intervention. OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in the treatment of PAD between Black and White patients over time and by US state. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study examined data for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with a PAD diagnosis between 2018 and 2022. Data were analyzed from November 14, 2023, to February 13, 2025. EXPOSURES: Black and White race. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The proportions of Black and White patients with PAD undergoing revascularization and major amputation were compared over time and by state. Data were adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, tobacco use, chronic kidney disease, and county-level Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). RESULTS: The total sample size was 2 376 300 beneficiaries (1 224 537 men [51.5%]). Black patients (219 338 [9.2%]) were slightly younger than White patients (2 156 962 [90.8%]; mean [SD] age, 75.8 [7.9] years vs 76.9 [7.8] years; P < .001) and had a higher prevalence of comorbidities. A higher proportion of Black patients (8.9%) than White patients (7.6%) underwent revascularization (odds ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.18-1.21]; P < .001), and a higher proportion of Black patients (2.8%) than White patients (1.0%) underwent major amputation (odds ratio, 2.91 [95% CI, 2.83-2.99]; P < .001). Higher proportions of Black patients than White patients underwent revascularization and major amputation in the majority of states, although with marked variation in these proportional differences across states. The proportions of Black and White patients who underwent revascularization decreased over time (from 8.0% to 7.4% for Black patients and from 6.8% to 6.2% for White patients). The proportion of Black patients who underwent major amputation decreased (from 2.9% to 2.5%; P < .001), but there was no change among White patients (from 0.7% to 0.7%; P = .53). Revascularization correlated weakly (ρ = 0.10), and amputation correlated moderately with SVI (ρ = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that higher proportions of Black patients than White patients undergo invasive procedures for PAD, with considerable variation across states. Although the proportional difference in major amputations has narrowed over time, the persistent proportional excess of major amputations among Black patients requires further study to investigate whether this difference reflects remediable disparities in care.

3. Institutional Variability in Processes of Care and Outcomes Among Patients With STEMI in the US.

70Level IIICross-sectional
JAMA cardiology · 2025PMID: 40498491

Among 73,826 STEMI patients across 503 US hospitals, only 59.5% (direct) and 50.3% (transfers) met FMC-to-device targets with wide hospital-level variability. Not meeting targets was strongly associated with higher in-hospital mortality for both direct presentations (aOR 2.21) and transfers (aOR 2.44).

Impact: Directly links system performance metrics to mortality at national scale, highlighting modifiable bottlenecks (ED dwell time, lab arrival-to-PCI, transfer delays).

Clinical Implications: STEMI systems of care should target process delays (ED dwell, cath lab throughput, interfacility transfer) and benchmark site-level FMC-to-device performance to reduce mortality.

Key Findings

  • Target FMC-to-device time achieved in 59.5% of direct presentations and 50.3% of transfers.
  • Large hospital-level variability: median site-level attainment 60.8% (direct) and 50.0% (transfer).
  • Failure to meet targets associated with higher in-hospital mortality (direct aOR 2.21; transfer aOR 2.44).
  • Rural vs urban status and PCI volume were not associated with odds of meeting targets.

Methodological Strengths

  • Very large, national multicenter quality-improvement registry
  • Granular process metrics with risk-adjusted mortality analyses
  • Stratification by presentation mode and site performance

Limitations

  • Retrospective cross-sectional design limits causal inference
  • Unmeasured confounding (e.g., prehospital delays, case mix) possible

Future Directions: Implement and test targeted process interventions (transfer protocols, ED-to-lab pathways) and continuous benchmarking to close site-level gaps.

IMPORTANCE: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the criterion standard for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Achieving target first medical contact (FMC)-to-device time is a quality metric in STEMI care. OBJECTIVES: To describe site-level variability in achieving target FMC-to-device time (≤90 minutes for primary presentations to PCI-capable hospitals and ≤120 minutes for transfers), compare treatment times according to hospital performance, location, and primary PCI volume, and assess whether these aspects are associated with clinical outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study from the American Heart Association Get With the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease registry from 2020 to 2022. Patients were recruited from a multicenter quality-improvement registry across 503 US hospitals. Patients with STEMI or STEMI equivalent who underwent primary PCI were included in this analysis. EXPOSURES: FMC-to-device time. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hospital performance was determined by the proportion of patients meeting target FMC-to-device time at each site. Treatment times and outcomes were compared by hospital performance, location, and primary PCI volume. RESULTS: A total of 73 826 patients were analyzed (median [IQR] age, 62 [54-71] years; 53 474 male [72.4%]). Of 60 109 patients who presented directly to PCI-capable hospitals (primary presentations), 35 783 (59.5%) achieved an FMC-to-device time of 90 minutes or less, whereas 6900 (50.3%) of 13 717 transfers had an FMC-to-device time of 120 minutes or less. There was substantial institutional variability in achieving target FMC-to-device time for both primary presentations (median [IQR], 60.8% [51.2%-68.8%]) and transfers (median [IQR], 50.0% [32.5%-66.9%]). High-performing centers met all target treatment times more frequently. Low-performing sites experienced prolonged emergency department stays, catheterization laboratory arrival-to-PCI times, and transfer delays, varying by mode of presentation. Compared with urban centers, presentation to rural hospitals did not affect the odds of meeting target FMC-to-device time for primary presentations (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.20; 95% CI, 0.96-1.50) or transfers (aOR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.50-1.47). Failure to achieve target FMC-to-device time was associated with increased in-hospital mortality risk for primary presentations (aOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 2.02-2.42) and transfers (aOR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.90-3.12). Low hospital performance was associated with increased mortality risk compared with high performance in primary presentations (aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00-1.34). Outcomes were similar between rural vs urban and low vs high primary PCI volume centers. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this large cross-sectional study of patients with STEMI, there was substantial hospital-level variability in achieving target treatment times. Patients in whom target FMC-to-device time was not met and those presenting to low-performing hospitals had worse outcomes.