Daily Anesthesiology Research Analysis
Today’s top anesthesiology-relevant studies span epidemiology, therapeutics, and stewardship: multisite chronic pain and opioid use in diabetes predict incident CKD with convergent proteo-metabolomic signatures; continuous perioperative esketamine reduces 30-day depressive symptoms after breast cancer surgery; and a nationwide ICU cohort shows 4.2% new persistent opioid use, dominated by early post-discharge prescribing.
Summary
Today’s top anesthesiology-relevant studies span epidemiology, therapeutics, and stewardship: multisite chronic pain and opioid use in diabetes predict incident CKD with convergent proteo-metabolomic signatures; continuous perioperative esketamine reduces 30-day depressive symptoms after breast cancer surgery; and a nationwide ICU cohort shows 4.2% new persistent opioid use, dominated by early post-discharge prescribing.
Research Themes
- Pain as a systemic risk factor
- Perioperative mental health interventions
- Opioid stewardship after critical illness
Selected Articles
1. Association between Multisite and Site-specific Chronic Pain, Analgesic Use, Metabolic-Proteomic Profile, and Incident Chronic Kidney Disease in Diabetes.
In 20,208 adults with diabetes followed for a median of 13.2 years, chronic pain—especially multisite pain—and opioid use were independently associated with incident CKD. Multiomics revealed convergent signals (↑chromogranin-A, ↑glycoprotein acetyls, ↓omega-3/total fatty acids) and TNF/EGFR-centered networks linking pain biology to renal risk.
Impact: Links common pain phenotypes and opioid exposure to future CKD in diabetes and anchors associations with biologically plausible proteo-metabolomic signatures, informing risk stratification and safer analgesic strategies.
Clinical Implications: Adopt renal-conscious pain management in diabetes: prioritize multimodal non-opioid analgesia, monitor renal function in patients with multisite pain, and de-emphasize chronic opioid therapy given its association with CKD risk.
Key Findings
- Chronic pain associated with 18% higher incident CKD risk (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.08–1.28).
- Dose–response for multisite pain: per additional pain site HR 1.08 (95% CI 1.05–1.12).
- Among those with chronic pain, opioid use increased CKD risk (HR 1.22; 95% CI 1.06–1.40); ibuprofen/paracetamol showed no significant association.
- Convergent biomarkers across pain sites: ↑chromogranin-A, ↑glycoprotein acetyls (GlycA), ↓omega-3/total fatty acids ratio; TNF and EGFR were central network nodes.
Methodological Strengths
- Large prospective cohort (N=20,208) with long follow-up and multivariable Cox modeling.
- Integration of metabolomics (248 metabolites) and proteomics (2,911 proteins) to support biological plausibility.
Limitations
- Observational design with potential residual confounding and self-reported pain phenotyping.
- Generalizability limited to UK Biobank participants; medication exposure misclassification possible.
Future Directions: Validate biomarkers and risk models in diverse cohorts; test renal-conscious analgesic pathways (e.g., opioid-sparing strategies) in interventional trials for people with diabetes and multisite pain.
BACKGROUND: Although chronic pain is highly prevalent among individuals with diabetes, its relationship with the risk of developing chronic kidney disease (CKD) in this population remains poorly understood. The authors aimed to explore the associations between multisite chronic pain and analgesic use with CKD risk in people with diabetes, and to further characterize the underlying metabolic and proteomic signatures. METHODS: The authors analyzed data from 20,208 UK Biobank participants with diabetes and complete chronic pain site information (headache, facial, neck/shoulder, back, stomach/abdominal, hip, knee). Using multivariable Cox regression models, they evaluated the prospective associations between chronic pain (both site specific and multisite), analgesic use (ibuprofen, paracetamol, opioid), and incident CKD risk. Multiomics data (248 metabolites, 2,911 proteins) were integrated to explore biological pathways. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 13.2 yr, 2,589 incident CKD cases were documented. Chronic pain was associated with an 18% higher CKD risk (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.28). Site-specific analysis identified significant associations between CKD risk and pain in neck/shoulder, back, hip, knee, and stomach/abdominal regions, while headache and facial pain showed no significant associations. Multisite pain exhibited a dose-dependent relationship with CKD risk (per additional site: adjusted HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.12). Among participants with chronic pain, opioid use showed significant positive associations with CKD risk (adjusted HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.40), whereas ibuprofen and paracetamol demonstrated no significant associations. Multiomics secondary analysis identified three consistently dysregulated biomarkers across all five significant pain sites: elevated chromogranin-A, increased glycoprotein acetyls, and reduced omega-3 to total fatty acids ratio. Protein network analysis revealed tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as central nodes in the observed chronic pain-CKD risk associations. CONCLUSIONS: Multisite chronic pain and opioid use are associated with elevated CKD risk in diabetes, supported by metabolomic/proteomic signatures. These findings highlight the need for renal-conscious pain management in diabetes care.
2. Effects of Continuous Perioperative Esketamine Infusion on Postoperative Depression in Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Trial.
In a double-blind RCT of 96 women undergoing mastectomy, continuous perioperative esketamine infusion significantly reduced HAMD-17 scores at day 30 versus saline, with earlier improvements (days 1 and 3), higher postoperative BDNF and serotonin, lower immediate postoperative pain, and no excess adverse events.
Impact: Provides randomized, double-blind evidence that a practical anesthetic adjunct can mitigate postoperative depression, a common and consequential outcome, with supportive biomarker changes.
Clinical Implications: Consider integrating low-dose continuous esketamine infusion protocols for high-risk surgical oncology patients to reduce postoperative depressive symptoms, with standard hemodynamic and neuropsychiatric monitoring.
Key Findings
- Primary outcome: HAMD-17 at POD-30 lower with esketamine (median 3.00 vs 5.00).
- Secondary outcomes: Lower HAMD-17 at POD 1 and 3; lower SDS at POD 1, 3, and 30.
- Higher postoperative BDNF and serotonin levels; lower VAS pain at 30 minutes post-extubation; no increase in adverse events.
Methodological Strengths
- Randomized, double-blind, controlled design with trial registration (ChiCTR2200061575).
- Biomarker assessment (BDNF, serotonin) supporting clinical effects.
Limitations
- Single-center study of female breast cancer patients limits generalizability.
- Modest sample size and 30-day follow-up; long-term durability and dosing generalizability remain unknown.
Future Directions: Multicenter trials across surgical populations to test scalability, dosing, and longer-term mental health outcomes; mechanistic work to link ketamine pharmacodynamics with perioperative neuroimmune pathways.
BACKGROUND: Comorbid depressive symptoms are prevalent in patients with breast cancer, which adversely impacts postoperative recovery outcomes. Esketamine has emerged as a promising intervention for perioperative depression due to its rapid and sustained effects. This study aims to investigate the impact of the continuous intravenous infusion of esketamine during the perioperative period on postoperative depressive symptoms in breast cancer patients. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, 96 female patients aged 18-65 years undergoing unilateral modified radical mastectomy were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The esketamine group received 0.5 mg/kg and 0.25 mg/kg/h esketamine and the normal saline group received 5 mL and 0.25 mL/kg/h normal saline during anesthesia induction and maintenance, respectively. The primary outcome was the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) score on postoperative day 30 (POD-30). Secondary outcomes included HAMD-17 scores on POD 1 and 3; self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores on POD 1, 3, and 30; serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) after surgery; relative changes in heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) before and after intubation; time to awakening; Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores; and adverse events related to esketamine. RESULTS: The HAMD-17 score on POD-30 was significantly lower in the esketamine group [3.00 (2.08-4.10)] than in the normal saline group [5.00 (4.00-6.20)]. Regarding secondary outcomes, HAMD-17 scores on POD 1 and 3 were significantly lower in the esketamine group. SDS scores on POD 1, 3, and 30 were also significantly lower in the esketamine group. Compared with the saline group, the esketamine group exhibited significantly higher postoperative levels of BDNF and serotonin. Additionally, VAS scores at 30 minutes after extubation were significantly lower in the esketamine group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Perioperative continuous administration of esketamine reduces postoperative depression scores in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. Identifier: ChiCTR2200061575.
3. New persistent opioid use among ICU survivors after discharge: incidence, predictors, and nationwide cohort analysis.
In a nationwide cohort of 567,260 opioid-naïve ICU survivors, 4.2% developed new persistent opioid use within six months. The dominant risk factor was any opioid prescription within 30 days of discharge (OR ~19.7), with differing predictors by opioid potency, supporting early tapering and tailored stewardship.
Impact: Defines the incidence and actionable predictors of persistent opioid use after critical illness at national scale, directly informing discharge prescribing, tapering, and follow-up strategies.
Clinical Implications: Avoid default opioid refills in the first 30 days post-discharge; implement early taper plans, multimodal non-opioid analgesia, and targeted follow-up for high-risk groups (e.g., ECMO, CRRT, malignancy).
Key Findings
- Six-month incidence of new persistent opioid use: 4.2% among 567,260 opioid-naïve ICU survivors.
- Strongest predictor: any opioid prescribed within 30 days of discharge (OR 19.7; 95% CI 19.1–20.3).
- Additional predictors: older age, female sex, socioeconomic disadvantage, malignancy/metastasis, ECMO (OR 1.80), and CRRT (OR 1.24).
- Potent vs less-potent opioid persistence had distinct risk profiles (cancer vs demographic/socioeconomic drivers).
Methodological Strengths
- Very large nationwide cohort with standardized definitions and multivariable modeling.
- Opioid potency-stratified analyses to refine risk profiling.
Limitations
- Retrospective claims-based design with potential misclassification (pain severity, inpatient medication, indications).
- Findings from South Korea may not fully generalize to other healthcare systems.
Future Directions: Prospective opioid stewardship programs testing early tapering and non-opioid multimodal regimens post-ICU; integration with electronic prompts to prevent automatic refills.
BACKGROUND: Long-term opioid dependence after critical illness is an emerging concern, yet the incidence and predictors of persistent opioid use among intensive care unit (ICU) survivors remain incompletely characterized. We aimed to estimate the six-month incidence of new persistent opioid use in opioid-naïve ICU survivors and to identify associated risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, nationwide cohort study using South Korea's National Health Insurance Service database. Adults admitted to any ICU between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022, were included if they survived to hospital discharge and remained alive for at least six months, with no opioid prescription in the 12 months preceding admission. New persistent opioid use was defined as at least one outpatient opioid prescription within 90 days after discharge and at least one additional prescription between 91 and 180 days. We performed multivariable logistic regression to identify independent predictors. RESULTS: Among 567,260 opioid-naïve ICU survivors, 23,945 (4.2%) developed new persistent opioid use within six months. Across the cohort, 22,643 (4.0%) received less-potent opioids (tramadol, dihydrocodeine) and 1,643 (0.3%) received potent opioids (morphine, fentanyl, oxycodone, hydromorphone, methadone). Independent predictors included older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.01 per year; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.02; P < 0.001), female sex (OR 1.13; 95% CI, 1.09-1.16; P < 0.001), socioeconomic disadvantage (Medical Aid, OR 1.30; 95% CI, 1.23-1.38; P < 0.001), malignancy (OR 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09; P = 0.017), metastatic tumor (OR 1.24; 95% CI, 1.15-1.35; P < 0.001), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR 1.80; 95% CI, 1.75-1.89; P < 0.001), and continuous renal replacement therapy (OR 1.24; 95% CI, 1.11-1.37; P < 0.001). The strongest predictor was an early opioid prescription within 30 days of discharge (OR 19.7; 95% CI, 19.1-20.3; P < 0.001). Potency-specific analysis showed potent opioid persistence was largely driven by cancer, while less-potent use was shaped more by demographic and socioeconomic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one in 25 ICU survivors developed new persistent opioid use by six months. Early post-discharge opioid prescription was the dominant risk factor. Risk profiles differed by opioid potency, underscoring the need for early tapering strategies, multimodal non-opioid analgesia, and stewardship programs tailored to patient subgroups and opioid type.