Skip to main content
Daily Report

Daily Endocrinology Research Analysis

03/20/2025
3 papers selected
3 analyzed

Three impactful endocrinology studies stood out today: a global phase 2b trial of an insulin receptor antibody (ersodetug/RZ358) markedly reduced hypoglycemia in congenital hyperinsulinism; a prospective trial of immune checkpoint inhibitors in aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumors identified MMR deficiency and temozolomide-induced hypermutation as biomarkers of response; and a nationwide cohort linked impaired glycemic status to higher future risk of acromegaly. These works advance therapy

Summary

Three impactful endocrinology studies stood out today: a global phase 2b trial of an insulin receptor antibody (ersodetug/RZ358) markedly reduced hypoglycemia in congenital hyperinsulinism; a prospective trial of immune checkpoint inhibitors in aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumors identified MMR deficiency and temozolomide-induced hypermutation as biomarkers of response; and a nationwide cohort linked impaired glycemic status to higher future risk of acromegaly. These works advance therapy, biomarker-driven oncology, and population-level risk stratification.

Research Themes

  • Novel endocrine therapeutics and receptor pharmacology in hypoglycemia disorders
  • Biomarker-driven immunotherapy in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors
  • Metabolic dysregulation as a risk factor for endocrine neoplasia

Selected Articles

1. Global, multi-center, repeat-dose, phase 2 study of RZ358 (ersodetug), an insulin receptor antibody, for congenital hyperinsulinism.

8.2Level IICohort
Med (New York, N.Y.) · 2025PMID: 40107271

In a global open-label phase 2b study (n=23), add-on ersodetug produced dose-proportional PK, no dose-limiting toxicities, and marked reductions in hypoglycemia events (median −59%) and time in hypoglycemia (median −54%), with 48–84% event reductions at 6–9 mg/kg. Improvements extended to overnight hypoglycemia, with near-universal response.

Impact: This first-in-class INSR-targeting antibody demonstrates clinically meaningful hypoglycemia reduction in congenital hyperinsulinism, addressing a major unmet need across genotypes.

Clinical Implications: Ersodetug could become a genotype-agnostic therapy for cHI, potentially reducing reliance on pancreatectomy or off-label agents and improving safety of glycemic control, including overnight periods.

Key Findings

  • Median reductions from baseline: hypoglycemia events −59% (p<0.001) and time in hypoglycemia −54% (p<0.001) across pooled doses.
  • At 6–9 mg/kg, hypoglycemia events decreased by 48%–84% and time in hypoglycemia by 61%–65% (p<0.05).
  • Predictable, dose-proportional pharmacokinetics with no deaths, adverse drug reactions, withdrawals, or dose-limiting toxicities.

Methodological Strengths

  • Global, multi-center design with standardized CGM and SMBG endpoints
  • Clear dose-ranging with pharmacokinetic characterization and consistent efficacy signals

Limitations

  • Open-label, nonrandomized design without a control arm
  • Short 8-week treatment period limits long-term safety and durability assessment

Future Directions: Randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up to evaluate durability, safety, genotype-specific responses, and combination strategies with existing cHI therapies.

BACKGROUND: Congenital hyperinsulinism (cHI) is a rare, primarily pediatric disease characterized by dysregulated insulin secretion resulting in severe, persistent hypoglycemia, frequently leading to lifelong neurologic impairments. The safety, pharmacokinetics, and glycemic efficacy of ersodetug, a fully human monoclonal antibody that allosterically and reversibly binds the insulin receptor (INSR) and reduces excess insulin action, are being evaluated for the treatment of cHI-related hypoglycemia. METHODS: A global, open-label, phase 2b study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04538989) was conducted in 23 patients with cHI with persistent hypoglycemia on standard-of-care (SOC) therapies. Eligible participants (age ≥2 years) received add-on ersodetug at dose levels between 3 and 9 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.) bi-weekly for 8 weeks in 4 sequential dose cohorts. FINDINGS: Enrolled participants (average age = 6.7 years) on SOC (87% medications; 17% previous pancreatectomy) experienced 13 events/week and 23% time in hypoglycemia at baseline. Ersodetug resulted in predictable, dose-proportional pharmacokinetics. No deaths, adverse drug reactions, study withdrawals, or dose-limiting toxicities occurred. Hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) events (self-monitored blood glucose) and time (continuous glucose monitoring) improved from baseline by medians of 59% (p < 0.001) and 54% (p < 0.001), respectively, across pooled dose levels and by 48%-84% (events) and 61%-65% (time) at doses of 6 or 9 mg/kg (p < 0.05) with a nearly universal individual patient response rate. Additional hypoglycemia metrics, including overnight hypoglycemia, similarly improved. CONCLUSION: Ersodetug was generally well tolerated and significantly improved hypoglycemia in participants with cHI. Ersodetug represents a novel INSR-targeted mechanism of action with the potential to be an effective therapy for all forms of cHI, alone or in combination with other therapies. FUNDING: Rezolute, Inc. (Redwood City, CA), provided funds.

2. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Aggressive Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors.

7.7Level IICohort
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025PMID: 40109237

A prospective phase 2 trial in aggressive PitNETs found no objective responses to ipilimumab+nivolumab but observed tumor shrinkage in 2/9 evaluable patients and demonstrated feasibility and safety. Biomarker analyses implicated mismatch repair deficiency and temozolomide-induced hypermutation as predictors of immune response, with evidence of immunoediting post-therapy.

Impact: This study establishes feasibility of ICI in PitNETs and identifies mechanistically plausible biomarkers (MMRd and temozolomide hypermutation), laying groundwork for precision immunotherapy in endocrine oncology.

Clinical Implications: Patients with aggressive PitNETs harboring MMR deficiency or temozolomide-induced hypermutation may derive benefit from checkpoint blockade; routine biomarker testing could guide referral for ICI.

Key Findings

  • No objective responses by iRANO; 2/9 evaluable patients had tumor shrinkage on ipilimumab+nivolumab.
  • Mismatch repair deficiency and temozolomide-induced hypermutation associated with immunological response.
  • Immunoediting observed post-ICI (loss of MMRd and/or decreased tumor mutational burden).

Methodological Strengths

  • Prospective phase 2 design with predefined response criteria (iRANO)
  • Integrated translational biomarker analysis including pre/post sequencing

Limitations

  • Small, single-center cohort limits statistical power
  • No objective responses; clinical benefit signals require confirmation

Future Directions: Multicenter trials enriching for MMRd/temozolomide-hypermutated PitNETs, exploration of combination regimens, and standardized biomarker testing pathways.

CONTEXT: Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) that progress following surgery and radiotherapy are in need of additional treatment options. Responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been described; however, the feasibility of ICI therapy and biomarkers of response have not been formally assessed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the activity of ICI as a treatment for PitNETs. METHODS: We performed a single-center, prospective, phase 2 trial investigating the activity of ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with PitNETs. The primary endpoint was objective response using the iRANO response criteria. We then explored genetic biomarkers of response to ICIs in 13 patients with PitNETs who were treated with ICIs, on or outside of the trial. RESULTS: Ten patients with a PitNET were enrolled, including 5 corticotroph, 4 lactotroph, and 1 somatotroph tumor, of which 9/10 (4 metastatic and 5 nonmetastatic) patients were evaluable for the primary endpoint. While no objective responses were observed, tumor shrinkage was seen in 2/9 patients. In a biomarker discovery cohort, comprising 7 tumors treated on trial and 6 tumors treated off trial, temozolomide hypermutation, and mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) were associated with immunological response. In 3 tumors sequenced pre- and post-ICI treatment, we identified evidence of immunoediting, characterized by loss of MMRd and/or a decrease in tumor mutational burden. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of ICI treatment in aggressive PitNETs. We also identified MMRd and temozolomide hypermutation as potential biomarkers of response to ICI. Overall, our data suggest that ICIs might provide an additional treatment option for PitNET; this should be evaluated more broadly in future studies.

3. Association between glycaemic status and the risk of acromegaly: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

7.3Level IICohort
BMJ open · 2025PMID: 40107690

In 9.7 million adults followed for a median of 9.2 years, impaired fasting glucose (HR 2.27) and type 2 diabetes (HR 2.45) predicted incident acromegaly versus normal fasting glucose. Risk was elevated across glycemic categories, peaking with poorly controlled T2DM (HR 3.07), and consistent across demographic and lifestyle subgroups.

Impact: This is the first nationwide evidence linking glycemic dysregulation to future acromegaly risk, suggesting metabolic status may aid in earlier case-finding or risk-based vigilance.

Clinical Implications: Patients with IFG or T2DM, especially with poor control, may warrant heightened suspicion for acromegaly when compatible symptoms/signs are present; integrating glycemic status into referral algorithms could reduce diagnostic delay.

Key Findings

  • Among 9,707,487 adults, 434 incident acromegaly cases occurred over a median 9.2 years.
  • IFG and T2DM increased acromegaly risk vs. normal fasting glucose (HR 2.27 and 2.45).
  • Risk stratified by glycemic category: new-onset T2DM (HR 2.18), well-controlled T2DM (HR 2.29), and poorly controlled T2DM with the highest risk (HR 3.07).

Methodological Strengths

  • Very large nationwide cohort with long follow-up and robust subgroup consistency
  • Granular glycemic categorization using fasting glucose and prescriptions

Limitations

  • Observational design susceptible to residual confounding and misclassification
  • Case ascertainment likely relies on administrative codes; mechanistic pathways not assessed

Future Directions: Prospective studies integrating biochemical GH/IGF-1 screening in high-risk glycemic groups and mechanistic research into glucose–GH/IGF axis interactions.

OBJECTIVES: Although evidence suggests that the overall prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was already higher in the acromegaly group than in the general population several years before diagnosis, the effect of glycaemic status on the risk of developing acromegaly remains unclear. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Data were obtained from the National Health Insurance Services in Korea. Baseline glycaemic status was defined based on fasting plasma glucose levels and prescription records, and it was classified into three categories: normal fasting glucose (NFG), impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or five categories: NFG, IFG, new-onset T2DM, well-controlled T2DM and poorly controlled T2DM. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 9 707 487 adults without acromegaly participated in the national health screening programme in 2009 and were followed up until 2019. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome of interest was the diagnosis of incident acromegaly. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up period of 9.2 years, 434 people (4.5 cases per 100 000 people) developed acromegaly at least 1 year after enrolment. Participants with IFG and T2DM exhibited an increased risk of acromegaly, with hazard ratios (HR) of 2.27 (95% CI 1.84 to 2.80) and 2.45 (95% CI 1.78 to 3.39), respectively, compared with those with NFG. When participants were categorised into five glycaemic status groups, an increased risk of acromegaly was observed in those with new-onset T2DM (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.38 to 3.43) and well-controlled T2DM (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.28 to 4.09), similar to individuals with IFG, with the highest risk found in individuals with poorly controlled T2DM (HR 3.07, 95% CI 1.88 to 5.01). These associations are persistent across various subgroups, regardless of age, sex, lifestyle factors and the presence of comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study supported that alterations in glucose metabolism, including IFG and T2DM, are associated with an increased risk of acromegaly.