Daily Endocrinology Research Analysis
Across endocrinology-related research, a very large prospective cohort links maternal protein intake with opposing risks for mothers and children, a randomized trial shows intranasal insulin does not improve cognition in multiple sclerosis, and multi-database analyses confirm higher incidence of new-onset diabetes after COVID-19. Together, these studies refine preventive nutrition strategies, temper expectations for neuroendocrine repurposing, and reinforce post-infection metabolic surveillance.
Summary
Across endocrinology-related research, a very large prospective cohort links maternal protein intake with opposing risks for mothers and children, a randomized trial shows intranasal insulin does not improve cognition in multiple sclerosis, and multi-database analyses confirm higher incidence of new-onset diabetes after COVID-19. Together, these studies refine preventive nutrition strategies, temper expectations for neuroendocrine repurposing, and reinforce post-infection metabolic surveillance.
Research Themes
- Prenatal nutrition and metabolic programming
- Neuroendocrine therapeutics for cognition
- Post-viral diabetogenesis and risk stratification
Selected Articles
1. Maternal protein intake during pregnancy and obesity risk in mothers and offspring: a prospective cohort study.
In 66,360 pregnancies, lower protein intake (diluted by higher fat/carbohydrate) was linked to higher maternal postpartum weight retention but lower offspring birth weight and BMI z-scores through adolescence. Nonlinear associations around a ~15% protein threshold indicated reduced SGA but increased LGA and childhood overweight/obesity with higher protein, revealing maternal–offspring trade-offs.
Impact: This very large prospective cohort quantifies a macronutrient trade-off between maternal and offspring obesity-related outcomes, providing actionable insights for prenatal nutrition policy and counseling.
Clinical Implications: Prenatal dietary counseling may target a balanced protein proportion near ~15% of energy to minimize postpartum weight retention while avoiding excess LGA and childhood overweight/obesity risk; shared decision-making should weigh maternal and offspring outcomes.
Key Findings
- Lower maternal protein (%) was associated with higher postpartum weight retention at 6 and 18 months.
- Higher protein intake showed nonlinear associations: reduced SGA but increased LGA risk around a ~15% protein threshold.
- Each 5% higher protein was linked to lower substantial PPWR risk (OR 0.90 at 6 mo; 0.88 at 18 mo) but higher childhood OWOB risk at 7 y (OR 1.07) and 11 y (OR 1.11), with no association at 14 y.
Methodological Strengths
- Very large prospective cohort with detailed dietary assessment and multiple maternal/offspring outcomes over up to 14 years.
- Advanced mixture models and restricted cubic splines to capture macronutrient interactions and nonlinearities.
Limitations
- Observational design with potential residual confounding and self-reported dietary intake.
- Findings from a Danish cohort may limit generalizability to diverse populations.
Future Directions: Randomized feeding trials or pragmatic interventions to test protein proportion targets, mechanistic studies on placental and hormonal mediators, and equity-focused replication in diverse populations.
BACKGROUND: The optimal dietary macronutrient composition during pregnancy to mitigate obesity risk in mothers and offspring remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess associations between maternal dietary macronutrient composition and obesity outcomes in mothers and offspring. METHODS: We analyzed 66,360 singleton pregnancies from the Danish National Birth Cohort, with dietary intake assessed at gestational week 25. Outcomes included maternal postpartum weight retention (PPWR) at 6 and 18 mo and offspring's birth weight, risks of small for gestational age (SGA) and large for gestational age (LGA), body mass index (BMI) z-scores, and overweight/obesity (OWOB) risk at ages 7, 11, and 14 y. Mixture models with response surface visualization examined interactive macronutrient associations, and mixed restricted cubic splines assessed potential nonlinear relationships between maternal protein intake and obesity outcomes. RESULTS: Mean maternal macronutrient compositions were 15.2% protein, 30.2% fat, and 54.1% carbohydrate. Response surfaces revealed that maternal lower protein intake (%), diluted by higher fat and/or carbohydrate, was associated with higher maternal PPWR at 6 and 18 mo but lower birth weight and BMI z-scores in offspring at ages 7, 11, and 14 y. Mixed restricted cubic splines indicated nonlinear associations between maternal protein intake (%) and SGA risk (nonlinear P = 0.003) and LGA (nonlinear P = 0.04), with a threshold around 15% protein; below this, SGA risk increased whereas LGA risk decreased. Linear associations were observed for risks of substantial PPWR (PPWR >5 kg) and childhood OWOB risk (nonlinear P > 0.05). Each 5% higher protein intake during pregnancy was related to a lower risk of substantial PPWR at 6 mo (odds ratio: 0.90; 95% confidence interval: 0.85, 0.95) and 18 mo (0.88; 0.82, 0.94) but higher risks of OWOB at ages 7 y (1.07; 1.01, 1.15) and 11 y (1.11; 1.03, 1.18), with no association at 14 y (1.02; 0.95, 1.10). CONCLUSIONS: Higher maternal protein intake during pregnancy was associated with lower PPWR and SGA risk but higher LGA and childhood OWOB risks, highlighting potential trade-offs in maternal and offspring obesity outcomes.
2. Intranasal insulin for improving cognitive function in multiple sclerosis.
In a phase Ib/II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in MS, intranasal insulin (10 or 20 IU twice daily for 24 weeks) was safe but did not improve the SDMT or secondary cognitive outcomes versus placebo. The negative efficacy results, despite biologic plausibility, highlight challenges in translating neuroendocrine modulation to clinical benefit in MS.
Impact: A rigorous RCT provides clear negative evidence on a widely discussed neuroendocrine strategy, refining therapeutic development and preventing premature clinical adoption.
Clinical Implications: Current evidence does not support intranasal insulin for MS-related cognitive impairment over 24 weeks; future studies may require longer duration, enriched populations with lower cognitive reserve, biomarker stratification, or alternative endpoints.
Key Findings
- Phase Ib/II RCT (n=105; 69 with follow-up) found no difference in SDMT or secondary cognitive outcomes versus placebo after 24 weeks.
- Intranasal insulin was generally safe and well tolerated; common AEs included headache, rhinorrhea, and dizziness; 13 SAEs were not drug-related; no deaths.
- Stratified randomization by MS subtype; limitations included small sample size for three arms, COVID-era missingness, and potential outcome insensitivity.
Methodological Strengths
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design with stratification by MS subtype.
- Safety rigor with detailed adverse event monitoring and multi-dose evaluation.
Limitations
- Small effective sample across three arms and data missingness during COVID-19 may reduce power.
- Outcome measures may have limited sensitivity; 24-week duration may be insufficient to detect changes.
Future Directions: Consider longer trials, cognitive enrichment strategies, pharmacodynamic biomarkers (e.g., CNS insulin signaling), and combination approaches to enhance efficacy.
Cognitive impairment is common in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). There is an urgent need to identify/develop novel therapies that can help cognitive function in MS. Insulin is critical for helping with regulation of multiple CNS functions, including learning and memory. Insulin administrated intranasally has shown to improve memory and learning in healthy people and in those with some neurodegenerative disorders. Hence, there was rationale for investigating intranasal insulin in PwMS who experience cognitive impairment. We completed a phase Ib/II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial; participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion, stratified by relapsing versus progressive MS, to intranasal insulin 10 international units (IU) twice a day, 20 IU twice a day, or placebo for 24 weeks. One-hundred and five PwMS were enrolled, 69 of whom had at least one follow up visit during the active treatment phase of the trial (baseline to week 24). The cohort's mean age was 52.4 ± 9.7years, 62 % were female, and ∼60 % had relapsing-remitting MS. The most common side effects amongst treatment groups included headache, rhinorrhea, and dizziness. There were 13 SAEs which were not deemed study drug related; there were no deaths. The main clinical outcome measure, SDMT, did not demonstrate any difference between intranasal insulin and placebo. Similar findings were noted for all secondary outcome measures. Intranasal insulin appeared safe and well-tolerated in PwMS. However, it was not superior to placebo in any of the clinical outcome measures assessed, which could have been impacted by the duration of the trial, small sample size for a three-arm trial design, data missingness (particularly during COVID-19), outcome measure insensitivity to change, baseline cognitive reserve, or other factors. Nonetheless, intranasally-administered therapeutics may be of interest to develop further as a way to get across the blood brain barrier.
3. Comparison of the association between COVID-19 and new onset diabetes in a regional and national dataset.
Across three databases, COVID-19 infection was associated with higher incidence of new-onset diabetes, with HRs 3.46 (UKHC) and 2.13 (MarketScan), and elevated risk even in outpatients but especially in hospitalized/treated patients. Type 1 diabetes risk was also elevated (HR 1.61).
Impact: Multi-database concordant evidence strengthens the association between COVID-19 and incident diabetes, informing screening strategies and long-COVID metabolic follow-up.
Clinical Implications: Post-COVID metabolic surveillance should include diabetes screening, with heightened vigilance after hospitalization or severe infection; health systems should prepare for increased diabetes incidence in post-COVID populations.
Key Findings
- COVID-19 infection increased incident diabetes across all datasets with adjusted HRs of 3.46 (UKHC) and 2.13 (MarketScan).
- Risk elevation was observed even in outpatients and was substantially higher in inpatients requiring interventions.
- Type 1 diabetes incidence was also higher in MarketScan (HR 1.61).
Methodological Strengths
- Use of multiple large datasets with distinct populations and control groups including pre-pandemic and COVID-era non-infected comparators.
- Time-to-event modeling with adjusted hazard ratios and inpatient/outpatient stratification.
Limitations
- Retrospective design with potential confounding, ascertainment, and coding biases; exact sample sizes per dataset not provided in the abstract.
- Findings reflect the initial 18 months of the pandemic and may not generalize to later variants or vaccination eras.
Future Directions: Prospective surveillance with laboratory confirmation, glycemic phenotyping, and mechanistic studies of beta-cell and insulin resistance pathways; evaluate mitigation via vaccination and antiviral therapy.
AIMS: This study examined new onset diabetes following COVID-19 infection in large datasets. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study design was used in three distinct databases: data from a large academic medical center (University of Kentucky Healthcare, UKHC), claims data from privately insured patients in the Merative MarketScan (MarketScan) database, and a subset of the MarketScan database with lab tests. Control groups included patients from the prepandemic timeframe (prepandemic cohort), as well as COVID-era patients without documented COVID infection (COVID - cohort). RESULTS: Incident diabetes in COVID infected patients was higher in all datasets. In the UKHC and MarketScan datasets, the adjusted Hazard ratios (HR) were 3.46 and 2.13 in UKHC and MarketScan. Incident diabetes was elevated even in patients who were treated in the outpatient setting and much higher in patients who were treated in the inpatient setting, especially those who required inpatient interventions. In MarketScan, the HR for developing type 1 diabetes was 1.61. CONCLUSIONS: Persons infected with COVID-19 during the initial 18 months of the pandemic demonstrated a higher incidence of new onset diabetes, which was evident in all populations. Diabetes incidence was especially high in an academic center population with higher health disparities, and in patients with a more severe infection with the virus.