Daily Cardiology Research Analysis
Analyzed 191 papers and selected 3 impactful papers.
Summary
Three impactful cardiology papers stand out today: a randomized trial (HOST-IDEA) shows that extending DAPT beyond 1 year after third-generation DES increases major bleeding without ischemic benefit; a mechanistic study repurposes the cancer drug neratinib to curb vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis via direct ASK1 inhibition; and a transformer-based survival model (TRisk) trained on 403,534 HF patients markedly improves 36‑month mortality prediction and generalizes to the U.S.
Research Themes
- Optimizing antiplatelet therapy duration after PCI
- Drug repurposing targeting vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis
- AI/Transformer-based risk prediction in heart failure
Selected Articles
1. Abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with ultrathin-strut drug-eluting stents in South Korea: 3-year outcomes of the multicentre, randomised HOST-IDEA trial.
In 2013 randomized PCI patients with third-generation DES, 3–6-month DAPT had similar 3-year net adverse clinical events as 12-month DAPT. Extending DAPT beyond 1 year increased major bleeding without ischemic benefit.
Impact: This pragmatic RCT provides robust long-term evidence to safely shorten DAPT and cautions against extending it beyond 1 year due to bleeding risk.
Clinical Implications: For patients receiving third-generation DES, consider 3–6 months of DAPT, avoid routine extension beyond 1 year unless compelling ischemic indications, and individualize therapy based on bleeding risk.
Key Findings
- 3-year NACE was similar between 3–6-month and 12-month DAPT arms (7.7% vs 8.2%).
- Post hoc propensity analysis: extending DAPT >1 year increased major bleeding without ischemic benefit.
- Follow-up completeness was high (~95%), supporting robustness of long-term comparisons.
Methodological Strengths
- Multicentre randomized design with adjudicator-blinded outcomes
- Prespecified 3-year follow-up and high follow-up completeness
Limitations
- Open-label treatment assignment
- Conducted in South Korea and limited to third-generation DES, which may affect generalizability
Future Directions: Refine patient-level DAPT tailoring with bleeding/ischemic risk tools and test ultra-short DAPT plus P2Y12 monotherapy strategies in diverse populations.
BACKGROUND: The HOST-IDEA trial demonstrated non-inferiority of 3-to-6-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to 12-month DAPT for net adverse clinical event (NACE) at 1 year in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with third-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). We evaluated the long-term outcomes of abbreviated antiplatelet therapy following PCI with third-generation DES. METHODS: In the open-label, adjudicator-blinded, multicentre, randomised HOST-IDEA trial, 2013 patients from 37 hospitals in South Korea were randomly allocated to 3-to-6-month (n = 1002) or 12-month (n = 1011) DAPT between January 2016 and May 2021. The primary outcome was NACE at 3 years, comprising cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR), stent thrombosis, and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5). Major secondary outcomes were target lesion failure (TLF)-comprising cardiac death, TVMI, and CD-TLR-and major bleeding at 3 years. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of >1-year DAPT, patients event-free at 1 year were classified into >1-year and ≤1-year DAPT groups and matched using a propensity score. These 3-year clinical outcomes were prespecified in the published protocol as mandatory clinical follow-up. HOST-IDEA is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02601157. FINDINGS: At 3 years, clinical follow-up was completed in 955 patients (95.3%) and 966 patients (95.5%) in the 3-to-6-month and 12-month DAPT groups, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 1095 days (IQR 1095-1095). The primary outcome occurred in 7.7% and 8.2% of patients in the 3-to-6-month and 12-month DAPT groups, respectively (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.69-1.29;
2. A transformer-based survival model for prediction of all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure: a multi-cohort study.
TRisk, a transformer-based survival model trained on 403,534 UK HF patients and externally validated in 21,767 US patients, substantially outperformed MAGGIC-EHR for 36-month mortality prediction. It maintained calibration, reduced subgroup variability, and surfaced underrecognized predictors such as remote cancer and hepatic failure.
Impact: Demonstrates a scalable, generalizable AI survival model that can enhance HF risk stratification beyond current tools, with transparent identification of novel risk contributors.
Clinical Implications: TRisk could support individualized prognosis, triage, and follow-up intensity in HF clinics; integration into EHRs may aid shared decision-making after local calibration.
Key Findings
- C-index 0.845 in UK cohort (n=403,534) vs 0.728 for MAGGIC-EHR for 36‑month mortality.
- External validation in US hospitals (n=21,767) achieved C-index 0.802 using transfer learning.
- Explainability highlighted established (age, CKD) and underrecognized predictors (remote cancers, hepatic failure).
Methodological Strengths
- Very large, routine-care dataset with external validation
- Use of transformer architecture with explainability analyses
Limitations
- Retrospective EHR data with potential confounding and missingness
- Clinical utility requires prospective impact evaluation and local calibration
Future Directions: Prospective trials to test decision support impact, fairness audits across subgroups, and integration with biomarkers/imaging to further boost performance.
Heart failure (HF) patients have complex health profiles that existing risk models fail to capture. We developed TRisk, a Transformer-based artificial intelligence survival model for predicting mortality using routine electronic health records (EHR) in HF patients. Using UK data from 403,534 HF patients across 1418 English general practices, we trained and validated TRisk and compared it against MAGGIC-EHR, the MAGGIC model adapted for use on routine EHR by substituting variables (e.g. left-ventricular ejection fraction) that are not routinely available. External validation was conducted on 21,767 patients from USA hospitals. In the UK cohort, TRisk achieved a concordance index (C-index): 0.845 (95% CI: 0.841, 0.849), outperforming MAGGIC-EHR (C-index: 0.728 [0.723, 0.733]) for 36-month mortality prediction. In subgroup analyses, TRisk demonstrated less variability in predictive performance by sex, age, and baseline characteristics compared to MAGGIC-EHR, suggesting less biased modelling. Evaluating TRisk in USA data via transfer learning yielded a C-index of 0.802 (0.789, 0.816). Explainability analysis revealed TRisk captured established risk factors while identifying underappreciated ones, particularly cancers and hepatic failure, with cancers maintaining prognostic utility even a decade before baseline. TRisk provides more accurate, well-calibrated mortality prediction using routine data across international healthcare settings, demonstrating potential for improved risk stratification in patients with HF.
3. Neratinib, a Clinical Drug Against Breast Cancer, Protects Against Vascular Inflammation and Atherosclerosis.
Connectivity mapping identified neratinib as a potent anti-inflammatory endothelial modulator. It suppresses TNF-α/IL‑1β/LPS-induced activation independent of HER2 by directly binding and inhibiting ASK1, and reduces atherosclerosis in vivo, supporting drug repurposing.
Impact: First mechanistic demonstration that neratinib directly targets ASK1 to quell endothelial inflammation and attenuate atherosclerosis, opening a translational path for anti-inflammatory CVD therapy.
Clinical Implications: While preclinical, this suggests a repurposable, oral agent to reduce residual inflammatory risk in atherosclerosis; safety and dose-ranging cardiovascular trials are warranted.
Key Findings
- Connectivity map screen flagged neratinib as a top anti-inflammatory candidate in endothelial cells.
- Neratinib inhibited inflammation triggered by TNF-α, IL‑1β, and LPS, independent of HER2/ERBB2.
- Direct binding to and inhibition of ASK1 was demonstrated, with in vivo reduction of atherosclerosis.
Methodological Strengths
- Drug-repurposing screen followed by mechanistic validation (target engagement with ASK1)
- Efficacy shown across multiple inflammatory stimuli and in vivo atherosclerosis models
Limitations
- Preclinical study; human efficacy and safety in CVD populations unknown
- Potential off-target effects and oncology dosing may not translate to CVD settings
Future Directions: Phase 1/2 cardiovascular trials to evaluate safety, pharmacodynamics (ASK1 pathway), and anti-inflammatory efficacy in patients with high residual risk.
BACKGROUND: Atherosclerosis commences with endothelial dysfunction and the retention of cholesterol within the vessel wall, followed by a chronic inflammatory response. Lowering LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; such as statins and PCSK9 [proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9] inhibitors) is the mainstay of current treatment for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases, but residual inflammatory risk remains high. METHODS: To address this pressing challenge, we used connectivity map screening of Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs, using perturbational data sets obtained from TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-α) and IL (interleukin)-1β-stimulated human endothelial cells. Male and female RESULTS: This screening endeavor allows us to identify neratinib, a clinical drug against breast cancer, as the hit compound with broad anti-inflammatory actions in endothelial cells. Further studies reveal that neratinib inhibited endothelial cell inflammation elicited by 3 different proinflammatory stimuli (TNF-α, IL-1β, and lipopolysaccharide). Intriguingly, the anti-inflammatory effect of neratinib was independent of its classical target HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)/ERBB2 inhibition. Further mechanistic investigation revealed that neratinib directly binds to ASK1 (apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1) and suppresses ASK1 activation. Importantly, in both male and female CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these findings support the concept that neratinib could be tested as a repurposed drug for vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis, thereby streamlining efforts to translate preclinical discoveries to clinical testing in humans.