Daily ReportOct 26, 2026
Anesthesiology, October 26 edition
We read 37 papers and selected 3.
Summary
Today’s most impactful anesthesiology research includes randomized evidence that preoperative intranasal oxytocin may reduce probable acute stress disorder after traumatic fracture surgery, prophylactic esketamine may prevent intraoperative penile erection during ureteroscopy, and virtual reality can substantially reduce preoperative anxiety in ambulatory surgery. These studies combine clinically relevant perioperative outcomes with practical, relatively low-burden interventions, although external validation and larger multicenter trials remain necessary.
Research Themes
- Perioperative psychological prevention
- Prophylaxis of anesthesia-related procedural complications
- Nonpharmacological reduction of preoperative anxiety
Selected Articles
1. Preoperative Intranasal Oxytocin and Probable Acute Stress Disorder After Traumatic Fracture Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
In this double-blind randomized clinical trial of 328 adults, a single 40-IU intranasal oxytocin dose before anesthesia induction reduced the 3-day incidence of screening-positive probable acute stress disorder from 30.5% to 15.9%. The risk ratio was 0.52 and the adjusted hazard ratio was 0.45, while no serious adverse events were observed.
Impact: This is a clinically relevant randomized evaluation of a preventive perioperative strategy for a common psychological complication for which effective pharmacological prevention is limited. The magnitude of benefit supports further trials integrating psychological and biological outcomes.
Clinical Implications: Preoperative intranasal oxytocin could become a feasible preventive intervention for patients undergoing traumatic fracture surgery, but it should not yet be adopted routinely because the study was single-center, follow-up was short, and the outcome was a screening-positive probable diagnosis rather than a confirmed long-term disorder.
Key Findings
- A total of 328 adults were randomized and analyzed by intention to treat, with 164 participants in each group.
- The 3-day incidence of screening-positive probable acute stress disorder was 15.9% with oxytocin versus 30.5% with placebo.
- Oxytocin was associated with a risk ratio of 0.52 and an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.45, with no serious adverse events observed.
Methodological Strengths
- Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial with intention-to-treat analysis.
- Prespecified psychological outcomes were supplemented by exploratory stress-related biomarkers and a registered protocol.
Limitations
- The trial was conducted at a single center, limiting generalizability.
- Follow-up was short and the primary outcome was a screening-positive probable disorder rather than a structured long-term psychiatric diagnosis.
Future Directions: Multicenter trials should assess confirmed acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder over longer follow-up, examine dose-response relationships, identify patients most likely to benefit, and evaluate interactions with perioperative psychological support and analgesic strategies.
IMPORTANCE: Acute stress disorder (ASD) is a common and debilitating psychological sequela following traumatic fracture surgery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single preoperative dose of intranasal oxytocin for prevention of screening-positive probable ASD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This single-center, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial enrolled adult patients scheduled for traumatic fracture surgery from April 2024 to April 2025. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received intranasal oxytocin, 40 IU, or saline placebo 10 minutes before induction of anesthesia.
2. Prophylactic Low-Dose Esketamine for Prevention of Intraoperative Penile Erection During Ureteroscopic Surgery Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Among 356 men undergoing elective ureteroscopic surgery, prophylactic intravenous esketamine at 0.3 mg/kg reduced intraoperative penile erection from 21.9% with placebo to 6.2%. It also reduced clinically significant erections requiring rescue treatment, without clinically important impairment of hemodynamics, recovery, or adverse-event rates.
Impact: The study addresses an uncommon but procedure-disrupting anesthesia complication with a simple pre-induction intervention and reports a large absolute risk reduction. Its practical value is high because prevention may avoid reactive rescue measures and potential urethral injury.
Clinical Implications: Low-dose esketamine may be considered as a preventive option for selected men undergoing ureteroscopic surgery, particularly when intraoperative erection would be highly disruptive. Routine adoption requires confirmation of cardiovascular, neuropsychiatric, and urologic safety in broader populations and different anesthetic protocols.
Key Findings
- The single-center trial randomized 356 adult men equally to esketamine or saline before induction of general anesthesia.
- Intraoperative penile erection occurred in 6.2% of patients receiving esketamine versus 21.9% receiving placebo, corresponding to a relative risk of 0.282 and a number needed to treat of 6.4.
- Clinically significant erections requiring rescue treatment occurred in 4.5% versus 21.3%, while recovery and adverse-event rates were not significantly different.
Methodological Strengths
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design with concealed allocation and blinding of patients, clinicians, surgeons, and outcome assessors.
- The primary outcome was assessed at nine predefined intraoperative time points, and clinically relevant rescue treatment was recorded.
Limitations
- The study was single-center and included only ASA physical status I-II adult men undergoing elective procedures.
- The trial was not designed to establish rare cardiovascular, psychiatric, or longer-term urologic adverse effects.
Future Directions: Large multicenter trials should evaluate diverse surgical populations, compare esketamine with established rescue and prophylactic approaches, define optimal dosing, and systematically assess cardiovascular, neuropsychiatric, urinary, and recovery outcomes.
PURPOSE: Intraoperative penile erection during ureteroscopic surgery may interrupt surgical procedures and increase the risk of urethral injury. We evaluated whether prophylactic esketamine reduces its incidence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 356 adult men undergoing elective ureteroscopic surgery. Patients received intravenous esketamine 0.3 mg/kg or saline before anesthetic induction. The primary outcome was intraoperative penile erection assessed at nine predefined time points, with rescue treatment for erections of grade 2 or higher.
3. Influence of Preoperative Virtual Reality on Preoperative State Anxiety in the Ambulatory Setting: The AMBLUMEEN Randomized Controlled Trial.
In 106 ambulatory surgery patients with moderate-to-severe preoperative anxiety, a single 20-minute immersive VR session produced an adjusted between-group reduction of 18.7 points in State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scores compared with standard care. Postanesthesia care unit morphine use was also lower in the VR group, whereas benzodiazepine use, postoperative pain, and overnight admission were comparable.
Impact: This trial demonstrates a large immediate anxiolytic effect from a brief, nonpharmacological intervention that is potentially scalable in ambulatory anesthesia. It also suggests possible downstream opioid-sparing effects, although secondary outcomes were not consistently improved.
Clinical Implications: A single preoperative VR session may be offered to appropriately selected anxious ambulatory surgery patients as an adjunct to standard care. Implementation should include screening for motion sickness, visual intolerance, cognitive impairment, and situations in which rapid communication or monitoring is essential.
Key Findings
- The trial randomized 106 adults with moderate-to-severe preoperative anxiety, with 53 participants in each group.
- The adjusted between-group difference in change in State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score was -18.7 points in favor of VR.
- Postanesthesia care unit morphine use was lower in the VR group, while benzodiazepine use, postoperative pain, and unplanned overnight admission were comparable.
Methodological Strengths
- Randomized superiority trial with intention-to-treat analysis and a prespecified primary patient-reported outcome.
- The intervention was standardized to a reproducible 20-minute immersive VR session, and acceptability and safety were assessed.
Limitations
- The study was single-center and open-label, allowing expectancy and performance effects.
- The sample was relatively small and restricted to patients with moderate-to-severe anxiety, limiting generalizability to routine ambulatory populations.
Future Directions: Future multicenter pragmatic trials should compare different VR contents and delivery platforms, evaluate cost-effectiveness and workflow integration, and determine whether anxiety reduction translates into lower anesthetic, analgesic, and healthcare utilization over longer follow-up.
BACKGROUND: Preoperative anxiety affects 30% to 80% of ambulatory surgery patients and is associated with increased anesthetic requirements, postoperative pain, and delayed recovery. METHODS: The AMBLUMEEN trial was a single-center, randomized, open-label, superiority trial in adults with moderate-to-severe preoperative anxiety. Patients were randomized to standard care alone or standard care plus a single 20-minute session of immersive 360-degree natural contemplative scenes. The primary endpoint was change in State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y-A score from arrival to operating room transfer.