Skip to main content

Daily Endocrinology Research Analysis

3 papers

Three impactful endocrinology/metabolism studies span mechanism, precision risk, and therapy: (1) colonic inflammation drives adaptive pancreatic β-cell proliferation via a liver–nerve–pancreas axis, (2) genetic risk (especially PNPLA3) predicts decade-wise fibrosis progression in MASLD, and (3) a randomized trial shows pioglitazone plus empagliflozin synergistically reduces liver fat and stiffness in T2D with MASLD.

Summary

Three impactful endocrinology/metabolism studies span mechanism, precision risk, and therapy: (1) colonic inflammation drives adaptive pancreatic β-cell proliferation via a liver–nerve–pancreas axis, (2) genetic risk (especially PNPLA3) predicts decade-wise fibrosis progression in MASLD, and (3) a randomized trial shows pioglitazone plus empagliflozin synergistically reduces liver fat and stiffness in T2D with MASLD.

Research Themes

  • Gut–liver–pancreas cross-talk regulating β-cell adaptation
  • Genetic risk stratification for fibrosis progression in MASLD
  • Combination therapy for MASLD in type 2 diabetes

Selected Articles

1. Colonic inflammation triggers β cell proliferation during obesity development via a liver-to-pancreas interorgan mechanism.

85.5Level VBasic/Mechanistic studyJCI insight · 2025PMID: 40337860

In mouse models, colonic inflammation induced by DSS or high-fat diet activates hepatic ERK and a splanchnic–vagal neuronal relay to drive adaptive pancreatic β-cell proliferation. Blocking the neuronal pathway or inhibiting gut homing via anti-LPAM1 suppressed β-cell proliferation and hepatic ERK activation. The study identifies a gut-origin signal that tunes β-cell mass during obesity.

Impact: This work uncovers a previously unrecognized gut–liver–pancreas axis that links intestinal inflammation to β-cell mass expansion, redefining β-cell adaptive biology in obesity.

Clinical Implications: Targeting colonic inflammation or the hepatic ERK–autonomic relay could become strategies to modulate β-cell adaptation in insulin resistance, potentially delaying hyperglycemia onset.

Key Findings

  • DSS-induced colonic inflammation increased hepatic ERK activation and pancreatic β-cell proliferation; both were suppressed by blocking the neuronal relay.
  • Anti-LPAM1 antibody reduced DSS-induced β-cell proliferation, implicating gut homing in the signaling pathway.
  • High-fat diet elicited colonic inflammation; anti-LPAM1 suppressed hepatic ERK activation and β-cell proliferation under HFD.

Methodological Strengths

  • Multiple in vivo models (DSS colitis and HFD) with convergent results
  • Causal interrogation via neuronal relay blockade and anti-LPAM1 intervention

Limitations

  • Findings are in animal models; human validation is lacking
  • Specific sensory and effector neural components beyond splanchnic/vagal pathways were not fully dissected

Future Directions: Validate the gut–liver–pancreas axis in humans (biomarkers, imaging, neuromodulation), and test whether modulating colonic inflammation alters β-cell mass/function in metabolic disease.

2. High inherited risk predicts age-associated increases in fibrosis in patients with MASLD.

75.5Level IIICohort (cross-sectional analysis with external validation)Journal of hepatology · 2025PMID: 40334848

In 570 adults with MASLD, high genetic risk (PNPLA3 risk alleles minus HSD17B13 protection) predicted higher decade-wise increases in liver stiffness by MRE, with PNPLA3 G/G showing early divergence by age ~44. Findings were consistent using PRS-HFC/PRS-5 and validated in an external Latin American cohort.

Impact: Provides actionable precision-medicine evidence to incorporate genotype-based risk stratification into MASLD monitoring strategies.

Clinical Implications: Genotyping (e.g., PNPLA3 and HSD17B13) can identify patients likely to experience faster fibrosis progression and who may benefit from earlier, more frequent noninvasive fibrosis assessment and targeted interventions.

Key Findings

  • High genetic risk score predicted increased liver stiffness per decade (β=0.28 kPa/10 years; p=0.001), not seen in low-risk patients.
  • PNPLA3 C/G and G/G genotypes independently associated with higher LSM; G/G diverged by age ~44; validated externally.
  • PRS-HFC and PRS-5 analyses corroborated genetic risk–fibrosis progression associations.

Methodological Strengths

  • Integration of MRE with targeted genotyping and polygenic risk scores
  • External validation cohort confirming generalizability

Limitations

  • Cross-sectional design limits causal inference about fibrosis progression
  • Cohort age range (18–70) and demographics may limit applicability to other populations

Future Directions: Prospective longitudinal studies testing genotype-guided surveillance intervals and therapeutic selection; evaluation of combined clinical-genetic risk algorithms.

3. Synergistic benefit of thiazolidinedione and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

74.5Level IRCTBMC medicine · 2025PMID: 40336058

In a 24-week, open-label RCT (n=50), pioglitazone+empagliflozin achieved the largest reductions in MRI-PDFF and MRE stiffness versus monotherapies in T2D with MASLD. All combination-group participants met ≥30% relative or ≥5% absolute liver fat reduction; half met both ≥30% fat and ≥20% stiffness reduction.

Impact: Demonstrates a plausible, synergistic pharmacologic strategy to treat MASLD in T2D using readily available agents, with quantitative MRI endpoints.

Clinical Implications: In T2D with MASLD, combining a TZD (pioglitazone) and an SGLT2 inhibitor (empagliflozin) may better reduce hepatic steatosis and stiffness than either alone, while favorably impacting visceral adiposity and adiponectin.

Key Findings

  • Combination therapy produced the greatest reductions in MRI-PDFF and MRE stiffness over 24 weeks.
  • 100% of the combination group achieved ≥30% relative or ≥5% absolute liver fat reduction (vs 57.1% PIO, 87.5% EMPA; p=0.010).
  • 50% of the combination group achieved ≥30% liver fat and ≥20% stiffness reduction (vs 21.4% PIO, 6.3% EMPA; p=0.029).
  • Combination reduced visceral fat the most and increased adiponectin the most, without the subcutaneous fat changes seen with monotherapy.

Methodological Strengths

  • Randomized allocation with quantitative MRI-PDFF and MRE endpoints
  • Registered trial (NCT03646292) with objective imaging-based outcomes

Limitations

  • Open-label design with small sample size (n=50) and 24-week duration
  • Single-center and dosing fixed; not powered for clinical events

Future Directions: Confirm efficacy and safety in larger, blinded, multicenter RCTs with histologic endpoints; explore dose optimization and class-generalizability.