Daily Cardiology Research Analysis
Analyzed 182 papers and selected 3 impactful papers.
Summary
Analyzed 182 papers and selected 3 impactful articles.
Selected Articles
1. Abluminus DES+ sirolimus-eluting stent versus everolimus-eluting stent in patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease (ABILITY Diabetes Global): results from a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
In this 3,032-patient multicenter RCT, the Abluminus DES+ sirolimus-eluting stent failed non-inferiority versus the XIENCE everolimus-eluting stent for 12-month ischaemia-driven target-lesion revascularization and target-lesion failure in diabetics undergoing PCI. Event rates between 12 and 24 months were similar, indicating an early disadvantage of Abluminus DES+.
Impact: This definitive head-to-head RCT in diabetics directly informs stent selection and demonstrates inferiority of a newer sirolimus platform to a widely used everolimus stent.
Clinical Implications: For diabetics undergoing PCI, XIENCE EES should be preferred over Abluminus DES+. Operators should be cautious about adopting newer platforms without proven non-inferiority, and guideline updates may reflect these findings.
Key Findings
- At 12 months, Abluminus DES+ failed non-inferiority for ischaemia-driven TLR versus XIENCE EES (KM 4.8% vs 2.1%; absolute difference 2.7%, 95% CI 1.3–4.1).
- Abluminus DES+ also failed non-inferiority for target-lesion failure at 12 months.
- Event rates converged between 12 and 24 months, suggesting the disadvantage was mainly early.
Methodological Strengths
- Large, multicenter randomized controlled design with concealed allocation and independent event adjudication
- Pre-specified coprimary endpoints with time-to-event analyses
Limitations
- Open-label design with operators unblinded may introduce procedural bias
- Adherence to recommended ≥45 s balloon inflation for Abluminus could vary across sites
Future Directions: Further RCTs should evaluate alternative sirolimus platforms in diabetics, explore mechanisms of early failure, and test adjunctive pharmacotherapy to mitigate restenosis risk.
BACKGROUND: In patients with coronary artery disease, diabetes increases the risk of restenosis and adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The Abluminus DES+ is a thin-strut cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) with abluminal and balloon-surface coating intended to enhance drug delivery to the vessel wall. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the Abluminus DES+ SES versus the XIENCE durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in patients with diabetes undergoing PCI. METHODS: ABILITY Diabetes Global was a multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomised controlled trial conducted at 74 sites in 16 countries. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes undergoing PCI for at least one de novo coronary lesion due to chronic coronary syndrome or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the Abluminus DES+ SES or the XIENCE EES. Randomisation was stratified by site using a secure web-based system with concealed allocation and randomly varying block sizes (4, 6, and 8). Operators were unmasked to allocation; staff performing clinical follow-up and the independent clinical events committee were masked. For the Abluminus DES+ SES, a balloon inflation time of at least 45 s was recommended to facilitate drug transfer; dual antiplatelet therapy was prescribed to all patients according to clinical guidelines and local practice. The primary hypothesis of the study was the non-inferiority of the Abluminus DES+ SES compared with the XIENCE EES for the two coprimary endpoints at 12 months (in the per-protocol population): ischaemia-driven target-lesion revascularisation (2·8% non-inferiority margin) and target-lesion failure (3·0% margin), defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischaemia-driven target-lesion revascularisation. Time-to-event analyses were conducted with Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04236609) and is complete. FINDINGS: Between June 12, 2020, and Sept 9, 2022, 3032 patients were randomly assigned to the Abluminus DES+ SES (n=1514) or XIENCE EES (n=1518). 2931 (96·7%) of 3032 patients completed follow-up to death or 24-month follow-up. Median age was 68·0 years (IQR 60-74). 879 (29·0%) of 3032 patients were female and 2153 (71·0%) were male. At 12 months, in the per-protocol analysis, the Abluminus DES+ SES did not meet the criteria for non-inferiority for ischaemia-driven target-lesion revascularisation compared with XIENCE EES (67 of 1421 patients [Kaplan-Meier estimate 4·8%, 95% CI 3·9-6·2] vs 30 of 1446 [2·1%, 95% CI 1·6-3·2]; absolute risk difference 2·7%, 95% CI 1·3-4·1; p
2. High-Dose vs Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults With Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of the DANFLU-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.
In a prespecified secondary analysis of the DANFLU-2 randomized trial (N=332,438; 13.2% with diabetes), high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine reduced cardiorespiratory, cardiovascular, and influenza hospitalizations compared with standard dose. Benefits were consistent irrespective of diabetes status, with stronger reduction in cardiorespiratory hospitalization among those with diabetes duration >5 years.
Impact: These results furnish high-quality randomized evidence that vaccine dose selection can reduce cardiorespiratory and cardiovascular hospitalizations in older adults, informing public health and cardiometabolic risk mitigation strategies.
Clinical Implications: For adults ≥65 years, especially those with longer-standing diabetes, clinicians and health systems should consider preferential use of high-dose influenza vaccine to reduce cardiorespiratory and cardiovascular hospitalizations during influenza seasons.
Key Findings
- High-dose inactivated vaccine reduced cardiorespiratory, cardiovascular, and influenza hospitalizations versus standard dose.
- Effect estimates were similar in those with and without diabetes; interaction by diabetes status was non-significant.
- Diabetes duration >5 years modified effect on cardiorespiratory hospitalization (rVE ~20%), suggesting greater benefit in long-standing diabetes.
Methodological Strengths
- Pragmatic, nationwide, individually randomized design with registry-based outcome capture and very large sample size.
- Prespecified secondary analysis with subgroup and interaction testing across diabetes strata.
Limitations
- Open-label design may introduce behavior-related biases.
- Secondary analysis; effect sizes for some endpoints were modest, and unmeasured confounding cannot be fully excluded.
Future Directions: Assess cost-effectiveness and implementation strategies for preferential high-dose vaccination, evaluate consistency across additional seasons and settings (e.g., nursing homes), and elucidate mechanisms linking influenza prevention to cardiovascular risk reduction.
IMPORTANCE: Influenza infection poses a substantial risk of severe complications, particularly in older adults and high-risk populations, such as individuals with diabetes. The high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-IIV) has demonstrated superior efficacy against influenza infection compared with the standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) among adults 65 years or older. However, there is limited evidence on its effectiveness in preventing severe respiratory and cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with diabetes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of HD-IIV vs SD-IIV against severe respiratory and cardiovascular outcomes according to diabetes status and across diabetes subgroups. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of DANFLU-2, a pragmatic, open-label, individually randomized clinical trial conducted in Denmark during the 2022/2023 to 2024/2025 influenza seasons. Adults 65 years or older were eligible for inclusion regardless of comorbidities. Data were obtained from nationwide health registries and analyzed from June to October 2025. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive HD-IIV or SD-IIV. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Outcomes included respiratory and cardiovascular hospitalizations. The potential effect modification by diabetes status and across diabetes subgroups was tested. RESULTS: Among 332 438 participants (mean [SD] age, 73.7 [5.8] years; 161 538 female individuals [48.6%]), 43 881 (13.2%) had diabetes. Overall, HD-IIV compared with SD-IIV was associated with reduced cardiorespiratory hospitalization, cardiovascular hospitalization, and influenza hospitalization. Effect estimates were similar for participants with and without diabetes for cardiorespiratory hospitalization (diabetes: rVE, 7.4%; 95% CI, -2.5% to 16.3%; no diabetes: rVE, 5.3%; 95% CI, 0.4%-10.0%; interaction P = .69), cardiovascular hospitalization (diabetes: rVE, 12.0%; 95% CI, -0.9% to 23.3%; no diabetes: rVE, 6.0%; 95% CI, -0.4% to 12.0%; interaction P = .38), and influenza hospitalization (diabetes: rVE, 41.6%; 95% CI, 5.0%-64.7%, vs no diabetes: rVE, 44.3%; 95% CI, 25.3%-58.7%; interaction P = .87). Duration of diabetes appeared to modify the effect of HD-IIV vs SD-IIV for cardiorespiratory hospitalization, with suggested benefit of HD-IIV in participants with diabetes duration longer than 5 years (rVE, 20.4%; 95% CI, 5.3%-33.1%), but not in those with shorter duration (rVE, -0.4%; 95% CI, -13.8% to 11.5%; interaction P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The trial results suggest that, among adults 65 years or older, HD-IIV provided consistent benefit for cardiorespiratory, cardiovascular, and influenza hospitalizations compared with SD-IIV, regardless of diabetes status. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05517174.
3. HIV-Associated Proteomic Signature of Myocardial Fibrosis and Incident Heart Failure.
Plasma proteomics coupled with CMR identified 39 proteins and a 42-protein cluster elevated in PWH that were independently associated with increased myocardial ECV. The same cluster and most proteins predicted incident heart failure over ~10 years in an independent community cohort, implicating T cell activation and TNF/ephrin signaling in myocardial fibrosis.
Impact: This study provides a validated, mechanistically informative protein signature that links immune activation to myocardial fibrosis and predicts heart failure beyond HIV, offering potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
Clinical Implications: The proteomic signature could inform risk stratification and monitoring for myocardial fibrosis and HF in PWH and the general population, and highlights immune pathways (T cell, TNF, ephrin) as potential targets.
Key Findings
- Identified 39 proteins and a 42-protein cluster elevated in PWH and independently associated with elevated myocardial ECV (FDR<0.05).
- In an independent cohort of 3,223 PWOH (118 HF events over 9.8±1.4 years), the cluster and 34/39 proteins predicted incident heart failure.
- Enrichment analyses implicated T cell activation, TNF signaling, ephrin signaling, and tissue maintenance/repair pathways.
Methodological Strengths
- Integration of high-throughput proteomics with CMR-derived extracellular volume metrics
- Independent external validation linking protein signature to incident HF in a large community cohort
Limitations
- Observational design with potential residual confounding
- Proteomic platform and thresholds may limit generalizability; prospective interventional validation is lacking
Future Directions: Prospective studies testing whether targeting identified immune pathways modifies fibrosis/HF risk, and integrating the signature into clinical risk models for PWH.
BACKGROUND: People with HIV (PWH) are at higher risk of myocardial fibrosis and subsequent heart failure (HF) compared to people without HIV (PWOH). Mechanisms underlying this risk and its specificity to PWH are unclear. METHODS: We measured 2594 proteins in plasma obtained concurrently with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging among 342 PWH and PWOH. We estimated associations with HIV serostatus and myocardial fibrosis (elevated extracellular volume fraction, ECV ≥30% among women, ≥28% among men) using multivariable regression. Among an independent community-based cohort, we estimated associations between the identified signature and time to incident HF. RESULTS: Participants were age 55±6 years, 25% female, 61% PWH (88% on antiretroviral therapy, 74% undetectable HIV RNA), and 52% had elevated ECV. We identified 39 proteins and one cluster of 42 proteins that were higher among PWH vs. PWOH and positively associated with elevated ECV, independent of risk factors (FDR<0.05). Among an independent cohort of 3223 PWOH (age 68±9 years; 52% female; 118 incident HF cases over 9.8±1.4 years), we found this protein cluster and 34 of 39 individual proteins were associated with time to incident HF. This signature was statistically enriched for T cell activation, TNF signaling, ephrin signaling, and tissue maintenance and repair. CONCLUSION: We identified an HIV-related proteomic signature associated with myocardial fibrosis regardless of HIV serostatus and that predicted incident HF among the general population. Our results identify several novel associations related to specific immune processes that may contribute to risk of myocardial fibrosis and subsequent HF among both PWH and PWOH.