Skip to main content

Immunological signatures of sepsis in abdominal solid organ transplant recipients: A multilayer and multicentric prospective cohort study.

Intensive care medicine2026-10-29PubMed 42955323
Design
Design 8 of 10
Novelty
Novelty 9 of 10
Journal
Journal 9 of 10
Clinical
Clinical 8 of 10

Summary

In a post hoc analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort, abdominal solid organ transplant recipients with sepsis had higher 30-day survival than non-transplant patients (84% versus 66%; adjusted hazard ratio 0.49). They showed lower IL-6 and TNF-α, higher IL-18, relatively preserved monocytic HLA-DR expression, and distinct innate immune, complement, lipid-metabolic, and cellular immunometabolic signatures. The findings suggest that chronic immunosuppression may reshape rather than simply suppress the septic host response.

Key Findings

  • Thirty-day survival was 84% in abdominal solid organ transplant recipients versus 66% in non-transplant patients; adjusted hazard ratio was 0.49.
  • Transplant recipients had lower IL-6 and TNF-α, higher IL-18, and relatively preserved monocytic HLA-DR expression.
  • Proteomic and intracellular analyses identified distinct innate immune, complement, lipid-metabolic, GLUT1, and TFAM/TFB2M-associated signatures.

Clinical Implications

Transplant status should not be interpreted as an automatic marker of poor prognosis in sepsis. Immune profiling, particularly monocytic HLA-DR, cytokine patterns, and immunometabolic markers, may eventually support individualized monitoring and treatment, although these markers are not yet validated for routine therapeutic decisions.

Why It Matters

This study challenges the assumption that chronic immunosuppression uniformly worsens sepsis outcomes and links survival differences to measurable immune and immunometabolic mechanisms. Its multilayer design provides a strong framework for biologically informed phenotyping of immunocompromised patients.

Limitations

  • The transplant analysis was post hoc and observational, so residual confounding and selection bias cannot be excluded.
  • Immune and immunometabolic markers were not prospectively tested to guide treatment allocation.

Future Directions

Prospective studies should validate whether the identified immune signatures predict treatment response and whether transplant-specific phenotypes can guide immunomodulatory or organ-support strategies.

Study Information

Study Type
Cohort
Research Domain
Pathophysiology
Evidence Level
II - Prospective multicenter observational cohort with integrated mechanistic profiling, but without randomized treatment allocation.
Study Design