Protection conferred by SARS-CoV-2 infection across a spectrum of reinfection symptoms and severities.
Summary
In a nationwide matched test-negative design spanning >17 million tests, prior infection conferred strong protection against severe COVID-19 reinfection in both eras, but waned against asymptomatic/symptomatic Omicron reinfections. The study quantifies a clear severity-dependent protection gradient.
Key Findings
- Pre-Omicron prior infection reduced asymptomatic, symptomatic, severe, and critical reinfections by ~81%, 88%, 98%, and 100%, respectively.
- During Omicron, protection against asymptomatic and symptomatic reinfections fell to ~46% and ~53%, while protection against severe and critical reinfections remained ~100%.
- Protection waned over time for mild/asymptomatic Omicron reinfections, but remained strong for severe outcomes.
Clinical Implications
Clinicians can reassure that prior infection strongly protects against severe outcomes, while advising patients—especially high-risk—that mild/silent reinfections remain likely in Omicron circulation and that vaccination/boosters remain important.
Why It Matters
Provides high-precision, policy-relevant estimates of natural immunity across reinfection severities, informing risk communication and booster strategies in the Omicron era.
Limitations
- Observational design subject to residual confounding and testing behavior biases
- Generalizability may vary with variant mix and public health measures
Future Directions
Integrate hybrid immunity (infection + vaccination) strata, variant-specific analyses, and modeling to optimize booster timing for protecting against severe disease while reducing transmission.
Study Information
- Study Type
- Case-control (test-negative)
- Research Domain
- Prevention/Prognosis
- Evidence Level
- III - Well-designed observational study with matched controls
- Study Design
- OTHER