Skip to main content
Daily Report

Daily Endocrinology Research Analysis

05/25/2026
3 papers selected
96 analyzed

Analyzed 96 papers and selected 3 impactful papers.

Summary

Three papers stand out today: (1) a prespecified RCT analysis from VESALIUS-CV shows baseline Lp(a) independently predicts major coronary events while evolocumab reduces risk regardless of Lp(a), with greater absolute benefit at higher Lp(a); (2) a prospective cohort in Thyroid supports safely de-escalating differentiated thyroid cancer follow-up to primary care after excellent response; (3) a multinational EClinicalMedicine study validates an AI tool that flags very high bone fragility from routine radiographs with high specificity across diverse cohorts.

Research Themes

  • Risk stratification and lipid therapeutics (Lp[a], PCSK9 inhibition)
  • De-escalation of oncology follow-up to primary care in endocrinology
  • AI-enabled opportunistic screening for skeletal fragility

Selected Articles

1. Lipoprotein(a) Levels, Risk of Cardiovascular Events and Benefit of Evolocumab: Findings From the VESALIUS-CV Trial.

81Level IRCT
Circulation · 2026PMID: 42183757

In this prespecified analysis of the VESALIUS-CV RCT (n=7,557 with Lp[a] measured), higher baseline Lp(a) independently predicted major coronary events in patients without prior MI or stroke. Evolocumab reduced relative risk similarly across Lp(a) strata, with numerically larger absolute risk reductions at higher Lp(a), supporting Lp(a)-informed risk communication and therapy prioritization.

Impact: This large prespecified analysis within an ongoing outcomes RCT clarifies how Lp(a) refines absolute benefit from PCSK9 inhibition in high-risk primary prevention, informing precision lipid therapy.

Clinical Implications: Measure Lp(a) in high-risk patients without prior events to improve risk stratification; evolocumab provides consistent relative risk reduction but greater absolute benefit with elevated Lp(a), aiding shared decision-making.

Key Findings

  • Baseline Lp(a) independently associated with higher risk of major coronary events in placebo arm.
  • Evolocumab reduced relative risk of major coronary events similarly across Lp(a) levels.
  • Absolute risk reduction was numerically greater among patients with elevated Lp(a).

Methodological Strengths

  • Prespecified analysis within a randomized, placebo-controlled outcomes trial with median 4.6-year follow-up.
  • Large sample with standardized baseline Lp(a) and multivariable Cox modeling.

Limitations

  • Subgroup/biomarker analysis; not randomized by Lp(a) strata.
  • Incomplete hazard ratio details for specific Lp(a) cutoffs in abstract; stroke outcomes not associated.

Future Directions: Prospective trials stratified by Lp(a) with absolute risk targets; evaluate integration with emerging Lp(a)-lowering agents for combined risk reduction.

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a risk factor for coronary heart disease. Whether baseline Lp(a) identifies higher risk patients who derive more benefit from evolocumab is not established in a population without prior myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke. METHODS: From June 2019 to November 2021, the VESALIUS-CV trial enrolled patients with qualifying atherosclerosis or high-risk diabetes, without prior MI or stroke and randomized them to evolocumab or placebo (median follow-up 4.6 years). In a prespecified analysis, Lp(a) was assessed at baseline in 7557 patients. Cox models were used to assess the adjusted risk of cardiovascular events by baseline Lp(a) in the placebo arm, and the efficacy of evolocumab by baseline Lp(a). The primary outcome of interest was the composite of major coronary events (coronary heart disease death, MI or urgent coronary revascularization). RESULTS: Median age was 66 [interquartile range 60-71] years and 42.8% were women; median Lp(a) was 28 (interquartile range 9-132) nmol/L. Higher baseline Lp(a) was associated with an increased risk of major coronary events (HR CONCLUSIONS: In patients with atherosclerosis or high-risk diabetes but without prior MI or stroke, Lp(a) was independently associated with an increased risk of major coronary events, but not ischemic stroke. Evolocumab reduced the relative risk of major coronary events to a similar degree irrespective of baseline Lp(a), with a numerically greater absolute risk reduction in patients with elevated Lp(a).

2. Prospective Evaluation of Follow-Up De-Escalation to Primary Care in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer with Excellent Response to Therapy.

77Level IICohort
Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2026PMID: 42184216

In 154 DTC patients transitioned to primary care after ≥5 years of specialist follow-up and achieving excellent response, ER status remained highly stable (96.1% at postdischarge reassessment) with minimal clinically meaningful recurrence despite markedly reduced surveillance. These data support response-adapted de-escalation of follow-up to primary care focusing on levothyroxine and TSH monitoring.

Impact: Prospective evidence that ER is a durable state enabling safe transition to primary care can reduce low-value surveillance and reallocate specialty resources.

Clinical Implications: For DTC patients with ER after ≥5 years, consider discharge to primary care with focus on thyroid hormone replacement and TSH monitoring, reserving specialty follow-up for higher-risk or non-ER states.

Key Findings

  • ER proportion increased from 76.6% at 6 months to 94.2% at predischarge and 96.1% postdischarge.
  • Minimal clinically meaningful recurrence occurred despite markedly reduced biochemical/imaging surveillance.
  • Findings support response-adapted care centered in primary care for ER patients.

Methodological Strengths

  • Prospective longitudinal design with predefined postdischarge reassessment.
  • Use of dynamic risk stratification to guide de-escalation decisions.

Limitations

  • Single cohort without a concurrent control group; modest sample size.
  • Incomplete reporting of statistical estimates in abstract (e.g., P values).

Future Directions: Multicenter pragmatic trials comparing specialist-led vs primary-care-led follow-up in ER DTC; define minimal surveillance schedules and patient-reported outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Dynamic risk stratification (DRS) enables response-adapted follow-up in differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). However, prospective data supporting surveillance de-escalation and discharge to primary care (PC) after an excellent response (ER) is lacking. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal cohort study with a prospectively conducted postdischarge reassessment, including 154 patients with DTC treated with total thyroidectomy, with or without radioiodine ablation, who completed ≥5 years of specialist follow-up and were discharged to PC after achieving ER. A small subset ( RESULTS: Baseline American Thyroid Association-2025 recurrence risk was low 78/154 (50.6%), intermediate-low 44/154 (28.6%), intermediate-high 23/154 (14.9%), and high 9/154 (5.8%). ER increased from 118/154 (76.6%) at 6 months to 145/154 (94.2%) at predischarge and to 148/154 (96.1%) at postdischarge reassessment ( CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that patients with DTC who complete ≥5 years of specialist follow-up and achieve ER may be safely transitioned to PC. ER represents a stable clinical state, with minimal risk of clinically meaningful recurrence even with markedly reduced biochemical and imaging surveillance. These findings support a response-adapted long-term care model centered in PC, focused on thyroid hormone replacement and TSH monitoring. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

3. Validation of a deep learning model for bone fragility detection from conventional radiographs: an international cohort study.

74.5Level IIICohort
EClinicalMedicine · 2026PMID: 42180399

A deep learning model trained on a composite Bone Fragility Index (TBS+BMD) identified very high bone fragility from routine radiographs with consistently high specificity (0.88–0.96) across three external sites, supporting opportunistic screening in diverse populations. Sensitivity was moderate (0.53–0.64), aligning with the intended use to minimize false positives.

Impact: Demonstrates robust external validation of an AI model that integrates bone quantity and quality proxies from routine imaging, enabling scalable, low-burden identification of patients needing osteoporosis workup.

Clinical Implications: Incorporate the AI tool into radiology workflows to flag very high bone fragility for DXA/TBS confirmation and fracture prevention; high specificity limits unnecessary referrals.

Key Findings

  • Model trained on a composite index (TBS+BMD) from 18,858 paired radiographs-DXA scans.
  • External validation across three sites showed high specificity (0.88–0.96) with moderate sensitivity (0.53–0.64).
  • Approach supports opportunistic identification of very high bone fragility from routine radiographs.

Methodological Strengths

  • Large, multinational, multi-vendor dataset with rigorous external validation.
  • Composite target combining BMD and TBS aligns with fracture pathophysiology.

Limitations

  • Retrospective design; selection limited to patients with available DXA within 6 months.
  • Sensitivity is moderate; prospective fracture prediction not yet assessed.

Future Directions: Prospective studies without prior DXA selection to assess incident fracture prediction and workflow impact; optimize sensitivity–specificity trade-offs by indication.

BACKGROUND: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based opportunistic risk stratification solutions can help to counter rising fragility fracture rates. Existing tools estimate bone mineral density (BMD) alone, while the present study incorporates trabecular bone score (TBS), a surrogate of bone microarchitecture, more closely mirroring fracture pathophysiology. We aimed to evaluate the performance of an AI tool that estimates bone fragility directly from standard radiographs to identify individuals at highest risk of fracture. METHODS: This retrospective, multinational cohort study included 18,858 paired radiographs and lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans from adult patients (aged at least 20 years) from three clinical sites in Europe and two sites in the United States. Routine clinical radiographs of the spine, abdomen, chest, or pelvis acquired in the anteroposterior or posteroanterior view and including visualisation of the lumbar spine were included. Eligible radiographs had an in-plane spatial resolution of ≤0.2 mm per pixel, independent of vendor, and had a corresponding DXA examination within 6 months, and included at least two lumbar vertebrae (L1-L4). The AI model training used a composite Bone Fragility Index, combining TBS and BMD. Training, internal validation and testing was performed on two European sites (n = 10,692; Italy and Austria); and external validation involved three sites with ethnically diverse populations (n = 7079): Slovakia, US site 1 (Wisconsin) and US site 2 (New York). Model performance for identifying very high bone fragility (characterised by degraded TBS and osteoporosis) prioritised specificity (as per the intended clinical use to prioritise low false-positive rates) and was evaluated with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, AUC and precision. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2010 and Dec 31, 2023, 18,858 paired radiographs and lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans from 11,138 participants across five international sites were retrospectively aggregated. Internal testing on two European sites demonstrated an accuracy of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.92), specificity of 0.93 (0.85, 0.99), and sensitivity of 0.53 (0.41, 0.67). External testing on three sites demonstrated consistently high specificity of 0.88 (0.77, 0.99) in the European cohort, 0.94 (0.91, 0.97) in the American White dataset, and 0.96 (0.81, 0.99) in the American Non-White. External sensitivity ranged from 0.53 (0.41, 0.67) to 0.64 (0.50, 0.88). INTERPRETATION: The proposed approach provides rapid identification of individuals with very high bone fragility from routine radiographs. Its specificity across diverse populations supports clinical use for opportunistic osteoporosis screening in real-world settings. Future work should assess the model's performance in more sex-balanced cohorts without prior DXA assessment, and evaluate its ability to predict incident fractures. FUNDING: The Swiss National Science Foundation, the Foundation of the Orthopaedic Hospital of the Vaudois University Hospital (Lausanne, Switzerland), and Medimaps Group SA, Switzerland.