Skip to main content
Daily Report

Daily Anesthesiology Research Analysis

07/21/2026
3 papers selected
47 analyzed

Analyzed 47 papers and selected 3 impactful papers.

Summary

Analyzed 47 papers and selected 3 impactful articles.

Selected Articles

1. PROSPECT guideline for total hip arthroplasty: updated systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations.

77Level ISystematic Review
Anaesthesia · 2026PMID: 42473710

This PROSPECT update synthesizes 103 studies and reaffirms core multimodal analgesia (paracetamol, NSAIDs, single-dose IV dexamethasone ≤10 mg) for total hip arthroplasty. It recommends supra-inguinal fascia iliaca and preoperative pericapsular nerve group blocks as preferred regional options, while discouraging quadratus lumborum and erector spinae plane blocks due to inconsistent efficacy and motor weakness risk.

Impact: Provides procedure-specific, evidence-based, motor-sparing regional anesthesia guidance likely to standardize care and reduce variability after total hip arthroplasty.

Clinical Implications: Adopt scheduled acetaminophen/NSAIDs with single-dose IV dexamethasone; consider 0.1 mg intrathecal morphine with spinal anesthesia in hospitalized patients; preferentially use supra-inguinal fascia iliaca or preoperative PENG blocks; avoid QL and ESP blocks; consider single-shot local infiltration when regional anesthesia is not feasible.

Key Findings

  • Core multimodal regimen: scheduled paracetamol plus NSAIDs with a single IV dexamethasone dose (≤10 mg).
  • Low-dose intrathecal morphine (0.1 mg) may be added in hospitalized patients receiving spinal anesthesia.
  • Supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block and preoperative pericapsular nerve group block provided the most consistent analgesia.
  • Quadratus lumborum and lumbar erector spinae plane blocks showed inconsistent efficacy and increased motor weakness risk and are not recommended.

Methodological Strengths

  • Systematic search with predefined PROSPECT methodology integrating efficacy, safety, and functional recovery.
  • Focused synthesis of RCTs and systematic reviews (103 studies) with expert-graded recommendations.

Limitations

  • Heterogeneity across trials and techniques may limit direct comparability.
  • Evidence gaps remain for some regional techniques and specific patient subgroups.

Future Directions: Head-to-head RCTs comparing PENG versus supra-inguinal fascia iliaca blocks, dose–response of dexamethasone, and pragmatic implementation studies to assess functional recovery and falls risk.

INTRODUCTION: The Procedure Specific Postoperative Pain Management (PROSPECT) collaboration develops evidence-based recommendations integrating analgesic efficacy, safety and functional recovery. Since publication of the 2021 PROSPECT guidelines for total hip arthroplasty, new evidence, particularly on motor-sparing regional techniques, has emerged. This systematic review updates the 2021 recommendations for postoperative pain management after elective primary total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Databases were searched systematically for randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews published between January 2020 and June 2024 evaluating peri-operative analgesic or surgical interventions for total hip arthroplasty. Studies involving non-randomised designs or lacking validated pain outcomes were not included. Evidence was synthesised according to PROSPECT methodology, focusing on pain within 24 h; opioid consumption; functional recovery; and adverse effects. Recommendations were graded by expert consensus. RESULTS: A total of 103 studies were included. Core recommendations remain unchanged: scheduled paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, combined with a single intravenous dose of dexamethasone (≤ 10 mg). Low-dose intrathecal morphine (0.1 mg) may be considered with spinal anaesthesia in hospitalised patients. Among regional techniques, supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block and pre-operative pericapsular nerve group block provided the most consistent analgesia. Quadratus lumborum and lumbar erector spinae plane blocks showed inconsistent efficacy and increased risk of motor weakness and are not recommended. Single-shot local infiltration analgesia remains an alternative when regional techniques are unavailable. DISCUSSION: In addition to previous recommendations, supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block and pre-operative pericapsular nerve group block are recommended as preferred regional techniques for total hip arthroplasty, with single-shot local infiltration analgesia as an alternative when regional anaesthesia is not feasible. WHAT WE DID: A group of researchers looked at all the best available studies about pain relief after hip replacement surgery. They reviewed research published since 2020 and combined the findings to update earlier recommendations on how to manage pain after surgery. WHY DID WE DO IT: Hip replacement surgery can be painful, and good pain relief helps people recover more quickly and comfortably. New research has become available in recent years, so the researchers wanted to find out which treatments work best and update advice for doctors and patients. WHAT WE FOUND: The researchers found that regular pain medicines, such as paracetamol and anti‐inflammatory drugs, should still be used as the main treatment after hip replacement surgery. A steroid medicine called dexamethasone may also help reduce pain. Some types of nerve blocks around the hip were found to work well and are recommended when possible. However, other nerve block techniques did not show clear benefits and are not routinely recommended. Overall, the updated recommendations aim to provide safe and effective pain relief to help patients recover after hip replacement surgery.

2. Topical Airway Anesthesia for Tracheal Intubation Prevents Intraoperative Hypotension and Improves Outcomes in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury by Reducing Anesthesia Induction: A Single-Center, Single-Blinded, Randomized Trial.

68.5Level IIRCT
Journal of patient safety · 2026PMID: 42474272

In severe TBI patients undergoing craniectomy, topical airway anesthesia for intubation (without standard induction agents) maintained higher post-intubation blood pressure, reduced in-hospital mortality and ICU morbidity, and improved 6-month neurological scores compared with standard induction.

Impact: Demonstrates a pragmatic airway strategy that mitigates induction-related hypotension and translates into improved survival and neurological outcomes in severe TBI.

Clinical Implications: For severe TBI, consider topical airway anesthesia to facilitate intubation while minimizing induction agents to avoid hypotension; integrate hemodynamic targets and neuroprotection protocols; confirm applicability in multicenter settings before broad adoption.

Key Findings

  • Post-intubation SBP and DBP were significantly higher with topical airway anesthesia than with standard induction (P<0.05).
  • In-hospital mortality and ICU morbidity were significantly lower in the topical group (P<0.05).
  • Lower postoperative injury rates to heart, kidney, and liver were observed with topical airway anesthesia (P<0.05).
  • Six-month neurological scores were improved in the topical group (P<0.05).

Methodological Strengths

  • Randomized, single-blinded design with clinically meaningful endpoints including mortality and neurological outcomes.
  • Standardized hemodynamic measurements at predefined time points.

Limitations

  • Single-center trial with modest sample completing follow-up (n=103), limiting generalizability.
  • Blinding limited to single-blind and potential performance bias cannot be excluded.

Future Directions: Multicenter RCTs assessing protocolized topical anesthesia approaches vs minimal-induction strategies, interaction with vasopressor use, and safety in varied neurotrauma contexts.

OBJECTIVES: Anesthesia induction is a key risk factor for intraoperative hypotension due to the cardiovascular system's suppression of induction anesthetics, and intraoperative hypotension significantly affects mortality linked to traumatic brain injury (TBI). Topical airway anesthesia could optimize intubation conditions with less induction anesthetic. This study aimed to determine whether topical airway anesthesia for tracheal intubation can prevent intraoperative hypotension by reducing the need for induction anesthetics in TBI patients. METHODS: A total of 120 patients with severe TBI who underwent craniectomy without preoperative intubation were randomized into the standard anesthesia (C) group or the topical airway anesthesia for intubation (T) group. The patients in the C group received standard anesthesia induction, and those in the T group received topical airway anesthesia without standard induction anesthetics. Intraoperative systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR) were recorded at the designated time points. In-hospital mortality, ICU morbidity, ICU stay duration, and neurological outcomes at discharge and 6 months postoperatively were evaluated. Postoperative injury to the heart, kidney, and liver was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients in the C group and 51 in the T group completed the trial. After intubation, the SBP and DBP in the T group were significantly greater than in the C group (P<0.05). The in-hospital mortality and ICU morbidity rates in the T group were lower than in the C group (P<0.05). The T group also had lower postoperative injury rates to the heart, kidney, and liver in was lower (P<0.05). While neurological recovery at discharge was improved in the T group, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05), except for the number of moderate and severe comas (P<0.05). The neurological score at 6 months postoperatively was increased in the T group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Topical airway anesthesia for tracheal intubation was associated with higher intraoperative blood pressure, lower in-hospital mortality and ICU morbidity rates, and improved neurological outcomes in patients with severe TBI. These findings suggest that reducing induction anesthetics through topical airway anesthesia may be a promising strategy for managing anesthesia in TBI patients, though confirmation in larger multicenter trials is warranted.

3. Age-related patterns in postoperative pain: insights from the paediatric pain out registry: A prospective cohort study.

67Level IIICohort
European journal of anaesthesiology · 2026PMID: 42473731

In a 2005-patient prospective pediatric cohort, 79% reported moderate-to-severe postoperative pain, increasing with age and peaking around 12 years, particularly in girls. Appendectomy and lack of regional anesthesia were associated with higher pain; older children received higher opioid doses for appendectomy and spine surgery.

Impact: Highlights pervasive undertreatment and identifies an age- and sex-specific pain peak, informing tailored multimodal and regional analgesia strategies.

Clinical Implications: Plan anticipatory, multimodal, and regional analgesia for peri-pubertal girls and older children, especially for appendectomy; integrate RA when feasible and monitor opioid dosing to balance efficacy and safety.

Key Findings

  • 79% of children experienced moderate-to-severe postoperative pain on day 1.
  • Pain increased with age, peaking around 12 years, particularly in girls (age–sex interaction coefficient 0.08; P=0.017).
  • Appendectomy and absence of regional anesthesia were associated with higher pain intensity.
  • Older children (≥12 years) received higher oral morphine equivalents for appendectomy and spine surgery.

Methodological Strengths

  • Prospective multicenter registry with large sample size and standardized pain measurement (Faces Pain Scale).
  • Regression models adjusted for surgery type, duration, perioperative opioid use, and regional anesthesia.

Limitations

  • Observational design limits causal inference and residual confounding may persist.
  • Outcomes focused on postoperative day 1; longer-term pain trajectories were not assessed.

Future Directions: Interventional trials testing age- and sex-tailored multimodal/RA bundles, and longitudinal studies of pain trajectories and functional recovery in adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain is common in children, yet its relationship to age and sex remains underexplored. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesise that postoperative pain intensity varies across age groups. The objective is to identify ages at which high pain with functional impairment is most prevalent and assess any sex difference in the association between age and postoperative pain. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Data were extracted from the paediatric PAIN OUT registry, an international registry. Data were prospectively collected at hospitals in Germany, the Netherlands and Austria. PATIENTS: The study includes 2005 patients aged 4 to 18 years who underwent appendectomy, tonsillectomy, hernia repair, orthopaedic, or spinal fusion surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postsurgical pain scores (Faces Pain Scale 0 to 10) were compared between surgical procedures, stratified by sex, and age. The association between the primary outcome, 'worst pain' score on the first day after surgery, and age and sex was analysed using regression models adjusted for confounding factors: surgery type, duration, perioperative opioid consumption, and use of regional anaesthesia. RESULTS: Postoperative pain intensity was high with 79% of children experiencing moderate to severe pain, increasing with age, peaking around 12 years, particularly in girls. The regression model confirmed an age-related increase in pain intensity in females (interaction coefficient: 0.08, 95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.15, P = 0.017). Appendectomy and not receiving regional anaesthesia were associated with higher pain intensity. Higher mean oral morphine equivalent doses were given to patients aged 12 years or older for appendectomy (0.57 ± 0.52 vs. 0.60 ± 0.66 mg kg-1, P = 0.003) and spine surgery (2.1 ± 1.6 vs. 2.7 ± 2.4 mg kg-1, P = 0.038), with comparable doses between the sexes. CONCLUSIONS: In this paediatric cohort, 79% experienced moderate to severe postoperative pain, with higher scores in children aged 12+ and a peak in girls around the onset of puberty. These findings emphasise the need for improved paediatric pain management with consideration for age and sex-related differences.