Daily ReportSep 29, 2026
Anesthesiology, September 29 edition
We read 32 papers and selected 3.
Summary
The most impactful studies addressed pediatric airway safety, translational mechanisms of cardiac-surgery-associated kidney injury, and the anesthetic implications of cannabis use. A large multicenter registry study found substantially fewer respiratory adverse events with supraglottic airway devices than tracheal intubation in children with airway hyperresponsiveness, while an ovine heart-failure model identified persistent renal medullary hypoxia as a potential therapeutic target after cardiopulmonary bypass. A nationwide-scale retrospective cohort also demonstrated that cannabis use is associated with modestly increased anesthetic dosing requirements.
Research Themes
- Pediatric airway management and perioperative respiratory safety
- Mechanisms and therapeutic targets of cardiac-surgery-associated acute kidney injury
- Cannabis-related variation in anesthetic requirements
Selected Articles
1. Association between supraglottic airway device use and respiratory adverse events during airway management in children with airway hyperresponsiveness: a report from the Japan Paediatric Difficult Airway in Anaesthesia (J-PEDIA) registry.
Among 4,878 analyzed pediatric encounters with airway hyperresponsiveness, supraglottic airway device placement was associated with substantially lower risks of respiratory adverse events than tracheal intubation. The association remained strong for airway-management-related events and severe oxygen desaturation after propensity-based adjustment, supporting consideration of supraglottic devices when clinically appropriate.
Impact: This is one of the largest multicenter evaluations of airway strategy in children at increased respiratory risk and provides an actionable comparative estimate. It directly informs a common anesthetic decision while appropriately retaining the need for clinical selection and awareness of residual confounding.
Clinical Implications: For children with airway hyperresponsiveness, including recent upper respiratory infection, asthma exacerbation, or smoke exposure, clinicians may consider a supraglottic airway device during induction when surgical and patient factors permit. The result should not be interpreted as universal superiority because airway anatomy, aspiration risk, procedure type, ventilation requirements, and operator expertise remain decisive.
Key Findings
- Of 27,844 registry encounters, 4,878 were analyzed: 3,005 with tracheal intubation and 1,873 with supraglottic airway devices.
- Supraglottic airway device use was associated with lower respiratory adverse events after adjustment: adjusted risk ratio 0.41, 95% CI 0.19-0.62, p<0.001.
- Associations were also observed for airway-management-related adverse events, adjusted risk ratio 0.32, and severe oxygen desaturation, adjusted risk ratio 0.47.
Methodological Strengths
- Large multicenter registry encompassing 12 tertiary-care institutions and clinically diverse high-risk pediatric encounters.
- Propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to reduce measured baseline confounding.
Limitations
- The retrospective observational design cannot eliminate residual or unmeasured confounding, including clinician selection of airway device.
- The registry population and Japanese tertiary-care setting may limit generalizability to other healthcare systems, procedures, and patient-risk profiles.
Future Directions: Prospective pragmatic studies should evaluate airway-device selection algorithms across specific procedures and risk strata, while recording aspiration, ventilation adequacy, conversion to tracheal intubation, and recovery outcomes. Comparative effectiveness research should also assess whether the observed association persists across institutions with different pediatric airway expertise.
BACKGROUND: Children with airway hyperresponsiveness face higher risks of perioperative respiratory adverse events. Although the use of supraglottic airway devices (SADs) is associated with fewer perioperative respiratory adverse events than tracheal intubation in selected paediatric populations, evidence remains limited regarding induction-phase airway management in children with airway hyperresponsiveness. We aimed to investigate the association between SAD placement (vs tracheal intubation) and respiratory adverse events during induction-phase airway management in children with airway hyperresponsiveness using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting. METHODS: This multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted at 12 tertiary-care institutions
2. Renal oxygenation, function and histopathology in an ovine model of heart failure undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass with 48 hours of recovery: a prospective, observational study.
In a clinically relevant ovine model, cardiopulmonary bypass reduced renal blood flow and medullary oxygenation in both healthy and heart-failure animals. Only animals with pre-existing heart failure developed persistent medullary hypoxia, lower urine output, and greater renal inflammation during recovery, supporting renal oxygenation and inflammation as mechanistic targets for cardiac-surgery-associated acute kidney injury.
Impact: This study addresses a major translational gap by modeling cardiopulmonary bypass in the presence of pre-existing heart failure rather than in otherwise healthy animals. The direct physiological and histopathological measurements identify persistent renal medullary hypoxia as a plausible, potentially modifiable mechanism of postoperative kidney injury.
Clinical Implications: Patients with pre-existing heart failure undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass may require intensified renal perfusion and oxygenation surveillance after surgery. The findings support future trials of strategies that preserve renal medullary oxygen delivery or reduce renal inflammation, but they do not yet establish a clinical intervention.
Key Findings
- Cardiopulmonary bypass reduced renal blood flow by approximately 55% and renal medullary oxygen tension by approximately 50% in both groups.
- At 48 hours, renal medullary oxygen tension remained lower in heart-failure sheep than in controls: 11 (11) versus 31 (10) mmHg, p=0.01.
- Heart-failure sheep had lower urine output and increased renal inflammation during recovery, consistent with persistent renal medullary hypoxia as a contributor to acute kidney injury.
Methodological Strengths
- Use of a large-animal model incorporating pre-existing heart failure, improving translational relevance.
- Repeated direct measurements of renal blood flow, cortical and medullary oxygenation, renal function, and postoperative histopathology over 48 hours.
Limitations
- The study included only 20 sheep, limiting precision and assessment of biological heterogeneity.
- The experimental model and short 48-hour follow-up cannot establish whether renal hypoxia causes clinically persistent kidney injury or whether oxygen-directed interventions improve outcomes.
Future Directions: Future studies should test renal oxygenation-guided perfusion, hemodynamic, or anti-inflammatory interventions in this model and determine whether the physiological signals predict clinically relevant acute kidney injury. Translation will require validation using perioperative renal oxygenation monitoring and biomarker studies in high-risk cardiac-surgery patients.
INTRODUCTION: Acute kidney injury is common after cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass, yet preventive strategies are limited. Progress has been hindered by a lack of clinically relevant experimental models incorporating pre-existing heart disease. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of heart failure on renal oxygenation and histopathological injury during and after cardiopulmonary bypass in a large animal model. METHODS: Heart failure was induced in 10 sheep (study group) via progressive coronary artery ligation; 10 healthy sheep served as controls (control group).
3. Cannabis use and anaesthetic agent dosing in patients undergoing surgery or interventional procedures: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.
In 341,199 adults undergoing sedation or general anesthesia, both medical and non-medical cannabis use were associated with modestly higher propofol and volatile anesthetic doses. The very large cohort provides more precise estimates than prior small studies, while the authors appropriately emphasize that the clinical significance of these dose differences remains uncertain.
Impact: This study substantially improves the precision of evidence regarding a common perioperative question: whether cannabis exposure changes anesthetic requirements. Its large sample and distinction between medical and non-medical use help replace anecdotal dose escalation with quantitatively grounded expectations.
Clinical Implications: Anesthesia teams should routinely ask about cannabis use and anticipate that some patients may require modestly higher propofol or volatile anesthetic doses. Dose titration should remain individualized using clinical effect and physiologic monitoring; the study does not justify automatic dose escalation or imply that cannabis use alone predicts difficult anesthesia.
Key Findings
- The cohort included 341,199 adults treated between 2008 and 2024; 23,896 patients were non-medical cannabis users and 3,193 had medical cannabinoid certification.
- Non-medical cannabis use was associated with an adjusted increase in propofol dose of 6.85 μg/kg.
- Both medical and non-medical cannabis use were associated with modestly higher anesthetic dosing, although the clinical relevance of the effect sizes was uncertain.
Methodological Strengths
- Exceptionally large real-world cohort spanning 16 years of perioperative practice.
- Exposure classification distinguished medical from non-medical cannabis use and adjusted analyses addressed measured patient and procedural factors.
Limitations
- The single-center retrospective design may limit external validity and cannot establish causality.
- Cannabis exposure characteristics such as dose, frequency, timing of last use, route, potency, and concurrent substances may have been incompletely captured.
- The abstract reports modest dose associations but does not establish effects on major clinical outcomes such as awareness, hemodynamic instability, postoperative pain, or recovery.
Future Directions: Prospective multicenter studies should characterize dose-response relationships using verified cannabis exposure data and evaluate clinically meaningful outcomes. Future work should also examine whether chronicity, route, cannabinoid composition, and withdrawal or intoxication states modify anesthetic pharmacology and postoperative recovery.
BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence that habitual cannabis consumption increases anaesthetic requirements. We hypothesised that cannabis use affects anaesthetic dosing among patients undergoing surgery or interventional procedures. METHODS: A total of 341 199 adult patients undergoing propofol sedation or volatile-based general anaesthesia at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA, between 2008 and 2024 were included. The primary exposure was cannabis use, differentiated into medical or non-medical use (recreational use or cannabis use disorder). Primary outcomes were propofol dose (μg kg