Skip to main content

Daily Cardiology Research Analysis

3 papers

Three impactful cardiology studies stood out: an extended follow-up of the DANISH trial found primary prevention ICDs in nonischemic HFrEF reduce sudden cardiac death but not all-cause mortality over 13.2 years; a Swedish national cohort linked adverse pregnancy outcomes to elevated atrial fibrillation risk for up to 46 years; and a nationwide Swedish case-crossover study showed both low and high ambient temperatures acutely increase all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among patients with hea

Summary

Three impactful cardiology studies stood out: an extended follow-up of the DANISH trial found primary prevention ICDs in nonischemic HFrEF reduce sudden cardiac death but not all-cause mortality over 13.2 years; a Swedish national cohort linked adverse pregnancy outcomes to elevated atrial fibrillation risk for up to 46 years; and a nationwide Swedish case-crossover study showed both low and high ambient temperatures acutely increase all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among patients with heart failure.

Research Themes

  • Device therapy outcomes and long-term mortality in nonischemic HFrEF
  • Reproductive history as a determinant of lifelong atrial fibrillation risk
  • Climate and environmental temperature effects on heart failure mortality

Selected Articles

1. Long-Term Effect of ICDs in Nonischemic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Extended Follow-Up Analysis of DANISH.

82.5Level IRCTJournal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025PMID: 41123523

In extended follow-up (median 13.2 years) of the DANISH trial, primary prevention ICDs in nonischemic HFrEF did not reduce all-cause mortality but halved sudden cardiovascular death. Younger patients appeared to benefit more in terms of sudden death prevention.

Impact: This long-term randomized evidence directly informs guideline decisions on ICD use in nonischemic HFrEF by distinguishing sudden death benefits from the absence of overall survival benefit.

Clinical Implications: ICD implantation for primary prevention in nonischemic HFrEF should be individualized: prioritize patients at high sudden death risk (e.g., younger age, arrhythmic substrate) while recognizing no long-term reduction in all-cause mortality.

Key Findings

  • Over 13.2 years, all-cause mortality did not differ between ICD and control groups (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.82–1.13).
  • ICD reduced sudden cardiovascular death (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.36–0.80).
  • Benefit on all-cause death did not vary by age statistically, but younger individuals appeared to derive greater benefit in sudden death reduction.

Methodological Strengths

  • Randomized trial with extended long-term follow-up (median 13.2 years).
  • Hard clinical endpoints (all-cause mortality, sudden cardiovascular death) with comprehensive follow-up.

Limitations

  • Extended follow-up analyses may face crossover and evolving background therapies that could dilute effects.
  • Nonischemic HFrEF population limits generalizability to ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Future Directions: Develop and validate risk models integrating age, arrhythmic markers, scar burden, and biomarkers to refine ICD selection; assess combinations with modern HF therapies (ARNI, SGLT2i) on arrhythmic vs non-arrhythmic death.

2. Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Long-Term Risk of Atrial Fibrillation.

77Level IICohortJAMA cardiology · 2025PMID: 41123920

In a Swedish cohort of 2.2 million women with up to 46 years of follow-up, adverse pregnancy outcomes—except small for gestational age—were associated with increased atrial fibrillation risk, persisting decades after delivery. Cosibling analyses indicated these associations were largely not explained by shared familial factors.

Impact: This study reframes adverse pregnancy outcomes as lifelong arrhythmic risk markers, enabling earlier AF prevention strategies targeting women with such histories.

Clinical Implications: Incorporate adverse pregnancy history into AF risk assessment and preventive care, with long-term monitoring (blood pressure, rhythm surveillance) and aggressive risk factor control in women with preeclampsia, hypertensive disorders, preterm delivery, LGA, or gestational diabetes.

Key Findings

  • Among 2,201,047 women over 54 million person-years, 2.3% developed AF (median diagnosis age 63).
  • All adverse pregnancy outcomes except small for gestational age were associated with increased long-term AF risk; effects persisted 30–46 years post-delivery.
  • Cosibling analyses suggested limited confounding by shared familial factors; multiple adverse pregnancy outcomes further increased AF risk.

Methodological Strengths

  • Nationwide population-based cohort with 2.2 million women and long follow-up (up to 46 years).
  • Use of cosibling analyses to mitigate shared genetic and environmental confounding.

Limitations

  • Residual confounding from unmeasured lifestyle or postpartum exposures remains possible.
  • AF ascertainment relies on administrative diagnoses, potentially missing subclinical cases.

Future Directions: Evaluate the incremental value of adverse pregnancy history in AF risk prediction models; test early rhythm surveillance and cardiometabolic prevention programs targeted to women with these histories.

3. Short-Term Exposure to Low and High Temperatures and Mortality Among Patients With Heart Failure in Sweden.

71.5Level IICohort (time-stratified case-crossover)JAMA cardiology · 2025PMID: 41123904

In a nationwide time-stratified case-crossover study of 250,640 deceased patients with heart failure, both cold (2.5th percentile) and heat (97.5th percentile) exposures were associated with higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, forming a U-shaped relationship. Heat-related mortality risk increased in more recent years, underscoring climate adaptation needs even in high-latitude regions.

Impact: This provides high-resolution, policy-relevant evidence that short-term temperature extremes acutely worsen mortality in heart failure, guiding public health adaptation and clinical risk mitigation amid climate change.

Clinical Implications: Implement temperature-aware HF management: patient education on cold/heat exposure, home climate control, medication review (e.g., diuretics), telemonitoring during temperature extremes, and coordination with community heat/cold alert systems.

Key Findings

  • U-shaped association between ambient temperature and mortality in HF: low temperature OR 1.130 (95% CI 1.074–1.189) and high temperature OR 1.054 (95% CI 1.017–1.093) for all-cause death.
  • For cardiovascular mortality, low temperatures: OR 1.160 (95% CI 1.083–1.242) overall; high temperatures: OR 1.084 (95% CI 1.014–1.159) during 2014–2021.
  • Higher susceptibility subgroups included men, patients with diabetes and diuretic use (cold), and those with AF/flutter or elevated ozone exposure (heat).

Methodological Strengths

  • Nationwide time-stratified case-crossover design controlling for time-invariant confounders.
  • High spatial resolution (1×1 km) temperature exposure with municipality-specific percentiles to account for regional adaptation.

Limitations

  • Exposure misclassification remains possible without personal-level temperature or indoor environment data.
  • Study population limited to decedents; findings inform risk among HF patients but are not incidence analyses.

Future Directions: Test targeted alerts and interventions (cooling/warming centers, medication adjustments) to reduce temperature-related mortality in HF; integrate air quality metrics; evaluate cost-effectiveness of climate adaptation strategies in HF care.