Daily Anesthesiology Research Analysis
Three perioperative pain studies stand out today. A large multicenter RCT found no benefit of adding gabapentin to multimodal analgesia after major surgery. An instrumental-variable analysis across 23,238 VA procedures identified NSAIDs plus dexamethasone or regional anesthesia as optimal non-opioid combinations to reduce postoperative opioids. An RCT of intraoperative ketamine showed no overall benefit after breast surgery, but patients with higher baseline temporal summation appeared to benefi
Summary
Three perioperative pain studies stand out today. A large multicenter RCT found no benefit of adding gabapentin to multimodal analgesia after major surgery. An instrumental-variable analysis across 23,238 VA procedures identified NSAIDs plus dexamethasone or regional anesthesia as optimal non-opioid combinations to reduce postoperative opioids. An RCT of intraoperative ketamine showed no overall benefit after breast surgery, but patients with higher baseline temporal summation appeared to benefit, supporting precision analgesia.
Research Themes
- Optimization of multimodal analgesia combinations
- De-implementation of low-value perioperative adjuncts
- Mechanism-informed precision analgesia
Selected Articles
1. Gabapentin for Pain Management after Major Surgery: A Placebo-controlled, Double-blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial (the GAP Study).
In a multicenter, double-blind RCT of 1,196 patients undergoing major cardiac, thoracic, or abdominal surgery, perioperative gabapentin did not reduce length of stay or serious adverse events versus placebo. The dosing regimen (600 mg preop; 300 mg BID for 2 days) produced no clinically meaningful benefit within a multimodal analgesia program.
Impact: This high-quality RCT directly tests a widely used but weakly evidenced adjunct and shows no benefit, supporting de-implementation of routine perioperative gabapentin for major surgery.
Clinical Implications: Routine addition of gabapentin to multimodal analgesia after major surgery should be reconsidered, focusing instead on interventions with proven benefit and minimizing polypharmacy.
Key Findings
- No reduction in length of stay: median 5.94 days (gabapentin) vs 6.15 days (placebo); HR 1.07 (95% CI 0.95–1.20), P=0.26.
- Serious adverse events were similar: 31.7% (gabapentin) vs 32.6% (placebo).
- Effect consistency across cardiac (n=500), thoracic (n=346), and abdominal (n=350) surgery subgroups.
Methodological Strengths
- Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT with large sample (n=1,196).
- Clear primary endpoint and prespecified follow-up at 4 weeks and 4 months.
Limitations
- Primary outcome (length of stay) may be influenced by non-analgesic factors, potentially diluting analgesic effects.
- Gabapentin dosing limited to 2 postoperative days; different regimens might produce different effects.
Future Directions: Focus on analgesic components with proven outcome benefits; evaluate patient-phenotyping strategies to target adjuncts to subgroups most likely to benefit.
BACKGROUND: Gabapentin is an anticonvulsant medication with approval for use in neuropathic pain and epileptic disorders. It is frequently added to multimodal analgesic regimens during and after surgery to reduce opioid use while controlling pain effectively. There is little evidence to show its effectiveness in major surgery. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial, adults undergoing major cardiac, thoracic, or abdominal surgery were randomized to receive either gabapentin (600 mg before surgery, 300 mg twice daily for 2 days after surgery) or placebo. The primary outcome was length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included acute and chronic pain, total opioid use, adverse health events, and health-related quality of life. Patients were followed up daily in-hospital until discharge and then at 4 weeks and 4 months after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 1,196 participants were randomized (500 underwent cardiac, 346 thoracic, and 350 abdominal surgery); 596 were allocated to placebo, and 600 were allocated to gabapentin. Median length of hospital stay was similar in the two groups (gabapentin, 5.94 [interquartile range (IQR), 4.08 to 8.04] days; placebo, 6.15 [IQR, 4.22 to 8.97] days; hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.20; P = 0.26). Overall, 384 participants experienced one or more serious adverse events (gabapentin, 189 of 596 [31.7%]; placebo, 195 of 599 [32.6%]), with some variation across surgical specialties. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing major cardiac, thoracic, and abdominal surgery, adding gabapentin to multimodal analgesic regimes did not alter the length of hospital stay or the number of serious adverse events.
2. Optimal multimodal analgesia combinations to reduce pain and opioid use following non-cardiac surgery: an instrumental variable analysis.
Using anesthesiologist assignment as an instrument across 23,238 non-cardiac surgeries, multimodal analgesia reduced opioids and pain. The most effective non-opioid combinations were NSAIDs plus dexamethasone or regional anesthesia, each cutting postoperative opioid consumption by roughly 28–30 oral morphine equivalents.
Impact: This quasi-experimental analysis identifies concrete, high-yield non-opioid combinations within MMA, offering actionable guidance to optimize perioperative protocols.
Clinical Implications: Incorporate NSAIDs plus dexamethasone and consider regional anesthesia to maximize opioid-sparing after non-cardiac surgery; reevaluate the marginal role of IV acetaminophen in MMA.
Key Findings
- Among 23,238 cases, MMA reduced inpatient postoperative opioid use by 6.8 OMEs (95% CI -10.2 to -3.4) and outpatient pain by 1.0 unit (95% CI -1.6 to -0.4).
- NSAIDs plus dexamethasone reduced opioids by -29.5 OMEs (95% CI -36.9 to -19.5).
- Regional anesthesia combinations reduced opioids by -28.4 OMEs (95% CI -40.1 to -16.8).
Methodological Strengths
- Instrumental variable design emulating randomization across multiple hospitals.
- Large, real-world cohort enabling robust estimates of treatment effects.
Limitations
- Observational design relies on instrument validity (exclusion restriction) and may be affected by residual confounding.
- Veterans Health Administration cohort may limit generalizability (older, predominantly male population).
Future Directions: Prospective trials to validate NSAID–dexamethasone synergies, quantify risks (e.g., bleeding, glycemic effects), and clarify the independent value of IV acetaminophen.
BACKGROUND: Multimodal analgesia (MMA) is a perioperative pain management strategy that targets various pain pathways, resulting in reduced postoperative pain and opioid use. Unfortunately, the optimal combinations of pain medications to use with perioperative MMA remain uncertain. Our goal was to estimate the treatment effect of MMA on postoperative pain and opioid use and identify optimal non-opioid medication combinations to enhance MMA benefits. METHODS: The study population includes all patients undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery with general anesthesia between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2022 at six geographically similar Veterans Health Administration hospitals. An instrumental variable (IV) analysis was conducted using the anesthesiologist as the instrument to emulate randomization to receiving specific pain medication combinations. Outcomes were self-reported pain and opioid use after surgery. RESULTS: Of the 23 238 procedures included in the study, 46.1% received MMA. MMA was more common in younger patients, females and those with a lower probability of mortality. With IV analysis, inpatients with MMA required 6.8 fewer oral morphine equivalents (OMEs, 95% CI -10.2, to -3.4) in the postoperative period, and outpatients with MMA reported postoperative pain scores that were, on average, 1.0 unit lower than patients who did not receive MMA (95% CI -1.6 to -0.4). Combinations of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) plus dexamethasone or regional anesthesia resulted in the greatest reductions in postoperative opioid use (mean reduction -29.5 OMEs, 95% CI -36.9 to -19.5 and mean reduction -28.4 OMEs, 95% CI -40.1 to -16.8, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our findings further support existing evidence on the effectiveness of MMA in reducing postoperative pain and opioid use following non-cardiac surgery. Importantly, our study highlights that dexamethasone and NSAIDs, not acetaminophen, which is almost universally used in MMA regimens, resulted in the greatest reduction of postoperative pain and postoperative opioid use. This has significant implications for the continued use of NSAIDs and dexamethasone in MMA protocols and underscores the need for future studies exploring the independent effect of intravenous acetaminophen on postoperative pain.
3. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intraoperative Ketamine for Acute Postsurgical Pain after Breast Cancer Surgery: The Moderating Effect of Baseline Temporal Summation of Pain.
In 225 breast surgery patients, intraoperative ketamine did not improve 2-week postoperative pain outcomes overall versus saline. Exploratory moderation indicated potential benefit among patients with higher baseline temporal summation of pain, suggesting a phenotype-driven, mechanism-based approach to ketamine use.
Impact: This trial advances precision analgesia by linking ketamine efficacy to a mechanistic pain phenotype (temporal summation), moving beyond one-size-fits-all perioperative analgesia.
Clinical Implications: Routine intraoperative ketamine for breast surgery is not supported; consider targeting ketamine to patients with high temporal summation (central sensitization tendency) when quantified preoperatively.
Key Findings
- No overall difference in pain severity or pain impact at 2 weeks between ketamine (n=113) and saline (n=112).
- Moderation analysis: higher baseline temporal summation predicted greater ketamine-associated reductions in pain.
- Surgical mix included lumpectomy (53%), mastectomy (16%), and mastectomy with reconstruction (30%).
Methodological Strengths
- Prospective randomized controlled design with adjustment for relevant covariates.
- Integration of quantitative sensory testing to probe mechanistic moderation.
Limitations
- Moderation findings were exploratory and sensory testing was limited to a subset.
- Two-week follow-up may miss longer-term effects on persistent postsurgical pain.
Future Directions: Validate phenotype-guided ketamine use in pre-specified trials; assess feasibility of perioperative temporal summation screening and long-term pain outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Activation of nociceptive pathways by surgical trauma can induce central sensitization, which is associated with greater pain severity and persistence. The N -methyl- d -aspartate receptor antagonist ketamine blocks central sensitization but has a variable track record for preventing postsurgical pain. Patient-level factors contribute to variability in pain and may serve as markers of differential efficacy of preventive effect. METHODS: This prospective, longitudinal randomized controlled trial investigated the effectiveness of intraoperatively administered ketamine to decrease postoperative pain after breast surgery. Before surgery, patients reported demographic and medical information and completed validated pain and psychosocial questionnaires. A subset of patients also underwent quantitative sensory testing to assess baseline temporal summation of pain (central sensitization tendency). Analyses of covariance, controlling for relevant pre- and perioperative factors, examined treatment group (ketamine vs . saline) differences in 2-week postoperative pain outcomes. Exploratory moderation analysis explored whether the efficacy of ketamine differed based on patients' baseline temporal summation of pain. RESULTS: Of the sample of 225 patients, 113 received ketamine, and 112 received placebo. The majority of patients underwent lumpectomy (53%), with 16% undergoing mastectomy and 30% mastectomy with reconstruction. There were no significant treatment group differences in pain severity or impact reported 2 weeks after surgery. However, moderation analysis revealed that among patients with higher baseline temporal summation of pain, ketamine was associated with lower pain severity and impact scores. CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine was not associated with an analgesic benefit over placebo in the acute postoperative period, as measured using a variety of pain assessments. However, exploratory moderation analysis suggested that patients with evidence of a greater central sensitization at baseline may derive an analgesic effect of ketamine. These findings support future collection of baseline phenotypic patient characteristics related to relevant mechanisms in trials to identify which patients may derive a larger benefit from analgesic interventions.