Daily Endocrinology Research Analysis
Analyzed 90 papers and selected 3 impactful papers.
Summary
Three high-impact endocrinology papers span translational metabolism, risk prediction, and comparative therapeutics. Metabolomic biomarkers improved prediction of kidney function decline in type 2 diabetes, antiresorptive agents showed comparable 12-month skeletal efficacy in men with osteoporosis, and a large multi-ethnic cohort revealed accelerating obesity—especially in younger migrant groups—informing targeted prevention.
Research Themes
- Metabolomic biomarkers for diabetic kidney disease risk stratification
- Comparative effectiveness of antiresorptives in male osteoporosis
- Ethnic and age disparities in obesity trajectories
Selected Articles
1. Acylcarnitines and prediction of renal function decline in type 2 diabetes.
Across two independent T2D cohorts (n=575 discovery; n=252 validation), 11 acylcarnitines associated with faster eGFR decline after multiple testing correction. A 6-metabolite acylcarnitine score independently improved discrimination and reclassification beyond clinical predictors, with partial replication across cohorts.
Impact: Metabolomic markers that improve prognostic models for diabetic kidney disease can enable earlier, more precise interventions. External validation strengthens translational potential.
Clinical Implications: Incorporating an acylcarnitine panel into risk assessment could refine identification of T2D patients at high risk of kidney function decline, informing intensified renoprotective therapies and monitoring.
Key Findings
- Eleven of 40 measured acylcarnitines associated with faster eGFR decline after Bonferroni correction in the discovery cohort.
- Tiglylcarnitine and methylglutarylcarnitine replicated in an independent validation cohort.
- A 6-acylcarnitine score independently improved discrimination (p<0.01) and reclassification (p<0.001) over clinical models.
- Associations persisted after adjustment for traditional risk factors including AER, HbA1c, lipids, and statin use.
Methodological Strengths
- Two independent cohorts with long follow-up and external validation.
- Rigorous statistical approach including Bonferroni correction and LASSO with incremental predictive performance testing.
Limitations
- Observational design cannot establish causality.
- Not all metabolite associations replicated across diverse populations; generalizability may be limited.
Future Directions: Prospective implementation studies are needed to test whether acylcarnitine-guided risk stratification improves renal outcomes, and to assess assay standardization and cost-effectiveness.
INTRODUCTION: We comprehensively investigated whether serum acylcarnitine levels are associated with and predict the decline of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two cohorts of patients with type 2 diabetes were investigated: a subset of the aggregate Gargano Mortality Study (aGMS, n=575; 9 years of median follow-up; mean age=60.9±9.8; mean diabetes duration=11.6±9.3) as a discovery set from Italy. A sample from the Joslin Kidney Study (JKS, n=252; 10 years of median follow-up; mean age=57.8±5.6; mean diabetes duration=14.2±7.6) was used as an independent validation set with different environmental and ethnic background for some associated metabolites in the aGMS. MAIN OUTCOME: estimated GFR (eGFR) change over time (mL/min/1.73 m RESULTS: Eleven out of the 40 acylcarnitines (by the AbsoluteIDQTM p180 Kit, BIOCRATES) were significantly associated with the rate of eGFR decline after Bonferroni correction. All 11 molecules were internally validated (p<0.05). Most of these associations survived the adjustment for several confounders, including age, sex, smoking habit, body mass index, glycated hemoglobin, disease duration, albumin excretion rate, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein and statins treatment (p<0.05). Tiglylcarnitine and methylglutarylcarnitine, but not tetradecenoylcarnitine and hexadecenoylcarnitine, were also associated with eGFR decline in the JKS (p<0.05). Using multivariable least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis, methylglutarylcarnitine, hydroxyvalerylcarnitine, hexenoylcarnitine, decadienylcarnitine, dodecanedioylcarnitine, tetradecadienylcarnitine were independently associated with kidney function decline. The pairwise correlation among these ranged from -0.02 to 0.55. An acylcarnitine score comprising these six molecules improved discrimination (p<0.01) and reclassification (p<0.001) of two clinical prediction models of GFR decline in diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes, four short, three medium and four long-chain acylcarnitines are associated with the rate of kidney function decline. Adding the acylcarnitine score to clinical prediction models improves the identification of individuals who are at greater risk of progression to kidney failure.
2. Efficacy and safety of denosumab, zoledronic acid and alendronate on bone mineral density and trabecular bone score in men with osteoporosis.
In a randomized open-label trial of 390 men, denosumab, alendronate, and zoledronic acid produced similar 12-month gains in lumbar spine and hip BMD and TBS, with comparable BTM suppression. Adverse events were fewer with denosumab and alendronate than zoledronic acid; prior antiresorptive therapy blunted denosumab spine BMD response by ~30%.
Impact: Head-to-head randomized data in men—a frequently under-studied population—clarify comparative skeletal effects across widely used antiresorptives and inform drug selection.
Clinical Implications: For men with osteoporosis, choice among these antiresorptives can prioritize safety, convenience, comorbidities, and prior therapy history, given similar 12-month BMD/TBS gains and BTM suppression.
Key Findings
- All three agents increased lumbar spine BMD by ~4.3–5.2% and total hip BMD by ~2.5–2.8% at 12 months with no significant between-group differences.
- Trabecular Bone Score increased by ~2.0–2.4% across groups; BTMs decreased significantly in all arms.
- Fewer adverse events occurred with denosumab and alendronate compared with zoledronic acid.
- Denosumab efficacy was similar irrespective of gonadal function; prior antiresorptive use reduced spine BMD gains by ~30%.
Methodological Strengths
- Randomized comparative design with balanced baseline characteristics and multiple skeletal endpoints (BMD, TBS, BTMs).
- Safety monitoring across three active comparators in a male cohort.
Limitations
- Open-label design without fracture endpoints; 12-month duration may be insufficient to assess long-term differences.
- Not powered for rare adverse events or subgroup superiority.
Future Directions: Longer blinded trials with fracture outcomes and health economic analyses in men are warranted to refine comparative effectiveness and safety.
OBJECTIVE: Osteoporosis in men is a common but often neglected health problem. We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of denosumab, zoledronic acid and alendronate in men with osteoporosis. METHODS: In this randomized, comparative, open-label study, 390 men with osteoporosis or osteopenia were included. They were randomized to receive the treatment of denosumab, alendronate, or zoledronic acid for 12 months. The percentage changes in bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone score (TBS) and bone turnover biomarkers (BTMs) during the treatment were evaluated. Safety parameters were observed. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were well balanced among the three groups. After 12 months of treatment, denosumab, alendronate and zoledronic acid significantly increased BMD by 4.83 ± 0.89%, 4.32 ± 0.77%, 5.18 ± 0.73% at lumbar spine, by 2.75 ± 0.51%, 2.50 ± 0.61% and 2.83 ± 0.59% at total hip, TBS was significantly increased by 2.44 ± 0.52%, 2.00 ± 0.64%, 2.29 ± 0.55%, respectively, without significant differences among the three groups. Serum levels of BTMs decreased significantly and similarly in all three groups (all P < .05 vs. baseline). Denosumab and alendronate group had fewer adverse events than zoledronic acid group. Denosumab had similar efficacy in patients with different gonadal functions. In patients previously receiving bone resorption inhibitors, denosumab continued to increase BMD and TBS, but the increments were reduced by approximately 30% in BMD at lumbar spine compared with treatment-naive patients. CONCLUSION: Denosumab, alendronate and zoledronic acid significantly and similarly reduced BTMs, increased BMD and TBS in men with osteoporosis, whether the gonadal function of patients was normal or decreased. Previous anti-bone resorption therapy may partially diminish the efficacy of denosumab.
3. Trends in obesity prevalence and changes in adiposity across ethnic groups: findings from a population-based prospective cohort study in Amsterdam, the Netherlands (HELIUS study).
In 10,484 adults followed ~6.3 years, obesity prevalence rose from 23.6% to 28.7%, with steeper increases among ethnic minorities versus Dutch-origin participants. The largest BMI/WC gains occurred in younger (<50 years) migrants—especially Ghanaian and African Surinamese—highlighting urgent need for tailored prevention.
Impact: Provides robust, age-stratified, multi-ethnic longitudinal evidence on obesity trajectories in Europe, pinpointing high-risk groups for targeted, equitable prevention.
Clinical Implications: Primary care and public health programs should prioritize culturally tailored obesity prevention for younger ethnic minority populations, integrating waist circumference screening and socioeconomic context.
Key Findings
- Age-adjusted obesity prevalence increased from 23.6% to 28.7% over ~6.3 years.
- Steeper increases in BMI and waist circumference occurred among ethnic minorities versus Dutch-origin participants.
- Younger (<50 years) Ghanaian and African Surinamese participants showed the largest adiposity gains.
- Among older adults, only Ghanaian and Turkish groups continued to show BMI increases.
Methodological Strengths
- Large, population-based, multi-ethnic prospective cohort with repeated measures.
- Linear mixed models with adjustment for age, sex, and socioeconomic position; age-stratified analyses.
Limitations
- Generalizability may be limited to Amsterdam and included ethnic groups.
- Residual confounding possible despite adjustments; lifestyle measures may be imperfectly captured.
Future Directions: Test targeted, culturally adapted interventions in the identified high-risk younger minority groups and assess long-term cardiometabolic outcomes.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Obesity has reached epidemic proportions worldwide, with large differences across regions. European data on obesity trends among ethnic groups is scarce, particularly regarding the influence of age and socioeconomic status on these trends, which is crucial for guiding targeted interventions. In this study, we assessed the prevalence of obesity and changes in body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) over time and the effects of key sociodemographic factors on these changes using longitudinal data from a large multi-ethnic cohort. METHODS: Using baseline and follow-up data from 10 484 participants in the HEalthy Life in an Urban Setting (HELIUS) study, representing Dutch, South-Asian Surinamese, African Surinamese, Ghanaian, Moroccan and Turkish populations; age-adjusted obesity prevalence; BMI and WC changes over an average follow-up of 6.3 (SD 1.2) years were calculated. Linear mixed models were used to assess changes in BMI and WC over time, adjusting for age, sex and socio-economic position. Key analyses were stratified by age (younger <50 years, older ≥50 years). RESULTS: Median age of the baseline population was 48.0 years (IQR 38.0, 56.0), with 56.7% being women. Age-adjusted prevalence of obesity increased from 23.6% at baseline to 28.7% at follow-up, with steeper increases in ethnic minority groups compared with the Dutch origin group. The steepest increase in BMI and WC was observed in younger migrants, especially in those of Ghanaian and African-Surinamese descent. In older participants, only individuals of Ghanaian and Turkish descent showed a further increase in BMI over time. CONCLUSION: Obesity is increasingly prevalent in ethnic minority groups under 50 years, potentially raising obesity-related health risks and underscoring the need for targeted interventions to prevent further complications.