Daily Endocrinology Research Analysis
Analyzed 59 papers and selected 3 impactful papers.
Summary
Three high-impact endocrinology studies stand out today: a network meta-analysis shows GLP-1 receptor agonists most effectively reduce both visceral and subcutaneous fat, an important determinant of cardiometabolic risk; a novel genomic method pinpoints maternal 11p15.5 loss as a hallmark in SDHD-related paragangliomas; and a mechanistic mouse study reveals ghrelin’s orexigenic action requires peripheral, extrahepatic growth hormone receptor signaling.
Research Themes
- Anti-obesity pharmacotherapy and body fat distribution
- Genomic imprinting and tumorigenesis in endocrine neoplasia
- Neuroendocrine regulation of appetite via ghrelin–GH axis
Selected Articles
1. Efficacy of Weight-Lowering Agents on Fat Distribution: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Across 41 RCTs, GLP-1 receptor agonists significantly reduced both visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous (SAT) adipose tissue, while SGLT2 inhibitors preferentially reduced VAT. Several agents (GLP-1 RAs, SGLT2 inhibitors, naltrexone–bupropion, metformin) lowered body weight and waist circumference. These findings support tailoring anti-obesity pharmacotherapy to patients’ fat distribution profiles.
Impact: Fat distribution is more predictive of cardiometabolic risk than weight alone; this synthesis quantifies compartment-specific effects of major anti-obesity drugs. It informs precision pharmacotherapy beyond scale weight.
Clinical Implications: For patients with predominant visceral adiposity, SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists are rational choices; when subcutaneous fat reduction is also targeted, GLP-1 receptor agonists may be preferred. Treatment plans should integrate fat distribution, cardiometabolic risks, and patient preferences.
Key Findings
- GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced VAT by −0.90 (95% CI −1.32 to −0.47) and SAT by −1.01 (−1.58 to −0.43) over a mean 29.4 weeks.
- SGLT2 inhibitors reduced VAT by −0.66 (−1.22 to −0.10) but did not significantly reduce SAT.
- Body weight and waist circumference decreased with GLP-1 RAs, SGLT2 inhibitors, naltrexone–bupropion, and metformin.
Methodological Strengths
- Network meta-analysis allowing indirect and direct comparisons across 41 RCTs
- Compartment-specific outcomes (VAT and SAT) in addition to weight and waist circumference
Limitations
- Average follow-up ~29 weeks limits long-term inference on fat distribution and outcomes
- Potential heterogeneity and reliance on study-level (not individual patient) data
Future Directions: Head-to-head RCTs with imaging-verified VAT/SAT endpoints, longer-term cardiometabolic outcomes, and stratification by baseline fat distribution.
BACKGROUND: Pharmacotherapy offers a potential solution for individuals with overweight and obesity to decrease their body weight. However, there is limited knowledge of the effects of antiobesity agents on the distribution of body fat. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were reviewed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of weight-lowering drugs between inception and May 23, 2023. The main results were visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT and SAT). Secondary outcomes were altered body weights and waist circumferences. For the statistical analysis, STATA 14.0 was utilized, and the frequentist method was used for random-effect network meta-analyses. RESULTS: A total of 39 articles including 41 RCTs with 2741 patients were included. GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors were observed to lower VAT (-0.90 [-1.32 to -0.47] and -0.66 [-1.22 to -0.10]) after a mean of 29.4 weeks, whereas only GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced SAT (-1.01 [-1.58 to -0.43]). Naltrexone-bupropion, GLP-1 receptor agonists, SGLT-2 inhibitors, and metformin were found to reduce body weight (-5.60 [-8.64 to -2.56] kg, -4.73 [-5.58 to -3.88] kg, -3.20 [-4.69 to -1.72] kg, and -1.93 [-3.01 to -0.85] kg). Lastly, waist circumference was decreased by GLP-1 receptor agonists, metformin, SGLT-2 inhibitors, and naltrexone-bupropion. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrated that GLP-1 receptor agonists may have advantages over other antiobesity agents in reducing VAT and SAT. SGLT-2 inhibitors were more helpful to reduce VAT. The clinical significance relates to physicians being able to choose appropriate weight-loss agents in accordance with a patient's fat distribution.
2. A Novel Targeted Sequence for Chromosome 11p15.5 Maternal Loss in SDHD-Related Paragangliomas.
Using a novel SNV-oriented, capture-based targeted enrichment with NGS, the authors demonstrated high-frequency maternal loss of 11p15.5–15.4 in SDHD-related paragangliomas (92% vs 47% in non-SDHD PGLs), confirming the maternal origin of the lost allele. Most SDHD-related tumors exhibited complete loss across this region, supporting the Hensen model of parent-of-origin tumorigenesis while highlighting challenges in pinpointing a single driver TSG.
Impact: Introduces a high-resolution assay to interrogate imprinting-related LOH in endocrine tumors and provides strong genetic support for a parent-of-origin mechanism in SDHD-related paragangliomas.
Clinical Implications: Potential incorporation of targeted LOH analysis of 11p15.5 into diagnostic workflows may refine risk assessment and genetic counseling for SDHD families. Understanding parent-of-origin mechanisms could guide surveillance strategies.
Key Findings
- Somatic loss of 11p15.5–15.4 detected in 92% of SDHD-related PGLs versus 47% of non-SDHD PGLs (p=0.0035).
- Parental genotyping confirmed the lost 11p region was of maternal origin.
- Complete loss across 11p15.5–15.4 in 12/13 SDHD tumors impeded localization of a specific maternal-expressed tumor suppressor gene.
Methodological Strengths
- Novel SNV-oriented, capture-based targeted enrichment enabling high-resolution LOH mapping
- Comparator cohort of non-SDHD PGLs and parental genotyping to establish maternal origin
Limitations
- Small cohort size limits generalizability
- Complete regional loss precluded pinpointing specific driver tumor suppressor genes; lack of functional validation
Future Directions: Apply this assay to larger, multi-institutional cohorts; integrate methylation/imprinting analyses and functional studies to identify specific maternal-expressed TSGs driving tumorigenesis.
Hereditary paragangliomas (PGLs) caused by germline SDHD pathogenic variants (PVs) exhibit a parent-of-origin effect, with tumors arising almost exclusively when the PV is inherited from the paternal allele. The Hensen model proposes that a cluster of maternally expressed tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) on chromosome 11p15.5 may play a crucial role in SDHD-related PGL tumorigenesis, wherein somatic loss of maternal 11p and wild-type SDHD allele, in conjunction with a paternally inherited SDHD PV, triggers tumor development. To systematically localize and identify the most crucial maternal-expressed TSGs within 11p15.5, we developed a novel single nucleotide variant (SNV)-oriented, capture-based targeted enrichment approach followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) to enable high-resolution loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) analysis. Among 13 SDHD-related PGLs and 23 non-SDHD-related PGLs, a somatic loss of 11p15.5-15.4 was detected in 92% and 47%, respectively, a significant difference (p = 0.0035). Parental genotype analysis confirmed that the lost chromosome was of maternal origin. In our studies, 12/13 SDHD-related tumors demonstrated complete loss of the maternal 11p15.5-15.4 region, preventing localization of a specific driver TSG. Only one exceptional SDHD-related tumor retained this region, warranting further investigation into the mechanism underlying parent-of-origin tumorigenesis.
3. Ghrelin-induced food intake in male mice requires peripheral extrahepatic GHR signaling.
In male mice, ghrelin’s hyperphagic effect depends on peripheral, extrahepatic GH receptor signaling rather than central GHR activation. Pegvisomant blunted ghrelin-induced feeding without affecting refeeding- or AgRP-driven hyperphagia, and hepatocyte-specific GHR knockout did not impair ghrelin’s effect. This identifies a selective, liver-independent GH-dependent pathway mediating ghrelin-induced appetite.
Impact: Clarifies the peripheral locus of GH signaling necessary for ghrelin-induced feeding, refining models of neuroendocrine appetite control and pointing to peripheral targets for anti-obesity strategies.
Clinical Implications: Peripheral GH pathway modulation may attenuate ghrelin-driven hyperphagia without broadly impairing central feeding circuits, suggesting a path to appetite-modulating therapies with fewer CNS effects.
Key Findings
- Systemic ghrelin increased food intake, GH, and glycemia, but did not activate brain GHR (no pSTAT5).
- Peripheral GHR antagonism with pegvisomant selectively blunted ghrelin-induced hyperphagia without affecting refeeding- or AgRP-driven feeding.
- Hepatocyte-specific GHR knockout preserved ghrelin-induced feeding, indicating a non-hepatic peripheral requirement.
Methodological Strengths
- Convergent approaches (single-cell transcriptomics, pharmacologic antagonism, tissue-specific knockout)
- Specificity controls showing no effect on refeeding or AgRP-mediated hyperphagia
Limitations
- Study restricted to male mice; sex differences not assessed
- Peripheral tissue(s) mediating the effect remain to be identified; translational relevance to humans untested
Future Directions: Map the specific peripheral tissues and circuits mediating GHR-dependent ghrelin feeding, evaluate females, and test pharmacologic modulation in obesity models.
Ghrelin acts via the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR), and increases both food intake and growth hormone (GH) secretion. Studies in mice with genetic manipulations of GH receptor (GHR) revealed that GH action is required for ghrelin's orexigenic effects. However, the biological basis of this interdependence remains unclear. Here, we studied the mechanisms by which GHR contributes to ghrelin-induced hyperphagia in male mice. Transcriptomic analyses of single-cell datasets revealed that Ghr and Ghsr are co-expressed in a small subset of neurons, particularly within the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus (ARH). Systemic ghrelin administration increased food intake, circulating GH, and glycemia, but did not induce GHR activation in the brain, as indicated by the absence of pSTAT5 immunoreactivity. Central GH administration failed to enhance ghrelin-induced food intake or glycemia. To evaluate the role of peripheral GHR signaling, we treated mice with the brain-impermeable GHR antagonist pegvisomant. Systemically-injected pegvisomant impaired ghrelin's orexigenic effect without affecting its impact on glycemia or hypothalamic c-Fos activation, indicating that peripheral GHR signaling is required for ghrelin-induced hyperphagia. Pegvisomant did not alter refeeding-induced or AgRP neuron-mediated hyperphagia, suggesting a selective blockade of ghrelin's action. Moreover, ghrelin-induced food intake was preserved in hepatocyte-specific GHR knockout mice, despite disrupted hepatic GH signaling. Thus, peripheral, non-hepatic GHR signaling is selectively required for the orexigenic effects of ghrelin. This work reveals a critical GH-dependent, liver-independent mechanism underlying ghrelin-driven feeding, with potential implications for the neuroendocrine regulation of appetite and for therapeutic strategies targeting the ghrelin-GH axis in metabolic diseases.