Daily Anesthesiology Research Analysis
Three perioperative anesthesia studies stand out today: an RCT meta-analysis finds that withholding ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers preoperatively reduces intraoperative hypotension (though with very low certainty for downstream outcomes); pediatric pharmacokinetic modeling refines safe ropivacaine dosing for continuous lumbar plexus blocks by highlighting late accumulation of the metabolite PPX; and a randomized trial shows perineural—versus intravenous—dexamethasone significantly
Summary
Three perioperative anesthesia studies stand out today: an RCT meta-analysis finds that withholding ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers preoperatively reduces intraoperative hypotension (though with very low certainty for downstream outcomes); pediatric pharmacokinetic modeling refines safe ropivacaine dosing for continuous lumbar plexus blocks by highlighting late accumulation of the metabolite PPX; and a randomized trial shows perineural—versus intravenous—dexamethasone significantly prolongs and strengthens thoracic paravertebral block analgesia after lung cancer surgery.
Research Themes
- Perioperative management of cardiovascular medications
- Pediatric regional anesthesia pharmacokinetics and safety
- Optimization of regional anesthesia adjuvants for thoracic surgery
Selected Articles
1. Withholding vs. continuing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers before surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Across 14 RCTs (n=4,063), withholding ACEIs/ARBs before noncardiac surgery reduced intraoperative hypotension (36.4% vs 48.4%; RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60–0.88). Effects on vasopressors and postoperative outcomes were uncertain, and overall certainty (GRADE) was very low, warranting cautious interpretation and further trials.
Impact: This synthesis addresses a ubiquitous perioperative decision with immediate bedside implications and aggregates the highest-level experimental data available.
Clinical Implications: Consider withholding ACEIs/ARBs on the day of noncardiac surgery to lower intraoperative hypotension risk, particularly in patients vulnerable to hemodynamic instability; balance against indications necessitating continuation and acknowledge very low certainty for downstream outcomes.
Key Findings
- Withholding ACEIs/ARBs reduced intraoperative hypotension (36.4% vs 48.4%; RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60–0.88).
- Meta-analysis included 14 RCTs with 4,063 patients and used GRADE to rate evidence.
- Effects on vasopressor use and postoperative outcomes (AKI, MACE, LOS, 30-day mortality) remain uncertain with very low certainty.
Methodological Strengths
- Meta-analysis restricted to randomized controlled trials with predefined outcomes.
- Use of GRADE framework and PROSPERO registration (CRD42021253965).
Limitations
- Very low certainty across several outcomes due to heterogeneity and potential bias.
- Incomplete reporting of secondary endpoints in abstracts limits precision of effect estimates.
Future Directions: Large, pragmatic, pre-registered RCTs with standardized definitions should evaluate patient-centered outcomes (AKI, MACE, mortality) and stratify by heart failure, hypertension control, and surgical risk.
BACKGROUND: The optimal preoperative management of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) remains debated. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessed withholding vs. continuing ACEIs/ARBs on intraoperative hypotension and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and China Biology Medicine were comprehensively searched to identify RCTs comparing preoperative withholding ACEIs/ARBs with a continuing therapy in adult patients. Two authors independently extracted and pooled data using a random-effects model. The primary outcome was the incidence of intraoperative hypotension. Secondary outcomes included duration of intraoperative hypotension, vasopressor use, postoperative hypotension and hypertension, major adverse cardiovascular events, acute kidney injury, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in ICU and hospital, and 30-d mortality. Evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs with 4063 patients were included. Withholding ACEIs/ARBs before noncardiac surgery was associated with a reduced incidence of intraoperative hypotension (36.4% vs. 48.4%; risk ratio = 0.73, 95% confidence interval = 0.60-0.88, CONCLUSIONS: While withholding ACEIs/ARBs may reduce intraoperative hypotension, the very low certainty of evidence underscores the need for future research to confirm clinical implications. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42021253965).
2. Revisiting Infusion Rate Limitations for Continuous Lumbar Plexus Blocks in Children and Adolescents with 0.2% Ropivacaine: A Pharmacokinetic Analysis.
In 20 children receiving 0.2% ropivacaine lumbar plexus blocks (2 mg/kg bolus + 0.4 mg·kg−1·h−1 infusion), unbound ropivacaine and PPX showed wide interpatient variability, and simulations indicated the 95th percentile of unbound ropivacaine + 1/12 PPX approached toxicity after prolonged infusion. Modeling supports standard dosing for the first 24 hours, then reducing/eliminating infusion in favor of timed boluses.
Impact: This provides rare pediatric human PK data on unbound ropivacaine and PPX during continuous regional anesthesia, directly informing safer dosing beyond 24 hours.
Clinical Implications: For continuous lumbar plexus blocks in children, maintain 0.4 mg·kg−1·h−1 for the first 24 hours with 0.2 mg/kg 6-hourly boluses; thereafter, consider discontinuing infusion and using timed boluses to mitigate PPX-driven late toxicity risk, especially in patients with altered clearance.
Key Findings
- Unbound ropivacaine plateau concentrations varied ~5-fold and PPX ~10-fold across patients.
- Standard infusion (0.4 mg·kg−1·h−1) plus regular boluses led the 95th percentile sum of unbound ropivacaine + 1/12 PPX toward the estimated toxic threshold after prolonged infusion.
- Switching after 24 hours to 6-hourly boluses lowered simulated ropivacaine and PPX concentrations while preserving analgesia strategy.
Methodological Strengths
- Prospective sampling of total and unbound ropivacaine and PPX with population PK modeling.
- Clinically anchored simulations against accepted toxicity thresholds to inform dosing.
Limitations
- Small single-center cohort of healthy children undergoing hip/femur surgery limits generalizability.
- Toxicity thresholds are estimated; clinical outcomes (toxicity events) were not primary endpoints.
Future Directions: Validate PK-guided dosing with multicenter trials including children with comorbidities and longer infusions, incorporating therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical toxicity endpoints.
BACKGROUND: A limitation to widespread use of pediatric lumbar plexus blocks is a scarcity of pharmacokinetic data. Concerns about absorption and consequent toxicity promote low doses, resulting in frequent episodes of breakthrough pain. The authors determined population pharmacokinetics of unbound ropivacaine and its toxic metabolite 2',6'-pipecoloxylidide (PPX) after a bolus dose and during continuous infusion to simulate current dosing guidelines relative to the toxic threshold of the combined effects of ropivacaine and PPX in the pediatric population. METHODS: A total of 20 healthy children, age 4 to 18 yr, undergoing unilateral hip/femur surgery who received lumbar plexus blocks with 0.2% ropivacaine bolus (2 mg/kg) and an infusion (0.4 mg · kg -1 · h -1 ) were prospectively enrolled. Blood samples were collected at regular intervals over 26 h to measure total and unbound plasma ropivacaine and PPX concentrations. RESULTS: The concentration versus time plots show an approximately 5-fold range of plateau unbound plasma ropivacaine concentrations and 10-fold range of PPX among the patients, suggesting similar variability in unbound ropivacaine and PPX clearances, respectively. Ropivacaine and PPX exposure simulations using standard infusion rates (0.4 mg · kg -1 · h -1 ) with regular bolus dose administration of 0.2 mg/kg resulted in the 95th percentile of sum of unbound ropivacaine plus 1/12 PPX concentrations approaching the estimated toxic threshold due to late-occurring approach to high steady state plasma concentrations of PPX. Discontinuing the continuous infusion and replacing it with larger bolus doses every 6 h resulted in lower simulated plasma ropivacaine and PPX plasma concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetic modeling supports a bolus dose of 2 mg/kg, continuous infusion rates of ropivacaine at 0.4 mg · kg -1 · h -1 , and boluses every 6 h of 0.2 mg/kg in healthy children for lumbar plexus blockade for the first 24 h. After that, with currently accepted toxic thresholds for ropivacaine and PPX, consideration should be given to dosing strategies that reduce or eliminate infusions and support timed boluses.
3. Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Intravenous versus Perineural Dexamethasone Injection Combined with Ropivacaine in Thoracoscopy-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Thoracoscopic Radical Lung Cancer Resection: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
In 150 patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer resection with thoracoscopy-guided paravertebral block, perineural dexamethasone (with ropivacaine) prolonged time to first rescue analgesia, lowered VAS scores at all time points, reduced 48-hour sufentanil use, blunted postoperative hyperglycemia, and hastened ambulation and discharge compared with intravenous dexamethasone.
Impact: This RCT provides direct, practice-changing evidence on dexamethasone route for a widely used thoracic regional technique, with consistent benefits across pain, opioid use, glycemia, and recovery.
Clinical Implications: When using thoracic paravertebral blocks for thoracoscopic lung surgery, consider perineural dexamethasone as the preferred adjuvant to enhance and prolong analgesia and facilitate ERAS goals, while observing local regulations regarding off-label perineural steroid use.
Key Findings
- Perineural dexamethasone prolonged time to first rescue analgesia versus intravenous administration.
- VAS pain scores were lower at all postoperative time points with perineural dosing.
- Perineural dosing reduced 48-hour sufentanil consumption, attenuated postoperative glucose rise, and shortened time to ambulation and hospital stay.
Methodological Strengths
- Prospective randomized controlled design with adequate sample size (n=150).
- Multidomain outcomes (analgesia, opioid use, glycemia, recovery) increase external validity.
Limitations
- Blinding procedures and detailed effect sizes were not fully reported in the abstract.
- Single-center setting may limit generalizability; long-term outcomes not assessed.
Future Directions: Confirm efficacy and safety across centers, assess optimal dosing of perineural dexamethasone, and evaluate long-term outcomes (chronic pain, functional recovery); consider comparative cost-effectiveness within ERAS pathways.
BACKGROUND: As an adjuvant, dexamethasone can enhance the analgesic intensity and prolong the duration of nerve blocks. However, to date, no studies have compared the effectiveness of different administration routes of dexamethasone for thoracoscopy-guided thoracic paravertebral block (TTPB). This prospective randomized controlled study evaluated the postoperative analgesic effects of dexamethasone administered intravenously or perineurally in combination with ropivacaine for TTPB in patients undergoing radical lung cancer resection. METHODS: A total of 150 patients were randomly assigned to receive dexamethasone intravenously (Group I, n=75) or perineurally (Group D, n=75). Before wound closure, patients in Group I underwent TTPB with ropivacaine while receiving an intravenous dexamethasone injection, whereas patients in Group D received a perineural mixture of ropivacaine and dexamethasone. The primary outcome was the time to first postoperative rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, postoperative 48-hour sufentanil consumption in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), postoperative blood glucose levels, postoperative recovery parameters, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Compared with Group I, Group D showed a significantly longer time to first postoperative rescue analgesia, lower VAS scores at all assessed time points, and reduced postoperative 48-hour sufentanil consumption. Group D also showed a smaller increase in postoperative blood glucose levels, an earlier time to first ambulation and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (all CONCLUSION: In TTPB, perineural dexamethasone administration with ropivacaine provided superior and longer-lasting analgesia compared with intravenous administration. Additionally, it accelerated postoperative recovery and shortened hospital stay.