Skip to main content

A novel integrated strategy combining feature-based molecular networking, QSIIR modeling, and in silico toxicity prediction accelerates the screening of illegal additives in cosmetics: Quinolones as a case study.

Talanta2025-08-30PubMed
Total: 76.0Rigor: 7Innovation: 9Journal: 8Clinical: 6

Summary

This analytical workflow integrates FBMN, a QSIIR-MLR model, and in silico toxicity prediction to non-targetedly detect and prioritize illegal quinolone adulterants in cosmetics. It clustered 51 quinolones (14 novel) into 13 groups with 1 ppm LOD using only 17 seed standards and accurately predicted concentrations from structural descriptors.

Key Findings

  • FBMN clustered 51 quinolones, including 14 novel analogs, into 13 structural groups using 17 seed standards.
  • Achieved a limit of detection of 1 ppm for quinolones in cosmetic contexts.
  • Developed a QSIIR model (MLR with 7 structural descriptors) to accurately predict quinolone concentrations.
  • Integrated in silico toxicity prediction to prioritize potentially hazardous adulterants.

Clinical Implications

Enhances public health by enabling earlier detection of harmful adulterants, informing recalls, and guiding toxicology follow-up; supports cosmetic dermatologists in identifying exposure sources in adverse reactions.

Why It Matters

Provides a scalable, reference-standard-sparing approach to uncover concealed and novel adulterants, directly strengthening cosmetic safety surveillance and regulatory enforcement.

Limitations

  • Validation reported for quinolones; generalizability to other prohibited classes requires demonstration.
  • External, real-world surveillance datasets and inter-laboratory reproducibility were not detailed.

Future Directions

Expand to other adulterant classes, prospectively validate across laboratories and product matrices, and link analytical flags to clinical toxicovigilance outcomes.

Study Information

Study Type
Case series
Research Domain
Diagnosis
Evidence Level
V - Analytical methods development and validation without clinical randomization or comparative groups.
Study Design
OTHER