Daily Sepsis Research Analysis
A multicenter prospective registry identified clinical factors beyond norepinephrine thresholds that predict vasopressin responsiveness in septic shock. A systematic review and meta-analysis suggests antiplatelet therapy may reduce short-term mortality in sepsis without increasing complications, though certainty is low. Additionally, a large ICU database analysis found the fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio at ICU admission strongly associates with mortality across timepoints in septic acute kidney inj
Summary
A multicenter prospective registry identified clinical factors beyond norepinephrine thresholds that predict vasopressin responsiveness in septic shock. A systematic review and meta-analysis suggests antiplatelet therapy may reduce short-term mortality in sepsis without increasing complications, though certainty is low. Additionally, a large ICU database analysis found the fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio at ICU admission strongly associates with mortality across timepoints in septic acute kidney injury.
Research Themes
- Hemodynamic optimization in septic shock
- Adjunctive antithrombotic strategies in sepsis
- Prognostic biomarkers in septic acute kidney injury
Selected Articles
1. Hemodynamic effects of adjunct arginine vasopressin to norepinephrine in septic shock: insights from a prospective multicenter registry study.
In a prospective multicenter registry of 200 septic shock patients, 79% were hemodynamic responders to adjunct vasopressin within 2 hours. Obesity and higher lactate were associated with lower odds of response, whereas norepinephrine ≥0.30 µg/kg/min increased response likelihood. Rebound hypotension occurred in 9% upon AVP cessation, with durations >24 h reducing its risk.
Impact: These data refine patient selection for vasopressin beyond norepinephrine thresholds, highlighting metabolic and dosing factors that predict response and recovery risks.
Clinical Implications: Consider arterial lactate, pH, BMI, and norepinephrine dose/duration when adding vasopressin in septic shock. Monitor for rebound hypotension at discontinuation and consider longer AVP durations (>24 h) to mitigate it.
Key Findings
- 79% (153/200) met the predefined AVP hemodynamic response (NE stabilized or decreased within 2 h).
- Obesity (aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.14–0.65) and hyperlactatemia (aOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75–0.99 per unit) were negatively associated with response.
- NE infusion rate ≥0.30 µg/kg/min increased odds of response (aOR 2.33, 95% CI 1.06–5.14).
- New-onset atrial fibrillation occurred less in responders vs non-responders (4% vs 14%, p=0.013).
- Rebound hypotension occurred in 9% at AVP termination; AVP duration >24 h reduced this risk (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05–0.85).
Methodological Strengths
- Prospective multicenter observational design across 11 ICUs
- Predefined primary endpoint and multivariable regression analysis
Limitations
- Observational design with potential residual confounding; no randomization
- Primary endpoint assessed at 2 hours may not capture longer-term hemodynamic stability
Future Directions: Develop predictive models integrating lactate, pH, BMI, and vasopressor kinetics; test individualized AVP strategies in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines suggest adding arginine vasopressin (AVP) when norepinephrine (NE) doses reach 0.25-0.50 µg/kg/min in septic shock patients. However, relying solely on a NE threshold has limitations, as other factors may be valuable in guiding AVP therapy during septic shock. Therefore, we aimed to identify additional patient characteristics associated with AVP hemodynamic responsiveness. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, observational study was conducted among adult ICU patients who met the predefined criteria for septic shock (not reaching the individual target mean arterial pressure despite adequate fluid resuscitation and NE base dose > 0.25 µg/kg/min) and received AVP therapy. AVP hemodynamic responsiveness was the primary study outcome, defined as stabilization or decrease of NE infusion rate two hours after initiating AVP. Secondary outcomes included shock duration and rebound hypotension following termination of AVP infusion. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to detect associations between characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: Between May 2020 and October 2023, 200 septic shock patients originating from 11 different ICUs were included. Of these, 153 (79%) met the definition for AVP hemodynamic responsiveness. Obesity and hyperlactatemia was negatively associated with AVP-response (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 0.30, 95%CI 0.14-0.65 and aOR 0.86, 95%CI 0.75-0.99, respectively), while a NE infusion rate ≥ 0.30 µg/kg/min showed positive odds of AVP response (aOR 2.33, 95%CI 1.06-5.14). Incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation was lower in AVP responders than non-responders (4% vs. 14%, p = 0.013). Higher body mass index (BMI) , NE infusion rate and duration prior to AVP initiation was associated with longer shock duration (aOR 1.06, 95%CI 1.02-1.11, aOR 1.12, 95%CI 1.01-1.25, and 1.01 95% CI 1.00-1.03, respectively), while higher pH associated with lower likelihood of prolonged shock (aOR 0.80, 95%CI 0.64-0.99). Rebound hypotension occurred in 9% when AVP was terminated, and AVP duration > 24 h was negatively associated with rebound hypotension (OR 0.22, 95%CI 0.05-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Arterial lactate, pH, BMI, and NE duration and dose were associated with AVP responsiveness and shock duration during septic shock, and rebound hypotension occurred in 9% during recovery. Our findings suggest that beyond NE thresholds, specific factors could be considered to optimize adjunctive AVP therapy in septic shock patients.
2. Impact of antiplatelet therapy on outcomes of sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Across 21 studies, antiplatelet therapy was associated with reduced in-hospital and 1–3 month mortality without an increase in complications. Lengths of ICU and hospital stay were not significantly affected, and evidence certainty was low to very low.
Impact: Synthesizes the best available evidence suggesting a mortality benefit of antiplatelet agents in sepsis, highlighting a potential adjunctive therapy.
Clinical Implications: Continuation or initiation of antiplatelet therapy in select septic patients may be reasonable given no observed increase in complications, but clinical decisions should be individualized until randomized trials confirm benefit.
Key Findings
- In-hospital mortality reduced with antiplatelet therapy (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.67–0.87).
- Mortality at 1 and 3 months reduced (both RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.66–0.90).
- No increase in complications (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.84–1.21).
- ICU length of stay (WMD −0.23 days; 95% CI −0.53 to 0.07; I2=97.2%) and hospital stay (WMD 0.63 days; 95% CI −0.66 to 1.92; I2=93.2%) were not significantly different.
- Certainty of evidence rated low to very low by GRADE.
Methodological Strengths
- Comprehensive database search (PubMed, Embase, Scopus) with predefined outcomes
- Use of GRADE framework and pooled effect estimates (RR/WMD) with 95% CI
Limitations
- Predominantly observational studies with potential residual confounding
- High heterogeneity for length-of-stay outcomes and low certainty of evidence
Future Directions: Randomized controlled trials to test antiplatelet agents as adjunctive therapy in sepsis and to identify patient subgroups most likely to benefit.
OBJECTIVE: Antiplatelet therapy has been studied for its potential benefits in various cardiovascular conditions, but its role in sepsis remains less clear. This review aims to systematically analyse the available evidence on the effects of antiplatelet therapy in sepsis to assess its potential benefits and risks. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The studies published until 01st April 2024 from PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases were searched. Pooled effect sizes were reported as relative risks (RR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Outcomes included mortality, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital stay, and the risk of complications. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were included. Antiplatelet therapy was associated with significantly lower risk of in-hospital mortality (RR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.87), and mortality at one (RR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.90) and three months (RR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.90) follow up. Risk of complications was comparable in all patients (RR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.84, 1.21). ICU stay (in days) (WMD -0.23, 95% CI: -0.53, 0.07; N=7, I2=97.2%) and overall duration of hospital stay (in days) (WMD 0.63, 95% CI: -0.66, 1.92; N=6, I2=93.2%) was also statistically similar among patients who received and did not receive antiplatelet drugs. The certainty of evidence for the outcomes ranged from "low to very low". CONCLUSION: Antiplatelet therapy appears safe and significantly lowers the risk of short-term mortality in septic patients. While antiplatelet therapy did not impact the duration of ICU or overall hospital stay, our findings underscore the potential of antiplatelet agents as a beneficial adjunctive therapy in sepsis management.
3. Fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio is associated with the prognosis of patients with septic acute kidney injury.
In 6,208 SAKI patients from MIMIC-IV, higher ICU-admission fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio was consistently associated with increased all-cause mortality from 30 days to 1 year. Kaplan–Meier, Cox models, and restricted cubic splines supported a robust positive association.
Impact: Identifies a simple, readily available biomarker that stratifies short- and long-term mortality risk in septic AKI.
Clinical Implications: FAR at ICU admission can aid risk stratification and triage in SAKI, potentially informing monitoring intensity and adjunctive therapies.
Key Findings
- N=6,208 SAKI patients; mean age 65 years; 58.94% male.
- Higher FAR quartiles were associated with increased 30-, 60-, 90-, 180-, and 365-day all-cause mortality by Kaplan–Meier analyses.
- Cox proportional hazards and restricted cubic spline models confirmed a positive association between FAR and mortality risk.
Methodological Strengths
- Large critical care cohort from MIMIC-IV with multiple timepoint outcomes
- Use of Cox regression and restricted cubic splines to model risk
Limitations
- Retrospective single-database design with potential residual confounding
- Lack of external validation and unclear optimal FAR thresholds for clinical decision-making
Future Directions: Prospective validation across centers and integration of FAR with other prognostic indices to create calibrated SAKI risk scores.
BACKGROUND: The fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR), a novel inflammatory biomarker, is strongly associated with the incidence of sepsis. Nonetheless, there is a lack of research regarding the FAR and prognosis in individuals with septic acute kidney injury (SAKI). The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between the FAR upon intensive care unit (ICU) admission and overall mortality in patients with SAKI. METHODS: All patient information was retrieved from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) database. All patients were divided into four distinct categories according to the FAR. The primary endpoints for this study were the 30-day and 365-day all-cause death rates, whereas the secondary endpoints were the 60-day, 90-day and 180-day all-cause death rates. The FAR was quartile, and the Kaplan-Meier curve was used to evaluate the outcomes across the groups. To evaluate the correlation between the FAR and outcomes, we used a Cox proportional hazards regression model and restricted cubic splines (RCSs). RESULTS: Among the 6208 participants, the average age was 65 years, with 3659 (58.94%) identified as male. Patients exhibiting elevated FAR values demonstrated an increased risk of all-cause mortality at 30, 60, 90, 180 and 365 days, as evidenced by the Kaplan-Meier curves (log-rank CONCLUSION: In severely ill patients with SAKI, elevated FAR levels are strongly correlated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality at 30, 60, 90, 180 and 365 days. FAR may serve as a reliable metric for assessing and managing patients with SAKI in the ICU.