Skip to main content

Daily Sepsis Research Analysis

3 papers

Three papers advance sepsis science across mechanisms and informatics: an AI-screened peptide that blocks gasdermin D pores delays pyroptosis and improves survival in murine sepsis; endothelial IL-6 signaling is shown to activate a noncanonical STAT1–cGAS–STING pathway driving IFN-like responses in endotoxemia; and NLP applied to ED triage free text markedly improves early sepsis prediction in a 134,266-patient cohort.

Summary

Three papers advance sepsis science across mechanisms and informatics: an AI-screened peptide that blocks gasdermin D pores delays pyroptosis and improves survival in murine sepsis; endothelial IL-6 signaling is shown to activate a noncanonical STAT1–cGAS–STING pathway driving IFN-like responses in endotoxemia; and NLP applied to ED triage free text markedly improves early sepsis prediction in a 134,266-patient cohort.

Research Themes

  • Targeting pyroptosis via gasdermin D pore blockade as a sepsis therapy
  • Endothelial IL-6 signaling through STAT1–cGAS–STING in shock pathophysiology
  • NLP-enhanced early sepsis prediction from unstructured ED text

Selected Articles

1. Delaying pyroptosis with an AI-screened gasdermin D pore blocker mitigates inflammatory response.

87Level VBasic/Mechanistic researchNature immunology · 2025PMID: 40954252

An AI-screened peptide, SK56, directly blocks gasdermin D pores, delaying pyroptosis and curbing cytokine efflux. In murine LPS and CLP sepsis models, SK56 improved survival without altering IL-1β or GSDMD cleavage, and reduced mitochondrial damage and bystander activation in organoid and dendritic cell assays.

Impact: This work identifies a tractable, first-in-class pore-blocking strategy against pyroptosis with survival benefit in sepsis models, linking AI-guided peptide discovery to actionable immunotherapy.

Clinical Implications: Although preclinical, GSDMD pore blockade could inaugurate a therapeutic class targeting pyroptosis in sepsis and other hyperinflammatory states; next steps include safety, PK/PD, and translational studies.

Key Findings

  • SK56 blocks GSDMD-NT pores and inhibits pyroptosis and cytokine release in macrophages.
  • SK56 improves survival in LPS-induced endotoxemia and CLP polymicrobial sepsis in mice.
  • SK56 does not affect IL-1β or GSDMD cleavage, indicating pore-level action.
  • In organoid and immune co-cultures, SK56 reduces dendritic cell activation and prevents widespread death of human alveolar organoids; it also mitigates mitochondrial damage.

Methodological Strengths

  • Multiple complementary systems: primary macrophages, dendritic cells, human alveolar organoids, and two in vivo sepsis models (LPS, CLP).
  • Mechanistic specificity demonstrated by unchanged IL-1β and GSDMD cleavage with functional pore blockade.

Limitations

  • Preclinical mouse models may not fully recapitulate human sepsis heterogeneity.
  • Peptide delivery, stability, and immunogenicity require evaluation for clinical translation.

Future Directions: Define SK56 PK/PD, toxicity, and delivery; test efficacy in additional infection models; and explore combinations with antibiotics or immunomodulators.

2. Endothelial STING and STAT1 mediate IFN-independent effects of IL-6 in an endotoxemia-induced model of shock.

84Level VBasic/Mechanistic researchThe Journal of clinical investigation · 2025PMID: 40956626

IL-6 elicits a transient, IFN-independent IFN-like gene program in endothelial cells via STAT1–cGAS–STING and IRFs, uncoupled from STAT3-mediated barrier regulation. Endothelial STING or global STAT1 deficiency attenuates endotoxemia responses and suppresses IFN-like signatures in vivo, revealing parallel IL-6 downstream pathways.

Impact: This study uncovers a noncanonical IL-6–STAT1–cGAS–STING axis in endothelium that drives IFN-like transcriptional responses in shock, redefining IL-6 signaling complexity and suggesting new intervention points.

Clinical Implications: Targeting endothelial DNA-sensing components (e.g., STING) or STAT1 may modulate IL-6–driven vascular inflammation in shock and sepsis, potentially complementing IL-6 or JAK pathway inhibitors.

Key Findings

  • IL-6 induces a transient IFN-like gene program in human endothelial cells via a noncanonical, IFN-independent mechanism.
  • This program requires STAT1, cGAS, STING, and IRF1/3/4 but is independent of STAT3.
  • Endothelial STING knockout or global STAT1 knockout mice show attenuated responses to endotoxemia and lack the endotoxin-induced IFN-like signature.
  • SOCS3 loss in endothelium enhances IFN-like responses in kidneys and brains during endotoxemia.

Methodological Strengths

  • Integrated in vivo genetic models (endothelial STING-KO, global STAT1-KO) with primary human endothelial cell mechanistic assays.
  • Clear dissection of pathway specificity distinguishing STAT1–cGAS–STING from STAT3-mediated functions.

Limitations

  • Endotoxemia models may not capture the complexity of human polymicrobial sepsis.
  • Therapeutic targeting feasibility and safety of endothelial STING/STAT1 modulation remain to be tested.

Future Directions: Evaluate endothelial-targeted STING/STAT1 modulators in polymicrobial sepsis models and assess synergy with IL-6/JAK pathway inhibitors.

3. Automated sepsis prediction from unstructured electronic health records using natural language processing: a retrospective cohort study.

67Level IIICohortBMJ health & care informatics · 2025PMID: 40953859

In a 134,266-patient ED cohort, adding triage free text to ML models significantly improved sepsis prediction: random forest achieved AUPRC 0.789 and AUC 0.80, while BERT using raw text reached AUPRC 0.7542 and AUC 0.7735. Key operational and demographic variables further contributed to performance.

Impact: Demonstrates scalable, real-world NLP of triage text to enhance early sepsis detection at the point of ED intake, a critical window for outcome improvement.

Clinical Implications: Integrating free-text NLP into ED triage decision support could flag high-risk patients earlier, enabling timely antibiotics and resuscitation while reducing missed sepsis cases.

Key Findings

  • Random forest using free-text triage features achieved AUPRC 0.789 (95% CI 0.7668–0.8018) and AUC 0.80 (95% CI 0.7842–0.8173).
  • BERT on raw text achieved AUPRC 0.7542 (95% CI 0.7418–0.7741) and AUC 0.7735 (95% CI 0.7628–0.8017).
  • Key predictors included ED treatment time, age, arrival-to-treatment time, Australasian Triage Scale, and visit type; incorporating free text improved detection and identified missed cases.

Methodological Strengths

  • Very large retrospective cohort (N=134,266) with both structured variables and unstructured free-text triage comments.
  • Comparative evaluation across multiple algorithms including BERT, with performance assessed by AUPRC and AUC.

Limitations

  • Retrospective single-system data may limit generalizability; prospective external validation is lacking.
  • Sepsis labeling and documentation quality in EHRs may introduce bias despite model performance.

Future Directions: Prospective deployment with clinician-in-the-loop evaluation, cross-site external validation, and assessment of time-to-antibiotics and outcome impact.