Skip to main content

Daily Endocrinology Research Analysis

3 papers

Three impactful studies span therapy and mechanism in metabolic endocrinology: a phase II RCT shows the pan-PPAR agonist chiglitazar substantially reduces liver fat in MASLD; a mechanistic study uncovers a glucose–α-ketoglutarate–JMJD1A–ChREBP epigenetic axis driving visceral adipogenesis; and imeglimin is shown to suppress glucagon secretion via α-cell EPAC2 signaling while altering α-cell identity. Together, they advance MASLD therapeutics and deepen understanding of adipose and islet biology.

Summary

Three impactful studies span therapy and mechanism in metabolic endocrinology: a phase II RCT shows the pan-PPAR agonist chiglitazar substantially reduces liver fat in MASLD; a mechanistic study uncovers a glucose–α-ketoglutarate–JMJD1A–ChREBP epigenetic axis driving visceral adipogenesis; and imeglimin is shown to suppress glucagon secretion via α-cell EPAC2 signaling while altering α-cell identity. Together, they advance MASLD therapeutics and deepen understanding of adipose and islet biology.

Research Themes

  • Therapeutic modulation of metabolic liver disease (MASLD)
  • Epigenetic nutrient sensing in adipose tissue
  • Islet alpha-cell signaling and glucagon regulation by antidiabetic agents

Selected Articles

1. Chiglitazar in MASLD with hypertriglyceridemia and insulin resistance: A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

84Level IRCTHepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2025PMID: 40720744

In a multicenter phase II RCT (n=104), chiglitazar reduced MRI-PDFF by 28–40% versus 3% with placebo over 18 weeks, with dose-dependent effects. Liver injury markers (ALT, AST, γ-GT) improved and safety was favorable, with trends toward better lipids, insulin resistance, and fibrosis indicators.

Impact: This high-quality RCT demonstrates robust reductions in liver fat on a quantitative imaging surrogate in MASLD with an agent targeting PPARs, advancing a promising therapeutic modality in an area of unmet need.

Clinical Implications: Supports further phase III development of chiglitazar in MASLD/MASH, suggests patient subgroups (hypertriglyceridemia with insulin resistance) may benefit, and motivates incorporation of MRI-PDFF endpoints alongside histology in trials.

Key Findings

  • Chiglitazar reduced MRI-PDFF by −28.1% (48 mg) and −39.5% (64 mg) vs −3.2% with placebo at 18 weeks.
  • Between-group differences vs placebo were −24.9% (p<0.05) and −36.3% (p<0.001) for 48 mg and 64 mg, respectively.
  • ALT, AST, and γ-GT improved significantly; lipid parameters, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, and fibrosis indicators trended better.
  • Both doses were well tolerated; adverse events were mostly mild to moderate.

Methodological Strengths

  • Multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled design with prespecified MRI-PDFF primary endpoint
  • Dose-ranging evaluation with consistent biomarker improvements

Limitations

  • Short duration (18 weeks) with surrogate imaging endpoints without histologic confirmation
  • Selective MASLD population (hypertriglyceridemia and insulin resistance); modest sample size (n=104)

Future Directions: Conduct phase III trials with longer follow-up, histologic endpoints (NASH resolution, fibrosis), cardiovascular/metabolic outcomes, and comparative effectiveness vs other PPAR or thyroid hormone receptor agonists.

2. Glucose-activated JMJD1A drives visceral adipogenesis via α-ketoglutarate-dependent chromatin remodeling.

78.5Level IVBasic/Mechanistic researchCell reports · 2025PMID: 40720241

The study delineates a glucose–α-ketoglutarate–JMJD1A–ChREBP epigenetic circuit that removes H3K9me2 at adipogenic loci and enables hyperplastic expansion of visceral fat during nutrient excess. JMJD1A deficiency shifts remodeling toward hypertrophy with inflammation, highlighting depot-specific control of adipogenesis.

Impact: Reveals a nutrient-sensitive chromatin mechanism linking glucose flux to adipose tissue expansion mode, offering tractable epigenetic targets to modulate unhealthy hypertrophy versus healthier hyperplasia.

Clinical Implications: Targeting the JMJD1A/NFIC/ChREBP axis may shift adipose remodeling away from inflammatory hypertrophy, potentially improving insulin sensitivity and cardiometabolic risk in obesity.

Key Findings

  • Glucose raises nuclear α-ketoglutarate, activating JMJD1A to demethylate H3K9me2 at adipogenic loci (e.g., Pparg).
  • NFIC recruits JMJD1A, enabling ChREBP binding and transcriptional activation—a feedforward nutrient–chromatin circuit.
  • In vivo, JMJD1A is essential for de novo adipogenesis and hyperplastic expansion of visceral fat; deficiency causes hypertrophy and local inflammation.

Methodological Strengths

  • Integrated mechanistic approach combining chromatin profiling with in vivo genetic models
  • Identification of transcription factor cooperation (NFIC–ChREBP) at pre-marked promoters

Limitations

  • Findings derived primarily from murine models; human depot-specific applicability remains to be confirmed
  • Long-term metabolic outcomes and pharmacologic tractability of JMJD1A targeting were not assessed

Future Directions: Validate the axis in human adipose depots, define systemic consequences of modulating JMJD1A activity, and explore small-molecule or nutrient-based interventions to bias adipose remodeling.

3. Imeglimin suppresses glucagon secretion and induces a loss of α cell identity.

77.5Level IVBasic/Mechanistic researchCell reports. Medicine · 2025PMID: 40713970

Imeglimin directly suppresses α-cell glucagon secretion by downregulating Gsα and limiting EPAC2-mediated secretion in response to low glucose, GIP, or adrenaline, and it induces loss of α-cell identity. The findings suggest dual implications: benefit in hyperglucagonemia but caution regarding α-cell phenotype.

Impact: Provides a clear mechanistic basis for imeglimin’s effects on α cells beyond glycemia, informing therapeutic use and safety monitoring, especially where counterregulation may be critical.

Clinical Implications: Imeglimin may mitigate hyperglucagonemia in type 2 diabetes, but clinicians should consider potential effects on α-cell identity and counterregulatory responses, especially in hypoglycemia-prone patients.

Key Findings

  • Imeglimin directly suppresses glucagon secretion from α cells independent of insulin.
  • Mechanism: reduced Gsα expression limits EPAC2-mediated glucagon release induced by low glucose, GIP, or adrenaline.
  • Imeglimin attenuates α-cell Ca2+ signaling and induces loss of α-cell identity.

Methodological Strengths

  • Mechanistic dissection across multiple α-cell stimuli (low glucose, GIP, adrenaline)
  • Direct assessment of α-cell signaling (EPAC2, Ca2+) and identity markers

Limitations

  • Preclinical mechanistic study; human in vivo counterregulatory effects not established
  • Long-term consequences of α-cell identity changes were not assessed

Future Directions: Evaluate imeglimin’s impact on glucagon counterregulation and hypoglycemia risk in humans; clarify reversibility and functional significance of α-cell identity changes; explore patient stratification.