Skip to main content
Daily Report

Daily Anesthesiology Research Analysis

02/04/2026
3 papers selected
84 analyzed

Analyzed 84 papers and selected 3 impactful papers.

Summary

Top perioperative research today spans digital health, anticoagulation management, and GLP-1 receptor agonist perioperative safety. A high-quality network meta-analysis identifies which digital tools most improve patient-reported outcomes, while prospective cohorts inform preoperative DOAC interruption and GLP-1–related gastric retention risk stratification.

Research Themes

  • Digital health interventions to improve perioperative patient-reported outcomes
  • Perioperative anticoagulation management and DOAC pharmacokinetics
  • GLP-1 receptor agonists, gastric emptying, and aspiration risk management

Selected Articles

1. Digital health interventions for perioperative patient-reported outcomes: a network meta-analysis.

84Level IMeta-analysis
NPJ digital medicine · 2026PMID: 41634301

Across 56 randomized trials, extended reality most reduced perioperative anxiety, mobile apps and XR reduced postoperative pain, and 2D video best improved quality of life. Evidence certainty ranged from moderate to high and was appraised with RoB 2 and GRADE.

Impact: Provides comparative effectiveness across digital modalities, guiding resource allocation and implementation for perioperative patient-reported outcomes.

Clinical Implications: Hospitals can prioritize XR for anxiety reduction, mobile apps or XR for pain control, and simple 2D videos for quality-of-life gains, aligning DHI selection with targeted perioperative outcomes.

Key Findings

  • Extended reality reduced perioperative anxiety (SMD 0.60; MD 8.05), meeting MID thresholds.
  • Mobile apps (SMD 0.64; MD 1.36) and XR (SMD 0.51; MD 1.09) probably reduced postoperative pain.
  • 2D video achieved the largest quality-of-life improvement (SMD 0.99), and XR improved satisfaction (SMD 1.27).

Methodological Strengths

  • Network meta-analysis of 56 RCTs with 6,154 participants
  • Risk of bias assessed with RoB 2 and certainty rated with GRADE

Limitations

  • Heterogeneity across interventions, outcomes, and measurement time points
  • Potential variability in standard perioperative care and DHI implementation fidelity

Future Directions: Prospective head-to-head trials comparing high-performing DHIs, cost-effectiveness analyses, and implementation studies in diverse surgical populations.

Digital health interventions (DHIs), delivered via digital platforms such as internet-based programs, mobile applications or short messages, may improve patient-reported outcomes (PROs), but comparative effectiveness is unclear. We conducted a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in adults undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, identified in PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science to March 1, 2025. Standardized mean differences (SMDs), mean differences (MDs) with minimal important differences (MIDs), and 95% CIs were estimated. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 and certainty of evidence with GRADE. Fifty-six trials (6,154 patients) were included. Extended reality (XR) most effectively reduced perioperative anxiety (SMD 0.60; 95% CI 0.37-0.84; MD 8.05; MID 6.71; moderate-certainty). For postoperative pain, mobile applications (SMD 0.64; 95% CI 0.32-0.95; MD 1.36; MID 1.0; moderate-certainty) and XR (SMD 0.51; 95% CI 0.26-0.76; MD 1.09; MID 1.0; moderate-certainty) were probably effective. For quality of life, 2D video yielded the greatest gain (SMD 0.99; 95% CI 0.11-1.88; MD 0.11; MID 0.05; high-certainty). XR also improved satisfaction (SMD 1.27; 95% CI 0.63-1.91; MD 1.91; MID 0.75; moderate-certainty). These findings suggest that DHIs may improve perioperative PROs.

2. Direct Oral Anticoagulant Levels at Time of Elective Surgery.

75.5Level IIICohort
JAMA network open · 2026PMID: 41637074

In 257 elective surgical patients, 7.6% had preoperative DOAC levels ≥30 ng/mL despite guideline-based interruption, with apixaban showing the highest proportion (13.1%). Higher levels were associated with apixaban use, reduced renal function, and shorter interruption, but not with surgical blood loss.

Impact: Directly informs perioperative DOAC interruption strategies, highlighting apixaban-specific pharmacokinetics and the limited predictive value of preoperative levels for intraoperative blood loss.

Clinical Implications: Standard protocols appear adequate for most, but patients on apixaban with impaired renal function may require longer interruption or individualized planning; routine level measurement does not predict blood loss.

Key Findings

  • Overall 7.6% had preoperative DOAC levels ≥30 ng/mL; apixaban 13.1% vs similar lower proportions for dabigatran/rivaroxaban.
  • Apixaban therapy, reduced kidney function, and shorter interruption time were associated with higher levels.
  • Preoperative DOAC levels were not associated with surgical blood loss; all major bleeds occurred with levels <30 ng/mL.

Methodological Strengths

  • Prospective cohort with standardized interruption protocol and LC-MS quantification
  • Multivariable regression identifying independent predictors

Limitations

  • Moderate sample size and early termination; two-center study in the Netherlands
  • Not powered to detect differences in clinical bleeding outcomes

Future Directions: Pragmatic trials of tailored interruption (especially for apixaban and CKD), incorporation of renal function into decision tools, and evaluation of outcomes beyond intraoperative blood loss.

IMPORTANCE: Before elective surgery, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are discontinued following a standardized protocol. However, this could result in insufficient lowering of DOAC levels that could increase bleeding risk. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the proportion of patients with elevated DOAC levels at the time of elective surgery, evaluate factors associated with DOAC levels, and examine associated blood loss. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study (DOAC Level Prior to Incision [DALI]) assessed adult patients prescribed a DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban) for any indication and at any dose, undergoing an elective procedure requiring DOAC interruption between May 27, 2018, and February 25, 2024, at 2 Dutch hospitals. EXPOSURE: Standardized interruption protocol (1 day before moderate- and 2 days before high bleeding-risk procedures) with interruption adjustments for the patient's kidney function. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Blood was drawn immediately before surgery to determine DOAC levels (by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry). Proportions of preoperative DOAC levels of 30 ng/mL or higher and their 95% CIs were estimated, stratified by DOAC type and surgical bleeding risk. Factors associated with DOAC levels were identified through multivariable linear regression. Surgical blood loss and 30-day postoperative complications were described according to DOAC concentrations. RESULTS: The study was terminated after including 257 patients (100 receiving apixaban, 100 receiving rivaroxaban, and 57 receiving dabigatran due to the slow inclusion rate of those receiving dabigatran; median [IQR] age, 72 [66-78] years; 173 male [67%]); 212 patients (82%) underwent a high bleeding-risk operation. Preprocedural DOAC levels were 30 ng/mL or higher in 7.6% (95% CI, 4.9%-11.6%) of patients. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban had similar proportions, whereas 13.1% (95% CI, 7.8%-21.2%) of patients treated with apixaban had levels of 30 ng/mL or higher. Treatment with apixaban, decreased kidney function, and a shorter interruption time were associated with higher levels. Surgical blood loss (median [range], 0 [0-4250] mL) was not associated with DOAC levels. Twelve patients (4.7%; 95% CI, 2.7%-8.0%), who all had DOAC levels less than 30 ng/mL, experienced major bleeding. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, most patients following the current protocol had DOAC levels less than 30 ng/mL, although the proportion of patients with elevated levels was higher for apixaban. Preoperative DOAC levels were not associated with blood loss during surgery.

3. Prevalence and predictors of residual gastric content in patients with type 2 diabetes on GLP-1 receptor agonists: A prospective observational study.

73Level IIICohort
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026PMID: 41635113

Among 390 hospitalized adults with T2DM, GLP-1 RA therapy was independently associated with higher residual gastric content despite standard fasting, with microvascular complications identifying a high-risk phenotype. Each day since the last GLP-1 dose reduced risk by 23%, supporting individualized withholding strategies.

Impact: Directly addresses anesthesia concerns regarding aspiration risk in GLP-1 RA users and provides quantifiable risk modifiers (microvascular disease, dosing interval).

Clinical Implications: Preoperative assessment should incorporate GLP-1 RA status, microvascular complications, and days since last dose; gastric ultrasound can guide risk mitigation and scheduling.

Key Findings

  • GLP-1 RA use increased residual gastric content after matching (53.3% vs 32.1%; p<0.001).
  • GLP-1 RA was independently associated with increased RGC (IPTW-adjusted OR 2.52; 95% CI 1.84-3.45).
  • Diabetic retinopathy (OR 1.84) and kidney disease (OR 1.67) identified a high-risk phenotype; each day since last dose lowered odds by 23% (adjusted OR 0.77).

Methodological Strengths

  • Prospective cohort with propensity score matching and IPTW-adjusted multivariable analysis
  • Objective ultrasound-based assessment of residual gastric content

Limitations

  • Single-center inpatient cohort with BMI <40 kg/m2 inclusion, limiting generalizability
  • RGC is a surrogate for aspiration risk; no direct aspiration outcomes

Future Directions: Randomized or stepped-wedge studies testing individualized withholding intervals and point-of-care gastric ultrasound pathways, including aspiration outcomes.

AIMS: To assess the prevalence and risk factors of increased residual gastric content (RGC) under fasting conditions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), providing evidence for peri-procedural medication management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-centre prospective cohort study enrolled inpatients with T2DM at the Endocrinology Department of Ningbo No.2 Hospital between April and December 2024. Patients aged 18-80 years with BMI <40 kg/m RESULTS: Of 390 patients included (237 [60.8%] male), 224 (57.4%) were GLP-1 RA users. After propensity score matching, the prevalence of increased RGC remained significantly higher in GLP-1 RA users compared with non-users (53.3% vs. 32.1%; p < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), GLP-1 RA use was robustly associated with increased RGC (OR 2.52; 95% CI 1.84-3.45). Notably, diabetic retinopathy (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.14-2.99) and diabetic kidney disease (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.17-2.39) emerged as independent risk factors, identifying a high-risk microvascular phenotype. Furthermore, among GLP-1 RA users, each additional day since the last GLP-1 RA dose reduced the odds of increased RGC by 23% (adjusted OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.65-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: GLP-1 RA therapy is a potent, independent driver of significant gastric retention in patients with T2DM, persisting despite standard fasting. Crucially, the presence of diabetic retinopathy or nephropathy identifies a "double-hit" high-risk phenotype, where pharmacological delay interacts with microvascular burden. These findings suggest that current fasting protocols may be insufficient for these patients, necessitating individualized preoperative assessment based on microvascular status and dosing timing.