Daily Respiratory Research Analysis
Across three complementary, real‑world studies, RSV prevention showed strong effectiveness and safety signals: maternal RSVpreF vaccination substantially reduced infant RSV hospitalizations; protein‑subunit vaccines in older adults were highly effective with a small, product‑specific GBS signal; and U.S. surveillance showed marked declines in infant RSV hospitalizations after program roll‑out. Together these data support rapid, season‑timed uptake of maternal and infant protection and informed p
Summary
Across three complementary, real‑world studies, RSV prevention showed strong effectiveness and safety signals: maternal RSVpreF vaccination substantially reduced infant RSV hospitalizations; protein‑subunit vaccines in older adults were highly effective with a small, product‑specific GBS signal; and U.S. surveillance showed marked declines in infant RSV hospitalizations after program roll‑out. Together these data support rapid, season‑timed uptake of maternal and infant protection and informed product selection in older adults.
Research Themes
- Real-world effectiveness of RSV immunization across age groups
- Vaccine safety signals and product-specific risk profiles
- Population-level impact of maternal and infant RSV prevention
Selected Articles
1. Real-world effectiveness of RSVpreF vaccination during pregnancy against RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease leading to hospitalisation in infants during the 2024 RSV season in Argentina (BERNI study): a multicentre, retrospective, test-negative, case-control study.
This multicenter test‑negative case‑control study in Argentina found RSVpreF maternal vaccination reduced infant RSV‑LRTD hospitalizations by 78.6% through 3 months and 71.3% through 6 months, with 76.9% protection against severe LRTD. All RSV‑related in‑hospital deaths occurred in infants whose mothers were unvaccinated.
Impact: Provides the first national, real‑world effectiveness data post‑program implementation, directly informing maternal immunization policy and timing to protect infants during peak RSV circulation.
Clinical Implications: Prioritize timely maternal RSVpreF vaccination (32–36 weeks’ gestation per local policy) before RSV season to protect infants up to 6 months. Counseling should emphasize substantial hospitalization risk reduction and the observed absence of deaths among vaccinated dyads.
Key Findings
- Vaccine effectiveness against RSV-associated LRTD hospitalization: 78.6% (birth–3 months) and 71.3% (birth–6 months).
- Effectiveness against severe LRTD hospitalization through 6 months: 76.9%.
- All three RSV-related in-hospital infant deaths occurred in the unvaccinated maternal group.
Methodological Strengths
- Multicenter test-negative design minimizing care-seeking bias.
- Laboratory confirmation (PCR or IFA) for case definition with age-specific effectiveness estimates.
Limitations
- Retrospective design with potential residual confounding.
- Limited to a single season and one country; generalizability to other settings requires caution.
Future Directions: Evaluate durability across multiple seasons, effectiveness by gestational timing and coadministration, and combined population impact alongside infant monoclonal antibody programs.
BACKGROUND: In March, 2024, Argentina became the first country to implement a national maternal immunisation programme with bivalent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F vaccine (RSVpreF) as the primary strategy to prevent RSV disease among infants. We aimed to evaluate vaccine effectiveness against RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) and severe LRTD leading to hospitalisation among infants during the first season after implementation. METHODS: A multicentre, retrospective, test-negative, case-control study was done during the 2024 RSV season in 12 hospitals across Argentina (BERNI study). We included infants aged 6 months or younger who were hospitalised with LRTD between April 1 and Sept 30, 2024, and tested for RSV using PCR or indirect immunofluorescence; cases were infants with any positive RSV test and controls were PCR-confirmed negative for RSV. Infants were considered born to an RSVpreF-vaccinated pregnant woman if RSVpreF was received between 32 FINDINGS: Of 633 infants hospitalised for LRTD between April 1 and Sept 30, 2024, 505 (286 cases and 219 controls) met full eligibility criteria for inclusion in the primary vaccine effectiveness analysis; 51 (18%) cases and 109 (50%) controls were born to individuals who received RSVpreF during pregnancy. Vaccine effectiveness against RSV-associated LRTD leading to infant hospitalisation was 78·6% (95% CI 62·1-87·9) from birth to age 3 months and 71·3% (53·3-82·3) from birth to age 6 months. Effectiveness against RSV-associated severe LRTD leading to hospitalisation was 76·9% (45·0-90·3) from birth to age 6 months. Three RSV-associated in-hospital deaths occurred, all among infants whose mothers did not receive RSVpreF during pregnancy. INTERPRETATION: These real-world estimates for the 2024 RSV season in Argentina show high RSVpreF effectiveness against RSV-associated LRTD and severe LRTD leading to hospitalisation from birth to age 3 months and sustained to age 6 months. FUNDING: Pfizer. TRANSLATION: For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
2. Effectiveness and Safety of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine for US Adults Aged 60 Years or Older.
In >787k tested adults ≥60 years, RSV protein‑subunit vaccines showed 75% effectiveness against RSV‑associated ARI, mirroring trial results, with modest reductions in immunocompromised subgroups and the lowest VE in stem cell transplant recipients. Safety analyses of >4.7 million recipients detected no excess ITP, and a small but significant excess GBS risk for RSVPreF (not for RSVPreF+AS01).
Impact: Largest U.S. real‑world VE and safety assessment informs product selection, risk communication (GBS signal), and prioritization of high‑risk subgroups.
Clinical Implications: Offer RSV vaccination broadly to adults ≥60 and counsel that VE remains high across settings; consider slightly lower VE in immunocompromised, especially post‑transplant. Discuss small, product‑specific GBS risk when choosing between RSVPreF and RSVPreF+AS01.
Key Findings
- Overall VE against RSV-associated ARI: 75.1% (95% CI 73.6–76.4).
- VE modestly reduced in immunocompromised; lowest in stem cell transplant recipients (approx. 29–44%).
- Safety: no excess ITP; excess GBS per 1,000,000 doses for RSVPreF (~18.2) but not RSVPreF+AS01 (~5.2, not elevated).
Methodological Strengths
- Test-negative design paired with self-controlled case series for safety.
- Very large, nationally representative EHR dataset enabling subgroup analyses.
Limitations
- Observational design with potential misclassification and residual confounding.
- Product assignment not randomized; differing risk profiles may influence VE estimates.
Future Directions: Head‑to‑head comparative effectiveness, evaluation of durability across seasons, and mechanistic studies into product‑specific GBS associations.
IMPORTANCE: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is associated with hospitalization and death among older adults. Characterizing the safety and effectiveness of recently introduced vaccines against RSV is critical. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of vaccines against RSV and the major adverse events among patients aged 60 years or older during the 2023-2024 RSV season. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this study using a data platform containing electronic health records for more than 270 million patients across the US, a test-negative case-control design was used to estimate vaccine effectiveness (VE), and a self-controlled case series of vaccine recipients was included to estimate vaccine-associated adverse events. Records from participants aged 60 years or older with acute respiratory infection (ARI) and testing for RSV between October 1, 2023, and April 30, 2024, were included in the VE study. For vaccine safety analysis, all participants aged 60 years or older who received the RSV vaccine from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 were included. Data were analyzed from August 2024 to March 2025. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cases were those patients who tested positive for RSV, and controls were those who tested negative for RSV. Patients were classified as vaccinated if the vaccine was received at least 14 days before testing. VE against RSV-associated ARI diagnosis, emergency department or urgent care visits, or hospitalizations was estimated using (1 - odds ratio) × 100%. Excess risks of immune thrombocytopenic purpura and Guillain-Barré syndrome diagnosis for 6 weeks after vaccine administration were calculated. RESULTS: Of 787 822 patients tested for RSV, 53 963 were positive (733 859 were controls); 1318 cases (2.4%) and 66 928 controls (9.1%) were vaccinated. Overall, VE was 75.1% (95% CI, 73.6%-76.4%) against ARI and was similar for age groups of 60 to 74 years and 75 years or older and against urgent care visits or hospitalizations. Immunocompromised patients had a VE from 67.0% (95% CI, 62.6%-70.9%) for patients aged 60 to 74 years to 73.1% (95% CI, 69.9%-76.0%) for those aged 75 years or older, and the lowest VE (ie, from 29.4% [95% CI, 3.5%-48.4%] for patients aged 60-74 years to 44.4% [95% CI, 1.0%-68.8%] for those aged ≥75 years) was for a subgroup of patients who received stem cell transplants. Among 4 746 518 vaccine recipients, no excess risk of immune thrombocytopenic purpura diagnosis was detected. An excess of 5.2 cases (RSVPreF3+AS01) or 18.2 cases (RSVPreF) of Guillain-Barré syndrome were diagnosed per 1 000 000 doses of RSV vaccine administered. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: VE for the RSV protein subunit vaccine in this case-control study was similar to the VE in clinical trials. The VE for immunocompromised patients was mildly (overall) to moderately (for stem cell transplant recipients) diminished. Risk of immune thrombocytopenic purpura after vaccination was not elevated, but the risk of Guilain-Barré syndrome was statistically significantly elevated in patients who received the RSVPreF vaccine but not in those who received RSVPreF+AS01 vaccine, although the risk was small. These observations should inform clinicians' choices and patient instructions.
3. Interim Evaluation of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Hospitalization Rates Among Infants and Young Children After Introduction of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prevention Products - United States, October 2024-February 2025.
Using RSV‑NET and NVSN surveillance, infant (0–7 months) RSV hospitalization rates in 2024–25 were substantially lower than 2018–20 pooled rates, with 43% and 28% reductions, respectively, and the greatest declines in 0–2 month infants and peak months. Data support ACIP recommendations for maternal vaccination or nirsevimab early in the season and soon after birth.
Impact: Provides timely, population‑level evidence that the combined maternal and infant prevention strategy reduces infant RSV hospitalizations in the U.S., guiding implementation timing and coverage optimization.
Clinical Implications: Health systems should ensure maternal vaccination during late pregnancy and prompt birth‑hospital nirsevimab administration for eligible infants to maximize protection before peak RSV transmission.
Key Findings
- Infant (0–7 months) RSV hospitalization rates reduced by 43% (RSV‑NET) and 28% (NVSN) vs 2018–20.
- Largest reductions in 0–2 month infants: 52% (RSV‑NET) and 45% (NVSN).
- Greatest impact observed during peak months (Dec–Feb), supporting early‑season implementation.
Methodological Strengths
- Dual national surveillance systems with historical comparison.
- Consistent signal across two networks and age strata.
Limitations
- Ecological comparison without individual vaccination linkage.
- Potential differences in testing practices and health‑care utilization across seasons.
Future Directions: Link individual vaccination/antibody data to outcomes, assess contributions of each product, and model optimal program timing and coverage targets.
Maternal respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine and nirsevimab, a long-acting monoclonal antibody for infants aged 0-7 months and children aged 8-19 months who are at increased risk for severe RSV disease, became widely available for prevention of severe RSV disease among infants and young children during the 2024-25 RSV season. To evaluate the association between availability of these products and infant and child RSV-associated hospitalization rates, the rates among children aged <5 years were compared for the 2024-25 and 2018-20 RSV seasons using data from the RSV-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network (RSV-NET) and New Vaccine Surveillance Network (NVSN). Among infants aged 0-7 months (eligible for protection with maternal vaccination or nirsevimab), 2024-25 RSV-associated hospitalization rates were lower compared with 2018-20 pooled rates (estimated relative rate reductions of 43% [RSV-NET: 95% CI = 40%-46%] and 28% [NVSN: 95% CI = 18%-36%]). The largest estimated rate reduction was observed among infants aged 0-2 months (RSV-NET: 52%, 95% CI = 49%-56%; NVSN: 45%, 95% CI = 32%-57%) and during peak hospitalization periods (December-February). These findings support Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' recommendations for maternal vaccination or nirsevimab to protect against severe RSV disease in infants and highlight the importance of implementing the recommendations to protect infants as early in the RSV season as possible, before peak transmission, and for infants born during the RSV season, within the first week of life, ideally during the birth hospitalization.