Skip to main content
Daily Report

Daily Sepsis Research Analysis

07/04/2025
3 papers selected
3 analyzed

Three impactful studies advance sepsis care across prognosis, supportive therapy safety, and long-term outcomes. An immune-metabolic lactylation signature achieved strong early mortality prediction and prospective validation; a large cohort linked prophylactic PPI use to higher 90-day mortality; and a prospective ED cohort quantified 2-year mortality and key prognostic factors.

Summary

Three impactful studies advance sepsis care across prognosis, supportive therapy safety, and long-term outcomes. An immune-metabolic lactylation signature achieved strong early mortality prediction and prospective validation; a large cohort linked prophylactic PPI use to higher 90-day mortality; and a prospective ED cohort quantified 2-year mortality and key prognostic factors.

Research Themes

  • Immune-metabolic biomarkers for sepsis prognosis
  • Medication safety in supportive care (PPI use in sepsis)
  • Long-term outcomes and risk stratification after sepsis

Selected Articles

1. A novel, rapid, and practical prognostic model for sepsis patients based on dysregulated immune cell lactylation.

74.5Level IICohort
Frontiers in immunology · 2025PMID: 40612938

Using bulk and single-cell transcriptomics, the authors built an eight-gene lactylation-associated signature that predicted early mortality in sepsis with strong performance (AUC up to 0.86) and prospectively validated it in 51 patients. Findings link dysregulated immune-cell lactylation to outcome and suggest actionable, metabolism-informed risk stratification.

Impact: Introduces a mechanistically grounded prognostic model with prospective validation, addressing a major gap in early risk stratification for sepsis.

Clinical Implications: The model could support early triage, monitoring intensity, and enrollment into targeted interventions; lactylation pathways (e.g., PPP1R15A) may represent therapeutic targets.

Key Findings

  • An eight-gene lactylation-associated signature (CD160, HELB, ING4, PIP5K1C, SRPRA, CDCA7, FAM3A, PPP1R15A) was derived and externally validated.
  • Predictive performance: AUC 0.78 (training), 0.73 (validation), and 0.82/0.80/0.86 for 7/14/28-day survival in a prospective cohort (N=51).
  • THP-1 experiments with the PPP1R15A inhibitor (Sephin1) increased global lactylation, supporting a mechanistic link.

Methodological Strengths

  • Integration of bulk and single-cell transcriptomics with machine learning and pseudotime analysis
  • Prospective single-center clinical validation with time-resolved AUCs

Limitations

  • Prospective validation cohort was single-center and relatively small (N=51)
  • Lack of interventional testing; generalizability across care settings remains to be established

Future Directions: Multicenter prospective validation, integration into clinical workflows, and trials testing lactylation-modulating therapies or care pathways triggered by the signature.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a global health burden characterized by high heterogeneity and uncontrolled immune response, with a notable lack of reliable methods for early prognosis and risk stratification. Epigenetic modifications, particularly lactylation, have recently emerged as key regulators in the early pathophysiology of sepsis. However, their potential for immune-related mortality risk stratification remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to investigate dynamic changes in lactylation during sepsis progression and to develop a rapid, lactylation-based prognostic signature. METHODS: Blood transcriptional profiles and single-cell RNA sequencing data from septic patients were analyzed to assess glycolytic activity and lactylation in relation to patient mortality. Patients were stratified into subgroups using k-means clustering based on lactylation levels. Machine learning algorithms, integrated with pseudotime trajectory reconstruction, were employed to map the temporal dynamics of lactylation. A prognostic model was then constructed using lactylation-associated hub genes and validated in external transcriptomic datasets, a prospective single-center clinical cohort. The underlying mechanism was further explored RESULTS: The study systematically characterized the dynamic alterations in lactylation patterns and immune microenvironment across distinct patient clusters. A lactylation-based prognostic model was developed, comprising eight key genes (CD160, HELB, ING4, PIP5K1C, SRPRA, CDCA7, FAM3A, PPP1R15A), and demonstrated strong predictive performance for sepsis outcomes (AUC = 0.78 in the training cohort; AUC = 0.73 in the validation cohort). Temporal expression patterns of lactylation-related hub genes revealed dynamic immune responses throughout disease progression. In the prospective cohort of septic patients (N = 51), the model showed high predictive accuracy for survival, with AUCs of 0.82 (7-day), 0.80 (14-day), and 0.86 (28-day). Additionally, global lactylation levels were significantly elevated in THP-1 cells following treatment with Sephin1, a selective PPP1R15A inhibitor, suggesting a mechanistic link. CONCLUSIONS: Lactylation is significantly associated with increased mortality risk in sepsis. The proposed individualized prognostic model, based on dysregulated immune cell metabolism, accurately predicts early mortality and may inform optimized clinical management of septic patients.

2. Prophylactic proton pump inhibitor use and all-cause mortality in adult sepsis patients: a retrospective analysis based on the MIMIC-IV database.

63Level IIICohort
Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025PMID: 40612738

In 18,198 ICU patients with sepsis from MIMIC-IV, prophylactic PPI use was associated with higher 90-day all-cause mortality and did not improve 28-day survival. Although ICU stay was reduced, total hospital stay was unchanged and clinically significant adverse events were more frequent.

Impact: Challenges routine prophylactic PPI use in sepsis by demonstrating potential harm at scale using contemporary real-world data.

Clinical Implications: Avoid routine prophylactic PPI in sepsis without a clear indication; reassess stress-ulcer prophylaxis policies and monitor for adverse events when PPIs are used.

Key Findings

  • Prophylactic PPI use was associated with increased 90-day all-cause mortality after ICU admission.
  • No improvement in 28-day survival; total hospital length of stay was not reduced despite shorter ICU stay.
  • PPI administration was linked to clinically significant adverse reactions.

Methodological Strengths

  • Very large sample size leveraging a well-curated critical care database (MIMIC-IV)
  • Time-to-event analysis with multivariable Cox models and Kaplan–Meier estimates

Limitations

  • Retrospective observational design with potential confounding by indication
  • Medication exposure misclassification and unmeasured confounders cannot be excluded

Future Directions: Prospective, ideally randomized, studies to test risk-adjusted stress-ulcer prophylaxis strategies and head-to-head comparisons of PPI vs H2RA in sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis poses a significant threat to human health, and extensive research has examined the relationship between proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and adverse outcomes in patients with sepsis. However, a consensus on this issue remains elusive. Therefore, this study aims to develop a prognostic model to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic PPI administration in patients with sepsis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the open-access Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database. Patients diagnosed with sepsis according to the Sepsis-3.0 criteria were selected for inclusion. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality occurring between 28 and 90 days following prophylactic PPI use. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, duration of hospital and ICU stays, and the incidence of adverse events. Stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed, and multivariate Cox regression models were developed and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier curves were utilized to compare patient survival at 28 and 90 days. RESULTS: This study included 18,198 sepsis patients. The results demonstrated that prophylactic PPI use was significantly associated with increased 90-day all-cause mortality following ICU admission ( CONCLUSION: Prophylactic PPI use failed to improve 28-day or 90-day survival rates in adult sepsis patients. Although PPI use was associated with reduced ICU length of stay, it did not shorten total hospital stay duration. Additionally, PPI administration was linked to clinically significant adverse reactions.

3. Two-Year Mortality and Prognostic Factors in Sepsis: A Prospective Cohort Study of 714 Danish Emergency Department Patients.

59.5Level IICohort
Clinical epidemiology · 2025PMID: 40611915

In a prospective ED cohort of 714 adults with sepsis (SOFA ≥2), 2-year all-cause mortality was 49.6%. Independent predictors included older age, SOFA >4, malignancy, ischemic heart disease, dementia, prior sepsis, new-onset atrial fibrillation, and low hemoglobin; skin infection source was protective.

Impact: Provides robust long-term outcome data and pragmatic prognostic factors to inform post-discharge care and trial design in sepsis.

Clinical Implications: Supports risk-stratified follow-up after sepsis, with targeted surveillance for patients with high SOFA, malignancy, cardiovascular disease, dementia, anemia, and new-onset atrial fibrillation.

Key Findings

  • Two-year all-cause mortality was 49.6% among 714 sepsis patients admitted via the ED.
  • Independent risk factors: age 65–85 (aHR 1.89) and >85 (aHR 2.99), SOFA >4 (aHR 2.45), malignancy (aHR 1.91), ischemic heart disease (aHR 1.38), dementia (aHR 1.84), prior sepsis admission (aHR 1.45), new-onset atrial fibrillation (aHR 1.56), low hemoglobin (aHR up to 2.30).
  • Skin infection source was associated with reduced mortality risk (aHR 0.50) compared with other sources.

Methodological Strengths

  • Prospective design with standardized SOFA-based sepsis definition
  • Time-to-event modeling with multivariable Cox adjustment

Limitations

  • Single-center study in Denmark; generalizability may be limited
  • Observational design cannot exclude residual confounding

Future Directions: Develop and test post-sepsis care pathways targeting identified high-risk groups, and validate these prognostic factors across diverse health systems.

OBJECTIVE: Given the lack of data on long-term outcomes among patients with sepsis, this study aimed to examine all-cause 2-year mortality and factors associated with mortality in adults admitted to an emergency department with sepsis. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: This study included all emergency department patients admitted with sepsis to Slagelse Hospital, Denmark, between October 1, 2017, and March 31, 2018. Data on patients with infectious diseases was prospectively extracted from electronic health records during the study period. Sepsis was defined as a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score ≥ 2 from baseline. The outcome was 2-year all-cause mortality. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the mortality. Cox regression analyses were used to compute adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals for prognostic factors associated with mortality. RESULTS: A total of 714 patients (58.4% men) with a median age of 75 years were diagnosed with sepsis. After two years, 354 (49.6%; 45.9-53.3) patients had died. Factors associated with elevated mortality risk included age (< 65 years as reference) 65-85 years (aHR 1.89; 1.35-2.64) or age > 85 years (aHR 2.99; 2.07-4.31); SOFA score > 4 (aHR 2.45; 1.82-3.30) (score of 2 as reference); and history of malignancy (aHR 1.91; 1.44-2.53), ischemic heart disease (aHR 1.38; 1.03-1.84), dementia (aHR 1.84; 1.34-2.53), previous sepsis admission (aHR 1.45; 1.15-1.82), new-onset atrial fibrillation (aHR 1.56; 1.05-2.34), and mildly decreased (6.9-7.9 mmmol/L) hemoglobin values (aHR 1.68; 1.29-2.19) and significantly decreased (<6.9 mmol/L) hemoglobin values (aHR 2.30; 1.74-3.02) with normal range (≥ 8mmol/L) as reference. Skin infection was associated with diminished mortality risk (aHR 0.50; 0.29-0.85) compared to patients with other sources of infection. CONCLUSION: Sepsis is associated with a poor prognosis. Our findings underscore the prognostic effects of age, SOFA score, and specific comorbidities on 2-year mortality among patients with sepsis.